AreaBased Management in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction Experiences Lessons Possible Ways Forward Organized by the Global Ocean Forum the Food and Agriculture Organization ID: 741021
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Capacity Development for" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Capacity Development for Area-Based Management in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: Experiences, Lessons, Possible Ways Forward
Organized by the Global Ocean Forum, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, UNEP World Conservation and Monitoring Centre, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, UNESCO, Ocean Policy Research Institute, Sasakawa Peace FoundationSide Event at the BBNJ PrepCom 4 Monday, 17 July13:15-14:45 PMConference Room 2Slide2
Introduction by the Co-Chairs Biliana Cicin-Sain, GOF, and Blaise Kuemlangan, FAOSlide3
GOF/FAO/GEF Project on Strengthening Global Capacity to Effectively Manage ABNJ
Main Focus on:Capacity in application of area-based management and ecosystem-based approaches and tools to ABNJ; focus on the interaction between national EEZs and ABNJ; emphasis on fisheries and biodiversity protectionPart of the GEF/FAO Program on Global Sustainable Fisheries Management and Biodiversity Conservation
in Areas Beyond
National Jurisdiction (Common Oceans
Program) (www.commonoceans.org)Slide4
Project
PartnersConvention on Biological Diversity SecretariatDeep Sea Conservation CoalitionGovernment of France (French Marine Protected Areas Agency)Government of South Korea (Korea Institute of Ocean Science
and Technology)
Institute
for
Sustainable
Development
and International Relations (IDDRI)
International
Maritime
Organization
International
Ocean
Institute
France
Partnerships in Environmental
Management for
the Seas
of
East
Asia
UN Division
for Ocean Affairs
and the
Law of
the Sea
SeaOrbiter
UNESCO
(
In
t
er
gov
er
n
m
e
n
tal
Oceanographic
Commission)
UNESCO (Natural
Science)
University
of
Delaware
Vietnam
National University
Western
Indian
Ocean Marine Science
Association
World
Ocean
NetworkSlide5
WORKSHOP ON
Capacity D· elapm nt to lmprav the ·anagementt/ Marine Areas B'eyo nd
atianal Jurisdiction
(ABIIUJ
:
s,
Optio
ns
.,,
and Opportuniti
s
Silpplilli
F:
f'l
lffl
-
·
'"'
ill:iiiiilEllil
=......-....
Q
I
R Cr.\ntl ...Ii
--
-
........._
efSlide6
Relationship between Capacity Development and Technology Transfer?
Capacity DevelopmentArea-based management and MPAsEIAsImplementation of the agreementTechnology TransferMarine genetic resourcesRelationship between the
two? 3 bundles
of issues: Area-based/EIAs;
legal/compliance
issues in implementation;
marine genetic
resources
(different sets
of
knowledge/skills)
Modalities
—what types of capacity development
are
needed and how
would
they be carried
out?Mechanism—institutional structures/processes
for carrying out the capacity
Funding—options for support
Clearinghouse mechanism—options for knowledge
managementSlide7
4 Stage-setting CommentsSlide8
1. Architecture of capacity development prescriptions exists
There is an existing architecture in place on capacity building--UNCLOS stream--UNCED streamExcellent prescriptions on Capacity DevelopmentBut:Limited implementation, more work at the individual level, insufficient
work on
institutional and
societal
capacity
More
work
on
sectoral,
than cross-sectoral aspects Not
tied to a
funding
mechanism
Not
tied to a follow-up
mechanismChallenge: Not to
repeat the global prescriptions, but instead, to build
a tangible system of capacity developmentSlide9
Global prescriptions on capacity development
Existing Global Provisions on Capacity Development– UNCLOS (1982, 1994, 1995)Sustainable development summits (UNCED 1992, 2002, 2012)• Agenda 2030 (2015)SIDS Samoa Pathway (2014)
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1994), Intergovernmental
Panel on Ecosystem Services
IPBES (
2012
)
UNFCCC Paris
Agreement
(2015)
All separate
global
processesSlide10
Global prescriptions on capacity development
UNCLOS (1982) Capacity development not explicitPart XII on the “Protection and preservation of the marine environment”Part XIII on “Marine scientific research” (MSR)Part XIV on the development and transfer of marine technologyPart XI on
“the Area”
provides for the
promotion
of
international cooperation, including by encouraging cooperation in marine scientific
research
in the
Area
The
Agreement
Related to the Implementation of Part
XI
(1994),
Deep
Seabed
MiningArticle 143 on
marine scientific research for
benefit of all mankindArticle
144 on transfer of tech and knowledge
related to the Area1995 Fish Stocks
Agreement
Part VII, article 25 on
aiming assistance to developing countries at enhancing their ability to conserve and manage straddling fish stocksSlide11
Global prescriptions on capacity development
Sustainable development summits (UNCED 1992, 2002, 2012)Agenda 21 (UNCED 1992)Public involvement (17.5)Human Resources Development (17.6)Regional Centers, Education, Training (17.1234); (17.135); (17.135) ;
(17.6)
Facilities, Centers, Demonstrations
(17.17)
Financial and
Technical
Resources (17.41); (17.69);
(17.39)
Research Facilities; Systematic Observations (17.40);
(17.43)
Institution Building, National Oceanographic Commissions (17.68; (17.95);
(17.114)
Capacity in Natural,
Social
Sciences
(17.115)
Special Capacity Needs of SIDS (17.136); (17.129); (17.1322); (17.137)
Traditional Knowledge (17.15);
(17.6)Fisheries and Aquaculture – Technology Transfer
(17.93)
Johannesburg Plan of Implementation
(WSSD 2002)Support and Cooperation (10(f)); (30(g)); (33(g))Institution Building (32(b)); 33(b))
Traditional Knowledge (37(f))
Support for
SIDS (58(c)); (58(j))
Rio+20
(2012)
“Capacity”
is
mentioned 47 times
in the Rio+20 document “The
Future
We
Want”
and “capacity-building” is
mentioned 40
times.
