ESSA Advisory Group 3 rd Meeting 9212016 Previous and Upcoming Work Group Meetings Accountably Russ Keglovits Meeting 4 TBD August 24 2016 230430 PM Meeting 3 July 25th 2016 100300 PM ID: 763005
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ESSA Advisory Group 3 rd Meeting 9/21/2..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
ESSA Advisory Group 3 rd Meeting 9/21/2016
Previous and Upcoming Work Group Meetings Accountably : (Russ Keglovits) Meeting 4 TBDAugust 24, 2016 (2:30-4:30 PM) Meeting #3July 25th, 2016 (1:00-3:00 PM) Meeting #2July 1, 2016 (8:00-10:00 AM) Meeting #1English Language Learners: (Karl Wilson)Meeting 4 TBDSeptember 19, 2016 (3:30-5:30 PM) Meeting #3August 12, 2016 (9:00-11:00 AM) Meeting #2June 30, 2016- (1:00-3:00 PM) Meeting #1 Assessment : (Peter Zutz) Meeting 3 TBD September 02, 2016 ( 1:00-3:00 PM) Meeting #2 August 8th, 2016 ( 9:00-11:00 AM) Meeting # 1 Funding Streams : (Steve Canavero) September 30, 2016 ( 1:00-3:00 PM) Meeting # 1 School Improvement : (Maria Sauter) Meeting 3 TBD August 1, 2016 ( 2:00-4:00 PM) Meeting #2 June 28, 2016- ( 10:30-12:30 PM) Meeting # 1 Teaching and Leading : (Dena Durish ) October 11, 2016 (3:30–5:30 PM) Meeting #3 September 22, 2016 (3:30– 5:30 PM) Meeting #2 June 30, 2016 (3:30-5:30 PM ) Meeting #1
Month Advisory Group Activity or Action Work GroupActivity or Action September MeetProgress report from Work GroupsMeet Develop recommendationsOctoberMeetRecommendations from Work Group: Advise on Initial FrameworkMeet (as needed)Develop recommendationsNovember Meet (as needed)Develop recommendations: Send all recommendations to AG on or before December 1, 2016December December 31, 2016MeetRecommendation from Work Group: Advise on Initial Framework Finalize Initial Framework Timeline for Plan Submission - July MonthAdvisory GroupActivity or ActionWork GroupActivity or ActionFebruary February 15, 2017MeetReview input and develop a consensus Draft ESSA State Plan Publish Draft ESSA Plan Benchmark I: January - Initial Framework to the State Board of Education for Feedback
Timeline for Plan Submission – July (Cont’d) Month Advisory Group Activity or Action Work Group Activity or ActionMarch/AprilMeetReview public feedback; make recommendations; develop consensus Benchmark II: February 15, 2017 Open Public Comment PeriodFebruary 15 – March 15MonthAdvisory GroupActivity or ActionWork GroupActivity or ActionJuneMeet (if needed)Final Draft Review Benchmark III: April Presentation of Final Draft to State Board of Education for Feedback Goal: July 5, 2017 Submission of Final ESSA State Plan to USED Goal: July 5, 2017 Submission of Final ESSA State Plan to USED
Timeline for Plan Submission - March Month Advisory Group Activity or ActionWork Group Activity or Action September MeetProgress report from remaining Work GroupsMeet Develop recommendationsOctoberMeetRecommendations from Work Groups: Advise on Initial FrameworkMeet (as needed)Develop recommendations: Send all recommendations to AG on or before November 1, 2016NovemberMeetFinalize Initial Framework Benchmark I: December – Draft ESSA Plan to the State Board of Education for feedback MonthAdvisory GroupActivity or ActionWork Group Activity or Action December/JanuaryMeetReview State Board feedback; make recommendations; develop consensus Benchmark III: February presentation of Final Draft to State Board of Education for feedbackMonthAdvisory GroupActivity or ActionWork GroupActivity or ActionFebruaryMeet (if needed) Review public and State Board feedback; discuss statewide communications plan Goal: March 1, 2017 Submission of Final ESSA State Plan to USED 2017-2018 School Year – Full Implementation of ESSA Plan
Work Group PresentationsESSA Advisory Group 09.21.2016
Teaching and leading Workgroup Update Dena Durish – Workgroup Lead Teaching and Leading Workgroup update
ESSA Teaching & Leading Work Group (Attract, Prepare, Develop, Retain) MeetingsJune 30, 2016September 22, 2016 (3:30pm – 5:30pm) Meeting #2October 11, 2016 (3:30pm – 5:30pm) Meeting #340 Work Group Members 2 – Business & Industry 8 – Classroom Teacher4 – School-Based Administrator10 – District-Level Personnel6 – Other School-Based Licensed Employee1 – Parent/Legal Guardian9 – Community Stakeholder/Other (Higher Ed. Faculty)Essential QuestionHow do we ensure that all Nevada students, particularly those who are identified as low-income, minority, English learners, and/or special education, have equitable access to experienced and effective educators (teachers, school leaders, other licensed personnel)?
