ma Dynamics UniformAccelerationDeceleration Equivalence to Pw 1471148w 147Noise148 InverseProportionality PowerLaw Decay PowerSpectrum Algebraicity Critical SoCalled 147SelfCriticality148 Is Si ID: 896045
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Law of Motion F" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1 Law of Motion F = ma Dynamics UniformA
Law of Motion F = ma Dynamics UniformAcceleration/Deceleration Equivalence to P(w) =1/w Noise InverseProportionality Power-Law Decay PowerSpectrum Algebraicity Critical : (So-Called) Self-Criticality Is Simply a Somewhat Tardy Computer-Rediscovery/Restatement of Newtons- Edward Siegel (physical-mathematicist) (a. k. a. Herr Doktor Professor Sigmund Frud FUZZYICS Ó @ Pacific Beach Institute of Simplicity of Complexity Optimality (PBISCO), @ La Jolla Institute of Simplicity of Complexity Optimality (LJISCO) @ La Jolla Institute for Biochemopsychotechnoinformaticsoscientifico(so called)complexity...-Babble Spin-Doctoring Media-Hype P.-R. Disambiguation (LaJ-B...A...D) 1101 Hornblende, San Diego, CA. 92109 & 6333 La Jolla Blvd., La Jolla, CA. 92037 (858) 270- fuzzyics@tnl- Much self-touted/promoted so-called self-criticality specificity-complexity
2 48; (SOC)-tactics is simply/merely compu
48; (SOC)-tactics is simply/merely computerrediscovery/restatement of Newtons-law of motion F : Proof: (1) F rewritten as originally a defines Output/Input c inverse-mass mechanical-susceptibility [definition]; (2) c) [fluctuation-dissipation theorem]; (3) E=m×) [special-relativity medium maximal-speed]; (4) E=(h [quantum classical-average].Via (3) and (4) m. Inverting: (1/m)»). But by (1): (1/m)ºc). And by (2): c).Thus configuration-(r space F (uniform = translational/invariance) equivalence to dual-( -space integral-transform P(w) =1/w noise inverseproportionality power-law decay powerspectrum algebraicity Critical ! QED FIN INEVITABILITY RootCause Ultimate-Origin for Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ Dominance of Classical-Mechanics Dynamics: DIGIT NeWBeKLaw BoseEinstein Condensation to 1.000... Causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation RigidBody Dynamics Manifestdemonstrated succinctly with PARSIMONY is the re for the rootcause ultimate- for Newtons law of motion dominance of classical-mechanics rigid-body dynamics r r F IDEALIZED ABSTRACTION TO r r F m a = × : AVERAGES Boltzmann classical-statistics CONDENSATION with extensions to quantum-theory and quantumtheories, is in automatic BoseEinstein CONDENSATION of DIGITS intrinsic/inherent onaverage statistical Newcombe[Am. J. Math., 4, 39 (18 -Goett. Nachr. (1914 ; Math. Ann. 77, 33 (1916 ]-Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 78, 551 (19 ]- law Pd)+èçöø÷1 interdigit repulsive- root-cause ultimateorigin for critical-exponents DICHOTOMY: n = 0 vs. n = 1.000 INEVITABILITY of asymptotic-limit antipodes of FUZZYICS Synergetics Paradigm & Dichotomy INEVITABILITY_ : with INVERSION to only BoseEinstein quantum-statistics "") 10 1 and EXPANSION to so-called "".. inverseproportionality noise (fluctuationdissipation theorem) equivalence to generalized-susceptibility power-spectrum INEVITABIL : () ] ")".."...1011
3 1111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Einste
1111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION possibility(ies): (in addition to numerator/amplitude/ magnitude-limit lim)#...