/
New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulant Crisis New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulant Crisis

New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulant Crisis - PowerPoint Presentation

roberts
roberts . @roberts
Follow
27 views
Uploaded On 2024-02-02

New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulant Crisis - PPT Presentation

Florida Courts Opioids amp Stimulant RESPONSE September 3 2021 2020 OD Death Data Facts Provisional What drove the OD Death Data in 2020 March 15 2020 COVID Source Ahmad FB Rossen LM Sutton P Provisional drug overdose death counts National Center for Health Statistics 2021 ID: 1044081

overdose death estimates data death overdose data estimates rates drug amp nchs county counties population models rural bayesian statistics

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulan..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. New Drug Threats: Latest on the Stimulant Crisis Florida Courts Opioids & Stimulant RESPONSESeptember 3, 2021

2. 2020 OD Death Data Facts (Provisional)

3. What drove the OD Death Data in 2020?

4. March 15, 2020COVIDSource: Ahmad FB, Rossen LM, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics. 2021.12 Month-ending Provisional Number of Drug Overdose Deaths

5. Top Five State OD Death Increases by Count

6. Drug Threat Analysis

7.

8.

9. Heroin Adjustment

10.

11.

12. Cocaine Adjustment

13.

14.

15. Methamphetamine Adjustment

16. Fentanyl Facts

17.

18.

19. Fentanyl Adjustment

20. Where do we go from here?

21. NETI Rural Areas Project – Feasibility Study

22. Rural Areas Teams

23. Study Areas

24. Is it possible to identify emerging drug threats for rural areas?

25. Ohio: Heroin Rates of Seizure Incidents & Overdose Deaths per 100,000 Population

26. Ohio: Methamphetamine Rates of Seizures Incidents & Psychostimulant Overdose Deaths per 100,000 Population

27. Oregon - Four Rural Counties: Heroin Rates of Seizures in kg & Overdose Deaths per 100,000 Population

28. Intel Gap:Constraints in some areas did limit analysis. Public Health agencies provided insufficient drug overdose death data to three of the six HIDTAs. Because of the limited population, there is not enough data to project a meaningful result in some rural areas. In certain states, this was overcome by combining multiple counties into a larger area to reach a conclusion.

29. Kentucky – 17 Rural Counties: Cocaine Rates of Seizures in kg & Overdose Deaths*Per 100,000 Population, 2012 - 2019

30. If it is possible (to identify emerging drug threats in rural areas, even with limitations), can NETI develop a methodology to identify emerging threats for rural counties?

31. Kentucky - 2020 - All Rx Opioid Controlled Substances Dosages Per 1,000 Patients

32.  Methamphetamine and Cocaine Seizure Incidents by Year and Region of Ohio, 2010 - 2019

33.

34.

35.

36. Examples of Current Projects

37. HIDTAs and Respective StatesNortheast Region HIDTA PDMPLiberty Mid-Atlantic PANew England MANew York - New Jersey NYWashington – Baltimore MD, DC & VASoutheast RegionAppalachia KY & TNAtlanta – Carolinas NCCentral Florida FLGulf Coast ARNorth Florida FLSouth Florida FLMidwest Region HIDTA PDMPChicago ILIndiana INIowa IAMichigan MINorth Central MNOhio OHRocky Mountain COTerritory & Distant StatesAlaska AKHawaii HIPuerto Rico - U. S. VI PR

38. HIDTAs and Respective StatesSouthwest Region HIDTA PDMPHouston TXArizona AZNew Mexico NMSouth Texas TXWest Texas TXTexoma OK & TXWest Region HIDTA PDMPCentral Valley California CALos Angeles CANevada NVNorthern California CANorthwest WAOregon – Idaho ORSan Diego/Imperial County CA

39. Opioid PrescriptionsState Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Data

40. Opioid Prescription Rates - Representative States

41. Opioid Prescription Rates - Representative States

42. Stimulant PrescriptionsState Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Data

43. Stimulant Prescription Rates - Representative States

44. Stimulant Prescription Rates - Representative States

45. Arizona Overdose & Addiction Data

46. U.S.Overdose Deaths 2019Deaths represent age adjusted overdose death rates per 100,000 Population. Source: CDC/NCHS National Vital Statistics System

47. Bayesian Overdose Death Estimates for 2003County-level estimates were generated using Hierarchical Bayesian models with spatial and temporal random effects using the INLA package for R (3,10–11). These models borrow strength over time and across neighboring counties to produce stable estimates of drug overdose death rates by county and year. Source: NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/death s.htm).

48. County-level estimates were generated using Hierarchical Bayesian models with spatial and temporal random effects using the INLA package for R (3,10–11). These models borrow strength over time and across neighboring counties to produce stable estimates of drug overdose death rates by county and year. Source: NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/death s.htm).Bayesian Overdose Death Estimates for 2008

49. County-level estimates were generated using Hierarchical Bayesian models with spatial and temporal random effects using the INLA package for R (3,10–11). These models borrow strength over time and across neighboring counties to produce stable estimates of drug overdose death rates by county and year. Source: NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/death s.htm).Bayesian Overdose Death Estimates for 2013

50. County-level estimates were generated using Hierarchical Bayesian models with spatial and temporal random effects using the INLA package for R (3,10–11). These models borrow strength over time and across neighboring counties to produce stable estimates of drug overdose death rates by county and year. Source: NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/death s.htm).Bayesian Overdose Death Estimates for 2018

51. Estimated Annual Prevalence of Marijuana Use: ArizonaSource: 2016-2018 NSDUH Substate Region EstimatesThe NSDUH Survey conducted by SAMHSA, includes persons aged 12 and over and is considered representative of the non- institutionalized population of the united states. Since the survey excludes homeless persons that are not present in shelters as well as other institutionalized persons such as residents of jails, nursing homes and mental institutions, the estimates may represent an under-estimation of actual prevalence.

52. Estimated Annual Prevalence of Methamphetamine Use: ArizonaSource: 2016-2018 NSDUH Substate Region EstimatesThe NSDUH Survey conducted by SAMHSA, includes persons aged 12 and over and is considered representative of the non- institutionalized population of the united states. Since the survey excludes homeless persons that are not present in shelters as well as other institutionalized persons such as residents of jails, nursing homes and mental institutions, the estimates may represent an under-estimation of actual prevalence.

53. Percent of Treatment Admissions By Type of Drugfor Arizona andU.S. - 2018Source: 2018 TreatmentEpisode Data SetThe Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) is based on clinical records collected by addiction treatment agencies and submitted to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) through state treatment authorities. The TEDS system routinely collects data for more than a million treatment episodes every year. All data are maintained and summarized by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.

54. John L Eadie jeadie@pdmpneti.org (518) 529-6397 National Emerging Threats Initiative (NETI)