Property of the W. Haywood Burns Institute. Do not

Transcript:Property of the W. Haywood Burns Institute. Do not:
Property of the W. Haywood Burns Institute. Do not edit, alter, reproduce or disseminate without proper credit attributed to the W. Haywood Burns Institute. www.burnsinstitute.org SF CJHWG MID COURSE CORRECTION December 16, 2020 Restructuring Necessary Based Upon Prior Year’s Experience Number of Meetings Unsustainable Confusion about Roles and Authority Communication Difficult across Platforms Transition from Information Gathering to Recommendations Major Components Restructure Sub-committees Implement Learning Exchanges Complete Listening Sessions Establish and Monitor Benchmarks Liaisons with Courts, County Attorneys, Buildings etc. Youth Artwork (logo) Current Subcommittee Structure Mental Health and Program Data and Needs Assessment Reinvestment and Policy Facilities Labor Proposed Subcommittee Structure Expand Community Alternatives Rehabilitative Non-Institutional Place of Detention Subcommittee #1: Expand Community Alternatives Subcommittee Focus: Shrink the footprint of legal processes that do not require judicial approval. Expand and enhance pre-arrest and pre-referral diversion opportunities. Explore strategies for reducing secure detention exposure for technical or non-new law violations (including but not limited to bench warrants and placement related detention). Explore opportunities to expand access to youth-serving resources that serve as alternatives to formal legal processes that are founded on principles of youth development and are community centered. Explore opportunities to coordinate and fund expanded youth-serving resources. Subcommittee #2: Rehabilitative Non-Institutional Place of Detention Subcommittee Focus: Build on findings from Data and Needs Assessment Report #1, regular data reports from SFJPD and forthcoming analysis and case file review from AIR to: Establish criteria for selection of “Non-Institutional Place of Detention” Explore “Non-Institutional Place of Detention” for these populations: Awaiting detention hearing (24-72 hrs, pending analysis) Awaiting adjudication (20 days, pending analysis) Awaiting disposition (10 days, pending analysis) Awaiting placement (wide range, pending analysis) Youth awaiting adult adjudication (1 year in) Explore Policy that impacts detention length, e.g: Hearing expedition Location of hearings **Note: Judicial Approval Required** Learning Exchanges Goal: Learn from experts across the nation who are instrumental in engaging shifts in their administration of justice that expand community alternatives and/or establish new models for rehabilitative, non-institutional place of detention. Planned Learning Exchanges: Diversion (Taylor Schooley, LA County Division of Youth Development and Diversion) Community Based Diversion (David Muhammad & Meredith Desautels, Oakland PD) Alternative Rehabilitative Community (ARC) Tour (Daniel Elby, ARC Founder) Restorative Justice (Impact Justice) Budget Realignment (Clinton Lacey, Director of District of Columbia Department of Youth and Rehabilitative Services (DYRS) Listening Sessions Goal: Solicit input from a broad array of community and stakeholder partners to ensure