/
Anergy in Memory CD T Cells Is Induced by B Cells  Sar Anergy in Memory CD T Cells Is Induced by B Cells  Sar

Anergy in Memory CD T Cells Is Induced by B Cells Sar - PDF document

tawny-fly
tawny-fly . @tawny-fly
Follow
582 views
Uploaded On 2015-04-28

Anergy in Memory CD T Cells Is Induced by B Cells Sar - PPT Presentation

Dalai Saied Mirshahidi Alexandre Morrot Fidel Zavala and Scheherazade SadeghNasseri Induction of tolerance in memory T cells has profound implications in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection Previously we reported that the ID: 56168

Dalai Saied Mirshahidi

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Anergy in Memory CD T Cells Is Induced b..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

AnergyinMemoryCD4TCellsIsInducedbyBCellsSaratK.Dalai,*SaiedMirshahidi,*AlexandreMorrot,FidelZavala,andScheherazadeSadegh-NasseriInductionoftoleranceinmemoryTcellshasprofoundimplicationsinthetreatmentofautoimmunediseasesandtransplantrejection.Previously,wereportedthatthepresentationoflowdensitiesofagonistpeptide/MHCclassIIcomplexesinducedanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.Inthepresentstudy,weaddressthespecicinteractionofdifferenttypesofAPCswithmemoryCD4 *DepartmentofPathology,JohnsHopkinsSchoolofMedicineandDepartmentof differentdosesofcOVA.WedemonstratethatanergyisinducedinmemoryTcellsexvivowhenBcellspresentedtheAgatacertainrangeoflowpeptidedoses.Further,wevalidatedthisndinginvivobydemonstratingthattransferringrestingBcellspulsedwithlowdosesofpeptidetomicebearingmemoryCD4Tcellsinducedanergy.WeruledoutaroleforCD11corotherDCsintheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcells.ConsistentwiththeroleforrestingBcellsexpressinglowlevelsofB7-1intheinductionofanergy,weshowedthatanergyinthissystemisreg-ulatedbyCTLA-4.MaterialsandMethodsTCRTgmice(DO11.10)thatexpressTCRrecognizinganI-AstrictedcOVAonBALB/cbackgroundwereusedasthesourceofTcells.Non-TgfemaleBALB/cmiceandC57BL/6(B6)miceat5–6wkofage,TgfemaleDO11.10andOTIImice,andcell-decientmuMTmicewereallpurchasedfromTheJacksonLaboratory.Diphtheriatoxinreceptor(DTR)TgmiceonBALB/cbackgroundwerebredwithnon-TgBALB/cmice,andtheheterozygousoffspringforDTRwereusedforthestudy.AllmicewerehousedintheJohnsHopkinsUniversityanimalfacilities(Bal-timore,MD)undervirus-freeconditions.AllexperimentswereperformedinaccordancewithprotocolsapprovedbytheAnimalCareandUseCom-mitteeoftheJohnsHopkinsUniversitySchoolofMedicine.PeptidesandAbsThepeptidecOVA(ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR)wassynthesizedbyGlobal-PeptideServices.Thepeptidewas90%pureasanalyzedbyre-verse-phaseHPLC.FluorescentlylabeledAbstomouseCD4,CD25,CD44,CD45RB,CD62L,CD69,CD45R(B220),CD19,CD11c,IL-2,,anti-mouseCTLA-4,CD80(B7.1),andCD86(B7.2)werepur-chasedfromBDPharmingen;theAbtoclonotypicTCR(KJ1.26)specicforDO11.10CD4TcellswaspurchasedfromCaltagLaboratories;andanti-mouseCTLA-4Abwaspuriedfromtheculturesupernatantofhy-bridoma(UC10-4F10-11;AmericanTypeCultureCollection(ATCC)).AdoptivetransferandimmunizationsTgCD4Tcells(2.0cellspermouse),preparedfrompooledLNsandspleensofDO11.10mice,wereresuspendedin100lofsterilePBS(Invitrogen)andtransferredi.v.intoBALB/crecipients.Twodayslater,micewereimmunizeds.c.(atthebaseofthetail)with15nmolofcOVApeptideemulsiedinCFA.InductionofanergyincOVA-specicmemoryCD4cellsinvivobyadministrationoflowdosesofpeptideinIFAFiveweekspostimmunization,toallowforthegenerationofmemoryTcells(veriedbystainingformemoryTcellmarkers;datanotshown),micewereinjecteds.c.withincreasingconcentrationsofcOVAtide(0.005–50,000pmol)mixedwithIFA.Tendayslater,inguinalLNswereremovedandTcellswerechallengedinvitrowithcOVAtide.ProliferationwasmeasuredbyCFSEdilutionassay.Briey,LNcellswerelabeledwith1MCFSEinPBSfor80satroomtemperatureandwashedtwicewithRPMI1640containing10%FCS.Cellswerecul-turedwithorwithoutpeptideat37Cfor72h.Followingtheculture,Tcellswerestainedwithuorescentlylabeledanti-mouseCD4AbandKJ1.26anticlonotypicTCRAbandanalyzedbyowcytometry.Tcelldivisioninresponsetoinvitropeptidechallengewascalculatedasde-scribed(14)usingthefollowingformula:numberofevents()ateachcelldividedby2.Thepercentageoftotaldividingcellsnumberofcohortsundergoing1–6divisions/totalnumberofcohortsun-dergoing0–6divisions)IsolationofTcellsSpleensfrom5-wkpostimmunizedmicewereremovedandasingle-cellsuspensionwasmadeafterlysisofRBCsandusedasthesourceofTcells.ThemicesacricedforthispurposehadreceivedasingleimmunizationafteradoptivetransferofTcells.ByusinganR&DSystemsCD3enrich-mentcolumn,Tcellswereisolatedfromsplenocytes.TcellpuritywasIsolationofinvivopulsedAPCsForty-eighthoursafters.c.injectionofpeptideemulsiedinIFA,miceweresacricedandinguinalLNswereremoved.ToseparatewholeAPCs,LNcellsweredepletedofTcellsbyusingeitherDynal-Thy1.2beadsorMACS-Thy1.2microbeads(MiltenyiBiotec)(95%depletion).ToisolateBcells,aMACSB220microbeadwasused(95%purity).ToobtainAPCsdevoidofBcells,LNcellsweredepletedofTandBcellsbyusingacombinationofThy1.2andB220microbeads(MACS).MACSCD43microbeadswereusedtopurifyB2Bcells.ToobtainAPCsdevoidofB2Bcells,LNcellsweredepletedofTcellsbyThy1.2microbeadsfollowedbypositiveselectionwithCD4microbeads(15).TheseAPCsaretermedinvivopulsedAPCsinthisstudy.InductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsexvivobyinvivopulsedAPCsToinduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells,enrichedTcells(1wereincubatedwithinvivopulsedAPCs(irradiated,2000rad)ataratioof1:2for48hina96-wellplate.Totestforanergy,splenocytesfromnormalmicewerepulsedinvitrowithcOVApeptide,irradiated,andadded(2perwell)totriplicateculturewellsandincubatedfurtherfor72hbeforeadding[H]thymidineorfor10hbeforeassayingforintracellularcytokinesynthesis.Todeterminethepercentageofcellsmak-ingIL-2orIFN-,cellswerestainedwithAbstoCD4,clonotypicTCR(KJ1.26),andIL-2orIFN-andanalyzedbyowcytometry.Duringdataanalysis,thequadrantsweredrawnbasedonthematchedisotypeAbcon-trols.ThepercentageofDO11.10cellsmakingIL-2orIFN-wascalcu-latedaftersubtractingthepercentageofDO11.10cellsstainedpositiveforthematchedisotypes.InductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsexvivobyinvitropulsedBcells,DCs,oractivatedBcellsWefollowedthesameanergyprotocolasaboveexceptthatBcellsorDCswerepuriedfromthespleensofunimmunizedmicebyusingMACs-B220 