/
A global framework for malaria intervention impact: A global framework for malaria intervention impact:

A global framework for malaria intervention impact: - PowerPoint Presentation

trinity
trinity . @trinity
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-05-31

A global framework for malaria intervention impact: - PPT Presentation

Merging geospatial and mechanistic modeling Amelia BertozziVilla IDM Symposium April 17 2019 We just learned how to use transmission models machine learning to generate highquality risk maps ID: 912394

annual distribution indoor intervention distribution annual intervention indoor prevalence impact residual probability treatment model archetypes run initial bednet coverage

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A global framework for malaria intervent..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A global framework for malaria intervention impact: Merging geospatial and mechanistic modeling

Amelia Bertozzi-VillaIDM SymposiumApril 17, 2019

Slide2

We just learned how to use transmission models + machine learning to generate high-quality risk maps.

Slide3

I’d like to talk about using high-quality maps + a complex model to generate intervention impact predictions.

Slide4

1. Generating Transmission Archetypes

Slide5

Once you’ve made a model, you want to explore how it works in different archetypal settings.

For malaria, the key variables usually relate to climate, mosquito bionomics, and baseline transmission.

Griffin et al.,

PLoS

Medicine

2010

All Species

An.

gambiae

An.

funestus

An.

arabiensis

Slide6

Archetypes are often found heuristically.

Good way to showcase the versatility and/or sensitivity of the model.

Difficult to predict outcomes for new sites.

All Species

An.

gambiae

An.

funestus

An.

arabiensis

Griffin et al.,

PLoS

Medicine

2010

Slide7

When you have detailed covariates on model-relevant variables, you can use them to define archetypes a priori.

Slide8

General strategy: dimensionality reduction + clustering

Slide9

We use SVD and K-means to find archetypes.

CHIRPS Rainfall

(monthly, synoptic)

MAP Temp Suitability

(monthly, synoptic)

MAP Relative Vector Abundance

(

gambiae

/

arabiensis

/

funestus

,

static)

SVD

Slide10

We use SVD and K-means to find archetypes.

Slide11

Resultant archetypes capture key seasonality zones.

Slide12

2. Finding Simulation Outputs

Slide13

40%

Bednet coverage (annual distribution)

40% Indoor residual spraying (annual distribution)40% Probability of treatment given a clinical case

Run many simulations to construct an intervention impact curve.

Slide14

40%

Bednet coverage (annual distribution)

40% Indoor residual spraying (annual distribution)40% Probability of treatment given a clinical case

Run many simulations to construct an intervention impact curve.

Slide15

40%

Bednet coverage (annual distribution)

40% Indoor residual spraying (annual distribution)40% Probability of treatment given a clinical case

Run many simulations to construct an intervention impact curve.

Slide16

40%

Bednet coverage

(annual distribution)40% Indoor residual spraying (annual distribution)

40% Probability of treatment given a clinical case

Run many simulations to construct an intervention impact curve.

Slide17

40%

Bednet coverage

(annual distribution)40% Indoor residual spraying (annual distribution)

40% Probability of treatment given a clinical case

Run many simulations to construct an intervention impact curve.

Slide18

Existing intervention efficacy depends strongly on indoor biting.

40% Bednets

40% Indoor residual spraying40% Probability of treatment

Slide19

Novel outdoor interventions have more nuanced effects.

Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits, 5% Kill Rate

Slide20

Combining the two, indoor biting still matters.

40% Bednets

40% Indoor residual spraying40% Probability of treatment

Attractive Toxic Sugar Baits,

5% Kill Rate

Slide21

3. Mapping back out the the pixel level

Slide22

Start with a MAP prevalence surface.

Slide23

For each pixel, extract starting prevalence and archetype.

Initial prevalence: 0.71

Slide24

Initial prevalence: 0.71

Find new prevalence for that initial prevalence and archetype.

Slide25

Find new prevalence for that initial prevalence and archetype.

0.71

0.39

Initial prevalence: 0.71

Slide26

Continue until a new map is constructed.

Slide27

Slide28

There is still much to explore/affirm in this framework.

Adding intervention history to archetype selectionIncorporating migration and disease importation

Thoroughly assessing uncertainty/sensitivity at every stageComparing to existing forecastsDetailed assessment of results outside of Africa

Slide29

There are limitations to be aware of…

Not directly calibrated to dataRelies upon previous calibration of model componentsPossible to compare to well-calibrated sites with good data

Only appropriate at certain scales– useful for understanding spatial distribution, but not for prediction on specific pixels.

Slide30

…but this framework has many possible uses:

Gain intuition for intervention impact in data-poor sites or for prospective tools.Can be used with any mechanistic model and/or set of input

rasters.

Amenable to uses in interactive dashboards or educational games.

Slide31

Thank you.

Jaline

Gerardin

Caitlin

Bever

Josh Proctor

Pete

Gething

Sam Bhatt

Spheres:

rocketpixel