Related to Recruiting and Hiring Employees W ith Disabilities In collaboration with and commissioned by Cornell University ILR School Employment and Disability Institute April 11 2012 SHRM in ID: 776511
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
SHRM Survey Findings: Employing People With Disabilities: Practices and Policies Related to Recruiting and Hiring Employees With Disabilities
In collaboration with and commissioned by Cornell University ILR School Employment and Disability Institute
April 11, 2012
Slide2SHRM, in collaboration with and commissioned by the Cornell University ILR School Employment and Disability Institute, conducted a survey of its members about organizational practices and policies related to employing people with disabilities. Areas of focused in this survey research included: Part 1: Recruitment and Hiring (Released April 11, 2012)Part 2: Accessibility and Accommodation (Released May 17, 2012)Part 3: Retention and Advancement (To be released soon)In addition, the survey explored metrics that organizations track for all employees and for employees with disabilities, as well as potential barriers in the employment of and advancement of people with disabilities. The data findings included in this document focus on Part 1 of the research: Practices and Policies Related to Recruiting and Hiring Employees With Disabilities.
Introduction
2
Slide3Part 1: Policies and Practices Related to Recruitment and Hiring
3
Slide4Study Purpose, Partners and Funding
Study purpose: to provide new knowledge about differences in HR practices in hiring, retaining and advancing individuals with disabilities and the relationship between these practices and positive employment outcomes. Partners: SHRM, in collaboration with Cornell University.Funding: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research grant to Cornell University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employer Practices (Grant No. H133B040013).
4
Slide5For this survey, we define a “person with a disability” as someone who has a physical and/or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. This could include (but is not limited to) individuals with a physical disability, a chronic health condition, a vision or hearing impairment, a mental health condition, or a workplace injury or illness. We define an “effective practice or policy” as one that leads to improved recruitment, hiring, retention, engagement, workplace climate and/or advancement of people with disabilities.
5
Definitions
Slide6Key Findings
6
What policies and practices related to the recruitment and hiring of people with disabilities are currently being implemented by organizations? Nearly two-thirds (61%) of organizations indicate including people with disabilities explicitly in their diversity and inclusion plans, 59% require subcontractors/suppliers to adhere to disability nondiscrimination requirements, 58% train HR staff and supervisors on effectively interviewing people with disabilities, and 57% have developed relationships with community organizations that promote the employment of people with disabilities.
Among organizations that have implemented policies
and practices related to
the recruitment
and
hiring of people with disabilities, which policies and practices were found to be very effective?
Nearly one-half (45%) of organizations found that training HR staff and supervisors on interviewing people with disabilities was very effective. Several organizations also believe that requiring subcontractors/suppliers
to adhere to disability nondiscrimination
requirements (38%) and having
explicit organizational goals related to the recruitment or hiring of people with
disabilities (34%) were very effective practices.
Slide7Key Findings (Continued)
7
Are some organizations more likely to have policies
and
practices
related to the recruitment and hiring of
people
with
disabilities depending on the organization’s staff size or sector?
Larger organizations
are
more likely to have polices and practices related to recruitment and
hiring of people with disabilities
compared with smaller
organizations.
Publicly owned for-profit organizations also are
more
likely to have
some of these policies and practices in place compared
with privately owned for-profit
organizations and nonprofit organizations.
