/
What Lurks in the Dark? An Exploration of Dark Matter What Lurks in the Dark? An Exploration of Dark Matter

What Lurks in the Dark? An Exploration of Dark Matter - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-19

What Lurks in the Dark? An Exploration of Dark Matter - PPT Presentation

Dr Simona Murgia UC Irvine Dr Will Dawson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Carolyn Slivinski STScI Facilitator Dr Emma Marcucci STScI Science Briefing October 5 2017 ID: 657572

dark matter ray mass matter dark mass ray nasa gas gamma galaxies galaxy center galactic particle key gravitational abell

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "What Lurks in the Dark? An Exploration o..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

What Lurks in the Dark?

An Exploration of Dark Matter

Dr. Simona

Murgia

(UC, Irvine)

Dr. Will Dawson (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)Carolyn Slivinski (STScI)Facilitator: Dr. Emma Marcucci (STScI)

Science Briefing

October

5

, 2017Slide2

Additional Resources

2

http://nasawavelength.org/list/1929

Dark Matter Day:

Primary WebsiteFeatured Activities:Jelly Bean UniverseFind the Missing Mass – paper plate activity“Gravitational lensing” with a wine glass

Basic Dark Matter Facts: Chandra Field GuideAsk an AstrophysicistBlog (archived)NASA’s Frontier Fields

Additional Activities:

Dark Matter Possibilities

What’s the Matter?Slide3

Searching for Dark Matter with

Gamma Rays

3

Simona Murgia

University of California, IrvineSlide4

Evidence for Dark Matter:

A Brief Overview

Evidence for dark matter is found at very different scalesGalaxies

Clusters of galaxiesUniverse

4Slide5

Galaxy Clusters

The existence of dark matter was postulated by Fritz Zwicky in the 1930’s to explain the dynamics of galaxies in the Coma galaxy cluster

Zwicky inferred the total mass of the cluster by measuring the velocities of its galaxies, based on Newtonian gravity. But the luminous mass (the galaxies in the cluster) was far smaller!

Dark matter makes up for the missing mass

F. Zwicky, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 86, p.217 (1937)gasDMCluster

stars

Velocities ~ 1000 km/s

R ~

Mpcs

Distance ~100

Mpc

(1 pc = 3.26 light

yrs

)

Virial theorem: relates the velocity (dispersion,

σ

) of galaxies at some distance

r

from the cluster center to the enclosed mass

M

tot

(r)

Galaxy cluster:

~1-2% stars, ~5-15% gas

;

the rest is dark matter

5Slide6

Rotation Curves of Galaxies

Departures from the predictions of Newtonian gravity became apparent also at galactic scales with the measurement of rotation curves of galaxies (Rubin et al, 1970)

However observed velocities stay approximately constant, i.e. stars and gas move faster then predicted!

Rotational speed

Distance from centerAndromeda galaxyand therefore:i.e. decreasing with r

6Based on Newtonian dynamics, the velocity (v) of stars and gas in the galaxy should decrease with the distance (r) from the center of the galaxy.Slide7

To reconcile theory with observations, postulate the existence of mass density

not steeply falling as luminous matter density!

Stellar bulge

Gas

Stellar diskDark matterCorbelli et al (2009)

Stars+gas: 1.4 ×1011M⊙ Total mass: 1.3×1012M⊙ ~10 times more dark matter than luminous matter

By adding this extended matter halo, we find good agreement with observations

e

.g

. Andromeda galaxy

therefore:

Assume additional mass:

and finally:

Dark matter makes up

for

the missing mass

Andromeda galaxy

Rotation Curves of Galaxies

7Slide8

Cosmic Microwave Background

Require additional matter to

start forming structure earlier

T = 2.725 K

ΔT ~ 200 μKVery small temperature fluctuations, too small to evolve into structure observed todayPlanck 2015Dodelson et al 2006Power spectrum of matter fluctuations

baryons onlysmaller scalesClumpiness

larger scales

Observed (SDSS)