ESSA Gradual shift in funding formula by 2020 from 35/65% to 20/80% (total student population/students in poverty) Nevada Estimate = 9.8% increasePrevious Hold Harmless for district formula allocations effective FY17 95% to districts; 4% statewide activities; 1% for NV administrationUp to additional 3% for developing school leadersFederal “highly qualified” definition/plans replaced with “full state certification and licensure requirements”Plan to address disparities resulting in students from low-income families & students of color being taught by INEFFECTIVE, inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of-field teachers at higher rates than peers (equitable distribution)Collection/public reporting of professional qualifications dataEducator evaluation systems not requiredRemoves student performance measure requirement, unless using Title II-A Professional development definition updated to ensure “personalized, ongoing, job-embedded activities”ESSA Teaching & Leading Work Gro up (Key Policy Considerations)
s T&L Work Group Next Steps SWOT Analysis Prioritize Strategic Questions/Remaining IssuesRecommendations for Superintendent and ESSA Advisory GroupQuestion(s) for the ESSA Advisory GroupHow should funding priorities be determined for the 4% of Title II-A funds reserved for statewide activities? What should be identified as the highest education workforce priorities in relation to attracting, preparing, developing, and retaining teachers and leaders? (SEA and district funds) NV definition of “ineffective,” “out of field,” and “inexperienced?”Should NDE reserve the additional allowable 3% to implement statewide strategies for principals/other school administrators? ESSA Teaching & Leading Work Group (Next Steps and Advisory Group Questions)
ESSA school improvement work group update Maria Sauter – Workgroup Lead School improvement
Update Two Work Group meetings have been held:June 26, 2016August 1, 2016Tentative 3rd Meeting Date TBDAverage 20 stakeholders including:TeachersSchool Improvement TeamsCommunity MembersHigher Education
Objectives Understand the priorities of the Nevada Department of Education Develop a vision for a statewide school improvement and support systemDevelop a process for support with districts in implementing evidence-based interventions for underperforming schoolsDevelop a process to build local capacity to sustain the improvements
Outputs: SWOT Strengths Weaknesses Data-based decision making to decide on interventionsFunding for evidence based interventions, PDStrong PD around 4 fundamentals NDE is being proactive Schools given autonomy for choices in interventions, goal-setting, programs, etc.Focusing on both proficiency and growthSchool choice, signature schoolsFunding to the schoolsNDE recognizing the needs for flexibility Available money aligned to needActions of NDE moved from compliance to supportLooking at 1 and 2 star schoolsOngoing monitoring – addressing barriers and addressing data to move forwardPre-K expansion Unknown criteria /NSPF unknown piecePD is one size fits allTeachers lacking support and coachingTiming of funding is not efficientPitting funding against schools with same needsAccessibility to programsFunding through districts is not always comprehensive/holisticBest practices – sharingSchools being reactive not proactiveFamily support and engagementRecruitment of STEM teachers – all high qualityLack of early childhood ED – compliance basedIncentives to work at most needy schoolsImpact on lack of assessment data Funding does not stream consistency through feedersFunding doesn’t exist or ends with higher performing school
Opportunities Threats NEPF – funding some of the 3/4/5 star schools – looking at future demographic patterns Differentiate PD – including leadersSite-based decision makingConsistency in program implementation Equity – cultural Timelines of funding Monitoring across all schools - feedersCollaboration among schools statewideWrap around – transportation, job opportunity, medicalTeacher improvement and retentionFlexibility in fundingClass sizeGreater alignment – curriculum and assessmentMultiple assessment measures for growth and proficiencyBraiding servicesMaximize PreK, Read by Grade 3, are we ready in the state–pushing up the barRecruitment/retention of highly qualified teachersPolitics and privatization of schoolsGet out in front of education (data, programs, grad rate) – be in front – educate public earlyData: targeting right schools, too many incentives, make sure data knowledge is at school level – human capitalNew teacher prep. out of college/programs, etc., ALRImplementing change – change is hard/threatening – buy inLegacy of NCLBElection sessions, new expectations Swot
Outputs
Next Steps Next Steps Hold third meeting Consolidate Work Group documentsReconcile with other Work GroupsFinalize recommendations for Advisory Group
Big Question Big Question In regards to school improvement, what do you see as expectations for ALL schools regardless of proficiency level?
ESSA Advisory GroupFederal Funding Overview Please note that these slides reflect best known information and are subject to revision. (Ex. Federal rules under consideration)
Title I: School Improvement Funds
Title I: School Improvement Funds Available: NCLB vs. ESSA SY 2016-17 (NCLB) SY 2017-18 (ESSA)4 percent State Set-Asideof Title I-A= ~$4.7 million7 percent State Set-Asideof Title I-A= ~$8.6 millionSIG FFY 2016 = ~$3.8 millionNo separate SIG fundsTotal = ~$8.5 millionTotal = ~$8.6 million (est.)Please note: Dollars are estimates or projections
Title I: Direct Student Services
Title II-A:Supporting Effective Instruction 2016: $11,417,000 (2015: $10,737,710) PROJECTED2017: $12,559,00092%: $11,554,2805%: $627,9503%: $376,7702023: $19,280,000
Title III Allocations FFY 2016 Total: $6,748,180 2017 Projected: $7,575,751 State Administration: $189,393State Activities: $189,394Grants to Districts: $7,196,963
Title IV, Part AStudent Support & Academic Enrichment Grants 2017 Estimate (total): $3,987,144 State Admin. (1%) $39,871.44Tech. Assistance (4%)$159,485.76LEA/School Subgrants $3,787,786.80
Title IV, Part A School Sub-Grant Distributions 95%
Title IV, Part B21 st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC)
Membership New Advisory Group Members Patrick Narajo (UNLV)Samantha Molisee (Board of Education Student Member)Roxann McCoy (NAACP Las Vegas)New Work Group MembersAssessment Work GroupTomas Macaluso (Assistant Principal at TMCC high school Reno which focuses on career tech)EL Work GroupCandice Birchum (Education Director for the Walker River Paiute Tribe) Teaching & Leading Work Group Patti Chance, Allison Smith, and Tracy Spies (UNLV Faculty)John Barlow (Somerset Academy Executive Director)Brenda Larsen-Mitchell and Roseanne Richards (CCSD District-Level Administrators)
Public Comment