THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE
Description: THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION BY 2030 Key findings Goran Forbici METHODOLOGY Broad, as well as in-depth approach: Wide online survey: 180 respondents 33 European CSO networks 147 CSOs from 24 EU member states
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION BY 2030
Key findings
Goran Forbici<br>
slide2. METHODOLOGY Broad, as well as in-depth approach:
Wide online survey:
180 respondents
33 European CSO networks
147 CSOs from 24 EU member statesÂ
Desk research
Review of over 30 studies, reports, academic research papers on development trends and future prospects of EU CSOs
27 interviews: members of EESC, EESC Liaison Group, CoE, Third Sector Impact academic consortium and representatives of national and European CSO platforms and global CSO network
2 workshops with members of Civil Society Europe<br>
slide3. GENERAL INSIGHTS Differences between member states make it difficult to measure and compare national CSO sectors
Comparing the number of CSOs is misleading due to vast differences in their size; a sector with a few very large CSOs carries more weight than one with many small CSOs.
Diminishing differences between sectors in EU regions
All three methods identified the same or very similar development factors
Current societal trends will most likely continue to influence CSOs until 2030<br>
slide4. 5 MOST INFLUENTIAL SOCIETAL TRENDS AFFECTING CSOS Demographic changes
Economic crisis
Digitalisation
Populism
Shrinking civic space<br>
slide5. EFFECT ON CSOs Stronger and changing relations with the authorities: more and more business-like -> social policies increasingly follow a social-investment-logical; CSOs have to do more to show their (social) impact; higher/increasing demand for CSOs services
Changes in lifestyle: people less willing/able to commit their time to CSOs; ageing CSO management and rigid management structures,
Decrease of national public funds, Revenue structures changed, Public funding returned to the pre-crisis amount. But not the character: From stakeholder to provider
Decline of citizen engagement with CSOs, since people can now directly participate in public life, help a cause (without interacting with CSOs)
Negative effects of digitalisation on the public discourse: lack of dialogue, in-depth discussions, loss of a lot of relevant information
Increasing pressure on CSOs (Western Europe: decrease in funds for advocacy, Eastern Europe: threats to freedom of assembly and expression)<br>
slide6. CSO RESPONSE UNDER WAY Diversifying existing and developing new services
Developing new business/organisational/fundraising models
Diversification of funding sources
Adapting to the new digitalised world
Engaging in civic education
Awareness raising campaigns
Mergers, rationalization of services<br>
slide7. REMAINING CHALLENGES Development of new services
Leadership succession; gradual, mentored and conflict-free change in CSO management structures. Attracting and keeping young staff
Upgrading and re-inventing CSOs’ societal role + Showing CSO social impact
Developing and promoting new activities, digital skills, importance of data security etc.
Defending and re-instating the trust in basic freedoms and human rights and fostering civic education
Improving CSO transparency, accountability and credibility
Developing an EU funding mechanism that would offer financial and other support to opposition civil society<br>
slide8. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES Upgrade service delivery and increase social innovations, collaboration with other CSOs, exchange of services
Proactive monitoring of implementation, quality and impact of services
To acknowledge the shift from ‘trust me to prove me’ discourse: enhance transparency, accountability and social impact
Support to infrastructural CSO networking and adaptation and upgrade of services + invest in CSO start-ups, similarly as they do in business
Challenging the assumptions that public expenditure cuts are inevitable and privatisation the way forward
Realistic approach to digitalisation, its positive effects, but also limitations. Digital technologies should not replace direct relations, but complement them
Institutions should promote and financially support civic education and enhancement of media literacy
Supporting and promoting the role of public media service as an important trustworthy source
EU should apply the same criteria of the rule of law that are used for enlargement and neighbourhood countries to EU member states + monitor civic space in Europe and financially support advocacy and awareness-raising
Promotion of Pan-European CSO solidarity: cooperation and support between national CSOs sectors, reacting to the shrinking of civic space in other countries<br>
slide9. TACKLING CHALLENGES TOGETHER - COOPERATION OF CSOS AND NATIONAL/EU INSTITUTIONS Joint debates and awareness-raising about the importance of CSO advocacy activities
Cooperation in development of new services for tackling new emerging needs
Joint promotion of a giving culture, as well as volunteering
(Collaborative) development of a consultation mechanism that would enable broad consultation with citizens as well as properly involve key stakeholders
Capacity-building of public officials on participatory decision-making
Broad promotion of RIA practices among member states
Avoiding equalisation of CSO advocacy with corporate lobbying
EU institutions need to address the shrinking civic space, promote civic education, democracy, rule of law and the role of CSOs
Development of support mechanisms (especially funding) to help CSOs tackle the issue of shrinking civic space<br>
slide10. Thank you!<br>
Key findings
Goran Forbici<br>
slide2. METHODOLOGY Broad, as well as in-depth approach:
Wide online survey:
180 respondents
33 European CSO networks
147 CSOs from 24 EU member statesÂ
Desk research
Review of over 30 studies, reports, academic research papers on development trends and future prospects of EU CSOs
27 interviews: members of EESC, EESC Liaison Group, CoE, Third Sector Impact academic consortium and representatives of national and European CSO platforms and global CSO network
2 workshops with members of Civil Society Europe<br>
slide3. GENERAL INSIGHTS Differences between member states make it difficult to measure and compare national CSO sectors
Comparing the number of CSOs is misleading due to vast differences in their size; a sector with a few very large CSOs carries more weight than one with many small CSOs.