FIGURE1.AdministrationofsuboptimaldosesofcOVAtideinIFAinducesanergyinspecicmemoryCD4Tcellsinvivo.Eightgroupsofmice(threemicepergroup)bearingmemoryCD4Tcellswerechallengedwithincreasingdoses(0.005–50,000pmol)ofcOVApeptideinIFA.Tendayslater,cellsfromdrainingLNswereharvestedandanergywasassayedbypeptiderechallengefor72hinvitro.Tcellpro-liferationwasmeasuredbyCFSEdilutionassayofAg-specicKJ1–26Tcells.ThedosesfortheinvitrochallengewithcOVApeptidearerepresentedasfollows:lledblackhistogram,0M;thingrayline,0.1M;blackline,1M;thickgrayline,10M.Datashownrep-resentoneofthreeindependentexperiments.ThelowerpanelthepercentageofAg-speciccells(DO11.10)dividedinresponsetoinvitrochallenge.3222BCELLSANERGIZEMEMORYCD4TCELLS forBcells(purity95%)orMACs-CD11cmicrobeadsforDCs(purity80%)andpulsedinvitrofor3hat37°CwiththecOVAbeforeincubatingwithmemoryTcells.ForactivatedBcells,puriedBcellswerestimulatedwithCpG(6g/ml)for24h(16)andwashedtwicebeforepulsingwithpeptide.NotethattheamountofpeptideforpulsingAPCsinvitrowascalculatedbasedonmolarpeptideconcentration,whereasthepeptidesgiventomicewereinmoleunits.InductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsinvivointheabsenceofBALB/cmiceexpressingDTRundertheCD11cpromoter(17)wereadop-tivelytransferredwithDO11.10TgTcells.Twodayslater,micewereimmunizeds.c.withcOVApeptideinCFA.After5wk,DCsweredepletedbymultipleinjectionsofdiphtheriatoxin(DT)(Sigma-Aldrich)duringtheinductionofanergyinvivointhesemice.Briey,micewereinjectedi.p.with100ngofDTpermouse12hbeforetheinjectionofpeptideemulsiedinIFA.Then,micewereinjectedwiththesamedoseofDTtwicemore,at10and36hafterAgchallenge.SamplingofspleenandLNtissuesduringthetreatmentinaparallelsetofmiceconrmedthedepletionofDCsinDT-injectedmiceasdetectedbyselectiononCD11candGFP(expressedundertheCD11cpromoter),indicating0.2%DCsintheLNsofthosemice.Onday3(60hafterAginjection),miceweresacricedandcellsharvestedfromthedrainingLNswerechallengedexvivowithcOVApeptidefor72h.InductionofanergyinAg-specicTcellswasdeterminedbyCFSEdilutionassay.ThepercentageofAg-specic(DO11.10)CD4Tcelldivisionsinresponsetoinvitropeptidechallengewascalculatedasdescribedabove.InductionofanergyinvivoinmemoryTcellsbyinvitropulsedBcellsBcellswerepuriedfromthespleensofunimmunizedmiceandpulsedinvitrowithincreasingamountsofcOVApeptide(0.00001–1000nM)for3hat37°C.Followingincubation,Bcells(notirradiated)werewashedtwicetoremoveexcesspeptideand10cells/mousewerei.v.transferredtoBALB/cmicebearingcOVA-specicmemoryCD4Tcells.Tendayslater,miceweresacriced,andcellsfromdrainingLNsandspleenswereharvested.InductionofanergyinAg-specicTcellswasdeterminedbytheCFSEdilutionassayafterinvitrochallengewiththecOVApeptidefor72h.ThepercentageofAg-specic(DO11.10)CD4Tcelldivisioninresponsetoinvitropeptidechallengewascalculatedasde-scribedabove.InductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsinvitrobyinvivopulsedB2BcellsAllBcells,B2Bcells,orAPCsdevoidofB2BcellswereobtainedfromthedrainingLNsofmiceimmunized48hearlierwithpeptideinIFAandincubatedwithmemoryCD4Tcellsfor48h.InductionofanergywastestedbyrestimulatingTcellswithcOVApeptide-pulsedsplenocytesfor72h,followedby[H]thymidineincorporation.InductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsinBcell-decientmuMTmiceBecausemuMTmiceareonB6background,onlyforthisexperimentB6micewereusedasrecipientsandOT-IITgCD4TcellsspecicforwereusedforadoptivetransferandthegenerationofmemoryTcells.RecipientmicewereimmunizedwithcOVACFAfortheinductionofmemoryTcellsadayafterTcelltransferasdescribedpreviously.Intheexperimentsshown,memorycellswereiso-lated4–6moafterimmunization.CD4Tcells(7toincludeOT-IITcells)werethenpuriedandtransferredtomuMTmicebeforetheinjectionofAgforanergyinduction.B6micebearingmemoryOT-IIcellswerecalledBcell-sufcientmice.Allgroupsofmicewereimmu-nizeds.c.withcOVAinIFA.Ninedayslater,cellsfromdrainingLNswereharvestedandassayedforanergybytheirabilitytoproliferate FIGURE2.BcellsloadedwithlowdosesofAginduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsexvivo.,Anergywasinducedinvivo(asdescribedinMaterialsandMethods).MicebearingmemoryCD4TcellsweregivencOVAinIFAfortheinductionofanergyand48hlaterdrainingLNswereharvestedandtestedforanergyinvitrousing[H]thymidineincorporation.,Anergywasinducedexvivo.MemoryTcellsisolated(APC-depletedTcells)frommiceimmunized5wkorlongerwereincubatedwithAPCpopulations(wholeLNcellsdepletedofTcells()orenrichedforBcells())isolatedfromBALB/cmicegivencOVAinIFA48hbeforethecellharvest.IsolatedAPCs(depletedofTcellsbyThy1.2microbeads)werepulsedwithdifferentdosesofpeptideasshownonthe-axis.MemoryTcellsandpulsedAPCswereincubatedfor48h.Culturedcellswereassayedfortheinductionofanergyduringtherst48hofexvivoculturebytheadditionoffreshlypulsedsplenocytesat0,0.1,1.0,and10McOVAinvitroandcellproliferation()andIL-2()andIFN-production()weremeasured.Thedatashownrepresentoneofthreeindependentexperiments.BarsrepresentmeanSDoftriplicatecultures.0.005,5,or50pmolvs0.05or5000pmolofpeptidedoses(Student’stest).TherewerevemicepergroupandcellsfromtriplicatewellswerepooledbeforemeasuringIL-2andIFN-synthesis.CytokinesynthesiswasanalyzedonKJ1.26cellsgatedonCD4Tcells.TheJournalofImmunology