as one of two core road connection between Austria and Czech Republic Milan Viturka Vilém Pařil Petr Halámek Faculty of Economics and Public Administration of Masaryks ID: 799130
Download The PPT/PDF document "Long run impacts assessment of planned R..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Long run impacts assessment of planned R52/A5 expressway as one of two core road connection between Austria and Czech Republic
Milan
Viturka
, Vilém Pařil, Petr Halámek
Faculty
of
Economics
and Public
Administration
of
Masaryk´s
University, Brno – Czech
Republic
8th
Geoffrey
J. D.
Hewings
Regional
Workshop „
Services
and
Regional
Growth
“,
organised
by WIFO
Wien
,
September
2015
Slide2Proposal of single method of evaluation of transport projects
-
example of highways (motorways and expressways)
Main objective
design of investment priorities by men of multi-criteria analysis of technical, economic, political, environmental and spatial aspects of planned projects.
Method – ranking of the projects within the criteria and consecutive aggregation of partial ranks:
The criterion of relevance
reflects the traffic intensity as basic factor which determinates the technical usefulness of construction
The criterion of usefulness
reflects the savings of time both passenger and freight traffic generated by the projects (relative value of savings time in comparison with the currently most rapid transport link)
The criterion of integration
reflects the strategic importance of the projects for internal (high-quality transport connections of the major cities) and external (high-quality transport connections with the
neighbouring
countries)
The criterion of stimulation
reflects the potential impacts of the projects on stimulation of regional quality of business environment (contribution to an increase of the value of roads and railways quality)
The sustainability criterion
reflects the potential impacts of the projects on
residental
(an increase in levels of noise and air pollution) and natural (disturbance of protected areas of nature conservation and water resources) environment.
Slide3Model scheme of investment preferences
Under the relatively stable conditions of developed countries, the relevant preferences can be chronologically interpreted using the following scheme
Slide4Core Road Network in Austria and the Czech Republic with Natura 2000 and Nationally Protected Areas
Slide5Criterion of purposefulness - Potential Time Savings
Version
- type
Maximum Speed
Theoretical
Speed
Theoretical
Travel
time (min.)Real Travel time (min.)Time Savings (min.)Time Savings (%)1st class907483,92103,99-16,99-19,53%Motorway12010956,9770,6016,4018,85%Highway13011952,1864,6622,3425,67%Current--70,2187,000,000,00%
Relevance criterion - Traffic Intensity
Section
Intensity
Section
in Brno
27 295
Section
Motorway
19 009
Section
1st
class
to
the
border
8 058
CZ -
average
15 087
AT -
average
25 137
Slide6Integration criterion
missing highway connection with Austria
which is considered as a major deficit
another factor is the low degree of urbanization on the route R52 / A5
The application of the gravity model
shows
Prague-Brno-
Wien
as 3rd most
important
supranational metropolitan axis in the Czech R.business environment quality (16 criterias)205 microregion MECspotential to stimulate regional development has the secondary importanceStimulation criterion
Slide7Sustainability criterion
Slide8Sustainability criterion
Impacts of R52-A5 on Nationally Protected Areas and Natura 2000
Cat
.
Category
description
Area (ha)
Weighted
impactATCZTotalTotal (%)ATCZTotalTotal (%)IUCN IVHabitat/Species Management Area0,00128,89128,8911,82%0,00127,81127,8112,99%IUCN VProtected Landscape/ Seascape0,45366,49366,9433,66%0,35315,85316,2032,13%SPASpecial Protection Area
0,00489,83489,83
44,94%
0,00
446,14
446,14
45,33%
SCI I
Sites of Community Importance I
0,00
104,43
104,439,58%0,0094,0394,039,55%Total impact0,451 089,641 090,09100,00%0,35983,82984,17100,00%
Impacts of R52-A5 on Population
Country
Area (km2)
Density in Urban Area
Population
Austria
10,61
2 046,91
21 728
Czech Republic
5,63
2 156,66
12 137
Total
16,24
-
33 865
Slide9ConclusionDrucker (1967): “Efficiency is doing things right, effectiveness is doing the right things”
effectiveness of the project R52 depends on the results of
(significantly
)
integration
criterion
connection
to the Austrian motorway network
r
elevance criterion, usefulness and sustainabilitycriterion of stimulation is not significant
Slide10Thank you for your attention