® @ 1 P ) possibilities: at d = 1 for NeWBeK first-digit logarithmic-law vs. at d = 0 for any/all-subsequent significant-digit laws, so that most-probable criticalexponent must be n = 1.000... , i.e. to a SELF-FULFILLING/FULFILLMENT PROPHESY: r r r r Fb======00010001....................... linearproportionality INEVITABILITY versus r r r r Fb¹¹¹¹¹¹00010001....................... any other possible nonlinear-proportionality impossibility RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r INEVITABILITY RootCause Ultimate-Origin for Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ Dominance of Classical-Mechanics Dynamics: DIGIT NeWBeKLaw BoseEinstein Condensation to 1.000... Causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation RigidBody Dynamics Manifestdemonstrated succinctly with PARSIMONY is the reason for the rootcause ultimate- for Newtons law of motion dominance of classical-mechanics rigid-body dynamics r r F IDEALIZED ABSTRACTION TO r r F m a = × : AVERAGES Boltzmann classical-statistics CONDENSATION with extensions to quantum-theory and quantumtheories, is in automatic BoseEinstein CONDENSATION of DIGITS intrinsic/inherent onaverage statistical Newcombe[Am. J. Math., 4, 39 (18 -Goett. Nachr. (1914 ; Math. Ann. 77, 33 (1916 ]-Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 78, 551 (19 ]- law Pd)+èçöø÷1 interdigit repulsive- root-cause ultimateorigin for critical-exponents DICHOTOMY: n = 0 vs. n = 1.000 INEVITABILITY of asymptotic-limit antipodes of FUZZYICS Synergetics Paradigm & Dichotomy INEVITABILITY_ : with INVERSION to only BoseEinstein quantum-statistics "") 10 1 and EXPANSION to so-called "".. inverseproportionality noise (fluctuationdissipation theorem) equivalence to gen
4 eralized-susceptibility power-spectrum I
eralized-susceptibility power-spectrum INEVITABILITY : () ] ")".."...10111111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION possibility(ies): (in addition to numerator/amplitude/ magnitude-limit lim)#...® @ 1 P ) possibilities: at d = 1 for NeWBeK first-digit logarithmic-law vs. at d = 0 for any/all-subsequent significant-digit laws, so that most-probable criticalexponent must be n = 1.000... , i.e. to a SELF-FULFILLING/FULFILLMENT PROPHESY: r r r r Fb======00010001....................... linearproportionality INEVITABILITY versus r r r r Fb¹¹¹¹¹¹00010001....................... any other possible nonlinear-proportionality impossibility RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r INEVITABILITY of ""... INVERSEProportionality Unique PowerLaw So-Called Noise Power-Spectrum Unique Critical-Exponent n = 1.000... Root-Cause Ultimate-Origin in DIGITS Classic (But Decidedly Not Classical!) Pure-Mathematics Newcombe(1881--) InterDigit On-Average Statistical- NeWBeK Sequence: Pd)+èçöø÷1,... INVERSIONS ALL to Bose-Einstein Quantum-Statistics With Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION to MostProbable (but Not the Only Possible) Critical-Exponent n = 1.000... [In Turn The Root-Cause Ultimate-Origin for the INEVITABILITY of Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ Dominance of Classicalics Dynamics: DIGIT NeWBeKLaw BoseEinstein Condensation to 1.000... Causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation Rigid-Body Dynamics] INEVITABILITY of ""... INVERSEproportionality unique powerlaw so-called noise equivalence to generalized-susceptibility power-spectrum with unique (most probable out of all possible, but not the only possible) critical-exponent_ n= 1.000... root-cause ultimate-origin is manifestly-demonstrated to be in DIGITS pure-mathematics classic (but decidedly not classical) Newcombe
5 (1881--) interdigit on-average statistic
(1881--) interdigit on-average statistical- (odds of gambling) [Hill-proven to have its rootcause ultimate-origin in: logarithm - invariance = unitsinvariance = SCALE!!!] NeWBeK sequence: Pd)11-=+èçöø÷, d Î [1 ,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; () )111019-=++èçöø÷, d Î [0 , 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; ...; {} bdiiii-=èçöø÷+èçöø÷éëêêêêùûúúúú=--=)11, d Î [0 , 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] INVERSION ALL to only BoseEinstein quantumstatistics with Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION to most critical-exponent_ n = 1.000... [which in turn is the root-cause