Country Mining Companies Relationship amp Large Mining Contracts How to adapt to a changing world March 11 th 2014 Marc Frilet Managing Partner Frilet Société d ID: 794924
Download The PPT/PDF document "Ecole des Mines de Paris – CESECO" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Ecole des Mines de Paris – CESECO“Country / Mining Companies Relationship & Large Mining Contracts”How to adapt to a changing world ?March 11th, 2014
Marc Frilet
Managing Partner « Frilet –
Société
d’
Avocats
»
Chair of the Management Committee of GcilA
Vice-President of the French Institute of International Legal Experts (IFEJI)
Head of the drafting committee CICA PPP-Working Group
Co-promoter of UNECE PPP International Centre of Excellence
Slide2The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to the 21st centuryThe search for an equitable approach mutually beneficial The very poor track record of some landmark mining projects
The development of best practices and standards
The development of modern mining codes and innovative mining agreements
The host countries expectations, the investors expectations, the issues
Economic and social development
Fair return on investment
Environment
Community
Taxation
Control of development
Freezing deposits
Asymmetric bargaining power
Development of better governance
Slide3The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryKey provisions of mining codes of the 90’s and a new equilibrium between mining companies, countries and stakeholdersExample: African mining codes
Prospection, authorizations and permits: rights and obligations created
Research or exploration permits: rights and obligations created
Regulatory conditions
Contractual conditions
Some key issues: land use, expropriation, resettlement
Exploitation: investment phase and operation phase
Environmental impact studies and related permits
Community relationships
Taxation
Optimization of operation and extraction
Dispute avoidance and dispute resolution
Slide4The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryMining agreement for large and complex projectsExample of relationship between code and mining agreement for defining respective rights and obligations in a large and composite mining project:
ilmenite Fort-Dauphin Madagascar
(see also
article ref
Madagascar had a modern mining code at a time as promoted by the IFI’s
The code was very comprehensive for environmental, community issues mining titles
However, many issues essential for major investments with long term recovery were not regulated by the code
The mining
company clarified
that
it
could only be interested in such a massive investment having an important transformational effect if mining laws, procedures and practice were elevated to international standards.
It was agreed that Madagascar could not elevate all the laws and practices to international standards in a short time period.
As a result, it was agreed to develop
a framework
mining agreement to reach those standards and to negotiate in good faith a comprehensive document submitted for approval to
the
national assembly.
If the national assembly approves, the agreement becomes the law of the country which supersedes local regulations to the country.
After numerous exchanges, a framework agreement has been agreed. It became law of Madagascar and permitted the investment and development of the mine to gather with public infrastructures (ports, roads, water and
power)
Slide5The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryHighlight of issues regulated by the framework agreementTitle granted to local company with 20% participation of the State
Status of the State participation: right to hold some shares without payment, right to have representatives to the Board and to control information
Main principles of shareholders agreement
Sale of minerals: arm length, good faith, project finance issues, price
Mining permits:
Exploration conditions renewal
Operation, conditions and Terms
Land status: when necessary public domain
Land for port and conditions of construction of a multi user port on the basis of possible PPP contract
Environment: Conditions of development of SEIA and of issuance of authorizations and permits
ownership of project assets
Protection of property, rights, titles and interests
The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryStability of the regulations (landscape or grandfather clause)
Insurance
Investment program
Evaluation phase
Establishment of the legal framework of the project
Preparation of a feasibility report
Condition of investment decision
Project financing
Shareholders capital contribution
Project financing plan
Financing of additional investment
The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryTax and custom regime Corporate income taxesLimit of the rates
Depreciation
Loss carry-forward
Calculation of taxable income
Deductions from taxable income
Value of products
Mining Taxes
Tax on Income from capital
Personal income tax
Sales
tax
Transfer tax
Professional tax
Taxes payable to local authorities
Indirect taxation
