MG12Paris 1 Evolutionary effects in onebubble open inflation for string landscape Daisuke YAMAUCHI Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Kyoto University Collaborators A ID: 291004
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "2009/7/17" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
2009/7/17
MG12@Paris
1
Evolutionary effects in one-bubble open inflation for string landscape
Daisuke YAMAUCHI
Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University
Collaborators :: A. Linde (Stanford), M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, A. Naruko (YITP)
MG12@Paris, SQG1Slide2
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
2
Spatially quite flat universe
Ω0,obs~1
: spatially quite flat
WMAP observational data
indicates that
Completely consistent
Why should we study
“ openness ”
now ???
[Dunkley et al. (‘08)]
almost flat : Ω
0,standard
~
1
Standard inflationary
s
cenario
leads to
[e.g.
Linde
(‘08)]Slide3
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
3
Eternal Inflation
From Linde (‘08)
Eternal inflating
“
megaverse
”
We are here.
End
for
Inflation
Inflating regime
There will be a end for inflation at a particular point.
BUT
, there
will be
no end
for the evolution of the universe
as a whole
in eternal inflation.
Large quantum fluctuations produced
during inflation leads to production of
new inflationary domains,
which is eternal
process of self-production of the
universe !Slide4
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
4
We should mention that eternal inflation divide whole universe into exponentially large domains corresponding to
different metastable vacuum .
Eternal Inflation and
metastable
vacua
The enormous number of
metastable
vacua
appears in LEET of string theory!
Superstring theory
: most promising candidate for theory of everything
We can choose different
metastable
vacuum
+
One can see that
the eternal inflation
leads to the exponentially production of
string vacuum
.
String Landscape
We are focusing !
Eternal inflating
“
megaverse
”Slide5
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
5
Susskind (‘03), Freivogel and Susskind (‘04),Freivogel
et al. (‘06),…Properties of “String Landscape”
There exists enormous number of metastable
de Sitter vacuum . The global universe is an eternal inflating “megaverse” that is continually producing small “pocket universe”. The
tunneling transition to other metastable vacuum always occurs. ….
Garriga
, Tanaka and
Vilenkin
(‘99)
Bousso
and
Polchinski
(‘00),Douglas
and
Kachru
(‘07),
…
These
lead to a natural realization of
The inflationary model
with tunneling transition
= Open Inflation
Landscape
Global minimum
Metastable
Vacua
Metastable
Vacua
tunneling
tunneling
Can we observe these effects ???
What’s the observational properties ???
…Slide6
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
6
Outline
Introduction (finish)One bubble open Inflation and dynamics inside bubble
Conclusion and future directionSlide7
potential
s
calar field
local minimum
global minimum
V
false
V
true
2009/7/17
MG12@Paris
7
The scalar field is trapped in the false vacuum during sufficiently long period. It
solves homogeneity problem
in this regime and universe is well approximated by
a
dS
.
1.
Bubble nucleation
occurs through quantum tunneling.
2.
= Coleman-De
Luccia
(CDL)
instanton
Analytic continuation to
Lorentzian
regime leads to O(3,1) open expanding bubble
3.
O(4) sy
m
→
O(3,1) sym
Gott
III (‘82), Got III and
Statler
(‘84),
Sasaki, Tanaka, Yamamoto and Yokoyama (‘93), …
Open Inflation
The inflationary model with tunneling transition
slow-roll inflation and reheating occurs. It solves
entropy problem
in this regime.
4
.Slide8
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
8
Euclidean region
time const surface
Open FRW universe
Open Inflation
We assume O(4)-symmetric bounce solution :
Analytic continuation to Lorentz regime
leads to
open
expanding universe.
Cauchy surface
actionSlide9
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
9
We found that in string landscape, “dynamics inside bubble” is most important !
The inflation model with KKLT mechanism
From standard SUSY phenomena the energy scale of the second-stage of the inflation becomes much lower than the Planck density:[
Linde(‘08), Kallosh and Linde (‘04), Kachru, Kallosh, Linde
and Trivedi (‘03),…]
H
false
>>
H
true
Dynamics inside our bubble
The condition for Coleman-De
Luccia
instanton
The slow-roll inflation can not begin immediately after CDL tunneling.
