CHAPTER 6 Cost Allocation amp ActivityBased Costing Slide 6 2 Purposes of Cost Allocation To provide information for decision making To reduce frivolous use of common resources To encourage evaluation of services ID: 290762
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Prepared by Debby Bloom-Hill CMA, CFM" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Prepared by Debby Bloom-Hill CMA, CFMSlide2
CHAPTER 6
Cost Allocation
&
Activity-Based Costing
Slide 6-
2Slide3
Purposes of Cost Allocation
To provide information for decision making
To reduce frivolous use of common resourcesTo encourage evaluation of servicesTo provide “full cost” information
Slide 6-3
Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide4
Purposes of Cost Allocation
Slide 6-
4
Learning objective 1:
Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide5
Purposes of Cost Allocation
Provide information for decision making
When managers use a company resource they are receiving a charge for useAllocated cost should measure the opportunity cost of using a company resourceProvides a useful benchmarkThe closer to the opportunity cost of use, the better the allocation
Slide 6-5
Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide6
Purposes of Cost Allocation
To reduce frivolous use of common resources
When managers are not charged for a service, they may tend to use it for frivolous or nonessential purposesFrivolous use may have hidden cost such as slower serviceAllocation provides incentive for departments to reduce frivolous use
Slide 6-6
Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide7
Purposes of Cost Allocation
To encourage evaluation of services
If costs are not allocated, there is no incentive to evaluate the services and look for lower cost alternativesWith cost allocation, there is a strong incentive to critically evaluate the efficiency and necessity of servicesUsers will certainly bring lower cost alternatives to the company’s attention
Slide 6-7
Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide8
Purposes of Cost Allocation
To provide “full cost” information
GAAP requires full costing for external reporting purposesFull cost information is needed when the company has an agreement whereby revenue received depends upon cost incurredAlso called “cost-plus” contracts
Slide 6-8
Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide9
All of the following are reasons indirect costs are allocated to products, services and departments, except:
To improve decision making
To reduce frivolous use of resourcesTo provide information on variable and fixed costsTo encourage evaluation of servicesAnswer: c Indirect costs are allocated to provide full cost information
Test Your Knowledge 1
Slide 6-9
Learning objective 1:
Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide10
Cost-Plus Contracts
Slide 6-
10
Learning objective 1:
Explain why indirect costs are allocatedSlide11
Process of Cost Allocation
Cost allocation is achieved by a three step process
Determine the cost objectiveForm cost poolsSelect an allocation base to relate cost pools to the cost objective
Slide 6-11
Learning objective 2: Describe the cost allocation processSlide12
Slide 6-
12
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation process
Step 1 – determine the cost objectiveDetermine the product, service, or department that is to receive the allocationThe object of the allocation is referred to as the cost objectiveFor example, if computer costs are allocated to contracts worked on, the contracts are the cost objectivesProcess of Cost AllocationSlide13
Process of Cost Allocation
Slide 6-
13
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation processSlide14
Slide 6-
14
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation process
Process of Cost AllocationSlide15
In the cost allocation process, the cost objective is the:
The allocation base used to allocate the costs
A grouping of individual costs whose total is allocated using one allocation baseThe product, service or department that is to receive the allocationNone of the aboveAnswer: c
The product, service or department that is to receive the allocation
Slide 6-15
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation process
Test Your Knowledge
2Slide16
Step 2 – form cost pools
A cost pool is a grouping of individual costs whose total is allocated using one allocation base
Cost pools can be organized along departmental lines or major activities, e.g. equipment setups, inspections.Costs in the pool must be homogeneous (similar)
Slide 6-16
Learning objective 2: Describe the cost allocation processProcess of Cost AllocationSlide17
Step 3 – select an allocation base that relates the cost pool to the cost objectives
The base must be some characteristic that is common to all of the cost objectives
Deciding which base to use is not easyThe allocation should be based on a cause-and-effect relationshipEstablishing cause-and-effect relationships is not feasible when indirect costs are fixedAccountants use other methods which are shown on the next slide
Slide 6-17
Learning objective 2: Describe the cost allocation processProcess of Cost AllocationSlide18
Fixed Indirect Costs – Other Approaches
Relative benefits approach to allocation
More costs allocated to those objectives that benefit most from incurring the costAbility to bear costsMore costs allocated to products, services or departments that are more profitableEquity approach to allocationBase results in allocations that are perceived to be fair or equitable
Slide 6-18
Learning objective 2: Describe the cost allocation processSlide19
Select an Allocation Base
Two production departments: Assembly and Finishing
Both receive allocations of indirect costs from the maintenance departmentShould labor hours or machine hours be used as the allocation base?