andtomakeIL-2andIFN-usingthymidineincorporationandintracel-lularcytokineassays.Forthymidineincorporation,cellswerestimulatedwithpeptidefor72hfollowedbytheadditionof[H]thymidineandincubatedfor18hbeforeharvest.Forintracellularcytokinesynthesis,cellswerestimulatedwithpeptidefor5.5hinthepresenceofGolgiStop.OT-IIcellswerethenstainedwithAbstoCD4,V2,V5.1,V5.2,andIL-2or.Duringdataanalysis,thequadrantsweredrawnbasedonthematchedisotypeAbcontrols.ThepercentageofOT-IIcellsmakingIL-2orwascalculatedaftersubtractingthepercentageofOT-IIcellsstainedpositiveforthematchedisotypes.ExpressionofCTLA-4inmemoryCD4TcellsMemoryCD4TcellswereincubatedwithinvivopulsedAPCs(BcellsorAPCsdepletedofBcells)for48h.SurfaceexpressionofCTLA-4onTcellswasdeterminedbyowcytometry.ThelevelofCTLA-4wasexpressedasCTLA-4index:meanuorescenceintensityfractionofcellspositiveforCTLA-4.ReversalofanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsbyanti-CTLA-4MemoryCD4TcellswereincubatedwithinvivopulsedBcellsfor48hinthepresenceof10g/mlanti-mouseCTLA-4Ab(UC10-4F10-11;ATCC).AnergyorreversalwastestedbyrestimulatingTcellswithpeptide-pulsedsplenocytesfor72h,followedby[dineincorporation.StatisticalanalysesLevelofsignicance(value)wasdeterminedbyusingunpairedStu-0.02wasconsideredsignicant.specicCD4Tcellsacquirememoryphenotype35dayspostprimingWehavepreviouslyshowntheinductionofanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsinresponsetolowdoseantigenicchallengeintwoantigenicsystems(11).ToextendthosendingstotheDO11.10Tgsystem(cOVAspecic),DO11.10TgTcellsweretransferredintowild-typeBALB/cmice(18)and2dayslater,whichallowedthehomingoftransferredcellstothelymphoidorgans,recipientswereimmunizedwith15nmolofcOVAinCFA.Thirty-vedaysafterimmunization,thetimerequiredforthegenerationofmemoryTcells(11,19),splenocyteswerehar-vestedandDO11.10CD4Tcellswerestainedformemorymarkers.LevelsofCD25,CD44,CD45RB,CD62L,andCD69expres-sionwereanalyzedonCD4andKJ1.26doublepositivecellsandcomparedwiththelevelsonnaiveTcellsfromcontrolmicetreatedwithIFAorCFAalone.Byday35postimmunization,80%oftheCD4TcellsacquiredthememoryphenotypeasevidencedbyanincreasedlevelofCD44anddecreasedlevelsofCD45RBandCD62LexpressionontheircellsurfacesInvivoadministrationoflowdosesofpeptideinIFAinducesanergyincOVA-specicmemoryCD4TcellsMicepreviouslyimmunizedwithcOVAforthegenerationofmemoryTcellswereadministereddifferentamountsofpeptideinIFA.After10days,cellsfromdrainingLNswerelabeledwithCFSEandCD4TcellswerestimulatedinvitrobyfreshAPCspulsedwithincreasingdosesofpeptidefor72h.TodetermineAg-speciccellproliferation,CFSEdilutionanalysiswasdoneondoublepositivecellsbyowcytometry.WefoundthatAg-specicTcellsthathadencountered0.5–50pmolofpeptideinvivoremainedundivided,whereasTcellsfromthemiceimmunizedwithdosesbeloworabovethatrangedividedseveralcycles(Fig.1).ThestartingnumbersofCD4TcellswerecomparableinallofthegroupsofmiceimmunizedwithpeptideinIFA,indicatingthatTcellsarenotdeletedbutratherareanergized.TheseresultsextendtheapplicabilityofourpreviousndingstoanentirelynewantigenicsysteminwhichmemoryTcellscanbeanergizedbyarangeofsuboptimaldosesofAgs(11,12).ExvivoanergyassaytotestrolesfordifferentAPCsintheinductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsDeterminingwhichAPCsuniquelyinteractwithmemoryTcellsinvivoisexperimentallychallenging.Tosimplifytheproblem,anexvivoassaywasdesignedtoevaluatethecontributionofdifferentAPCstotheinductionofanergyinCD4memoryTcells.WehypothesizedthatAPCsloadedinvivowithlowdosesofpeptidecouldanergizememoryTcellsexvivoinasimilarmannerastheydoinvivo.Totestthis,memoryTcellswereisolatedfrommice35dayspostimmunizationandcoincubatedwithAPCsfromthedrainingLNsofmicethathadbeenimmunizedwithincreasingdosesofpeptide(range0–5,000pmol)inIFA48hearlier.Cellswereculturedfor48handthentestedforanergyinductionuponstimulationwithsplenocytespulsedwith0,0.1,1,and10peptide.Fig.2isacontrolproliferationexperimentindicatingthatanergyisestablishedwithin48hinvivo.Fig.2,,depictresultsoftheexvivoassayindicatingtheproliferationofTcellsexposedtoAPCsfrommiceinjectedwithdifferentdosesofpep-tideinIFA.Theseexperimentsclearlyshowthatduringthe48-hexposuretoAPCs,memoryTcellsbecameanergicinresponseto FIGURE3.InvitropulsedBcellsinduceanergyinmemoryCD4cellsexvivo.EnrichedB220Bcells()orCD11cenrichedDCs(fromspleensofvenormalBALB/cmicewerepulsedwiththeindicateddosesofcOVApeptidefor3h,incubatedwithmemoryCD4cellsfor48h,andtestedforanergyasdescribedinthelegendofFig.2using[H]thymidineincorporation.Datashownrepresentoneoffourindependentexperiments.BarsrepresentmeanSDoftriplicatecultures.0.001,0.15,or1.5nMvs0.0015or15,000nMpeptide3224BCELLSANERGIZEMEMORYCD4TCELLS wholeAPCs(LNcellsfreeofTcells)loadedwithtolerogenicdosesofpeptide,whileAPCsloadedwithnontolerogenicdosesofpeptidedidnotpreventthesubsequentproliferationofTcells(Fig.).TheproliferationofmemoryTcellsencounteringtolerogenicdosesofAg,asaccessedby[H]thymidineincorporation,wassignicantlyreduced(0.005)comparedwiththeproliferationofTcellsencounteringnontolerogenicdosesofAg,althoughnotcompletelyblocked.Thisbackgroundproliferationwaslikelybe-causeofnonspecicthymidineuptakebybystanderlymphocytes.ThismightbeduetothedistributionoftheMHCIImolecules/MHCII-peptidecomplexesonAPCsthatmostlikelyfollowthePoissondistributionand,thus,thoseAPCswithhighernumbersofMHCII-peptidecomplexesinduceactivationinTcellsratherthanBcellsastheAPCsthatinduceanergyinmemoryTcellsNext,wetestedtheabilityofpuriedB220-enrichedBcells(tobecalledpuriedBcellsthroughoutthearticle)loadedwithpep-tideinvivotoinduceanergyinAg-specicmemoryTcellsexvivo(Fig.2,)bymeasuringIL-2andIFN-synthesis.WefoundthatBcellsexposedto5–50pmolofpeptideinvivoaner-gizedmemoryTcellsasassessedbytheirreducedabilitytopro-duceintracellularIL-2andIFN-.Encouragedbytheseresults,weinvestigatedwhetherBcellspulsedwithAginvitrocouldinduceanergyexvivo.PuriedsplenicBcellsfromunimmunizedmicewerepulsedinvitrowithdifferentamountsofpeptideandtestedfortheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsexvivo.WefoundthatsplenicBcellspulsedwith0.1–1nMpeptideinvitroin-ducedanergy(Fig.3).Notethatwehaveusedmole(mol)unitsforabsoluteamountsofpeptideinjectedpermouseandconcentrationsofpeptideusedtopulseAPCsexvivoareinmolar(M)units.DCsdonotinduceanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsexvivoWenextexaminedthecontributionofDCstotheinductionofanergy.PuriedDCsfromthesplenocytesofunimmunizedBALB/cmicewerepulsedwithdifferentconcentrationsofpeptideandincubatedwithmemoryTcells.BecausethelevelsofMHCIIexpressiononDCswerethreetimeshigherthanthoseonBcells,theconcentrationofpeptideusedforpulsingwasadjusted3-foldtokeeptheabsolutenumbersofpeptide/MHCcomplexesbetweenBandDCsthesame.Fig.3depictsonerep-resentativeexperimentoffourshowingthatDCsdidnotanergizememoryCD4Tcellsatanyofthepeptideconcentrationstested.DCdepletiondoesnotaffecttheinductionofanergyinvivoAlthoughwefoundthatBcellsbutnotDCsinduceanergy,be-causeofthebroadimmunologicalsignicanceofDCs,itispos-siblethatourinvitroconditionswerenotidealandthatDCsmightcontributetoanergyinductioninmemoryTcellsinvivo.Toad-dressthisissue,weusedDTRTgmiceasDO11.10TgTcellrecipientsandgeneratedmemoryTcellsbyOVApeptideinCFAimmunizationasdescribedabove.DTRTgmiceexpressafusionproteinofDTRandenhancedgreenuorescenceprotein(EGFP) FIGURE4.AbsenceofCD11cDCsdoesnotaffecttheinductionofanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsinvivo.DTRTgmiceexpressingDTRundertheCD11cpromoter(BALB/cbackground)wereusedasthesourceofmemoryCD4Tcells.Miceweregivendailyi.p.injectionsofDTfor3daysstarting12hbeforeAgchallengeinIFA.Miceweresacriced60hafterAgchallenge,andcellsfromdrainingLNswereharvested.Inductionofanergywasmeasuredby[H]thymidineincorporation()aswellasbytheCFSEdilutionassay().Forthymidineincorporation,cellswerechallengedexvivowithcOVApeptidefor54handpulsedwith[H]thymidinefor18h.ForCFSEdilutionassay,cellswerelabeledwithCFSEandsimilarlychallengedexvivowithcOVApeptidefor72h.Ag-specicTcellproliferationwasmeasuredbyCFSEdilutionassayusingowcytometryonCD4doublepositivecells.DosesforinvitrochallengewithcOVApeptidearerepresentedasfollows:lledblackhistogram,0M;blackline,0.1grayline,1.Datashownrepresentoneofthreeindependentexperiments.Datainaresummarizedasthepercentageofdividingcellsandshownin.Therewerethreemicepergroup.BarsrepresentmeanSDoftriplicatecultures.0.001,5,or50pmolvs0.005or5000pmolofpeptidedosesTheJournalofImmunology underthecontroloftheCD11cpromoter(17).ThispromoterisconstitutivelyactiveinnearlyallconventionalDCsubsets.MicedonotpossessanativeDTRandtheircellsarethushighlyresis-tanttoDT.TransgenicDCsexpresssufcientamountsofDTR-EGFPandthusaredepletedfollowinganinjectionofDT.BecauseDCsarereplenishedfromprecursors,depletionpersistsonlyfor24haftertreatmentandnewDCsaregenerated48hafterDTinjection(17).Ofnote,anergyinoursystemwasoptimallydevel-opedduringtherst48hofAgencounterinvivo(11).ToavoidthepresenceofDCsduringanergyinduction,threeinjectionsofDTweregiven:once12hbefore,andtwiceat10h,and36hafterpeptideinjectioninIFA.ThepercentageofDCs,asjudgedbyGFPuorescence,didnotexceed0.15%ofthetotalleukocytesindrainingLNs,i.e.,85–90%ofDCsremaineddepleted24hafterthelastDTinjection.Fig.4showsresultsfromtwosetsofexperiments.InFig,4experimentsweredoneinthepresenceofCD11cDCs,i.e.,DTRTgmicewithoutDTinjection,andin,withmultipleDTinjec-tions.WeobservedthatTcellsfromthemiceinjectedwith5–50pmolofpeptidewereanergizedintheabsenceofDCs(Fig.4,)astestedby[H]thymidineuptake.SimilarresultswereobtainedinanothersetofexperimentsinFig.4byCSFEdilutionassay,suggestingthatthecontributionofDCstotheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsisnotessential.InvitropulsedBcellsinduceanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsinvivoToclarifyfurthertheroleofBcellsintheinductionofanergy,weinvestigatedwhethermemoryTcellscouldberenderedanergicbyinvitropulsedBcellsinvivo.Totestthis,wetransferred10cellspermouse(pulsedinvitrowithpeptideconcentrationsrang-ing0.00001–1000nMfor3h)intodifferentgroupsofmicebear-ingmemoryTcells.Tendayslater,weusedaCFSEdilutionassaytodeterminewhetheranergywasinducedinthosememoryTcells.WefoundthatAg-specicTcellsceasedtodividebeyond1–2divisionsingroupsofmicethatwereinjectedwithpuriedBcellsloadedwith0.001–0.01nMpeptide,whereasTcellsinmicethatreceivedBcellspulsedwithpeptidebeloworabovethosecon-centrationsproliferatedmultipletimes(Fig.5).B2BcellsaremajorcontributorsforinductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsTodissectthepopulationofBcellsthatinduceanergyinmemoryTcells,wepuriedB2Bcells(conventionalBcellsresidinginlymphoidfollicles;Refs.21and22)fromdrainingLNsofmiceimmunizedwithpeptideinIFA48hearlier,andincubatedthemwithCD4Tcellsfortheinductionofanergyexvivo.Inaparallelexperiment,wealsousedallAPCsdepletedofB2Bcellsandtestedtheirabilitytoinduceanergy.Wefoundthatbothpu-riedBcellsandB2BcellsinducedanergyinmemoryTcellswhereasAPCsdevoidofB2Bcellsfailedtodoso,indicatingthatB2BcellsaretheprimaryBcellsthatinduceanergyinmemoryTcells(Fig.6).Bcell-decientmicedonotsupportmemoryTcellanergyToestablishthatonlyBcellsandnotanyotherAPCsinduceanergyinmemoryTcellsinvivo,weusedcell-decientmuMTmice(23).BecausemuMTmicedonotsupportefcientdevelop-mentofCD4memoryTcells(24),werstgeneratedmemoryTcellsusingOTIITgcellsspecicforOVA(25,26)bytransferringOTIITgcellstoB6recipientsandimmunizingthem.MemorycellswerethentransferredtomuMTmice.AllgroupsofmiceweregivendifferentdosesofpeptideinIFAasbeforeandassayedforanergy9dayslater.Wefoundthatwhile5or50pmol