/
Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain

Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2019-06-22

Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain - PPT Presentation

Matthew Somma PT DPT MTC CSCS October 14 2017 Todays Highlights Understand the Significance of Low Back Pain Provide a Framework for Successfully Examining a Patient with Low Back Pain Ruling out Red Flags Consider Yellow Flags ID: 759732

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Examination Strategies for Low Back Pain

Matthew Somma, PT, DPT, MTC, CSCS

October 14, 2017

Slide2

Today’s Highlights

Understand the Significance of Low Back Pain

Provide a Framework for Successfully Examining a Patient with Low Back Pain

Ruling out Red Flags, Consider Yellow Flags

Determine a Working Diagnosis for the Patient

Slide3

Opioid Epidemic

“Americans, constituting only 4.6% of the world’s population, have been consuming 80% of the global opioid supply, and 99% of the global hydrocodone supply”

Manchikanti

L. Therapeutic Use, Abuse, and Nonmedical Use of Opioids: A Ten Year Perspective.

Pain Physician

. 2010; 13: 401-435.

Slide4

Low Back Pain

1 year Incidence of first ever episode of back pain is between 6.3% and 15.4%Recurrence within 1 year is between 24% and 80%Incidence of low back pain is highest in its third decade of life

Hoy D et al. The epidemiology of low back pain.

Best

Pract

Res

Clin

Rheumatol

. 2010 Dec; 24(6): 769-781

Slide5

Low Back Pain

Point Prevalence is 11.9% and 1-month prevalence at 23.2%Direct cost of low back pain is between $12 billion - $90 billionOn average 17% of this is related to physical therapy servicesIndirect cost lof low back pain is between $7 billion - $28 billion

Hoy D et al. A systematic review of global prevalence in low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; Jun 64(6):2028-2037

Dagenais

S et al. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and Internationally.

Spine

. 2008;8(1):8-20

.

Slide6

Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Slide7

Non-Specific Low Back Pain

“Patients with persistent low back pain often have misconceptions about what is going on, and may have given all sorts of speculative explanations for their symptoms resulting in anxiety and confusion”

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide8

Non-Specific Low Back Pain

May reduce the patient’s confusionReassurance that the provider understands the patient’s conditionVisualizing the potential benefit of treatment directed at painful tissue

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide9

Imaging Studies

False positive findings on imaging studies 32% of “asymptomatic subjects” had abnormal lumbar spinesOnly 47% subjects who were experiencing low back pain had abnormal imaging

Savage RA et al. The Relationship Between MRI appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males.

Eur

Spine J

. 1997;6:106-114

Slide10

Imaging Studies

Slide11

Slide12

Slide13

Slide14

Examination Strategies

Slide15

Goal

Providing a working diagnosis, through better examination strategies, and reducing imaging will likely improve patient outcomes, reduce cost of care, provide treating providers better opportunity for success with the patient, ultimately leading to better patient satisfaction

Slide16

Biopsychosocial Model

Puentedura

EJ, Louw A. A neuroscience approach to managing athletes with low back pain .

Phys

Ther

in Sport

. 2012: 1-11

Slide17

Terminology

Specificity: If a test has a high specificity and is positive, you can be fairly certain they have the condition.

Sensitivity: If a test is highly sensitive and it is negative, you can be fairly certain they do not have the condition.

Likelihood Ratio: the greater the number the greater chance they have the condition. Generally over 2.0 can be considered

Slide18

Clinical Red Flag Examination

The prevalence of findings a medical emergency in those with acute low back pain is 0.9%.  The majority of findings are spinal fracture.  9% of patients not tested80% of patient with low back pain present with a red flag

Henschke

N et al. Prevalence and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain.  

Arthritis and Rheumatism

.  2009;60(10):3072-3080.

Slide19

Spinal Cancer

0.66% of the populationIf you are considering spinal cancer in your patient, consider the following variables:Previous history of cancer has a 0.98 specificityUnexplained weight loss has a 0.94 specificityFailure to improve after one month of therapy has a 0.90 specificityIf the patient is greater than 50 years of age, had a history of cancer, present with unexplained weight loss or failure of conservative therapy, then there is a 1.00 sensitivity

Deyo

RA, Diehl AK. Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies.  

J Gen Intern Med

.  1988;3(3):230-238.

Slide20

Spinal Infection

The prevalence of infection is extremely rare. 0.01%Most findings will come from the subjective history of the patient.Symptoms are more consistent with fever, chills, and night sweats.  The pain is non-mechanical in nature and does not usually improve in the recumbent position.

Verhagen

AP et al. Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines.  

Eur

Spine J

.  2016;25:2788-2802.

Slide21

Spinal Fracture

The prevalence of spinal fracture is 0.7% in acute low back painA diagnostic recommendation has been developed to aide in clinical decision making for spinal fracture:  If a patient is a female, greater than 70 years of age, who reports minor or significant trauma, and report prolonged corticosteroid use, there is a high incidence of fracture.  If three of the four tests are positive, the likelihood of a fracture can increase by 52%.

Henschke

N et al. Prevalence and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain.  

Arthritis and Rheumatism

.  2009;60(10):3072-3080.

Slide22

Cauda Equina Syndrome

Rare, occurs 0.1% of the timeThe etiology of cauda equina syndrome often includes lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and tumorIf a patient presents with both bowel or bladder dysfunction and saddle anesthesia, the specificity is 0.92 and the likelihood ratio is 3.46

Henschke N et al. Prevalence and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain.  Arthritis and Rheumatism.  2009;60(10):3072-3080.

Raison NTJ et al. The reliability of red flags in spinal cord compression.  

