Dr Kehui Chen Assistant Professor Dr Nancy Pfenning Senior Lecturer University of Pittsburgh Dept of Statistics dBSERC August 2015 Summary of Abstract Proposed developing and conducting use of student response system clickers for ID: 246334
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Improving Teaching and Learning in Intro..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Improving Teaching and Learning in Intro Stat Classes with Student Response Systems: pre-Implementation Discussion
Dr.
Kehui
Chen, Assistant Professor
Dr. Nancy Pfenning, Senior Lecturer
University of Pittsburgh Dept. of Statistics
dB_SERC
August 2015Slide2
Summary of Abstract
Proposed developing and conducting use of student response system (“clickers”) for
surveys
and short quizzes
throughout the semester to achieve more effective communication between the instructor and
students
specially
designed
data-generating activities
to improve concept learning in statistics
sampling
interactive
case studies
to help students apply statistical methods to real data
analysisSlide3
Summary of Abstract (continued)
Proposal includes plans for
d
ocumentation, adaptation
to other intro-level statistics
classes
a
ssessment
of
learning gains and attitude improvementsSlide4
Background
Very broad cross-section of close to 1,000 Pitt students take intro stats each semester.
Communication
needed for optimal teaching/learning:
Students
benefit from ongoing awareness of their strengths and weaknesses relative to instructor’s expectations as well as their peers
Instructors
should closely monitor knowledge,
understandingSlide5
General Challenge #1 for Intro Stats Instruction
Large class sizes (typically 80+)
limit
opportunities for..
i
n-class discussions so
students
can gauge self- and peer- understanding
(Typical hindrance to learning: Students inclined to give up because “
e
veryone but me knows what’s going on”)
f
requent graded quizzes so
instructor
can monitor all students’ progress
(Typical hindrance to instructor setting appropriate pace: Unaware of students’ failure to comprehend ideas until they perform poorly on an exam)Slide6
Facilitating Self- and Instructor- Awareness of Students’ Comprehension
Immediate anonymous responses with clickers facilitate:
Students’ gauging their own understanding concurrently with that of peers in a way that saves time AND prevents embarrassment
“Reality check” so instructor knows immediately when a skill or concept requires further explanation (or when it’s time to move on to new material)Slide7
General Challenge #2 for Intro Stats Instruction
Key processes in learning Statistics:
d
esign of experiments/observational studies
data collection
data cleaning
data analysis
Because of time constraints, traditional lecture mainly just focuses on data analysis.Slide8
Clickers to Convey all Key Processes of Intro Stats Instruction
Activities can highlight:
study design:
how to divide class into treatment/control groups, etc.
data collection:
anonymity, sampling bias, which response options to provide, etc.
data cleaning:
possible modification of response files
data analysis:
opportunity for immediate displays and summaries of meaningful data from students themselvesSlide9
General Challenge #3 for Intro Stats Instruction
Common “missing link” in understanding:
Probability and Sampling Distributions
Whereas recitations may be conducted in computer lab, with software available to explore behavior of repeated random samples, lecturers ordinarily can’t gather data on the spot from all class members electronicallySlide10
Clickers to Convey Key Ideas of Probability and Sampling Distributions
Instead of students having to take it on faith that instructor has conjured up multiple random samples, each student participates actively in the process and witnesses patterns as they unfold in real time.Slide11
Proposed Transformations
1.
Surveys
and
Short Quizzes
First-day clicker-based survey of students’ backgrounds
First-day administration of pre-test featuring well-established valid, reliable conceptual questions taken from CAOS* instrument
Subsequent survey about attitudes and ability to self-assess progress
Periodic insertion of questions for students to discuss, then answer via clickers, addressing most challenging concepts as identified by the instructor and experienced TA
Last-day administration of post-test
(* Comprehensive Assessment of Outcomes in a first Statistics course, developed by
delMas
et al)Slide12
Proposed Transformations
2
. Concept Learning via Clicker
Activitie
s (examples)
Sampling Distributions: Generate repeated collection of sample means or
proportions,
explore as a group how patterns evolve, observe differences resulting from modifying population parameter, sample size, etc.
Inference: Generate repeated collection of confidence intervals or hypothesis test
P
-values to best understand how these inference results behave in the long runSlide13
Proposed Transformations
3.
Interactive Case Study
and Peer Instruction
Group data analysis (
eg
. simple regression) by class using
a real data
set:
Pose
multiple-choice questions at each key
step, have students discuss with classmates, then choose
most appropriate way to proceed.
This gives them experience in making appropriate
problem solving decisions on their
own,
and
developing
critical thinking. Slide14
Goals and Assessments
Goal #1: More Effective Communication
Assessment #1:
Survey
questions
will ask students extent to which they agree with statements like
,
“For most of the lectures, I had a pretty good idea of how much my classmates and I were understanding new material.”
Results will be compared with those of students in a non-clicker-based lecturer’s class.Slide15
Goals and Assessments
Goal #2: Increased Engagement
Assessment #2:
Survey questions will ask students extent to which they agree with statements like,
“Participation with clickers improved my understanding of the subject content
,
”
and
“Use of clickers helped me focus and pay more attention during lectures.”Slide16
Goals and Assessments
Goal #3: Improved Conceptual Learning
Assessments #3:
P
re- to post-test:
gains
will be
compared for
items based on “transformed”
material versus items
based on
non-transformed
material.
Midterm and final exams:
performance
will be compared for items
testing
on “transformed” material versus items
testing
on
non-transformed material
. Slide17
Challenges and Responding Plans
To offset additional time taken up by use of clickers, students’ feedback will guide instructor to reduce time on topics that they grasp quickly.
Experienced Graduate
TAs
will be part of the course transformation. The instructor will have frequent communication with recitation TAs to use lecture time more effectively. Slide18
Sustainability, Scalability
Clickers provided by this dB-SERC grant will be available for other Fall 2015 and future classes
Testing of clicker function can be done periodically by students in lecture
Maintenance costs (
eg
. replacement batteries) will be requested from Stats Dept.
Materials developed (
eg
. questions, activities) will be made available to other intro-stats instructorsSlide19
Budget
Clickers:
$
4
0*100
=$4,000
Half-time TA: $7,500
(Note: grad student deemed to be best-suited for the job isn’t available during lecture times. Fortunately, some connectivity can be achieved by having him hired as TA for 2 of the 4 recitations)Slide20
Example 1: Clicker Activity for Understanding Standard Deviation
Display
distribution and discuss standard deviations when students use clickers to haphazardly choose...
between options 1 and
5;
then between options 1, 2, 3, 4,
5;
then between options 2, 3, 4.
(The first will have largest
sd
, the last will have smallest.)Slide21
Example 1 Concept: Understanding Standard Deviation
CAOS Questions #14 & 15:
Five histograms are presented below. Each histogram displays test scores on a scale of
0 to
10 for one of five different statistics classes
.Slide22Slide23
Example 1 Concept: Understanding Standard Deviation
#14. Which of the classes would you expect to have the lowest standard deviation, and why?
Class A, because it has the most values close to the mean
Class B, because it has the smallest number of distinct scores.
Class C, because there is no change in scores.
Class A and Class D, because they both have the smallest range.
Class E, because it looks the most normal.Slide24
Example 1: Understanding Standard Deviation
#15. Which of the classes would you expect to have the highest standard deviation, and why?
Class A, because it has the largest difference between the heights of the bars.
Class B, because more of its scores are far from the mean.
Class C, because it has the largest number of different scores.
Class D, because the distribution is very bumpy and irregular.
Class E, because it has a large range and looks normal.Slide25
Example 1: Concept for comparison
Comparable CAOS questions on topic not taught with clickers:
#17.
Imagine you have a barrel that contains thousands of candies with several different colors. We know that the manufacturer produces 35% yellow candies. Five students each take a random sample of 20 candies, one at a time, and record the percentage of yellow candies in their sample. Which sequence below is the most plausible for the percent of yellow candies obtained in these five samples?
30%, 35%, 15%, 40%, 50%.
35%, 35%, 35%, 35%, 35%
5%, 60%, 10%, 50%, 95%
Any of the above.Slide26
Example 1: concept for comparison
2nd CAOS Question on Topic not Taught with Clickers:
#22. Researchers surveyed 1,000 randomly selected adults in the U.S. A statistically significant, strong positive correlation was found between income level and the number of containers of recycling they typically collect in a week. Please select the best interpretation of this result.
We can not conclude whether earning more money causes more recycling among U.S. adults because this type of design does not allow us to infer causation.
This sample is too small to draw any conclusions about the relationship between income level and amount of recycling for adults in the U.S.
This result indicates that earning more money influences people to recycle more than people who earn less money.Slide27
Example 2: Understanding Confidence Intervals in the Long Run
CAOS Questions #28, 30, 31
CAOS Questions on topic not taught with clickers: #25, 26, 27Slide28
Example 3: Understanding Hypothesis Tests and P-values in the Long Run
CAOS Question #40
CAOS Question on topic not taught with clickers: #36Slide29
Conclusion
Students and instructors alike will benefit from the implementation of this project made possible by dB-SERC. We look forward to reporting progress during the coming fall semester.
Questions?
Tips on clicker use?
Please c
ontact
nancyp@pitt.edu
khchen@pitt.edu