19211936 Washington Naval Conference 1921 The conference was organized by the US and aimed at reducing naval armaments The US UK and Japan all actively built up naval fleets following WWI but the UK and Japan couldnt afford to continue the naval race and the US wanted to decrease spendin ID: 266307
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Disarmament" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Disarmament
1921-1936Slide2
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
The conference was organized by the US and aimed at reducing naval armaments. The US, UK and Japan all actively built up naval fleets following WWI, but the UK and Japan couldn’t afford to continue the naval race and the US wanted to decrease spending. In addition, there was a need to reduce tension between Japan and US in Asia before it reached the state of international crisis. Slide3
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
Results of Conference
:
Limited size/number of battleships, aircraft carriers and cruisers (ratio of 5:5:3)
No new battleships for 10 years
Limited construction of bases in the Pacific (this would give Japan dominance in the eastern Pacific)
Successes
:
There was short-term, limited success – mainly because in order to be successful they needed to address the reasons for the arms race
before
disarmament occurred
Issues included grievances, territorial claims, mistrust of neighboring nations
Many nations (Germany, Russia, Japan, Italy) would see rearmament as their only option
It was possible that these conferences
encouraged aggression
rather than discouraging itSlide4
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
While success was short-term and limited, it did further disarmament negotiations. It was seem by the public as a very positive step (people were very supportive of any form of disarmament following WWI). Much of this support was based on the following agreements:
These agreements temporarily reduced tension between the US and Japan, but
depended entirely on the cooperation of each nation
. They were vaguely worded and that it easy for a nation to back out if their interests changed.
4- Power Agreement
: (US, Japan, UK, France) Replaced the Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1902 and protected the Asian territorial rights of each nation. Agreed to defend each other in case of aggression.
9-Power Agreement
: this confirmed the Open-Door Policy regarding trade in China (ended in 1931)Slide5
London Naval Conference (1930)Slide6
Geneva Disarmament Conference
(1932-1934)
Failure because
:
There were major world issues regarding arms race (Germany was violating numerous terms of the Versailles Treaty)
There was international pressure to revise Paris Peace Settlement
Great Depression had reduced optimism (nations were worried about their own security and “collective security” wasn’t top priority)
Problems distinguishing between offensive and defensive weapons- undermined any real discussion at conference)
Germany used the conference as a way to show the hypocrisy of other countries (said either Germany should be allowed to build arms equal to that of other nations or others should reduce to Germany’s permitted strength)Slide7
Geneva Disarmament Conference (1932-1934) Slide8
Geneva Disarmament Conference (1932-1934)
In addition to German resistance at the conference, Italy also had issues with the disarmament process – Mussolini wanted to build an empire.
As long as Germany, Russia, Italy and Japan were determined to revise the Paris Peace Settlements and recover lost territory, then there wasn’t much hope for arms reduction.
No real agreements were made at the conference and tensions increased. Nations had two options on how to best protect themselves:
1. Increase defense spending and continue to build up their militaries
2. Attempt diplomatic negotiations regarding issues in order to avoid
escalation Slide9
Writing Prompt - Disarmament
Answer the following questions regarding your opinions on ‘disarmament’ on a separate sheet of paper.
Do
you believe there will always be reasons to have weapons? Why or why not?
How realistic is disarmament as a strategic objective
?
Could international policies be put in place to limit the spread of weapons? What incentives do nations have to disarm and adhere to these policies?