8

Relic of

a time in the early Universe when matter and radiation decoupled

(protons and electron form neutral hydrogen and become transparent to photons, ~100,000s years after Big Bang)

Universe was isotropic and homogeneous at large scales Slide9

Dark Matter

What data tell us about dark matter: makes up almost all of the matter in the Universe (present day Universe mostly made out of dark energy, dark matter, and small contribution from

ordinary matter)interacts very weakly, and at least gravitationally, with ordinary matter is cold, i.e. non-relativistic

is neutralis stable (or it is very long-lived)

But not what it is...9Slide10

Dark Matter Candidates

Need new particles and new theories beyond the Standard Model of particle physics!

None of the known elementary particles has the right properties to be

the dark matter

Image credit: G. Bertone10Slide11

Dark Matter Searches

COLLIDER SEARCHES

Large Hadron Collider

Dark Matter

Standard ModelDIRECT SEARCHES

CDMSXENON100

INDIRECT SEARCHES

PAMELA

Fermi-LAT

IceCube

Dark Matter

Dark Matter

Standard Model

Standard Model

Produce it in the lab

Find its annihilation

byproducts

Detect energy it deposits

11Slide12

Indirect Dark Matter Searches

Via

Lactea

II (Diemand et al. 2008)

+12DARK MATTER DISTRIBUTIONANNIHILATION PROCESSVery rich search strategy, multi-messenger and multi-wavelengthGamma rays are particularly good probes to learn about the particle nature of dark matter via its annihilations

Simulated Milky Way-like dark matter halo:very dense at its center, large number of substructures 12Slide13

Gamma rays from Dark Matter

Annihilation

Pieri et al, arXiv:0908.0195

Galactic centerDark matter substructures

13Slide14

Indirect Detection Results - Gamma Ray

If a signal is detected, we can learn about the mass of the dark matter particle, how often it annihilates, how it is distributed in space, and constrain underlying theories

Dark matter particle mass

Annihilation cross section

(how often annihilations occur)Detection!14Slide15

Dark matter particle mass

Annihilation cross section

(

how often annihilations occur)Indirect Detection Results - Gamma Ray

If a signal is not detected, we can rule out many possibilitiesRuled outAllowed15Slide16

Fermi MissionThe Large Area Telescope

Orbit: 565 km,

25.6o inclination, circular. The LAT observes the entire sky every ~3 hrs (2 orbits)

The Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) observes the gamma-ray sky in the 20 MeV to >300 GeV energy range with unprecedented sensitivity

Fermi LATFermi LAT is a pair conversion telescope: gamma ray converts to electron-positron pairs which are recorded by the instrument

16Slide17

The Fermi LAT Gamma-Ray Sky

Fermi LAT data

4 years, E > 1 GeV

A potential dark matter signal must be disentangled from other more conventional (and brighter!) processes that produce gamma rays

17Slide18

A Dark Matter Signal from the

Galactic Center?

An excess in the Fermi LAT GC data consistent with dark matter annihilation was first claimed in 2009 (Goodenough and Hooper, arXiv:0910.2998.)

More recent analyses are consistent with these results

Properties of the dark matter particle and underlying particle physics model can be inferredHowever, other more mundane gamma-ray sources such as pulsars could explain the excessImage credit: NASA/T. Linden, U. ChicagoC. Karwin et al, arXiv:1612.05687

Annihilation cross sectionDark matter particle mass18Slide19

Caveats

=

+

+

datasourcesgalactic interstellar emissionisotropic+

dark matter??Modeling of the gamma-ray sky is complex, and improvements are crucial to confirm the properties of the excess and to conclusively determine whether it originates from dark matter or something else!

The determination of the Galactic center excess heavily relies on modeling of the gamma-ray emission from other processes (the excess is a small fraction of the total emission observed toward the Galactic center!)