ultimate-origin for the INEVITABILITY rootcause ultimate-origin for Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ dominance of classical-mechanics rigid-body dynamics Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation: DIGIT NeWBeKlaw BoseEinstein Condensation to 1.000... causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation rigid-body dynamics classical- INEVITABILITY manifestdemonstration of root-cause ultimate-origin for FUZZYICS S.P.D. Inevitability_ so-called noise (fluctuation-dissipation theorem-equivalence to) generalized-susceptibility power-spectrum unique critical-exponents Dichotomy: n = 0= 0.000... WHITE/FLAT/ FUNCTIONLESS vs. n = 1.000... power-Law Decay HYPERBOLICITY Shlesinger- as DIGITS Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION INEVITABILITY to most-probable Digit-sequence in/via 1.000... DIGITS onaverage statistical Newcombe(18-- s Sequence d)+èçöø÷1digit repulsive- root-cause ultimate-origin for critical-exponents DICHOTOMY: n = 0 vs. n = 1.000 INEVITABILITY of asymptotic-limit antipodes of FUZZYICS Synergetics Paradigm & Dichotomy with INVERSION to Only BoseEinstein Quantum-Statistics "") 10 1 and EXPANSION () ] ")".."...10111111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION possibility(ies): (in addition to numerator/amplitude/magnitude-limit lim)#...® @ 1 P ) possibility at d = 0, so that most-probable critical
6 -exponent is n = 1.000... , i.e. to a
-exponent is n = 1.000... , i.e. to a SELF-FULFILLING/FULFILLMENT PROPHESY RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r INEVITABILITY RootCause Ultimate-Origin for Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ Dominance of Classical-Mechanics Dynamics: DIGIT NeWBeKLaw BoseEinstein Condensation to 1.000... Causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation Manifestdemonstration for the rootcause ultimate- for Newtons law of motion dominance of classical-mechanics rigid-body dynamics r r F IDEALIZED ABSTRACTION TO r r F m a = × : AVERAGES MaxwellBoltzmann classical-statistics CONDENSATION with extensions to quantum-theory and quantum-theories, is in automatic BoseEinstein COND of DIGITS intrinsic/inherent onaverage statistical Newcombe[Am. J. Math., 4, 39 (18 -Goett. Nachr. (1914 ; Math. Ann. 77, 33 (1916 ]-Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 78, 551 (1938 ]- law Pd)+èçöø÷1 interdigit repulsive- root-cause ultimate-origin for critical-exponents DICHOTOMY: n = 0 vs. n = 1.000 INEVITABILITY of asymptotic-limit antipodes of FUZZYICS Synergetics Paradigm & Dichotomy : with INVERSION to only BoseEinstein quantum-statistics "") 10 1 and EXPANSION to so-called "".. inverseproportionality noise (fluctuation-dissipation theorem) equivalence to generalizedsusceptibility power-spectrum INEVITABILITY : () ] ")".."...10111111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Einstein CONDENSATION possibility(ies): (in addition to numerator/amplitude/ magnitude-limit lim)#...® @ 1 P ) possibilities: at d = 1 for NeWBeK first-digit logarithmic-law vs. at d = 0 for any/all subsequent significant-digit laws, so that most-probable criticalexponent must be n = 1.000... , i.e. [via Siegel manifest-demonstration of r r F m a = × equivalence to P)".. w : (1) r r r====--1, [Definition]; (2) c w w (" " ) ~ (" " ) P [FluctuationDissipation Theorem];
7 47;the Max & Al Show: (3) E m ~