Slide 6-19
Learning objective 2: Describe the cost allocation processSlide20
Selecting an Allocation Base
Slide 6-
20
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation processSlide21
In the cost allocation process, an allocation base:
Must be some characteristic that is common to all of the cost objectives
Ideally should result in cost being allocated based on a cause-and-effect relationshipBoth a and bNone of the aboveAnswer: c Both a and b
Slide 6-21
Learning objective 2:
Describe the cost allocation process
Test Your Knowledge
3Slide22
Allocating Service Department Costs
Organizational units of manufacturing firms classified as either:
Production departmentsEngage in direct manufacturing activityService departmentsProvide indirect supportCost poolsFormed by service departmentsAllocated to production departments
Slide 6-22
Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide23
Direct Method – Mason Furniture
Slide 6-
23
Allocate janitorial cost of $100,000Allocation base: square feet Assembly department: 20,000 square feet Finishing department: 30,000 square feetCalculate the allocation rate: $100,000 / (20,000 + 30,000) = $2/sq
ftAllocation to production departments: Assembly dept.:20,000 sq ft x $2 = $40,000 Finishing dept.: 30,000 sq ft x $2 = $60,000
Learning objective 3:
Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide24
Direct Method – Mason Furniture
Slide 6-
24
Allocate personnel cost of $200,000Allocation base: number of employees Assembly department: 60 employees Finishing department: 40 employeesCalculate the allocation rate: $200,000 / (60 + 40) = $2,000/employeeAllocation to Production DepartmentsAssembly
dept: 60 x $2,000 = $120,000Finishing dept: 40 x $2,000 = $80,000
Learning objective 3:
Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide25
Direct Method of Allocating Service Department Costs
Service department costs allocated to production departments but not to other service departments
Slide 6-
25
Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide26
The direct method of allocating costs:
Allocates service department costs to other service departments
Allocates only direct costsAllocates service department costs to production departments onlyBoth b and c
Answer: cAllocates service department costs to production departments only
Slide 6-26
Learning objective 3:
Discuss allocation of service department costs
Test Your Knowledge
4Slide27
Direct Method – Mason Furniture
Slide 6-
27
Learning objective 3:
Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide28
Taylor Bath has three production departments and allocates mailroom costs of $600,000 based on number of employees
Showers:
80 employeesBathtubs: 40 employeesVanities: 30 employeesCalculate the mailroom allocation rateThe mailroom allocation rate =
Slide 6-
28
Learning objective 3:
Discuss allocation of service department costs
Test Your Knowledge
5Slide29
Taylor Bath has three production departments and allocates mailroom costs of $600,000 based on number of employees
Showers:
80 employeesBathtubs: 40 employeesVanities: 30 employeesUse the allocation rate of $4,000 per employee to allocate the mailroom costs to showers, bathtubs and vanitiesShowers 80 employees * $4,000 rate = $320,000Bathtubs
40 employees * $4,000 rate = $160,000Vanities 30 employees * $4,000 rate = $120,000
Slide 6-29
Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of service department costs
Test Your Knowledge
6Slide30
Allocating Budgeted and Actual Service Department Costs
Management should allocate based on budgeted rather than actual costs
Allocation of actual amounts allows service department to pass on cost of inefficiencies and waste to production departments
Slide 6-30
Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of service department costsSlide31
Problems with Cost Allocation
Potential problems are brought about by:
Allocations of costs that are not controllableArbitrary allocationsAllocation of fixed costs that make the fixed costs appear to be variable costsAllocations of manufacturing overhead to products using too few overhead cost poolsUse of only volume-related allocation bases
Slide 6-31
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide32
Responsibility Accounting and Controllable Costs
One of the primary uses of managerial accounting is to evaluate the performance of managers and the operations under their control
Evaluation is facilitated by a system which traces revenues and costs to units with related responsibility for generating revenue and controlling costsThis system is referred to as a responsibility accounting system
Slide 6-32
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide33
Responsibility Accounting and Controllable Costs
Cost allocation is generally required in a responsibility accounting system
