/
Examining Past Isolates of Examining Past Isolates of

Examining Past Isolates of - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
347 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-22

Examining Past Isolates of - PPT Presentation

Salmonella Enteritidis for Genetic Similarity Using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis MLVA Andrew Chang Public Health Internship Program School of Biological Sciences University of Texas at Austin ID: 675306

outbreak isolates salmonella enteritidis isolates outbreak enteritidis salmonella mlva egg related genetic pfge number dna 224 similarity repeat code health locus tdshs

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Examining Past Isolates of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Examining Past Isolates of Salmonella Enteritidis for Genetic Similarity Using Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA)

Andrew ChangPublic Health Internship ProgramSchool of Biological SciencesUniversity of Texas at Austin

Mentors: Aaron Benfield, Ph.D and Tori A. PonsonMolecular Biology DepartmentTexas Department of State Health ServicesSlide2

INTRODUCTIONSlide3

SalmonellaFamily: Enterobacteriaceae

Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacilli, facultative anaerobesNon-spore formingPeritrichous flagella ChemoorganotrophsSlide4

Species and Subspecies

SpeciesS. bongori S. entericaSubspecies of S. enterica

S. enterica (I)S. salamae (II)S. arizonae (IIIa

)

S.

diarizonae

(

IIIb

)

S. houtenae (IV)S. indica (VI)Over 2300 serotypes of Salmonella Slide5

Gastroenteritis (Salmonellosis)

SymptomsGI tract inflammation, bloody diarrhea, fever, vomiting, abdominal cramps 12-72 hours after infection, severe dehydrationIllness lasts 4-7 daysPathogenesisReaches GI tract, enters enterocytes and M-cells, replicates in the lamina propria

Can disseminates via the lymphatic system  septicemia Slide6

Modes of Transmission Fecal-oral route

Consumption of contaminated foodsShell eggs, peanut butter, tomatoes, spinach, alfalfa sproutsExposure to animalChicken, reptiles, amphibians, cats, dogsSlide7

Modes of TransmissionSlide8

Bioterrorism1984 use of Salmonella Typhimurium on local restaurants in Oregon

Rajneeshee cult group attempt to incapacitate voters in upcoming electionOver 750 people infectedSlide9

Salmonella Foodborne Illnesses2

nd most common food borne illness Estimated > 1 million cases each yearOnly 40,000 reported due to milder symptomsEach year20,000 cases result in hospitalization350-500 deathsSlide10

2010Shell eggs-

S. Enteritidis2009Peanut butter- S. Typhimurium2008Tomatoes, jalapeno and serrano peppers- S.

Saintpaul2007Pot pies- Salmonella 4,[5], 12:i-:

Food Related Outbreaks Slide11

2010 Salmonella Egg Outbreak

Number of 

Salmonella

 

Enteritidis

Cases Matching PFGE Pattern JEGX01.0004 Reported to

PulseNet

, United States, 2010Slide12

Outbreak Source Epidemiological investigations

Wright County Egg Hillandale FarmS. Enteritidis isolated from: egg water wash, chicken feed, manure, and walkwaysSlide13

Outbreak Aftermath Voluntary recall of ~500 million eggs

May-November: 3,578 illnesses reported1,639 illnesses expected based on past 5 year averagesEstimated 1,939 illnesses associated with outbreakSlide14

Outbreak Impact in Texas “Here’s the issue: in terms of Salmonella, it’s multiplied fourfold in Texas – a large number of increases” – Zachary Thompson Dallas County Health and Human Services Director

More than 150 S. Enteritidis infections in over 40 different countiesSlide15

TDSHS Molecular Biology Dept. Response

Pure isolates received

Isolates processed

PFGE performed

PFGE pattern assigned

Clusters reported to epidemiologistsSlide16

Molecular Subtyping of Outbreak StrainsTwo common techniques

Pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)Multiple locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)Slide17

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)Slide18

Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat

Analysis (MLVA)Locus 1`Strain A: VNTR 4x3atgggtaatccgtcgACgCACgC

ACgCgccaatcgatacgatStrain B: VNTR 4x5atgggtaatccgtcgACgCACgCACgCACgC

ACgC

gccaatcgatacgat

Trees, Eija. PulseNet MLVA protocols – General overviewSlide19

PFGE vs MLVA

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Multiple Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis

Large fragments (2-10 Mb) can be resolved

Current CDC “gold standard” for molecular subtyping

Limitations: requires precise standardization, discriminatory power lacking against highly clonal organisms

Differentiates based on repeat sequences in the DNA –superior discriminatory power

Not widely used

Limitations: requires knowledge of organism DNA sequence; results not always reproducible between labs using difference DNA sequencersSlide20

PurposeThe purpose of this project was two-fold:

to analyze patient demographics and isolate characteristics to analyze genetic similarity of past Salmonella Enteritidis isolates sent to TDSHS from 12/09 – 12/10 using multiple locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)Slide21