47;the Max & Al Show: (3) E m ~ [Special-Relativity: Existence of Upper Limiting-Speed in a Medium: Eº2 ] ; (4) to a SELF-FULFILLING/FULFILLMENT PROPHESY: r r r r Fb======00010001....................... linearproportionality INEVITABILITY versus r r r r Fb¹¹¹¹¹¹00010001....................... any other possible nonlinearproportionality impossibility!!!: i.e. RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r INEVITABILITY RootCause Ultimate-Origin for Newtons Law of Motion r r F m a 1........ Dominance of Classical-Mechanics Dynamics: DIGIT NeWBeKLaw BoseEinstein Condensation to (OnAverage) Statistically Most Probable CriticalExponent 1.000... Causes Maxwell-Boltzmann Condensation [a.k.a. Rigid-Body Dynamics (1687) Classical- Manifestdemonstration for the rootcause ultimate- for Newtons law of motion dominance of classical-mechanics rigid-body dynamics r r F IDEALIZED ABSTRACTION TO r r F m a = × : AVERAGES MaxwellBoltzmann classical-statistics CONDENSATION with extensions to quantum-theory and quantum-theories, is in automati BoseEinstein CONDENSATION of DIGITS intrinsic/inherent onaverage statistical Newcombe[Am. J. Math., 4, 39 (18 -Goett. Nachr. (1914 ; Math. Ann. 77, 33 (1916 ]-Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 78, 551 (1938 ]- law Pd)+èçöø÷1 interdigit repulsive- root-cause ultimate-origin for critical-exponents DICHOTOMY: n = 0 vs. n = 1.000 INEVITABILITY of asymptotic-limit antipodes of FUZZYICS Synergetics Paradigm & Dichotomy : with INVERSION to only BoseEinstein quantum-statistics "") 10 1 and EXPANSION to so-called "".. inverseproportionality noise (fluctuation-dissipation theorem) equivalence to generalizedsusceptibility power-spectrum INEVITABILITY : () ] ")".."...10111111000PP=@-@-+++@ with dual Bose-Eins
8 tein CONDENSATION possibility
tein CONDENSATION possibility(ies): (in addition to numerator/amplitude/ magnitude-limit lim)#...® @ 1 P ) possibilities: at d = 1 for NeWBeK first-digit logarithmic-law vs. at d = 0 for any/all subsequent significant-digit laws, so that most-probable criticalexponent must be n = 1.000... , i.e. [via Siegel manifest-demonstration of r r F m a = × equivalence to P)".. w : (A) physics : (1) rr r r====--1, [Definition]; (2) c w w (" " ) ~ (" " ) P [FluctuationDissipation Theorem]; the Max & Al Show: (3) E m ~ [Special-Relativity: Existence of Upper Limiting-Speed in a Medium: Eº2 ] ; (4) E ~ w [proportionality: not (necessarily)the quantum]. By (3) & (4): m E ~ ~ w . Inverting: 111 ~ . But by (1) and (2): P E ))~ w 11. Hence r r F m a = × equivalence to P)".. w ! , in agreement with (B) pure : r r F m a = × double time-integral range-formula uniform r r r r r r sao= time formal integraltransform (Fourier, Laplace, z,...) to a formal power is: [] } aatataittit)((()(())".....wwww¹=¹+¹==--=+¹º--¥òòrrrrrrrrrrrr2200122000121000 to a SELFFULFILLING/FULFILLMENT PROPHESY: r r r r Fb======00010001....................... linearproportionality INEVITABILITY versus r r r r Fb¹¹¹¹¹¹00010001....................... any other possible nonlinear-proportionality impossibility RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r NewtonsLaw of Motion F = ma Both Different Physics and Pure-Mathematics Yet Equivalent Manifest-Demonstration Equivalence to FluctuationDissipation Theorem Equivalent 1/w Generalized-Called) Noise Power-Spectrum INEVITABILITY : (1667) F = ma Was Merely Accidental Rediscovery in (So-Called) Self-Criticality (SOC) SpecificityComplexity (SoC-tactics)!: Brillouinization /
9 Fourier- of Newtons Law of Motion
Fourier- of Newtons Law of Motion Classical- FUZZYICS SYNERGETICS PARADIGM & DICHOTOMY INEVITABILITY_-WEB OUTLINE Siegel S.P.D. FUZZYICS automatically with optimality is, in list- SYNERGETICS PARADIGM & DICHOTOMY(SPD) COMMON PARSIMONYDICHOTOMY (POD)- DIMENSIONALITY (DD)- INEVITABILITY ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- ( 0.) DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES LEVEL0. LOGIC : df = dst = ODD AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER via INTERMEDIATE CONTINUOUS INTERPOLATING FRACTIONAL FRACTAL- EVEN INTEGER = dst =d-f DIMENSIONALITY UN FLUCTUATIONS = ODD Z Dst EVEN Z = dst cau ß ses cau ß ses cau ß ses ( I.) EXTENT/ LEVELI. LOGIC : (relative (relative [BOUNDARYFUL]=[LOCALITY] AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER (...GLOBALITY...)=(...BOUNDARY ...) {Kallen &/|| &/|| representation (II.) POWER LEVELII. LOGIC : [l/WHITE/ FLAT/FUNCTION AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER (...l/w HYPERBOLICITY ...) whose frequency defines at least necessarycondition for so-called complexity as Noethers-theorem SCALE current