One unit is often responsible for the costs incurred by another unitSome allocations are not consistent with a responsibility accounting systemManagers should be held responsible for controllable costs onlyControllable costs are affected by a manager’s decisions
Slide 6-33
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide34
Arbitrary Allocations
Cost allocations are inherently arbitrary
Typically there are numerous allocation bases that are equally justifiableIn almost all situations, determining the true allocation is impossibleManagers support the allocation which makes them look bestManagers reject allocations which cast an unfavorable light on their performance
Slide 6-34
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide35
Unitized Fixed Costs
The allocation process may make fixed costs appear to be variable costs
This happens when fixed costs are unitizedUnitized fixed costs are stated on a per unit basisWhen managers increase sales they also increase their allocated general and administrative costsThis could lead to decisions which could hurt the profitability of the company
Slide 6-35
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide36
Lump Sum Allocations
Allocations of fixed costs can be made that they appear fixed to managers
This is achieved by lump-sum allocations of fixed costsA lump-sum allocation is not affected by changes in the activity level of the organizational unitLump-sum allocations generally should remain the same from year to year
Slide 6-36
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide37
When fixed costs are stated on a per unit basis:
Fixed costs are said to be controllable
Fixed costs may appear to be variable to managers receiving allocationsA lump-sum allocation has been madeDivisions with high sales receive a low amount of allocated costsAnswer: bFixed costs may appear to be variable to managers receiving allocations
Slide 6-37
Learning objective 4:
Identify potential problems with cost allocation
Test Your Knowledge
7Slide38
Too Few Cost Pools
Some companies assign overhead to products using only one or two overhead cost pools
Although simple, this may lead to distortion of cost allocationSome products will be overcostedSome products will be undercostedThis problem is solved by setting up separate cost pools for overhead
Slide 6-38
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide39
Product costs will be more accurate when more overhead cost pools are
used
Decisions that rely on product cost information will be improvedHowever, more cost pools equals more expensive record keepingMust analyze cost-benefit relationship of more cost pools
Slide 6-39
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversToo Few Cost PoolsSlide40
Using Only Volume-Related Allocation Bases
Some firms allocate manufacturing overhead based on volume, using allocation bases like
Direct labor hours, or Machine hoursNot all overhead costs vary with volumeReferred to as the traditional approach
Slide 6-40
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide41
Using Only Volume-Related Allocation Bases
The problem with the traditional approach is that it assumes that all overhead costs are proportional to production volume
Many overhead costs are not proportional to volumeThe cost of setting up equipment for a production runThe cost of inspecting raw materialsAmong others
Slide 6-41
Learning objective 4: Identify potential problems with cost allocationSlide42
Which of the following is not a volume-related cost driver?
Direct labor hours
Direct labor costMachine timeTime to set up a production runAnswer: dA production run will take the same amount of time to set up no matter how many units are in the production run
Slide 6-42
Learning objective 4:
Identify potential problems with cost allocation
Test Your Knowledge
8Slide43
Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
Using the ABC approach, companies identify major activities that cause overhead costs to be incurred
Some activities are related to production volume, some are notThe cost of resources consumed performing these activities are grouped into cost pools Costs are assigned to products using a measure of activity referred to as a cost driver
Slide 6-43
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide44
The ABC Approach
Slide 6-
44
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide45
Relating Cost Pools to Products Using Cost Drivers
The company will estimate the total cost assigned to each cost pool
The company will then decide on an appropriate driver, such as number of inspections for inspection costsThe company will then estimate the activity in the driverThe overhead allocation rate is:
Slide 6-
45
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide46
Common Activities and Associated Cost Drivers
Slide 6-
46
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide47
McMaster Screen Technologies has two products and allocates overhead costs using a rate of $4 per dollar of labor.