Diminishing differences between sectors in EU regions
All three methods identified the same or very similar development factors
Current societal trends will most likely continue to influence CSOs until 2030<br>
slide4. 5 MOST INFLUENTIAL SOCIETAL TRENDS AFFECTING CSOS Demographic changes
Economic crisis
Digitalisation
Populism
Shrinking civic space<br>
slide5. EFFECT ON CSOs Stronger and changing relations with the authorities: more and more business-like -> social policies increasingly follow a social-investment-logical; CSOs have to do more to show their (social) impact; higher/increasing demand for CSOs services
Changes in lifestyle: people less willing/able to commit their time to CSOs; ageing CSO management and rigid management structures,
Decrease of national public funds, Revenue structures changed, Public funding returned to the pre-crisis amount. But not the character: From stakeholder to provider
Decline of citizen engagement with CSOs, since people can now directly participate in public life, help a cause (without interacting with CSOs)
Negative effects of digitalisation on the public discourse: lack of dialogue, in-depth discussions, loss of a lot of relevant information
Increasing pressure on CSOs (Western Europe: decrease in funds for advocacy, Eastern Europe: threats to freedom of assembly and expression)<br>
slide6. CSO RESPONSE UNDER WAY Diversifying existing and developing new services
Developing new business/organisational/fundraising models
Diversification of funding sources
Adapting to the new digitalised world
Engaging in civic education
Awareness raising campaigns
Mergers, rationalization of services<br>
slide7. REMAINING CHALLENGES Development of new services
Leadership succession; gradual, mentored and conflict-free change in CSO management structures. Attracting and keeping young staff
Upgrading and re-inventing CSOs’ societal role + Showing CSO social impact
Developing and promoting new activities, digital skills, importance of data security etc.
Defending and re-instating the trust in basic freedoms and human rights and fostering civic education
Improving CSO transparency, accountability and credibility
Developing an EU funding mechanism that would offer financial and other support to opposition civil society<br>
slide8. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES Upgrade service delivery and increase social innovations, collaboration with other CSOs, exchange of services
Proactive monitoring of implementation, quality and impact of services
To acknowledge the shift from ‘trust me to prove me’ discourse: enhance transparency, accountability and social impact
Support to infrastructural CSO networking and adaptation and upgrade of services + invest in CSO start-ups, similarly as they do in business
Challenging the assumptions that public expenditure cuts are inevitable and privatisation the way forward
Realistic approach to digitalisation, its positive effects, but also limitations. Digital technologies should not replace direct relations, but complement them
Institutions should promote and financially support civic education and enhancement of media literacy
Supporting and promoting the role of public media service as an important trustworthy source
EU should apply the same criteria of the rule of law that are used for enlargement and neighbourhood countries to EU member states + monitor civic space in Europe and financially support advocacy and awareness-raising
Promotion of Pan-European CSO solidarity: cooperation and support between national CSOs sectors, reacting to the shrinking of civic space in other countries<br>
slide9. TACKLING CHALLENGES TOGETHER - COOPERATION OF CSOS AND NATIONAL/EU INSTITUTIONS Joint debates and awareness-raising about the importance of CSO advocacy activities
Cooperation in development of new services for tackling new emerging needs
Joint promotion of a giving culture, as well as volunteering
(Collaborative) development of a consultation mechanism that would enable broad consultation with citizens as well as properly involve key stakeholders
Capacity-building of public officials on participatory decision-making
Broad promotion of RIA practices among member states
Avoiding equalisation of CSO advocacy with corporate lobbying
EU institutions need to address the shrinking civic space, promote civic education, democracy, rule of law and the role of CSOs
Development of support mechanisms (especially funding) to help CSOs tackle the issue of shrinking civic space<br>
slide10. Thank you!<br>