Capacity
development
is treated as
a
cross-cutting
aspect of
sustainable developmentSlide12
Global prescriptions on capacity development
Sustainable development summits (UNCED 1992, 2002, 2012)SIDS Samoa Pathway (2014) (following the Barbados (1994) and the Mauritius (2005) SIDS summitsCapacity Development Provisions include, among many others:Fostering entrepreneurship and innovationSupporting national, regional and international CD initiatives in
SIDS
Designing and implementing
measures
to enhance
employment
opportunities in sustainable tourism
Increase
technology,
finance and support for mitigation and adaptation actions
Build resilience to the
impacts
of
climate
change and to
improve
nations' adaptive
capacity
Address gaps in capacity for gaining access to and managing
climate financeUndertake marine
scientific research and develop the tech capacity
of SIDSAgenda
2030 (2015)
SDGs adopted by
countries in as part of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development11 of SDGs have provisions on capacity development
SDG 14 on Oceans
and Seas:
“Increase scientific knowledge, develop research
capacity
and
transfer marine
technology…”
UN
DESA
divisions
working
in an
integrated
manner
to
assist nations in CD
through
capacity-building workshops, national training sessions
together with
UN Country
Teams
and
UNDPSlide13
Global prescriptions
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1994)15.11. There is a need, where appropriate, to:(a) Strengthen existing institutions and/or establish new ones responsible for the conservation of biological diversity…;(b) Continue to build capacity for the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of biological resources in all relevant sectors;(c) Build capacity, especially within Governments, business enterprises and bilateral and multilateral development agencies, for integrating biodiversity concerns…(d) Enhance the capacity of governmental and private institutions, at the appropriate level, responsible for protected area planning and management …
Intergovernmental Science-Policy
Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)
(2012)
Deliverable
1(b):
IPBES has
been
mandated
to
integrate capacity
building into
all
relevant aspects of
its work and to undertake capacity-building
activities that address the
priority needs identified…Activities
are to include
technical assistance, training workshops, fellowship and exchange programmes and support for the
evolution of national, subregional
and regional science-policy…
Also this deliverable is implemented through the task force on capacity building…Part of the initial work
programme is the development of a clearinghouse mechanism (IPBES/1/INF/10),
2(c))Slide14
Global prescriptions on capacity development
Paris Agreement (2015)Capacity-building for climate action: Paris Agreement, Article 11Capacity-building should enhance the capacity and ability of developing country Parties, in particular LDCs and SIDS, to take effective climate change actionCapacity-building should be
country-driven, based on and
responsive to
national needs, and
foster country ownership of
Parties
All
Parties
should
cooperate to
enhance the
capacity of
developing
country Parties to implement
this
Agreement
All Parties should regularly communicate CD
actions or measures
on capacity-buildingCapacity-building activities shall be
enhanced through appropriate institutional arrangements to
support implementationEstablished Paris Committee on Capacity-building-
-Aims to address
gaps and needs in implementing capacity-building in developing country Parties
The Durban Forum on Capacity-building is an annual, in-session event organized under the auspices of the SBI that brings together stakeholders involved in
building the capacity of developing countries to mitigate
and adapt to climate change.Slide15
Lessons from past global prescriptions*
Discussions at Grenada workshop May 2016These prescriptions represent a great “architecture” of global mandates on capacity development on oceans, aimed at all three levels: societal, institutional, and individual. The combined set of prescriptions are rightly very ambitious and, if implemented, would have a big impact
However:
--the extent of implementation
is not
known
(there
is no
overall tracking of efforts,
expenditures, aggregate
impact)
--partial empirical information
suggests
limited implementation
and that the
total level of
funds expended has been
relatively small--Most of the
provisions (except for the
Paris Agreement and IPBES) are:--not associated with a follow-up
mechanism/procedure
--not associated with a funding mechanism--
There has been little strategic planning and vision
involved
* Drawn, in part, from ICP 2010, and Cicin-Sain et al 2011, Rio+20 reportSlide16
2. Capacity Development Needs
Refer to ABNJ survey of needs (hand-out)Expressed needs vary by region Continuum—Coastal zones—EEZs, ABNJABNJ capacity to benefit EEZ management as wellSlide17