10 4- / (d/d ) [[ ¶ = 0] ( w)] = 1/ w =
4- / (d/d ) [[ ¶ = 0] ( w)] = 1/ w =(for arbitrary base)= 1/ w &/|| &/|| (III.) CRITICAL LEVELIII. LOGIC : n = 0 AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER n = 1.000... Ý ß Ý ß Ý ß DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES-FREEDOM - IN ALSO ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- (IV.) NOETHER'S - THEOREM : CONTINUOUS- S C A L E- SYMMETRY LEVELIV. LOGIC : SCALE - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - RESTORING SCALE - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - BREAKING Ý causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß ¶ = 0 SCALE 4-[VERGENCE] 4-[ whose frequency- defines at least necessaryion for so-called complexity as Noetherstheorem SCALE current 4-/ CONSERVATION (d/d ) [[ ¶ = 0] ( w)] = 1/ w =(for arbitrary base)= 1/ w 0 ¹ ¶ SCALE 4-(... DIVERGENCE...) 4 & & & DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES-FREEDOM - IN ALSO ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- (V.) STAR}
11 OF OTHER NOETHER'S
OF OTHER NOETHER'S - THEOREM: CONTINUOUS SYMMETR LEVEL : . . . - INVARIANCES SYMMETRY - RESTORING - . . . - INVARIANCES SYMMETRY - BREAKING - Ý causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß { ... = 0}- { . . . { { {0 ¹ ¶ ... { . . . {(... DIVERGENCES { [fluctuationdissipation theorem-equivalent] noise @ generalized-susceptibility [c) = d(OUTPUT)/d(INPUT) = d(EFFECT or RESULT)/d(CAUSE)] power-spectrum qualitative-type functional-form and quantitative critical-exponent "automatic- mathematicalcatastrophe" (AUTMATHCAT) "dimensionality-catastrophe" (DIM-CAT) crossover second-order phase-transition critical-phenomenon. [the Kallen-Lehmann representation-equivalence, reviewed succinctly by Bjorken & Drell, are that extant measures of asymptoticlimit antipodes of the PARSIMONY-Dichotomy (relative) [LOCALITY] = [BOUNDARYFUL] versus (relative) (...BOUNDARYLESS...) = (...GLOBALITY...): propagators @ Green's-functions @ diffusivity @ ... are equivalent to extant measures of asymptotic-limit antipodes of the PARSIMONY-Dichotomy (relative) ["l"/wWHITE/FLAT/FUNCTIONLESS] versus (relative) (..."1"/w FLICKER HYPERBOLICITY ...): {fluctuation-dissipation theoremequivalent} noise @ generalized-susceptibility power-spectrum as complex-functions of complex-variable w'+i w" in first even-integer critical-dimensionality complex-plane C in their pure-mathematics analyticity ]. For purposes of (so-called) Bak self-criticality (SOC
12 ) specificity-complexity
) specificity-complexity (SoC)-tactics merely being an accidental rediscovery of 1687 Newtons-law of motion F = ma , original Siegel12 manifest-demonstration, in list- SYNERGETICS PARADIGM & DICHOTOMY(SPD) COMMON PARSIMONYDICHOTOMY (POD)- DIMENSIONALITY (DD)- INEVITABILITY ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- ( 0.) DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES LEVEL0. LOGIC : df = dst = ODD AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER via INTERMEDIATE CONTINUOUS INTERPOLATING FRACTIONAL FRACTAL DIMENSIONALITY UN FLUCTUATIONS = ODD Z Dst EVEN Z = dst EVEN INTEGER = dst =d-f cau ß ses cau ß ses cau ß ses ( I.) EXTENT/ LEVELI. LOGIC : (relative (relative [BOUNDARYFUL]=[LOCALITY] AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER (...GLOBALITY...)=(...BOUNDARY ...) III III III [UNIFORM/CONSTANT VELOCITY] - (...UNIFORM/CONSTANT III III III {Kallen &/|| &/|| representation (II.) POWER LEVELII. LOGIC : (in TWO distinct WAYS : · (1) pure &/or/ · (2) pure- ________________________ · (1) pure (expanded in size below table for clarity!!