FIGURE5.InductionofanergyinmemoryCD4cellsinvivobyinvitropulsedBcells.SplenicBcellswerepulsedinvitrowithdosesofcOVA(asshownonthe-axis)for3h,transferredtomicebearingmemoryTcells,and10dayslaterthemiceweresacriced.TcellproliferationwasmeasuredindrainingLNsbytheCFSEdilutionassayafterinvitrochallengewithcOVApeptide.DosesforinvitrochallengewithcOVApeptidearerepresentedasfollows:lledblackhistogram,0mM;blackline,0.1M;grayline,1.Datashownrepresentoneoftwoindepen-dentexperiments.Therewerethreemicepergroup.LowerpanelrepresentsthepercentageofAg-speciccells(DO11.10)dividedinresponsetoinvitro3226BCELLSANERGIZEMEMORYCD4TCELLS ofpeptideinducedanergyinBcell-sufcient(B6wildtype)mice,memoryOT-IIcellsfromBcell-decientmuMTmicedidnotshowsignsofanergyasevidencedbyIFN-andIL-2production(Fig.7).ThisexperimentconrmsthatBcellsarethecriticalAPCsforinducinganergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.InductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsbyBcellsismediatedbyCTLA-4isapotentnegativeregulatorofTcellactivation.TotestwhetherCTLA-4wasmediatingBcell-inducedanergyinmemoryTcells,weincubatedmemoryCD4Tcellsfor48hwithAPCs(BcellsorAPCswithoutBcells)pulsedinvivoandmea-suredCTLA-4expressionontheTcellsurface(Fig.8,Wefoundadirectcorrelationbetweentheinductionofanergyandtheup-regulationofCTLA-4(Fig.8).TcellsinteractingwithBcellspulsedwithanergizingdosesofAgexpressedhigher(fold)levelsofCTLA-4comparedwithTcellsinteractingwithBcellspulsedwithnonanergizingdosesofpeptide.APCsdevoidofBcellspulsedwithanydoseofAgdidnotinduceanergyandthelevelsofCTLA-4remainedunchanged.InonefurtherstudyoftheroleofCTLA-4,weincludedananti-mouseCTLA-4blockingAbduringexvivoanergyassayandfoundthatthepresenceofCTLA-4AbpreventedtheinductionofanergybyBcells(Fig.8InductionofTcelltoleranceiscriticalinprotectionagainstself-destructiveimmuneresponses.BecausememoryTcellsarekeyplayersinautoimmunepathogenesis(27–29),itisimportanttosilencethemtopreventautoimmunity.AlthoughtoleranceiswelldocumentedinnaiveTcells,itispoorlyunderstoodinmemoryTcells.OurearlystudiesshowedthatlowavidityengagementoftheTCRbyagonistpeptide-MHCIIcomplexesinducedanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells(10–12).AnergyinducedinthosestudieswaslonglastingandmetthedenitionofanergyofferedbySchwartzandcolleaguesas“astateofTcellunresponsivenessaccompaniedbyalackofresponsetoproliferationsignalsinclud-ingIL-2production,anditsreversibilitybyexogenousIL-2(30–32).”Inthepresentstudy,wehavetakenastepfurtherinunder-standinghowanergyisinducedandaskedwhichAPCstriggeranergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.TheabilitytomanipulatememoryTcellresponseshashighpotentialforprovidingnewtherapeuticavenues.Toaccomplishthis,anovelexvivoapproachwasdesignedinwhichmemoryTcellswereexposedtodifferentpuriedAPCpopulationspulsedwithdifferentdosesofantigenicpeptide.Wefoundthatresting,butnotactivated,BcellsaretheprimaryAPCsthatinduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.Ourexperimentsalsostronglysuggested FIGURE6.B2BcellsloadedwithlowdosesofAginduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsexvivo.DrainingLNcellswereharvestedfromthemicethathadbeenimmunized48hearlierwithcOVApeptideemulsiedinIFA.AllBcells()werepuriedbyB220microbeads,B2Bcells()werepuriedbyCD43microbeads,andAPCsdevoidofB2Bcells()wereobtainedbydepletingTcellsfromLNcellsbyThy1.2microbeadsfollowedbypositiveselectionwithCD43microbeads.AllthreedifferenttypesofAPCswereincubatedwithmemoryTcellsfor48h.InductionofanergywastestedbyrestimulatingtheTcellswithcOVApeptide-pulsedsplenocytesat0,0.1,1,and10Mfollowedby[H]thymidineincorporation.Thedatashownrepresentoneofthreeindependentexperiments.BarsrepresentmeanSDoftriplicatecultures.0.005,5,or50pmolvs0.05or5000pmolofpeptidedoses(Student’sTheJournalofImmunology thatCD11cDCsdidnotplayasignicantroleintheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcells.Thiswasconrmedinbothexvivoandinvivosettings.SeveralreportsindicatethatrestingBcellsmaybethepredominantAPCsthatinducetolerance.Thetolerogenicna-tureofrestingBcellsmaybeduetothelowabundanceofco-stimulatorymoleculessuchasB7,whichishighlyexpressedinDCsandactivatedBcells(33–35).AseeminglycontrarystudyreportsthatrestingBcellsfailedtoinduceanergyinmemoryTcellsspecicforHYAg(36).Failuretoinduceanergyinthatstudymightbebecauseofoneormoreofthefollowingrea-sons:1)theliganddensitypresentedbyBcellsisnotregulated;2)AgpresentationbyMHC-ItoCD8TcellsmightbedifferentfromthepresentationbyMHC-IItoCD4Tcells;and3)theactivationstatusofCD8TcellsinresponsetolowdensityofligandislikelydifferentfromthatofCD4Tcells.OurstudyrevealsthedualrelationshipofBcellswithmemoryTcells:Bcellsweretolerogenicwhenpresentinglimitednumbersofpeptide/MHCcomplexesandstimulatorywhenpresentinghighernumbersofcomplexes.ThelatterisconsistentwiththereportthatallAPCs,includingrestingBcells,canactivatemem-oryTcells,whichmaybeduetoalessstringentrequirementofmemoryTcellsforcostimulatorymolecules(34,37).Thedatapresentedhereprovidestrongevidenceinfavoroftheformer,inthatBcellsinduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.Inthisstudy,memoryCD4TcellswereanergizedbothexvivobyBcellsthathadcapturedpeptideinvivo,andinvivobyBcellsthatwereloadedwithpeptideinvitro.Dendriticcellsarepotentinitiatorsofimmuneresponses,al-thoughtheyarealsoreportedtobeinvolvedintheinductionoftoleranceinvivo(38–40).WhentheavailabilityofpeptideAgislimited,aswasthecasehere,matureDCswithhighMHCclassIIexpressionontheirsurfacesmightbethelikelyAPCstocapturelowlevelsofAgandrenderTcellsanergic.Nevertheless,weclearlydemonstratethatDCswerenotresponsibleforinducinganergyinmemoryCD4Tcellsbyusingseveralseparateexperimentaldesigns.Inone,APCsdepletedofBcellsorenrichedfor FIGURE7.Bcell-decientmicedonotsupportmemoryTcellanergy.GroupsofB6andBcell-decientmuMTmicebearingmemoryOT-IITcells(18hafteradoptivetransferofpuriedCD4TcellscontainingmemoryTcells)werechallengedwithincreasingdoses(0.05–5,000pmol)ofcOVApeptideinIFA.Ninedayslater,cellsfromdrainingLNswereharvestedandtestedforanergyinvitro.TcellresponsesweremeasuredbyintracellularandIL-2production(middlepanels)and[H]thymidineincorporation(lowerpanels).ThequadrantsforIL-2-orIFN--producingcells()weredrawnbasedonthematchedisotypecontrols.Therewerethreemicepergroupandwereassayedindividuallywithsimilarresults.Thedatashownrepresentoneoftwoindependentexperiments.BarsrepresentmeanSDoftriplicatecultures.0.001or5pmolvs0.05or5000pmolofpeptidedoses(Student’s3228BCELLSANERGIZEMEMORYCD4TCELLS DCsfailedtoinduceanergyinourexvivoanergyassay.Intheother,anergywasinducedbyAPCsintheabsenceofDCsinvivo.Moreover,Bcellsthatwereloadedwithpeptideinvitrosuccess-fullyinducedanergyinmemoryCD4Tcellswhentransferredinvivo.Finally,Bcell-decientmice,whilepresumablysufcientinallotherAPCtypes,failedtoinduceanergyinCD4memoryTcells.Therefore,wefeelconvincedthatBcellsarethecriticalAPCstoinduceanergyinmemoryCD4Tcells.AroleforCTLA-4inthenegativeregulationofTcellactivationiswelldocumented(41–44).Interestingly,wefoundthatBcellspresentingtolerogenicdosesofpeptideinducedhigherlevelsofCTLA-4expressiononTcells.Upontheadditionofanti-CTLA-4Abtotheculture,anergywasprevented,stronglysuggestingthatanergyinducedbyBcellsismediatedbyCTLA-4.TheexpressionoflowlevelsofB7.1onBcells,whichdoesnotchangeatdifferentdosesofantigenicstimulation(datanotshown),isinagreementwiththenotionthatBcellsaretheAPCsinvolvedintheinductionofanergyinasystemthatisregulatedbyCTLA-4.BecauseCTLA-4/B7.1avidityishigherthanCD28/B7.1interaction,itiscertainlyfeasiblethatunderlimitingB7.1expressiontheinhibitoryeffectsofCTLA-4willbedominant(45).Inagreementwiththisnotion,CpG-stimulatedBcellsfailedtoinduceanergyinmemoryTcellsinallconcentrationsofthepeptide(0–10,000nM)tested,whereasthecontrolBcellspulsedwith0.1–1.0nMpeptideweresuccessfulininducinganergy(datanotshown).Recentreportshaveindicatedthatprogrammeddeath(PD)-1/PD-L1,andnotCTLA-4/B7,interactionsdictatethestateofex-haustiongeneratedinCD8Tcellsinchronicviralinfections(46,47).Basedonourdata,wesuggestthatanergymightberegulateddifferentlyinCD4vsCD8Tcells.Indeed,itisreportedthatanergyinCD8TcellswasinducedintheabsenceofCTLA-4/B7interaction(48).Thus,ourstudyopensnewavenuesforinvesti-gatingdifferencesinmolecularmechanismsunderlyingCD4vsCD8anergy.BecauseoftheinvolvementofCTLA-4intheinductionofan-ergyinmemoryCD4TcellsandinlightofexpressionofCTLA-4andCD25onregulatoryTcells(Tregs),onepossibleexplanationforourobservationsmightbethatthehyporespon-sivenessshownhereisinducedbyTcellsthathaveTregfunction.Interestingly,arecentreportdocumentedthatAgpresentationbyBcellscausedanincreaseinFoxP3expressioninTregcells(49).Despitethosendings,inoursystem,Tregsdonotseemtobetheinduceroftheobservedhyporesponsiveness.WehadpreviouslyreportedthatinductionofanergyisnotduetoregulatoryTcells(11).Inthoseexperiments,cellsfrominvivoanergizedgroupsweremixedwiththenonanergizedrespondinggroupsatdifferentratiostondoutwhetherpotentialTregspresentintheanergizedgroupswouldrendertherespondingcellsanergicexvivo.Theresultsindicatednoreductioninresponseinthecell-mixedculturewells.Additionally,amicroarraygenechipassaycomparingin FIGURE8.InductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsbyBcellsisCTLA-4mediated.Fourgroupsofmicewereimmunizedwithincreasingdoses(0.05–5000pmol)ofcOVApeptideinIFA.After48h,miceweresacriced;BcellsandAPCsdevoidofBcellswerepuriedfromthedrainingLNsandincubatedwithmemoryCD4Tcellsfor48h.ExvivoinductionofanergybyBcells()orAPCsdevoidofBcells()wastestedbyrestimulatingTcellswithcOVApeptide-pulsedsplenocytes(atconcentrationsshown)for72hfollowedby[H]thymidineincorporation.CTLA-4expressiononAg-specic(CD4)Tcellswasdeterminedbyow-cytometry().ReversalofanergybyBcellswastestedsimilarly,exceptthatanti-mouseCTLA-4AbwasaddedtothecultureinthebeginningofthecoincubationofBcellsandmemoryCD4Tcells().Therewerevemicepergroup.Datashowninrepresentoneoftwoindependentexperiments;thoseinhavebeenrepeatedfourtimes.Barsrepresentmeanoftriplicatecultures.0.001,5,or50pmolvs0.05or5000pmolofpeptidedoses(Student’sTheJournalofImmunology vivoanergizedcellstononanergizedcellsdemonstratednosignif-icantincreaseofFoxP3inanergizedTcells.Inthesameexperi-ment,thelevelsofexpressionofCD25,amarkerofTregs,re-mainedlowerintheanergizedcellscomparedwiththenonanergizedcells(datanotshown).WendthesedatatoargueagainstaroleforTregsintheinductionofanergyinoursystem.OnemightarguethattheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsmightnotbebenecialtothemaintenanceofahealthyimmuneresponse.WeproposethatareducedlevelofAg/MHCexpressiononthesurfaceofBcellsmightbeamechanismthathasevolvedtosignalmemoryTcellsofthe“endofaninfection”sothatcellswouldstopproliferatingandsecretinginammatorycytokines(50).Undoubtedly,excesscytokinesecretionisharmfulandnotneededoncetheinfectionisterminated.Followingtheterminationofinfection,Agloadisgraduallydiminishedwithinammation.BcellsbearingspecichighafnityAgreceptors,suchasB2Bcells,atacertainthresholdofAgloadwouldpreferentiallycaptureAgandpresentittomemoryCD4Tcells.Ourstudy,therefore,suggestsanewroleforBcellsastheAPCsofchoicewhenAgfallstononthreateninglowlevels(51).Thus,itislogicaltohy-pothesizethatBcellssignalmemoryTcellstoundergoanergy.Incontrast,atthebeginningofaninfection,whentheAgloadmightalsobelow,theinductionofanergyinmemoryTcellswouldnotbedesirable.AfeatureofanergyasdescribedinthisarticleisitsreversibilityuponanencounterwithIL-2andAg,aconditionthatismetduringtheonsetofaninfectionwhenasurgeofinamma-toryresponsesfromtheinnateimmunesystemcoincideswiththereleaseofmultiplecytokinesincludingIL-2(52).InsupportofthishypothesisareourpreviousreportsshowingthatanencounterwithlowdensitiesofAginthepresenceofIL-2doesnotleadtotheinductionofanergyandthatanergizedcells,whenincubatedwithIL-2andAg,arenolongeranergized(10–12).ThepointsdescribedabovesuggestthattheinductionofanergyinmemoryTcellsmightbeanevolutionarilybenecialmecha-nism.Abetterunderstandingofthisphenomenoncouldhelpinrevealingtheunderlyingmechanismsforviralandtumorsurveil-lance.ManyvirusesandseveraltumorsareknowntodecreasetheexpressionofcellsurfaceMHCclassII(53).Also,sometumor-associatedpeptidesbindpoorlytotheMHCmolecules(54).ThereducedsurfaceexpressionofMHCand/orlowafnitypeptide/MHCcomplexesleadstothepresentationoflowdensitiesofspe-cicpeptide/MHC,whichwouldinduceanergytotheviralortu-mor-derivedAgs.Thus,ourndingssuggestnewstrategiesforovercomingviralinfectionsandtreatingtumors.Ratherthanre-peatedimmunizations,itmightbemoreproductivetofocusonthereversalofanergy.Inthecaseofautoimmunity,self-reactivememoryTcellsmightbekeptundercheckfromeffectorfunctionbyencounteringlowdensitiesofpeptide-MHCpresentedbyBcells,whichcouldbeanimportantprocessinthepreventionoforgan-specicautoimmunediseases.Thus,memoryTcellsinau-toimmuneconditionscouldbetargetedspecicallyforinductionofanergybytransferringsyngeneicBcellspulsedexvivowiththespecicpeptides.ControversialobservationshavebeenreportedontherolesthatBcellsmightplayinautoimmunediseasemodels(55–57).TheidenticationoffollicularBcells(B2Bcells)asthecriticalAPCsforinductionofanergyinmemoryCD4TcellsleadsthewaytofurtherstudiesontheuniquecharacteristicsofthemembraneofmemoryCD4Tcellsand/ormoleculesexpressedonthesurfaceofmemoryTcellsandBcellsthatcontributespe-cicallytotheinductionofTcellanergy.WeespeciallythankDrs.DavidScott,RonGermain,andRonSchwartzforinsightfuldiscussions,AbdelHamad,ChungDang,andKedarNarayanfordiscussionandcriticalreadingofthemanuscript,andStanislavKho-ruzhenkoforFACSdataanalysisandpreparationofhighresolutionTheauthorshavenonancialconictofinterest.1.Moulton,V.R.,andD.L.Farber.2006.Committedtomemory:lineagechoicesforactivatedTcells.TrendsImmunol.27:261–267.2.Seder,R.A.,andD.L.Sacks.2004.Memorymaynotneedreminding.Nat.Med.10:1045–1047.3.Hataye,J.,J.J.Moon,A.Khoruts,C.Reilly,andM.K.Jenkins.2006.NaiveandmemoryCD4Tcellsurvivalcontrolledbyclonalabundance.114–116.4.McKinstry,K.K.,S.Golech,W.H.Lee,G.Huston,N.P.Weng,andS.L.Swain.2007.RapiddefaulttransitionofCD4Tcelleffectorstofunctionalmemorycells.J.Exp.Med.204:2199–2211.5.Chandok,M.R.,F.I.Okoye,M.P.Ndejembi,andD.L.Farber.2007.Abio-chemicalsignatureforrapidrecallofmemoryCD4Tcells.J.Immunol.3689–3698.6.Watson,A.R.,andW.T.Lee.2004.Differencesinsignalingmoleculeorgani-zationbetweennaiveandmemoryCD4Tlymphocytes.J.Immunol.33–41.7.Steinman,R.M.,D.Hawiger,andM.C.Nussenzweig.2003.Tolerogenicden-driticcells.Annu.Rev.Immunol.21:685–711.8.Blair,D.A.,andL.Lefrancois.2007.IncreasedcompetitionforantigenduringprimingnegativelyimpactsthegenerationofmemoryCD4Tcells.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA104:15045–15050.9.Patke,D.S.,andD.L.Farber.2005.ModulationofmemoryCD4Tcellfunctionandsurvivalpotentialbyalteringthestrengthoftherecallstimulus.J.Immunol.174:5433–5443.10.Korb,L.C.,S.Mirshahidi,K.Ramyar,A.A.SadighiAkha,andS.Sadegh-Nasseri.1999.InductionofTcellanergybylownumbersofagonistJ.Immunol.162:6401–6409.11.Mirshahidi,S.,C.T.Huang,andS.Sadegh-Nasseri.2001.AnergyinperipheralmemoryCD4TcellsinducedbylowavidityengagementofTcellreceptor.J.Exp.Med.194:719–731.12.Mirshahidi,S.,L.C.Ferris,andS.Sadegh-Nasseri.2004.ThemagnitudeofTCRengagementisacriticalpredictorofTcellanergyoractivation.J.Immunol.5346–5355.13.Wilson,N.S.,andJ.A.Villadangos.2005.Regulationofantigenpresentationandcross-presentationinthedendriticcellnetwork:facts,hypothesis,andim-munologicalimplications.Adv.Immunol.86:241–305.14.Lyons,A.2000.AnalysingcelldivisioninvivoandinvitrousingowcytometricmeasurementofCFSEdyedilution.J.Immunol.Methods243:147–154.15.deVinuesa,C.G.,M.C.Cook,J.Ball,M.Drew,Y.Sunners,M.Cascalho,M.Wabl,G.G.Klaus,andI.C.MacLennan.2000.GerminalcenterswithoutTJ.Exp.Med.191:485–494.16.Chen,W.,Y.Yu,C.Shao,M.Zhang,W.Wang,L.Zhang,andX.Cao.2001.Enhancementofantigen-presentingabilityofBlymphomacellsbyimmunos-timulatoryCpG-oligonucleotidesandanti-CD40antibody.Immunol.Lett.17.Jung,S.,D.Unutmaz,P.Wong,G.Sano,K.DelosSantos,T.Sparwasser,S.Wu,S.Vuthoori,K.Ko,F.Zavala,etal.2002.InvivodepletionofCD11ccellsabrogatesprimingofCD8Tcellsbyexogenouscell-associatedantigens.17:211–220.18.Kearney,E.R.,K.A.Pape,D.Y.Loh,andM.K.Jenkins.1994.Visualizationofpeptide-specicTcellimmunityandperipheraltoleranceinductioninvivo.1:327–339.19.Jelley-Gibbs,D.M.,D.M.Brown,J.P.Dibble,L.Haynes,S.M.Eaton,andS.L.Swain.2005.Unexpectedprolongedpresentationofinuenzaantigenspro-motesCD4Tcellmemorygeneration.J.Exp.Med.202:697–706.20.Dutton,R.W.,L.M.Bradley,andS.L.Swain.1998.Tcellmemory.Annu.Rev.16:201–223.21.Martin,F.,andJ.F.Kearney.2000.B-cellsubsetsandthematurepreimmunerepertoire:marginalzoneandB1Bcellsaspartofa“naturalimmunememory.”Immunol.Rev.175:70–79.22.Hardy,R.R.2006.B-1Bcells:development,selection,naturalautoantibody,andCurr.Opin.Immunol.18:547–555.23.Kitamura,D.,J.Roes,R.Kuhn,andK.Rajewsky.1991.ABcell-decientmousebytargeteddisruptionofthemembraneexonoftheimmunoglobulin350:423–426.24.Linton,P.J.,J.Harbertson,andL.M.Bradley.2000.AcriticalroleforBcellsinthedevelopmentofmemoryCD4cells.J.Immunol.165:5558–5565.25.Barnden,M.J.,J.Allison,W.R.Heath,andF.R.Carbone.1998.DefectiveTCRexpressionintransgenicmiceconstructedusingcDNA-based-andgenesunderthecontrolofheterologousregulatoryelements.Immunol.CellBiol.76:34–40.26.Robertson,J.M.,P.E.Jensen,andB.D.Evavold.2000.DO11.10andOT-IITcellsrecognizeaC-terminalovalbumin323–339epitope.J.Immunol.4706–4712.27.Ponchel,F.,A.W.Morgan,S.J.Bingham,M.Quinn,M.Buch,R.J.Verburg,J.Henwood,S.H.Douglas,A.Masurel,P.Conaghan,etal.2002.Dysregulated3230BCELLSANERGIZEMEMORYCD4TCELLS lymphocyteproliferationanddifferentiationinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis.100:4550–4556.28.Davis,L.S.,J.J.Cush,H.Schulze-Koops,andP.E.Lipsky.2001.RheumatoidsynovialCD4TcellsexhibitareducedcapacitytodifferentiateintoIL-4-producingT-helper-2effectorcells.ArthritisRes.3:54–64.29.Skapenko,A.,J.Wendler,P.E.Lipsky,J.R.Kalden,andH.Schulze-Koops.1999.AlteredmemoryTcelldifferentiationinpatientswithearlyrheumatoidJ.Immunol.163:491–499.30.Schwartz,R.H.1996.ModelsofTcellanergy:isthereacommonmolecularJ.Exp.Med.184:1–8.31.Quill,H.,andR.H.Schwartz.1987.StimulationofnormalinducerTcellcloneswithantigenpresentedbypuriedIamoleculesinplanarlipidmembranes:spe-cicinductionofalong-livedstateofproliferativenonresponsiveness.J.Immu-138:3704–3712.32.Jenkins,M.K.,D.M.Pardoll,J.Mizuguchi,H.Quill,andR.H.Schwartz.1987.T-cellunresponsivenessinvivoandinvitro:nespecicityofinductionandmolecularcharacterizationoftheunresponsivestate.Immunol.Rev.95:113–135.33.Eynon,E.E.,andD.C.Parker.1992.SmallBcellsasantigen-presentingcellsintheinductionoftolerancetosolubleproteinantigens.J.Exp.Med.34.Ronchese,F.,andB.Hausmann.1993.BlymphocytesinvivofailtoprimenaiveTcellsbutcanstimulateantigen-experiencedTlymphocytes.J.Exp.Med.679–690.35.Yuschenkoff,V.N.,M.P.Sethna,G.J.Freeman,andD.C.Parker.1996.Co-expressionofB7-1andantigenblockstoleranceinductiontoantigenpresentedbyrestingBcells.J.Immunol.157:1987–1995.36.Fuchs,E.J.,andP.Matzinger.1992.BcellsturnoffvirginbutnotmemoryT258:1156–1159.37.Croft,M.,L.M.Bradley,andS.L.Swain.1994.NaiveversusmemoryCD4Tcellresponsetoantigen:memorycellsarelessdependentonaccessorycellco-stimulationandcanrespondtomanyantigen-presentingcelltypesincludingrest-ingBcells.J.Immunol.152:2675–2685.38.Steinman,R.,S.Turley,I.Mellman,andK.Inaba.2000.Theinductionoftol-erancebydendriticcellsthathavecapturedapoptoticcells.J.Exp.Med.411–416.39.Svensson,M.,A.Maroof,M.Ato,andP.M.Kaye.2004.Stromalcellsdirectlocaldifferentiationofregulatorydendriticcells.21:805–816.40.Wakkach,A.,N.Fournier,V.Brun,J.P.Breittmayer,F.Cottrez,andH.Groux.2003.CharacterizationofdendriticcellsthatinducetoleranceandTregulatory1celldifferentiationinvivo.18:605–617.41.Greenwald,R.J.,V.A.Boussiotis,R.Lorsbach,A.K.Abbas,andA.H.Sharpe.2001.CTLA-4regulatesinductionofanergyinvivo.14:145–155.42.Perez,V.L.,L.VanParijs,A.Biuckians,X.X.Zheng,T.B.Strom,andA.K.Abbas.1997.InductionofperipheralTcelltoleranceinvivorequiresCTLA-4engagement.6:411–417.43.Thompson,C.B.,andJ.P.Allison.1997.TheemergingroleofCTLA-4asanimmuneattenuator.7:445–450.44.Walunas,T.L.,D.J.Lenschow,C.Y.Bakker,P.S.Linsley,G.J.Freeman,J.M.Green,C.B.Thompson,andJ.A.Bluestone.1994.CTLA-4canfunctionasanegativeregulatorofTcellactivation.1:405–413.45.ChambersC.A.,M.S.Kuhns,J.G.Egen,andJ.P.Allison.2001.Ctla-4-mediatedinhibitioninregulationoftcellresponses:mechanismsandmanipula-tionintumorimmunotherapy.Annu.Rev.Immunol.19:565–594.46.Barber,D.L.,E.J.Wherry,D.Masopust,B.Zhu,J.P.Allison,A.H.Sharpe,G.J.Freeman,andR.Ahmed.2006.RestoringfunctioninexhaustedCD8Tcellsduringchronicviralinfection.439:682–687.47.Trautmann,L.,L.Janbazian,N.Chomont,E.A.Said,S.Gimmig,B.Bessette,M.R.Boulassel,E.Delwart,H.Sepulveda,R.S.Balderas,etal.2006.Upregu-lationofPD-1expressiononHIV-specicCD8Tcellsleadstoreversibleimmunedysfunction.Nat.Med.12:1198–1202.48.Frauwirth,K.A.,M.L.Alegre,andC.B.Thompson.2001.CTLA-4isnotrequiredforinductionofCD8Tcellanergyinvivo.J.Immunol.4936–4941.49.Chen,X.,andP.E.Jensen.2007.PrimaryBlymphocytespreferentiallyexpandallogeneicFoxP3CD4Tcells.J.Immunol.179:2046–2050.50.Marsden,V.S.,J.W.Kappler,andP.C.Marrack.2006.HomeostasisofthememoryTcellpool.Int.Arch.AllergyImmunol.139:63–74.51.Lanzavecchia,A.1985.Antigen-specicinteractionbetweenTandBcells.314:537–539.52.Granucci,F.,S.Feau,V.Angeli,F.Trottein,andP.Ricciardi-Castagnoli.2003.EarlyIL-2productionbymousedendriticcellsistheresultofmicrobial-inducedJ.Immunol.170:5075–5081.53.Brodsky,F.M.,L.Lem,A.Solache,andE.M.Bennett.1999.Humanpathogensubversionofantigenpresentation.Immunol.Rev.168:199–215.54.Topalian,S.L.,M.I.Gonzales,M.Parkhurst,Y.F.Li,S.Southwood,A.Sette,S.A.Rosenberg,andP.F.Robbins.1996.Melanoma-specicCD4TcellsrecognizenonmutatedHLA-DR-restrictedtyrosinaseepitopes.J.Exp.Med.55.Chen,C.C.,A.Rivera,J.P.Dougherty,andY.Ron.2004.Completeprotectionfromrelapsingexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisinducedbysynge-neicBcellsexpressingtheautoantigen.103:4616–4618.56.Litzinger,M.T.,Y.Su,T.C.Lei,N.Soukhareva,andD.W.Scott.2005.Mech-anismsofgenetherapyfortolerance:B7signalingisrequiredforpeptide-IgGgene-transferredtoleranceinduction.J.Immunol.175:780–787.57.Melo,M.E.,J.Qian,M.El-Amine,R.K.Agarwal,N.Soukhareva,Y.Kang,andD.W.Scott.2002.GenetransferofIg-fusionproteinsintoBcellspreventsandtreatsautoimmunediseases.J.Immunol.168:4788–4795.TheJournalofImmunology