/
VAR Models VAR Models

VAR Models - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
375 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-08

VAR Models - PPT Presentation

Yankun Wang Cornell University Oct 2009 What is VAR A var p model is with and Originally proposed by Sims 1980 Efficient way of summarizing information contained in the data ID: 276565

restrictions var estimates rate var restrictions rate estimates shocks run output sign criterion equation shock capital variables structural long

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "VAR Models" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

VAR Models

Yankun

Wang, Cornell University, Oct 2009Slide2

What is VAR?

A

var

(p) model is: with andOriginally proposed by Sims (1980)Efficient way of summarizing information contained in the dataUseful for forecastingConduct economically interesting analysis under meaningful identification restrictionsSlide3

Outline:

Reduced form VAR

Wold

TheoremSpecificationEstimationPresentation of ResultsStructural VAR

IdentificationPotential extension to “Evaluation of Currency Regimes: the Unique Role of Sudden Stops”by

Assaf Razin and Yona RubinsteinSlide4

The Wold

Theorem

Wold

Theorem: Every stationary process can be written as the sum of two components: a deterministic part and an MA(∞) part.As a result:

Every stationary process can be written as a VAR process of infinite order. Potential Problem:

In reality, we can only deal with finite order. Slide5

Specification

What is the appropriate lag length in the VAR?

Three criterions:

Akaike information criterion (AIC)Schwarz criterion (SIC)Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQC)

( all functions of m, T, and variance-covariance matrix)In practice: Fix an upper bound of lag length q (12), choose the q which minimizes one of the information criterionAIC is inconsistent

For T>20, SIC and HQC will always choose smaller models than AICSlide6

Estimation

Multivariate GLS estimates are the same as equation by equation OLS estimates.

For unrestricted VAR models: ML estimates and equation by equation OLS estimates coincide.

When a VAR is estimated under some restrictions, ML estimates are different from OLS estimates; ML estimates are consistent and efficient if the restrictions are true. Slide7

Presentation of Results

It is rare to report estimated VAR coefficients.

Instead:

Impulse responsesForecast error variance decomposition: assess the relative contribution of different shocks to fluctuations in varablesHistorical Decomposition: given the path of one specific shock, how will the variables evolve?Slide8

Structural VARs

Suppose we have estimated the following reduced form VAR:

with .

! : u is just reduced form residuals, no economic meaning.Solution: Assume , where is the vector of fundamental shocks, then naturally:Lack m(m-1)/2 restrictions to exactly identify D. Slide9

Short-Run Timing Restrictions

Example: Suppose m=3: output, inflation and interest rate:

Criticism: hard to justify from theoretical foundations

In practice: try to switch the ordering the variablesSlide10

Long-run Impact Restrictions

Classical example: Blanchard and

Quah

( 1989)Suppose two variable system: output growth and unemploymentTotal long run impact matrix: Assume: accumulated long-run effect of demand shocks on is zero, Slide11

Sign Restrictions

Restricting the sign (and/or shape) of structural responses.

Faust (1998), Canova and De

Nicolo (2002) and Uhlig(2005)Informally used in research ( e.g. monetary shocks must generate a liquidity effect): this approach makes it explicitMore justifiable by theoretical model: DSGEs seldom deliver all zero restrictions, but lots of sign restrictions usableSlide12

Example:

Uhlig

(2005)

Contractionary Policy: Responses of prices and nonborrowed reserves are not positive and those of the federal funds rate are not negativeSlide13

Razin and Rubinstein:

Output

Growth Rate

Prob

of Sudden Stop/Currency

Crisis

Flexible Exchange Rate Regime

Capital Account Liberalization

-

-

-

+

+Slide14

Could we extend this framework to a dynamic analysis?

What are the variables to include?

[growth rate of output;

change/level of exchange rate regime; change/level of capital account liberalization; probability of crisis]What are the shocks we want to identify? One choice: shocks interpreted according to variablesSlide15

How to Identify the Structural Shocks

?

Shock run restriction?

Long run restriction?Sign restriction?Available convention: Exchange rate shock from flexible to peg should increase crisis probability; Capital Account Liberalization shock from less to more free capital flow should increase crisis probability What are their effects on output?

Slide16
Slide17
Slide18
Slide19
Slide20
Slide21
Slide22