19Slide20

Optically observed dwarf spheroidal galaxies: largest dark matter substructures predicted by simulations

Excellent targets for gamma-ray dark matter searches

Very rich in dark matter

Expected to be free from other gamma ray sources, and therefore a potential signal is more easily interpreted compared to the Galactic center

Dark Matter Substructures20Slide21

Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies

Dark matter particle mass

Annihilation cross section

Ruled out

AllowedThe limits probe a dark matter explanation of the Galactic center excessSearch for a signal in 25 dwarf spheroidal galaxies. No significant emission is found

21Fermi LAT Collaboration, arXiv 1503.02641Slide22

Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies

Fermi LAT Collaboration,

arXiv

1503.02641

The limits probe a dark matter explanation of the Galactic center excessDark matter particle massAnnihilation cross sectionDark matter interpretation of Galactic center excess

Search for a signal in 25 dwarf spheroidal galaxies. No significant emission is found

22Slide23

Summary/Outlook

Evidence for dark matter is overwhelmingMany experiments have been relentlessly searching for dark matter particle candidates

Gamma rays have been able to test and rule out many possibilitiesAn intriguing excess originating from the Galactic center has been found; however, more work and improved understanding of the gamma-ray sky are necessary to determine its nature, dark matter or otherwise

Thank you!

23Slide24

Will Dawson

Lawrence Livermore National Lab

LLNL-PRES-

739383

This work was performed under the auspices of the

U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLCSlide25

Galaxy ClusterMass ~ 1015 Solar Masses

Abell 1689

NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL/LAM), P. Natarajan (Yale) and J-P. Kneib (LAM)

25Slide26

Most people are familiar with

Credit: NASA CXC26Slide27

Astronomer’sPeriodic Table

Credit: NASA CXC27Slide28

A new component to clusters

28Slide29

Accelerating electronsemit photons

29Slide30

Chandra X-ray Map of the Cluster Plasma

Abell 1689

X-ray: NASA/CXC/MIT/E.-H Peng et al; Optical: NASA/STScI

30Slide31

Far more of the mass is in the X-ray emitting intracluster plasma

31Slide32

Cosmologist’sPeriodic Table

DarkMatter

32Slide33

Gravitational lensingbest tool for studying dark matter

Zwicky (1937)

33Slide34

Mass warps space-time andalters the path of light

34Slide35

Gravitational lensingdistorts galaxy images

35Slide36

36Slide37

37Slide38

38Slide39

39Slide40

Gravitational lensing of clustersnot observed until 1990

Tony Tyson40Slide41

Weighing clusters with weak gravitational lensing

Tyson et al. (1990)Abell

168941Slide42

The first gravitational lensingmass map

Tyson et al. (1990)Abell

168942Slide43

Thanks to Hubble a lot has improved in past 20 years

Abell 1689

NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL/LAM), P. Natarajan (Yale) and J-P. Kneib (LAM)

43Slide44

Much higher resolutionmass maps

Abell 1689

NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL/LAM), P. Natarajan (Yale) and J-P. Kneib (LAM)

44Slide45

Abell

1689X-ray: NASA/CXC/MIT/E.-H Peng et al; Optical: NASA/STScI

Abell

1689X-ray PlasmaDark Matter

NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL/LAM), P. Natarajan (Yale) and J-P. Kneib (LAM)45For some clusters the X-ray plasma and dark matter distributed similarly Slide46

Merging galaxy clusters are an exception

X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/M.Markevitch et al.; Optical: NASA/STScI; Magellan/

U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.; Lensing Map: NASA/STScI; ESO WFI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.