Arch Trauma Res

.  2014;3(1):e17850.

Slide23

Differential Diagnosis

Slide24

Facet Mediated Pain

Pain that is just off center of the spine. Referred pain down the thigh, the groin or into the buttocks. Does not travel distal to the knee. Pain with movement after prolonged posturing.Morning stiffness often exists. Patients will have a tendency to function in extension for general posturing and activities of daily living.

Allegri

et al. Mechanisms of lower back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy [version 2; referees: 3 approved] F1000 Research 2016, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev): 1530.

Slide25

Facet Mediated Pain

Binder DS et al. The provocative lumbar facet joint.

Curr

Rev Musculoskeletal Med

. 2009;2:15-24

Slide26

Binder DS et al. The provocative lumbar facet joint.

Curr

Rev Musculoskeletal Med

. 2009;2:15-24

Slide27

Facet Mediated Pain

Findings to Rule in Facet Dysfunction: Extension Rotation TestFindings to Rule out Facet Dysfunction: centralization of symptoms, no relief with recumbencyLikelihood Ratio is 1.28

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide28

Spondylolisthesis

Google Search: spondylolisthesis

Slide29

Spondylolisthesis

Findings to Rule in a Spondylolisthesis:2 of the following variables – intervertebral slip by inspection or palpation, and segmental hypermobilitySpecificity: 0.81 – 0.99Likelihood Ratio: 2.4 – 12.8

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide30

Spinal Stenosis

Acquired via degenerative changes to facet, disc, and hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum or posterior longitudinal ligamentDiagnostic Criterion: 10-12mm in sagittal plan diameter on radiographs.Can have sensory or motor findings associated with extension based postures

1. Cook C, Brown C, Michael K, Isaacs R, Howes C, Richardson W, Roman M,

Hegedus

E.

The clinical value of a cluster of patient history and observational findings as a diagnostic support tool for lumbar spine stenosis

.

Physiother

Res Int

. 2011; 16(3): 170-8.

Slide31

Spinal Stenosis

Google Search: Spinal Stenosis

Slide32

Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Prediction Rule: 1. Bilateral symptoms 2. Leg pain > back pain 3. Pain during walking/standing 4. Pain relief upon sitting 5. > 48 years old

1. Cook C, Brown C, Michael K, Isaacs R, Howes C, Richardson W, Roman M,

Hegedus

E.

The clinical value of a cluster of patient history and observational findings as a diagnostic support tool for lumbar spine stenosis

.

Physiother

Res Int

. 2011; 16(3): 170-8.

Slide33

Spinal Stenosis

Variables

Sensitivity

Specificity

+LR

-LR

+ Post-test

Prob

1

0.96

0.20

1.20

0.19

44.0%

2

0.68

0.62

1.80

0.51

55.0%

3

0.29

0.88

2.50

0.80

63.0%

4

0.06

0.98

4.60

0.95

76.0%

5

0.01

1.00

0.99

99.0%

Slide34

Discogenic Pain

Google Search: Discogenic back pain

Slide35

Discogenic Pain

Insidious onset of symptoms (ie repetitive strain) or after an episode of bending, lifting or twisting with an audible “pop”. Pain is often described as central low back that may radiate into the glute. The pain reduces with extension, standing or lying supine. Pain is described as a dull ache that worsens with sitting, driving, flexion, bending, or twisting. Coughing and the Valsalva maneuver can increase or exacerbate symptoms. The pain generally worsens by the end of the day.

Simon J et al. Discogenic Low Back Pain.

Phys Med

Rehabil

Clin

N Am.

2014; 25(2):305-317.

Slide36

Discogenic Pain

Findings to Rule in Intervertebral Disc Dysfunction: Centralization Likelihood Ratio 2.1

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide37

Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy

Google Search: Disc Herniation

Slide38

Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy

Findings to Rule in Nerve Root InvolvementPositive SLR for referred leg pain3 out of the 4 following findings: dermatomal pain in concordance with nerve root, corresponding sensory deficits, reflex and motor weaknessCrossed Straight Leg Raise TestSpecificity: .83-.94Likelihood Ratio: 2.2 – 5.0

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide39

SI Joint Dysfunction

SI Distraction Test

SI Compression Test

Thigh Thrust Test

Gaenslen’s

Test (right and left)

Sacral Thrust Test

Slide40

SI Joint Dysfunction

Laslett

M. Evidence-Based Diagnosis and Treatment of the Painful Sacroiliac Joint.

J Man Manip

.  2008; 16(3): 142-152.

Slide41

SI Joint Dysfunction

Laslett

M. Evidence-Based Diagnosis and Treatment of the Painful Sacroiliac Joint.

J Man Manip

.  2008; 16(3): 142-152.

Slide42

SI Joint Dysfunction

Likelihood Ratio: 4.00  It was also suggested that if all 6 tests were negative, then SI joint pathology may be ruled out

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide43

Myofascial Pain

No clinical diagnostic rule currently presentSuggest a composite of 4 minimum criteria:Presence of palpable taut band within skeletal musclePresence of hypersensitive spot within taut muscle with an/or without distinct referred painPatient recognition of referred pain

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide44

Central Sensitization

Increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to their normal of subthreshold afferent inputCriterion 1: pain disproportionate to extent of injuryCriterion 2: bilateral pain, pain varying in location unrelated to the source of nociception, widespread pain, allodyniaCriterion 3: hypersensitivity of senses unrelated to the muscular system

Peterson T et al. Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostics rules based on systematic reviews.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

. 2017; 18: 188-211.

Slide45

Questions?

Matthew Somma, PT, DPT, MTC, CSCSmsomma@orthoassociates.com

October 14, 2017