Slide88
Policies and Practices Related to Recruitment and Hiring
Note: Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Our organization…
Slide99
Policies and Practices Related to Recruitment and Hiring (Continued)
Our organization…
Note: Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Slide10Effectiveness of Policies and Practices
10
Our organization…Very effectiveSomewhat effective Not effectiveEffectiveness not knownTrains HR staff and supervisors on effective interviewing of people with disabilities.(n = 334)45%37%17%1%Requires subcontractors/suppliers to adhere to disability nondiscrimination requirements.(n = 310)38%30%3%29%Has explicit organizational goals related to the recruitment or hiring of people with disabilities.(n = 149)34%31%9%25%Participates in internships or similar programs that target people with disabilities.(n = 111)33%37%5%25%
Note: Respondents who answered that a policy or practice related to recruitment and hiring was “not in place” at their organization, “in development/under review” or “don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Slide11Effectiveness of Policies and Practices (Continued)
11
Our organization…Very effectiveSomewhat effective Not effectiveEffectiveness not knownIncludes people with disabilities explicitly in its diversity and inclusion plan.(n =349)29%36%7%27%Has relationships with community organizations that promote the employment of people with disabilities.(n = 326)28%37%7%28%Has senior management that demonstrates a strong commitment to disability recruitment and hiring.( n = 223)27%42%8%23%
Note: Respondents who answered that a policy or practice related to recruitment and hiring was “not in place” at their organization, “in development/under review” or “don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Slide12Effectiveness of Policies and Practices(Continued)
12
Our organization…Very effectiveSomewhat effective Not effectiveEffectiveness not knownActively recruits people with disabilities.(n = 273)26%37%6%30%Takes advantage of tax incentives for hiring people with disabilities (e.g., Small Business Tax Credit, Architectural/ Transportation Tax Deduction or Work Opportunities Tax Credit).(n = 128)26%34%6%34%Includes progress toward recruitment or hiring goals for people with disabilities in the performance appraisals of senior management.(n = 99)29%33%11%28%
Note: Respondents who answered that a policy or practice related to recruitment and hiring was “not in place” at their organization, “in development/under review” or “don’t know” were excluded from this analysis. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Slide13Comparison by Organization Sector
13
Slide14Publicly owned for-profit organization is a limited liability company that offers its securities (stock/shares, bonds/loans, etc.) for sale to the general public, typically through a stock exchange or through market makers operating in over-the-counter markets. This is separate and distinct from a government-owned corporation that might be described as a publicly owned company.Privately owned for-profit organization is a business company owned either by nongovernmental organizations or by a relatively small number of shareholders or company members. A privately owned for-profit organization does not offer or trade its company stock (shares) to the general public on the stock market exchanges, but rather the company's stock is offered, owned and traded or exchanged privately. Less ambiguous terms for a privately held company are unquoted company and unlisted company.Nonprofit organization is neither a legal nor a technical definition, but generally refers to an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than to distribute them as profit or dividends. States in the U.S. defer to the IRS designation conferred under United States Internal Revenue Code Section 501 when the IRS deems an organization eligible. A nonprofit organization may or may not have shareholders.
Definition of Sectors
14
Slide1515
Our organization…
actively recruits people with disabilities.
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (58%)Privately owned for-profits (41%)Publicly owned for-profits >privately owned for-profits
Comparison by Organization Sector
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (64%) Privately owned for-profits (52%)Publicly owned forprofits >privately owned for-profits
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (24%)Privately owned for-profits (14%)Publicly owned for-profits >privately owned for-profits
has relationships with community organizations that promote the employment of people with disabilities.
includes progress toward recruitment or hiring goals for people with disabilities in the performance appraisals of senior management.
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide1616
Our organization…
takes advantage of tax incentives for hiring people with disabilities.
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (42%)Privately owned for-profits (21%)Nonprofits (23%)Publicly owned for-profits >privately owned for-profits, nonprofits
Comparison by Organization Sector (Continued)
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (80%) Privately owned for-profits (48%)Nonprofits (55%)Publicly owned for-profits >privately owned for-profits, nonprofits
requires subcontractors/suppliers to adhere to disability nondiscrimination requirements.
includes people with disabilities explicitly in its diversity and inclusion plan.
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (77%) Privately owned for-profits (54%)Nonprofits (60%)Publicly owned for-profits >privately owned for-profits, nonprofits
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide1717
Our organization…
has explicit organizational goals related to the recruitment or hiring of people with disabilities.
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (40%)Nonprofits (34%)Privately owned for-profits (19%)Publicly owned for-profits, nonprofits >privately owned for-profits
Comparison by Organization Sector (Continued)
Organization sectorDifferences based on organization sectorPublicly owned for-profits (49%)Nonprofits (48%)Privately owned for-profits (32%)Publicly owned for-profits, nonprofits>privately owned for-profits
has senior management that demonstrates a strong commitment to disability recruitment and hiring.
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide18Comparison by Organization Staff Size
18
Slide19Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (37%)100 to 499 employees (39%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (64%)25,000 or more employees (78%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
19
Our organization…
actively recruits people with disabilities.
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (48%)100 to 499 employees (50%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (75%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
has relationships with community organizations that promote the employment of people with disabilities.
Comparison by Organization Staff Size
includes people with disabilities explicitly in its diversity and inclusion plan.
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (47%)500 to 2,499 employees (66%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (72%)25,000 or more employees (85%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide2020
Our organization…
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size100 to 499 employees (12%)25,000 or more employees (39%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
has explicit organizational goals related to the recruitment or hiring of people with disabilities.
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (18%)100 to 499 employees (24%)25,000 or more employees (52%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
includes progress toward recruitment or hiring goals for people with disabilities in the performance appraisals of senior management.
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size100 to 499 employees (13%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (28%)25,000 or more employees (35%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
participates in internships or similar programs that target people with disabilities.
Comparison by Organization Staff Size (Continued)
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide21Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (33%)100 to 499 employees (33%)25,000 or more employees (63%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
21
Our organization…
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (16%)100 to 499 employees (15%)500 to 2,499 employees (36%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (43%)25,000 or more employees (61%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
takes advantage of tax incentives for hiring people with disabilities.
has senior management that demonstrates a strong commitment to disability recruitment and hiring.
Comparison by Organization Staff Size (Continued)
requires subcontractors/suppliers to adhere to disability nondiscrimination requirements.
Smaller organizationsLarger organizationsDifferences based on organization staff size1 to 99 employees (46%)500 to 2,499 employees (68%)2,500 to 24,999 employees (69%)25,000 or more employees (82%)Larger organizations > smaller organizations
Note:
Respondents who answered “don’t know” and “in development/under review" were excluded from this analysis.
Only statistically significant differences are shown.
Slide22Industry Percentage of Respondents Manufacturing26% Finance and insurance 12% Professional, scientific and technical services12% Retail trade12% Wholesale trade9% Transportation and warehousing 8% Accommodation and food services 7% Entertainment and recreation 5% Information5% Utilities5% Construction4% Educational services4%
Demographics: Organization Industry
Note: n = 637. Total does not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
22
Slide23Industry Percentage of Respondents Health care and social assistance 4%Religious, grantmaking, civic, professional and similar organizations4% Repair and maintenance4% Real estate and rental and leasing 3%Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services 2% Management of companies and enterprises 2% Public administration 2% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1% Mining1% Personal and laundry services1% Other8%
Demographics: Organization Industry (Continued)
Note: n = 637. Total does not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
23
Slide24Demographics: Respondents by Organization Sector
24
Slide25Demographics: Respondents by Organization Staff Size
n = 627
25
Slide26Demographics: Other
Does your organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only or does it operate multinationally?U.S.-based operations only60%Multinational operations40%n = 617
What is the HR department/function responded for throughout this survey?Corporate (companywide)57%Facility/location26%Business unit/division17%n = 519
Is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization? Multi-unit organization: An organization that has more than one location80% Single-unit organization: An organization in which the location and the organization are one in the same20%n = 635
26
For multi-unit
organizations, a
re HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit corporate headquarters, by each work location or both?
Multi-unit
headquarters determines HR policies and practices
51%
A combination of both the
work location and the multi-unit headquarters determine HR policies and practices
46%
Each work location determines HR policies
and practices
3%
n
= 516
Slide27Further Information Available
27
SHRM® Disability
Employment Resource
Page
www.shrm.org/disabilityemployment
HR Tips
www.hrtips.org
Employer Assistance and Resource Network (EARN)
www.askEARN.org
Job Accommodation
Network (JAN)
http
://
askjan.org
National ADA Network
www.adata.org
Cornell
Employment and Disability Institute publications
online
http
://
digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu
Employment
and Disability Institute at Cornell
University
www.ilr.cornell.edu/edi
U.S
. Disability Status
Report
www.disabilitystatistics.org
Slide28Response rate = 23%Sample consisted of 662 HR professional respondents from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership. A series of e-mail reminders along with a call campaign were used to encourage survey participation. Margin of error is +/-3%.Survey fielded October 19-December 15, 2011
28
Survey Methodology
For
more
survey/poll
findings, visit
www.shrm.org/surveys
For more information about SHRM’s Customized Research Services, visit
www.shrm.org/customizedresearch
Follow
us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/SHRM_Research