13 ) ()()[]()()()[]()"]()"()()11234534 rrr
) ()()[]()()()[]()"]()"()()11234534 rrr-=èçöø÷èçöø÷ºººººº--@-=--=cwww P~))()())]()).......1161111271èçöø÷æèçöø÷æèçöø÷æèçöø÷ºèçöø÷èçöø÷èçöø÷-èçöø÷wwwwwrrr &/or/ &/or/ · (2) pure- [] ] rrrrrrrrrraat--=+------ºº=+==-¹==+¹ò)()))()()()((122012200012 ] ] ] ))()(()[]()....".....=---==èçöø÷èçöø÷=+¹=-++-ºº-®at00022001221w¶¶wwrr III III III [] )()()()[]w===- 0 + [] [ ] at)()(().......w=¹==-221 III III III [l/WHITE/ FLAT/FUNCTION AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER (...l/w HYPERBOLICITY ...) whose frequency defines at least necessary condition for so-called complexity as Noethers- theorem SCALE current 4- / (d/d ) [[ ¶ = 0] ( w)] = 1/ w =(for arbitrary base)= 1/ w &/|| &/II &/|| (III.) CRITICAL LEVELIII. LOGIC : n = 0 AUTMATHCAT - - - - - - - - - - - CROSSOVER n = 1.000... Ý ß Ý ß Ý ß DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES-FREEDOM - IN ALSO ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- (IV.) NOETHER'S - THEOREM : CONTINUOUS- S C A L E- SYMMETRY LEVELIV. LOGIC : SCALE - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - RESTORING SC - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - BREAKING Ý
14 causes ß Ý
causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß ¶ = 0 SCALE 4-[VERGENCE] 4-[ whose frequency- defines at least necessarycondition for so-called complexity as 0 ¹ ¶ SCALE 4-(... DIVERGENCE...) 4 Noetherstheorem SCALE current 4-/ CONSERVATION (d/d ) [[ ¶ = 0] ( w)] = 1/ w =(for arbitrary base)= 1/ w & & & DIMENSIONALITY DEGREES-FREEDOM - IN ALSO ROOT-CAUSE ULTIMATE- (V.) STAR} OF OTHER NOETHER'S - THEOREM: CONTINUOUS SYMMETR LEVEL : . . . - INVARIANCES SYMMETRY - RESTORING - . . . - INVARIANCES SYMMETRY - BREAKING - Ý causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß { ... = 0}- { . . . { { {0 ¹ ¶ ... { . . . {(... DIVERGENCES { ________________________ ________________________: ______________________________: III III III TRANSLATIONAL - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - RESTORING - TRANSLATIONAL - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - BREAKING -
15 Ý
Ý causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß {0 = ¶ TRANSLATIONAL { TRANSLATIONAL 4- 4- [CONSERVATION] {0 ¹ ¶ TRANSLATIONAL { TRANSLATIONAL 4- NON- {(... DIVERGENCE...)} { { { & & & ROTATIONAL - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - RESTORING ROTATIONAL - INVARIANCE SYMMETRY - BREAKING Ý causes ß Ý causes ß Ý causes ß {0 = ¶ ROTATIONAL { ROTATIONAL 4- 4- [CONSERVATION] { { {0 ¹ ¶ ROTATIONAL { ROTATIONAL 4- NON- {(... DIVERGENCE...)} { [fluctuationdissipation theorem-equivalent] noise @ generalized-susceptibility [c) = d(OUTPUT)/d(INPUT) = d(EFFECT or RESULT)/d(CAUSE)] power-spectrum qualitative-type functional-form and quantitative critical-exponent "automatic-catastrophe" (AUTMATHCAT) "dimensionality-catastrophe" (DIM-CAT) crossover second-order phase-transition critical-phenomenon. [the Kallen-Lehmann representation-equivalence, reviewed succinctly by Bjorken & Drell, are that extant measures of asymptoticlimit antipodes of the PARSIMONY-Dichotomy (relative) [LOCALITY] = [BOUNDARYFUL] versus (relative) (...BOUNDARYLESS...) = (...GLOBALITY...): propagators @ Green's-functions @ diffusivity @ ... are equivalent to extant measures of asymptotic-limit antipodes of the PARSIMONY-Dichotomy (relative) ["l"/wWHITE/FLAT/FUNCTIONLESS] versus (relative) (..."1"/w FLICKER HYPERBOLICITY ...): {fluctuation-dissipation theorem-equivalent} noise @ generalizedsusceptibility power-spectrum as complex-functions of complex-variable w'+i w" in first even-integer criti