Bullet Cluster46Slide47

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesSN

47Slide48

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesSN

Gravitational Attraction

48Slide49

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesSN

49Slide50

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesSN

50Slide51

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesN+S51Slide52

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxies

N

S

Momentum

Momentum

52Slide53

Merger Scenario

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxies

NS

C

53Slide54

Musket Ball Cluster54Slide55

Musket Ball Cluster

Galaxy Density

Contourszphot

= 0.53±0.1Dawson et al. (2012a)

55Slide56

Weak Gravitational Lensing

Mass Map

HSTDawson et al. (2012a)

Mass Mapwith

Galaxy Density Contours (white)56Slide57

X-ray

Gas Map

57Slide58

Dissociative Merger

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxies

N

S

C

58Slide59

4 ways to constrain

sDM with dissociative mergers

Key

Dark Matter

GasDark Matter+ GasGalaxies

Gas and dark matter offset

 

 

59Slide60

Significant DM-Gas Offsetenables sDM constraint

 

Weak lensing peaks to X-ray peak offset:

Following work of Markevitch et al. 2004

 

Mass MapwithGalaxy Density Contours (white)andX-ray contours (red)

60Slide61

4 ways to constrain sDM with dissociative mergers

Key

Dark Matter

Gas

Dark Matter+ GasGalaxiesGas and dark matter offsetSlowing of the subclustersM/L ratio of subclustersGalaxies and dark matter offset

 

 

61Slide62

4.5

2.5

0.5

-

1.5-3.56.5Surface Mass Density S/NThe Musket Ball mass & galaxy maps generally agree, but…Surface mass density S/N mapGalaxy density(white contours)Centroid errors;68%, 95% Confidence (black contours)62Slide63

4.5

2.5

0.5

-

1.5-3.56.5Surface Mass Density S/NThe Musket Ball shows an offset between galaxies and WL

19”Weak Lensing CentroidGalaxy Centroid

63Slide64

We are improving the dark matter constraint by studying more systems

Galactic light

Total mass

X-raysRadio waves

Golovich+ 2017Benson+ 201764Slide65

Dark Matter Activities

65

Carolyn

SlivinskiSlide66

66

Jelly

Bean

Universe Paper

Plate Activity Wine Glass demonstrationACTIVITIESSlide67

67

Energy Distribution of the Universe

Based on

http://

chandra.harvard.edu/resources/flash/univ_pie.htmlSlide68

68

Paper Plate Activity – Find the Hidden Mass

Use a screwdriver to poke a hole in the center of 2 paper plates, then separate the plates. Arrange 6 quarters symmetrically across the center line of one paper plate.

Add a 7

th quarter in a random location, then tape or glue the second paper plate on top.Use the screwdriver to spin the plate. One side should tilt down. Try to find a location for an 8th quarter on the top plate which will balance the spinning plate (tape it down so it’s firmly attached!). Then measure and mark a location that is located opposite from that 8th quarter. The 7th quarter should be underneath that mark! Check your results by holding the plates up to a strong light.This activity is based on materials created by Sonoma State University.Slide69

69

“Gravitational lensing” – using an image

Abell 370Slide70

70

Credit: Phil Marshall

“Gravitational lensing”

– using a light sourceSlide71

71

Wineglass stem

Black Hole

massMagnificationDistortion

MagnificationDistortionSlide72

ASTC partnership

A Professional Development opportunity –

How to Use NASA Resources;

future funding resources available

Seven webinars to be held in 2018, with these goals:Increase knowledge of NASA Astrophysics-related conceptsImprove familiarity of NASA Astrophysics resources and ways to use themUtilize real NASA dataInteract with NASA Subject Matter Experts

To participate in this webinar series, contact Wendy Hancock at whancock@astc.org or Tim Rhue at trhue@stsci.edu by December 31, 2017As a follow-on to this webinar series, there will be an opportunity to apply for $2,500 mini-fund

resources to be competitively

awarded

to

selected institutions, in order to implement

or facilitate programming, produce exhibits, etc., using Universe of Learning

resources.

58Slide73

To ensure we meet the needs of the education community (you!), NASA’s UoL is committed

to

performing regular evaluations, to determine the effectiveness of Professional Learning opportunities like the Science Briefings.

If you prefer not to participate in the evaluation process, you can opt out by contacting

Kay Ferrari <kay.a.ferrari@jpl.nasa.gov>.This product is based upon work supported by NASA under award number NNX16AC65A to the Space Telescope Science Institute, working in partnership with Caltech/IPAC, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, and Sonoma State University.

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.73