One product has a very low gross profit and the other has a very high gross profit
The CFO suspects that this may be due to problems with the costing systemThe CFO authorizes a study of how product costs will change if an ABC approach is taken
Slide 6-47
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversActivity Based Costing- McMaster Screen TechnologiesSlide48
The study finds that overhead cost is related to 7 drivers shown on the next slide
The ABC approach reveals that the high-volume product is very profitable
However, the selling price does not come close to covering the full cost of the low volume productThe CFO’s intuition that the traditional product costing might be providing misleading information is correct
Slide 6-48
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversActivity Based Costing- McMaster Screen TechnologiesSlide49
Activity Based Costing-
McMaster Screen Technologies
Slide 6-
49
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide50
Power Electronics uses two cost pools
Equipment setups
Total estimated cost $1,500,000Estimated setups 10,000InspectionsTotal estimated cost $3,000,000Estimated inspections 15,000Calculate the cost per driver unit for each poolEquipment setups $1,500,000 / 10,000 = $150 per setupInspections $3,000,000 / 15,000 = $200 per inspection
Slide 6-50
Test Your Knowledge 9
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide51
Power Electronics has two products:
EP150
10 setups3 inspectionsEP17540 setups8 inspectionsCalculate the overhead applied to EP150Equipment setups 10 * $150 per setup = $1,500Inspections 3 * $200 per inspection = $600Total overhead $1,500 + $600 = $2,100
Slide 6-51
Test Your Knowledge 10
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide52
Power Electronics has two products:
EP150
10 setups3 inspectionsEP17540 setups8 inspectionsCalculate the overhead applied to EP175Equipment setups 40 * $150 per setup = $6,000Inspections 8 * $200 per inspection = $1,600Total overhead $6,000 + $1,600 = $7,600
Slide 6-52
Test Your Knowledge 11
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide53
Pros and Cons of ABC
Benefits
Less likely to undercost complex low volume products and overcost simple high volume productsDrivers used in ABC are not always volume relatedABC may lead to improvements in cost controlCosts are not buried in one or two pools
Slide 6-53
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide54
Pros and Cons of ABC
Limitations
More costly to develop and maintain than a traditional costing systemAllocations are made from each cost pool to each productUsed to develop full cost of productsIncludes fixed costsLacks incremental information necessary for decision making
Slide 6-54
Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide55
Fixed and Variable Costs
Slide 6-
55
Learning objective 5:
Discuss activity-based costing (ABC) and cost driversSlide56
Activity-Based Management
A tool that involves analyzing and costing activities with the goal of improving efficiency and effectiveness
ABC focus is on measuring cost of products and servicesABM focus is on goal of managing the activities themselvesFor example, ABC would calculate the cost per equipment setupABM would focus on ways to improve the setup process and reduce setup cost
Slide 6-56
Learning objective 6: Distinguish activity-based costing (ABC) from activity-based management (ABM)Slide57
Activity-Based Management
Slide 6-
57
Learning objective 6:
Distinguish activity-based costing (ABC) from activity-based management (ABM)Slide58
Cost Allocation and Decision Making
Slide 6-
58
Learning objective 6:
Distinguish activity-based costing (ABC) from activity-based management (ABM)Slide59
Appendix
The steps in activity-based management are:
Determine major activitiesIdentify resources used by each activityEvaluate the performance of the activitiesIdentify ways to improve the efficiency and/or effectiveness of the activities
Slide 6-59
Learning objective 6: Distinguish activity-based costing (ABC) from activity-based management (ABM)Slide60
Copyright
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.
Slide 6-
60