METHODSSlide22

Overview of Methods

Cultured

Salmonella

Enteritidis isolates

Extracted DNA from isolates

Amplified purified DNA via multiplex-PCR

Performed MLVA on amplified DNA

Raw data imported into BioNumerics software

Calculated dendogram showing genetic similarities Slide23

Preparation of IsolatesSamples kept in freezer @ -70O

CSamples grown on BHI platesInoculated into BHI brothIncubated @ 37OCSlide24

Extraction MethodsManual

Blood & Tissue Kit by QiagenAutomatedMagNA Pure Compact DNA Isolation Kits by RocheSlide25

Multiplex-PCR AmplificationSlide26

MLVALoaded dilute amplified DNA product onto 96-well plates

Sequenced samples using the Beckman Coulter CEQ 8000 sequencerExamined fragment sizesSlide27

DataSlide28

Data Processing Imported peak file into

BioNumerics SEMLVA databaseEstablished phylogenetic relationships between isolates based on VNTR copy numbers Slide29

RESULTSSlide30

Patient DemographicsSlide31

Patient Gender Distribution

N=224Slide32

Age Distribution of PatientsSlide33

Isolate InformationSlide34

Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates

224

Isolates

51

Egg-outbreak related

173

Egg-outbreak

unrelated

3

NC-outbreak relatedSlide35

Source of Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates Sent to TDSHS, 12/09-12/10Slide36

Distribution of Specimens by County, 12/09-12/10

Counties with < 4 isolatessentCounties with > 4 isolates sentSlide37

Top 10 Counties Submitting > 4 Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates to TDSHS, 12/09- 12/10

CountyNo. (%) of specimens submittedDallas81 (42%) Travis52 (27%)

Bexar12 (6%)Bell11 (5.7%)Tarrant10 (5%)Lubbock9 (4.7%)

Williamson

6 (3.1%)

Collin

4 (2%)

Nueces

4 (2%)

Nacogdoches

4 (2%)Total193 (100%)Slide38

Distribution of Isolates

N=224

Number of 

Salmonella

 

Enteritidis

Cases Matching PFGE Pattern JEGX01.0004 Reported to

PulseNet

, United States, 2010

Isolation Dates of

Salmonella

Enteritidis

Isolates Sent to TDSHS 12/09-12/10Slide39

PFGE and MLVA ResultsSlide40

Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates

224

Isolates

51

Egg-outbreak related

173

Egg-outbreak

unrelated

3

NC-outbreak relatedSlide41

Genetic Similarity Between S. Enteritidis Isolates with Outbreak Code 1006TXJEG-1 Using PFGESlide42

Genetic Similarity Between S. Enteritidis Isolates with Outbreak Code 1006TXJEG-1 Using MLVASlide43

Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates

224

Isolates

51

Egg-outbreak related

173

Egg-outbreak

unrelated

3

NC-outbreak relatedSlide44

Genetic Similarity Between S. Enteritidis Isolates with Outbreak Code 1005NCJEG-1c Using MLVASlide45

Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates

224

Isolates

51

Egg-outbreak related

173

Egg-outbreak

unrelated

3

NC-outbreak relatedSlide46

Genetic Similarity Between S. Enteritidis Isolates with Outbreak Code 1005NCJEG-1c and Non-outbreak Associated Isolates Using MLVASlide47

Salmonella Enteritidis Isolates

224

Isolates

51

Egg-outbreak related

173

Egg-outbreak

unrelated

3

NC-outbreak relatedSlide48

Genetic Similarity Between

S. Enteritidis Isolates with Outbreak Code 1005NCJEG-1c and Outbreak Code 1006TXJEG-1Slide49

CONCLUSIONSSlide50

Conclusions: Patient DemographicsPatient gender

No gender preferencePatient age groups0-20 = 33%0-10 = 18% 21-50 = 33%51-70+ = 28%Slide51

Conclusions: Isolate InformationCounties

3 counties in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area- 49%2 counties in the Austin area- 30%Isolation date45% isolated in June; corresponded with peak number of cases reported nationally Isolate sourceStool samples – 91%Slide52

Conclusions: MLVA ResultsMLVA-

greater power of differentiation than PFGEIsolates associated with same outbreakGenetically identical by PFGEFurther differentiated by MLVA into 3 distinct clustersMLVA useful to demonstrate genetic relatedness of isolates associated with different outbreaks in NC and TXSlide53

LimitationsSubjectivity of MLVA

Replication of dataTimeCostly reagents/equipmentSlide54

Future Studies

Furthur analyze isolates not assigned outbreak codeWere they part of 2010 egg outbreak in TX?Compare MLVA results with other known MLVA results egg outbreak-related isolatesSlide55

AcknowledgementsTDSHS

Tori PonsonAaron Benfield, Ph. DUT AustinLeanne Field, Ph. DDiane Kneeland, Ph. DNancy Elder, MLS

THANK YOU!Slide56

THANK YOU!Funding generously provided by an Association of Schools for Public Health/Association of Public Health Laboratories “Pathways to Public Health Careers and Internships Grant” From The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention