20 yr journey Oritetanga mo te mate pukupuku Māori Nina Scott Ngāpuhi Ngāti Whātua and Waikato FNZCPHM MPH MBChB n scottwaikatogmailcom Young and starry eyed ID: 913022
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Māori cancer equity my" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Māori cancer equitymy 20 yr journey
Oritetanga mo te mate pukupuku Māori
Nina Scott, Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Whātua and Waikato, FNZCPHM, MPH, MBChB, nscott.waikato@gmail.com
Slide2Young and starry eyed
through the organised efforts of society . . . suffering from cancer is largely avoidable
Powhiri
to
MoH
job 2000
Slide3Inequities along the entire cancer pathwayBetween Māori and non-Māori
multiple small inequities = large impact multipronged, multilevel solutions required
Incidence 21%Ministry of Health. 2014. Cancer: New registrations and deaths 2011. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Age-standardised
Mortality
72%
Risk
factors
P
revention
T
imely
diagnosis
T
imely
quality treatment
survival
Drivers/root cause – lack of Māori Equity Cancer
Control,
leadership , decision making, resourcing + action =
institutionalised racism
= colonisation
Slide4Māori are nearly twice as likely to die from cancer than non-Māori
Ministry of Health. Cancer: New registrations and deaths 2013.
Slide5.
Soeberg, Blakely, Sarfati et al. 2012. Ethnic and socioeconomic trends in cancer survival, New Zealand, 1991-2004
Māori have worse survival rates for almost all cancers
Slide6Inequity at every treatment stepThis is clearly not due to genetics or an inherent cultural reluctance to present for care and is not fixable by information pamphlets
Slide7LeadershipInvolvement of related sectors in decision-making Partnership
Evidence based decision-making Systemic approach - a comprehensive programme with interrelated key components sharing the same goals and integrated with other related programmesC
ontinuous quality improvement Stepwise approach to planning and implementing interventionshttp://www.who.int/cancer/nccp/en/
WHO
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CONTROL
Slide820 years and not much actioninaction in the face of need a hallmark of institutionalised racism
Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. American journal of public health 2000; 90
(8): 1212-5.“How do you do Mr Governor? All we think is that you have come to deceive us. The Pakehas tell us so, and we believe what they say.”Mohi Tawhai - Waitangi Signatory number 145 From his speech before signing The Treaty of Waitangi and How New Zealand Became a British Colony . TL Buick
Slide9“At all steps of the screening pathway, Māori women were served less well than other women” 2004 Summary report on the Invasive Cervical Cancer Audit 2004Quality . . . the cornerstone of screening
Slide10National Screening Unit Standardising Breast Cancer Treatmenteliminating survival inequity Indicator
setEach with a huge work uprationaletargetsdata elements
Data dictionary – each data element defined Data collection Agreement and training on how to collect data by data collectors Proforma – surgical and pathologyData analysis and reporting Independent Māori monitoring
Slide11Equity Focused Reporting
measure
+ report inequities = low hanging fruit indicator of what could be achieved for priority groups
at a minimum = the most privileged/non-Maori level
pinpoint
relatively
quick
+
cheap health
gains
Non-standardised
care = inequities
Inequities
highlight where
standardisation
is needed first
Slide12Māori had significantly lower rates (35%) of having
no radiotherapy (surgery alone
) than all other ethnic groups (45–49%).
Slide13inequities
between indigenous & non- indigenous people are unfair, preventable and
entirely remediable
Slide14Leadership Partnership
National Bowel Cancer Working Group
National Bowel Tumour Standards GroupNational Bowel Cancer Screening Advisory Group
Cancer Treatment Advisory Group
National Screening Advisory Group
Bowel Screening Pilot Steering Group
Hei Ahuru
Mowai - National
Maori Cancer Leadership
Bowel Tumour
Standards Working
Group
National
Māori
Bowel Screening Network
Interim Cancer Agency Advisory Board
National Bowel Cancer Maori Equity Advisory
Group
Slide15National Bowel Cancer Working Group Equity Statement 2014
The National Bowel Cancer Working Group is
concerned that there are differences in bowel cancer survival between groups of New Zealanders which are inequitable. Inequities, by definition, are unfair, avoidable and remedial.Maori Equity Statement revised
2017“We recognise that achieving health equity for Māori will require accelerated efforts
to realise a radical improvement in Māori health.”
Slide16The bowel screening programme
will increase inequities Unless we;
Create a screening participation gap 73% M 58% n-M or,
Drop age by 10 yrs for Māori 50-74 M
60-74 n-M
Decrease blood
level
in screening test for M
Create extra health gain
along screening
pathway
Hei
Āhuru
Mōwai
met on May 16th and
discussed how bowel
screening could
have
either a positive or negative effect on equity.
. .
Slide17Equity champions
National Bowel Screening equity hui and fono
National Pacific Bowel Screening NetworkNational Maori Bowel Screening NetworkTumu Whakarae
– National Māori DHB General Managers forum Midland DHB Chief Executives
Slide18Bowel Screening Academic HuiNational Bowel Screening Programme
Drop age to 50 for
Māori
Māori leadership in the National Screening Unit
Improve participation for Māori
Set up a research support service
Support
value added
interventions
Explore
optimising
the FIT
level
National Bowel Screening Maori
Network co-chairs Shelly Campbell
and Dr Rawiri McKree- Jansen
Slide19Screening Maori from age 50 will
double the number
of Māori cancers detected.>1/2 Maori BC
Dx pre 60yrs vs < 1/3 for n-M
Slide20Bowel screening participation
target 60%
active
follow up
3 phone call attempts -
M + PI
non-responders
RCT
Maori participation up 7
46%
to
53%
Maori
vs “Other” equity gap
4.8
(57.5 / 52.7)
Pilot round
1 equity gap
13.7
Māori
=
46%
Other
= 59.7%
Slide21United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Maori have the right
to equity and development maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage,
traditional knowledgedevelop and determine health programmes + administer programmes through their own institutions
. . + financial and technical assistance from States . . . for the enjoyment of the rights contained in this Declaration
enjoyment
of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
States shall take the necessary steps
with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of this right.
Slide22Share power + support Maori self-determinationEquity focus entire cancer care systemContinuous equity improvement
ID equity hotspots – develop and test interventions, evaluate Public equity monitoring
Quality Māori data / right to be counted + monitor the Crown. Equal explanatory and analytical powerMaori models. Holistic. Address determinants of health for individuals
, whanau and communities
Necessary steps
Slide23“free, frank and fearless discussions in which there is zero tolerance for white fragility and racism, and in which there is an understanding that Māori & Pacific leaders’ knowledge and expertise will be privileged rather than undermined
.”Rhys Jones
Chin MH, King PT, Jones RG, et al. Lessons for achieving health equity comparing Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States.
Health policy. 2018;122:837-853. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.001.