NOS PROPERT TA APPEA BOARD PTABx001b1x001b - PDF document

1 ,//,NO,S PROPERT< TA; APPEA/ BOARD PTAB/
,//,NO,S PROPERT< TA; APPEA/ BOARD PTAB/-*/-1 APPE//ANT: :odo //C DOC.ET NO.: 15-33.001-R-1 PARCE/ NO.: 14-33-205-00-0000 Review is warranted. TKe corrTOTA/: TKe appeOOant timeO\ fiOed tKe appeaO from a decision of tKe CooN Count\ Board of Review pursuant to section 16-160 of tKe Propert\ Ta[ Code 35 ,/CS 200/16-160 cKaOOenJinJ tKe TKe subMect propert\ consists of a two-stor\ masonr\ muOti-famiO\ Kome witK 24 square feet dweOOinJ is appro[imat TKe ta[pa\er contends assessment inequit\ as tKe basis of tKe appeaO. :Ken unequaO treatment in tKe assessment process is tKe basis of tKe appeaO tKe inequit\ of tKe assessments must be proved b\ cOear and convincinJ evidence. 6 ,OO.Admin.Code §110.63e. Proof of unequaO treatment in tKe as

2 sessment process sKouOd consist of docum
sessment process sKouOd consist of documentation of tKe assessments for tKe assessment \ear in question of not Oess tKan tKree comparabOe properties sKowinJ tKe simiOarit\ pro[imit\ and OacN of distinJuisKinJ cKaracteristics of tKe assessment comparabOes to tKe subMect propert\. 6 ,OO.Admin.Code §110.65b. TKe Board finds tKe appeOOant did not meet tKis Ke subMect s assessment is TKe Board finds tKe best evidence of assessment equit\ to be tKe appeOOant’s comparabOe #1 as weOO as tKe board of review’s comparabOes #2 #3 and #4 as tKe\ are most simiOar to tKe subMect propert\ in si]e Oocation and amenities. TKese comparabOes Kad improvement assessments tKat ranJed from $1.0 to $25.2 per square foot of OivinJ area. TKe subMect s improvement assessment of $23.1 per squ

3 are foot of OivinJ area faOOs witKin tKe
are foot of OivinJ area faOOs witKin tKe ranJe estabOisKed b\ tKe best comparabOes in tKis record. Based on tKis record tKe Board finds tKe appeOOant did not demonstrate witK cOear and convincinJ evidence tKat tKe subMect s improvement was inequitabO\ subMect s assessment is not Mus 3 of 5 Ta[ Code provides in part: TKis is a finaO administrative decision of tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board wKicK is subMect to review in tKe Circuit Court or AppeOOate Court under tKe provisions of tKe Administrative Review /aw 35 ,/CS 5/3-101 et seq. and section 16-15 of tKe Propert\ Ta[ Code. Pursuant to Section 110.50d of tKe ruOes of tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board 6 ,OO.Admin.Code §110.50d tKe proceedinJ before tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board is terminated wKen tKe decision is rendered. TKe Propert\ Ta[

4 AppeaO Board does not require an motio
AppeaO Board does not require an motion or request for reconsideration. CKairman Member Member Member Member D,SSENT,N*: C E R T , F , C A T , O N As COerN of tKe ,OOinois Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board and tKe Neeper of tKe Records tKereof , do Kereb\ certif\ tKat tKe foreJoinJ is a true fuOO and compOete FinaO Administrative Decision of tKe e entitOed appeaO now of record in tKis said office. COerN of tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board ",f tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board renders a decision OowerinJ tKe assessment of a particuOar parceO after tKe deadOine for fiOinJ compOaints witK tKe Board of Review or after adMournment of tKe session of tKe Board of Review at wKicK assessments for tKe subsequent \ear or \ears of tKe same JeneraO assessment period as provided in Sections -125 tKrouJK -225 are beinJ considered

5 tKe ta[pa\er ma\ witKin 30 da\s
tKe ta[pa\er ma\ witKin 30 da\s after tKe date of written notice of tKe Propert\ Ta[ AppeaO Board’s decision appeaO tKe assessment for sucK subsequent \ear or \ears directO\ to tKe ,n order to compO\ witK tKe above provision { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "contentUrl": "https://www.docslides.com/slides/869790/NANtKe_ta_pa_er_ma___x000f__witKin_30_da_s_", "description": "tKe_ta_pa_er_ma___x000f__witKin_30_da_s_after_tKe_date_of_written_notice_of_tKe_Propert__Ta__AppeaO_Board___s_decision__", "width": "1275" }