The economic, legal and contractual development of mining projects up to 21st centuryCustom provisionsFinal admission: Initial investment period, operation periodtemporary admission
Stability of tax and custom regime
Accounting principles: annual financial statements, interim reports
Financial obligations:
i
)
of the State,
ii)
of
the mining company
Prerogatives
of the State: consequences of breach of the mining agreement, inspection, monitoring of mineral for exports
Force majeure
Early termination
Dispute resolution
Structured conciliation
Arbitration
Applicable laws
Indemnification in case of breach by either parties
:
Events
Quantum of damage
Payment conditions
Currency of payment
A changed situation for country / mining companies relationship at the dawn of the 21st centuryContrary to expectations many landmark projects faced important problems
Between 2001 and 2010 the number of cases submitted to international arbitration increased nearly fourfold
This dramatic increase reflects tensions among stakeholders involved in the sector, culminating in disputes that have been difficult to resolve in a cooperative manner
A simplistic approach may attribute this situation to “resource nationalism”
Quote from an authoritative piece of work: the Chatham House Report conflict and coexistence in extractive industry:
“many analysts fail to distinguish incendiary rhetoric from policies that legitimately address societal concerns”
A new evolving concept for resilience for large and complex mining projects
From “Corporate Social Responsibility” to “Social License to Operate”
Slide10Key findings and way forwardUseful ReferencesThe Chatham House Report – November 2013
The ICMM
Tookit
for Mining
Partneships
for Development
– July 2011
Model Mining Agreement
– April 2011
Innovative approaches building on lessons learnt in the PPP world:
Guiding Principles for Durable Mining Agreements in Large Mining Projects
by Marc Frilet & Ken Haddow in “IBA Journal of Energy &Natural Resources Law –
Vol
31 N° 4 – 2013”
Guiding principles for durable mining agreements in large mining projects (abstract of IBA article) Recognizing that it is impossible to foresee in advance all feature situations and that a water tight agreement is in most cases counter productiveEngage with governments and stakeholders: the agreement should:be founded in discussed and mutually agreed objectives of each party;
define an economic balance within which the enterprise will operate and outside of which terms will be adjusted to return the enterprise to the agreed balance; and
in the form of agreement, draw on the scheme of modern public-private-partnership (PPP) agreements.
Main objectives:
create an agreement that minimizes the possibility of disruptive future renegotiations that are costly for all concerned. The goal is an agreement that will be stable and predictable in the long term.
put aside consideration of pure legal mechanics. Instead, the parties should start with a detailed setting down of the mutually agreed objectives of each for the enterprise and for the agreement, based on a joint evaluation and understanding of those
The subsequent detailed mechanics of the agreement will be based on those. The objectives will head the agreement and be an enduring reference in the future conduct and equilibrium of it.
Slide12Guiding principles for durable mining agreements in large mining projects (abstract of IBA article) reach an agreed consensus at the outset on the enduring economic and financial parameters for the project, based on an agreed and transparent business case. This ensures that the core objectives and fundamental terms remain satisfied during the life of the enterprise. Practical outcome: from a traditional mining agreement to a collaborative joint-venture (Social License to Operate)
Occasionally in future years, in the face of fundamentally changed external circumstances, detailed terms can be adjusted to reflect the founding objectives of the parties and thus re-establish overall contractual equilibrium in line with the objectives.
Conceptually, the relationship can be reconceptualised from a mining agreement granting rights to the miner, to a collaboration agreement, akin to a collaborative joint venture, in which each party is bringing different things to fulfill mutually agreed and understood objectives.
In return, this triggers concepts that are easy to translate into enforceable clauses or regulations – such as hardship, right to economic equity, special rights of the State when public interest is at stake, special rights of the private investor when sovereign rights are triggered, guarantee of fair and efficient compensation, limitation of speculative profits balanced by various guarantees to make reasonable profit over the life of the venture, simplification of the permitting process, clarification of the tax and customs situation, clear procedures for land use, transparency of the accounts, etc.
Slide13Thank You ! Me Marc Frilet
Frilet – Law firm/ GcilA
91, rue du
Faubourg
Saint
Honoré
75008 Paris – France
Tel : + 33 1 56 26 00 40
e-mail : avocats@frilet.com
www.gcila.org