The Pennsylvania State University APS 2016 Negotiation individual differences AND self viEWS Small differences in salary may become large gaps over time Assuming that MBAs graduate at age 30 and work until they are 65 and that they receive only a 3 raise per year the value of a gende ID: 597995
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Susan Mohammed" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Susan MohammedThe Pennsylvania State UniversityAPS, 2016
Negotiation: individual
differences AND self-
viEWSSlide2Slide3
Small differences in salary may become large gaps over time
“Assuming that MBAs graduate at age 30 and work until they are 65 and that they receive only a 3% raise per year, the value of a gender gap in starting salary of $10,000 amounts to a gender gap in earnings of more than $600,000 over the course of a career. Assuming 5% annual interest on those additional earnings, that gender gap in earnings becomes a wealth gap of $1.5 million.”
Bowles, Babcock, & McGinn, 2005 Slide4
Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide
“I talk to people in Personnel, and they say, “Well, this is the high end of the salary range, and this is all we can do.” And I just accepted that. And then after my son was born, my costs were so high for child care and other things that I went to the personal responsible for administration and said, “I have to have a substantial increase.” And I got it. And I realized after that that I could have really negotiated for much more. I could have negotiated for fewer hours; I could have negotiated for a signing bonus; there were lots of things I could have negotiated for, but I didn’t. Because I accepted, “Oh, I want to tie in with the range. I should feel lucky to have this job.”
Linda Babcock and Sara
Laschever
, 2003, p. 48 Slide5
helpful newsBowles, Babcock, & McGinn (2005)
Gender differences in negotiation depend on the situation, which is malleable
Gender
differences in negotiation are substantially
reduced when:
There is decreased ambiguity in the economic structure of a negotiation
Price comparison information
Knowledge of what the market will pay for skills and
time
Women
act on others’ behalf
Slide6
research on individual differences and negotiation: more Hopeful news
Meta-analysis of 75 studies on individual differences and negotiation
(Sharma, Bottom, &
Elfenbein
, 2013)
Compared to cognitive ability and personality traits, the most powerful predictors of negotiation performance were:
E
xpectations and beliefs More open to change than core personalitySlide7
What expectations and beliefs matter for negotiation performance?
(Sharma, Bottom, &
Elfenbein
, 2013)
Feelings of appropriateness
How appropriate is it to engage in negotiation and use negotiation tactics?
Mindset:
Belief that negotiation ability is fixed
versus
Belief that negotiation ability is malleable and can be learnedSlide8
A leader development approach to negotiation (Day & Dragoni, 2015)
Negotiation self-views affecting willingness to seek out negotiations and set lower/higher aspirations
Identity
To what extent do you see yourself as a negotiator?
Motivation
Like to? Feel obligated to? Feel that the benefits will outweigh the costs?Slide9
A leader development approach to negotiation (Day & Dragoni, 2015)
Negotiation self-views affecting willingness to seek out negotiations and set lower/higher aspirations
Self-awareness
Deep understanding of strengths and weaknesses, preferences, and how impact others in negotiation
Self-efficacy
Confidence that one can succeed was the single
best predictor
of negotiation performance in meta-analysis
(Sharma, Bottom, &
Elfenbein
, 2013) Slide10
Modifying expectations and beliefs to improve negotiation performance
Experience/Practice
With feedback (preferably multiple rating sources)
With reflexivity
Training programs
Build self-efficacy
More likely to feel that negotiation is appropriate and can be improved
Mentorship