Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo

Published  . 0 views
↓ Download
Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo
1 / 1
Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 1 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 2 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 3 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 4 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 5 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 6 of 7 Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo - slide 7 of 7
Description: Hag-Seed The death of the author Team Gonzalo leaves that to your imagination The death of the author In 1967, literary critic Roland Barthes wrote an essay announcing the death of the author in literature. Barthes argued that the

Related Topics

Download Presentation

"Hag-Seed The death of the author “Team Gonzalo" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

slide1. Hag-Seed The death of the author

“Team Gonzalo leaves that to
your imagination”<br>
slide2. The death of the author In 1967, literary critic Roland Barthes wrote an essay announcing the ‘death of the author’ in literature.

Barthes argued that the author’s personal context and creative intentions are distinct from her or his literary work—that writing and creator are unrelated.

Popular among postmodern thinkers

Also associated with modernist thinking

Related to how we, as readers, interpret meaning<br>
slide3. The Death of the Author Continued. Barthes describes “literature as a space "where all identity is lost, beginning with the very identity of the body that writes". The death of the author marks the birth of literature, defined, precisely, as "the invention of this voice, to which we cannot assign a specific origin”. Indeed, the "modern writer" – or "scriptor" as Barthes calls him – can only mimic "a gesture forever anterior, never original" by recombining what has already been written. Whereas the "Author-God" maintained with his work "the same relation of antecedence a father maintains with his child," the scriptor "is born simultaneously with his text": for him, "there is no other time than that of the utterance, and every text is eternally written here and now". As Barthes puts it, apropos of Mallarmé, "it is language which speaks, not the author" – or the scriptor for that matter. Works of fiction are palimpsests and as such are devoid of any "single 'theological' meaning (the 'message' of the Author-God)". The key to a text is not to be found in its "origin" but in its "destination": "the birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the Author".”

- Source, Death of the Author: https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/jan/13/death-of-the-author<br>
slide4. “Team Gonzalo” In Ch. 44 of the play, a small team of inmates present to the rest of the cast and crew about how they think Gonzalo’s life plays out after the final events of the play
This in itself is typical of Atwood’s playful approach to ‘conversing’ with Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ in the novel<br>
slide5. “Team Gonzalo” continued “He chooses to go back to the island with a small group of other people as good as himself”
“…there he sets up a kingdom … where there will be…no wars, no crimes, and no prisons”
Felix: “And how does it go?”
Bent Pencil: “Team Gonzalo leaves that to your imagination”<br>
slide6. The key to a text is not to be found in its "origin" but in its "destination": "the birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the Author". - Barthes<br>
slide7. Consider how does the imagining of Gonzalo the character’s possible future, beyond the plot of the play, enact “the birth of the reader”?
Shakespeare as author, Atwood as author and reader, we the reader—who ‘lives’ and who ‘dies’ in this textual conversation?
how does this chapter reinforce and explore the theme of ‘the humanising power of the imagination’?
what does this chapter reflect about Atwood’s overall style, and the textual conversation in which she engages?<br>