16 cal-dimensionality complex-plane C in th
cal-dimensionality complex-plane C in their pure-mathematics analyticity ]. i. e.: (1): ()()[)()()[]()"]()"()()11234534 rrr-=èçöø÷èçöø÷ºººººº--@-=--=cwww P ~))()())]()) .......1161111271èçöø÷æèçöø÷æèçöø÷æèçöø÷ºèçöø÷èçöø÷èçöø÷-èçöø÷wwwwwrrr and/versus: (2) [][] rrrrrrrrrraat--=+------º=+==-¹==+¹ò)()))()()()((122012200012 ] ] ] =---==èçöø÷èçöø÷=+¹=-++-ºº-®at00022001221))()(()[]()....".....w¶¶wwrr i. e.: [] )()()()[]w===- 0 + [] [ ] at)()(().......w=¹==-221 Thus, all Baks SOC SoC-tactics have done is to accidentally rediscover the (1667) Newtons-law of motion F = ma some 320 years later!!! RIGID BODY DYNAMICS F m a CLASSICAL MECHANICS - = - º r r "'""....."-=--000r 1. E. Siegel: Symposium on Fractals, Scaling,... , M.R.S. Fall Mtg., Boston (1989-summary!; ibid. (1990)-2!; I. B. M. Conf. On Computers and Mathematics , Stanford (1986); J. Noncryst. Sol. 40, 453 (1980); Aristotle Birthday Symposium on Mechanics and Physics , Thessoloniki (1990); ... 2. M. Shlesinger and B. West, Intl. J. Mod. Phys. ??? (1989);... 3. P. Handel, Phys. Rev. A22, 2, 745 (1980);... 4. K.-L. Ngai, Comments in Solid-State Physics: 9, 4, 127 (1979); 9, 5, 141 (1980);... 5. Y. Klimontovich, J.E.T.P. Lett. 51, 51 (1990); Statistical , Pitman (1978);... 6. R. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, NoiseInduced Phase- , Springer(1983), (1987) 7. F. McClintock and F. Moss, Noise in Physical- , Addison-Wesley (1989?) 8. M.-O. Hongler, Chaotic and Stochastic Behavior of Automated Manufacturing- , Spring
17 er (1992) 9. Y. Bar-Yam, Dynamics of Co
er (1992) 9. Y. Bar-Yam, Dynamics of Complex- , Addison-Wesley (1997) 10. R. Badii and A. Politi, Complexity: Hierarchical-Structures and SCALING in Physics , Cambridge (1997), (1999) 11. E. Siegel: Symp. on Scaling... , M. R. S. Fall Mtg., Boston (1990); Bull. A. P. S. March Mtgs.: Anaheim (1990), Indianapolis (1992) 12. P. Bak, ... (198 13. E. Siegel: Phys. Stat. Sol. & (1971); I.E.E.E. Ultrasonics Symp. , Monterey (1973); Scripta Metallurgica & (1974); Acta Metallurgica (1977); Third Intl. Conf. On Acoustic- , Tokyo (1976-pub. By J. I. P. A. (1977); Intl. Conf. On Internal-Friction and Ultrasonic- , Manchester (1980 Intl. Quantum-Electronics Conf. , Boston (1980);... and many many acousticemission references therein: B. Kaiser, C. Tatro, F. Nabarro, N. Mott, A. Seeger, H. Kronmuller, R. Sedgwick, S. Carpenter, K. Ohno, R. Tinder and R. Terzil, G. Speich and R. Fisher, J. Frederick, N. Shankar, P. Neumann et. al., ... 14. A. Lighthill, Theory of Distributions , Dover (1955) 15. E. Siegel, J. Noncryst. Sol. 40, 453 (1980); Phys. and Chem. Of Liquids 4(4) (1975); 5(1) (1976) - 8-papers!; Scripta Metallurgica. 13, 913 (1979) [with T. Matsubara]; Ferroelectrics 34, 127 (1982); International Conference on Lattice Dynamics , Paris(1977) - (with T. Matsubara); International Conference on Statistical- , The Technion, Haifa(1977) - pub. in Ann. Israel Physical Society, A.P.S.(1978) - (with T. Matsubara) (1978); I. B. M. Conf. On Silica and Interfaces , Yorktown Heights (1978) - ed. By S. Pentalides; I. B. M. Conf. On Amorphous Glasses , Yorktown Heights (1978); R.P.I. Conference on Amorphous-Materials and Glasses , R.P.I., Troy, N.Y. (1979); New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Atomic and Molecular Glasses , N.Y., N.Y. (1980);