[ Jensen and Steinhardt (‘84),
Linde
(‘99),
Linde
, Sasaki and Tanaka (‘98), … ]
If this condition is broken, HM
instanton
, which leads to the huge density perturbation and inhomogeneous domains, appears.
There might exist the rolling down phase
with sufficient long period !!!
potential
s
teep slope
field
l
ow energySlide10
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
10
Tensor-type perturbation
One can expand metric perturbation by using mode function:Square amplitude is given by
where
[Garriga
, Montes, Sasaki and Tanaka (’98,’99)]Spatial harmonic function on open universe
Transfer includes the information of the dynamics inside our bubble !
Tunneling effects
Sasaki, Tanaka and
Yakushige
(‘97) showed
that the
large angle modes
gives significant
contribution to spectrum in thin-wall case.
present time
Large angle
Small angle
Log[physical scale]
Log[a]
H
-1
High energy
: Transfer inside bubbleSlide11
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
11
tfroze
: froze-in time 1/a2=
ρφpot+ρφkin
teq :
potential-kinetic equality time ρφpot=ρφkin
We found that the amplitude can be estimated by using following two time-scale !
Log[scale factor]
Energy
density
Log
t
eq
t
froze
What’s happened???
ρ
φpot
ρ
φkin
1/a
2
Fluctuations evolves
Fluctuations
floze
-in
a
ttractor
Nucleation point
?????
?????
H
2
=
1/a
2
+
ρ
φpot
+
ρ
φkin
1/a
2
: energy density for openness
ρ
φpot
: potential energy density
ρ
φkin
: kinetic energy density
where
Amplitude for tensor-type perturbationSlide12
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
12
Evolution inside bubble
Just after the tunneling, the dominant component of the universe is spatial curvature :
Euclidean region
time const surface
Open FRW universe
Curvature dominant phase
From
b.c
. at the nucleation point, the potential can be well approximated as constant.
Thus, one can solve EOM as a attractor solution:
Attractor solution
t
froze
:
froze-in
time
1/a
2
=
ρ
φpot
+
ρ
φkin
t
eq
:
potential
-kinetic
equality time
ρ
φpot
=
ρ
φkinSlide13
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
13
Very Steep Slope
Large Evolutionary effects : Hfalse
>> Htrue
potential
Very s
teep slope
field
l
ow energy
Froze-in
1/a
2
ρ
φkin
ρ
φpot
H
false
2
H
true
2
S
ame
as
usual
thin-wall
case !!!
t
froze
>>
t
eq
We found that
Amplitude is determined by
the Hubble
inside
the bubble
even in steep slope !
usual scale-invariant spectrum
ρ
φpot
a
nd
ρ
φkin
dramatically
falls down
after
t=
t
eq
!!!Slide14
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
14
Marginal Steep Slope
1/a
2
ρ
φpot
H
false
2
H
true
2
ρ
φkin
Marginal Evolutionary effects :
H
false
>
H
true
Large enhancement
can occur !!!
t
froze
~
t
eq
We found that
Amplitude
for large angle mode
is determined by
the Hubble
outside
the bubble.
Amplitude
for small angle mode
is determined by
the Hubble
in
side
the bubble.
ρ
φpot
a
nd
ρ
φkin
dramatically
falls down
after
t=
t
eq
~t
froze
!!!
potential
Merginal
s
teep slope
field
l
ow energySlide15
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
15
Log[power spectrum]
Log[mode index]
Marginal Steep Slope
Potential
inside bubble
Inflation field
For s
mall mode index =
l
arge angle
mode
spectrum become
enhanced
!
For large mode index = small angle mode
spectrum is
scale-invariant
!
Thin-wall Large evolutionary effectsSlide16
2009/7/17MG12@Paris
16
We considered the possibility that “one-bubble open inflation scenario”
can realize in “string landscape”. Especially, we presented power spectrum under the conditions that one expects in string landscape.
we found that the amplitude of the fluctuation is determined not by Hubble outside bubble but by the one inside bubble even if the
potential tilt is large.Conclusion
Mild slope
Very steep slope
Marginal steep slope
After the transition,
Same as usual thin-wall case
Large enhancement can occur
if one chooses specific parameters.
Future direction
Scalar-type perturbations leads to
supercurvature
mode.
Multi-field extension leads to classical anisotropy.
Non-
Gaussianity
due to the vacuum choice