3. Advances in
consensus building in the PrepComdeliberationsPoints from Chair’s Non-Paper from PrepCom 3Slide18
Objectives of capacity building and transfer of technology in BBNJ instrument
Enhance and develop the capacity and ability of developing countries to effectively implement the agreementStates shall cooperate in promoting transfer of technology and scientific knowledge on BBNJ so that all States, especially SIDS, will benefit from the BBNJ resourcesEnhance the implementation of UNCLOS obligations to promote the development
of marine scientific research
capacity in developing States and
to
promote
the transfer
of marine
science and
technology
Enable States now unable
to
do so
to eventually
become parties
to
and effectively participate in
the implementation of the implementing agreement.Slide19
Scope of needs and priorities for capacity building
Includes, but is not limited to, human resource and institutional capacity:scientific, educational, technical assistanceindividual capacity building through training and scholarships, exchange of experts, and research cooperation programmes, awareness raising and knowledge sharingCovers capacity building in respect to
new access
and benefit-sharing regime;
implementation
and
monitoring of
ABMTs
including
MPAs;
conduct
and
evaluation
of
EIAs
Includes institutional building
at the
regional, sub- regional
and national levelsSlide20
Principles guiding capacity-building and technology transfer
The capacity-building and/or transfer of marine technology under the existing instruments and mechanisms (such as UNCLOS, ISA, IOC- UNESCO capacity development) should be enhanced; taking into account the IOC GuidelinesShould be clear, results-oriented, needs-driven and guided by lessons learned, including from other instrumentsShould be on fair and reasonable terms; voluntaryTransfer
of technology should enable all countries concerned,
to
benefit
from
developments in
marine
science
related
activities
on an equitable basis
Should be
long-term/ongoing,
to take into account
developments in scientific
knowledge and
address
new impactsSlide21
Types of and modalities for capacity- building and technology transfer
Must be simple, targeted, expeditious and include mechanism for identification of needsPrioritize identifying institutional needs under ILBI before discussing whether existing arrangements can fulfill these needsStates involved in bioprospecting should provide CB&TT to developing countriesConcrete measures may include: Development of regional centers; knowledge sharing; scholarships/other grants for SIDS/other
relevant training
programmes; joint scientific
research
projects between
developed and developing countries;
national
and
regional
scientific
centres,
including
as
data
repositories.Slide22
Repository/Clearing-house mechanism
Could provide centralized information access and sharing for all on activities, programmes and projects occurring in ABNJ; existing and futureProvide prioritized lists of required capacity-building efforts and marine technology; may have a “match-making” functionInclude a provision to improve the interoperability and linkages between existing mechanisms, including in terms of data and sample collection and sharingFurther consideration of IOC as a possible clearing-house mechanism for ILBISlide23
Funding
Establish an adequate, predictable and sustainable fund to:Assist SIDS and other developing countries in meeting their commitments under the agreementFund capacity-building and TT activities and programmesInnovative financing/new ocean sustainability finance tools will be needed to support international cooperation, development of technologies and collaborative research
Establish a multilateral fund to support regional
scientific and technological centers with pooled global
resources
in order to enhance technology transfer
efforts
Funding and institutional arrangements based
on
both voluntary and monetary
proceeds, see
Nagoya
Protocol
and ISA capacity building funding
arrangementsSlide24
Monitoring, review and follow-up
The needs identified and priorities for capacity building reviewed by an advisory or decision-making body under ILBIEstablishment of a monitoring mechanism and reporting requirements to facilitate periodic reviews, measure successHold regular meeting of the States Parties to assess the needs and to fill in the gaps
Mechanism to monitor the impacts
of
the capacity building and technology transfer
programmes
with a periodic
review
to
assess
funding needs, and funding
sources
so that the
recipient
countries and
regions’
needs can be adequately
met on a stable and long-
term basis.Slide25
4. Some questions for Side Event
--What lessons are/have we learned from existing efforts at Capacity Development in ABNJ?--What should be the relationship between Capacity Development and Technology Transfer?--Regarding Modalities, Funding Options, Clearinghouse Mechanism, what might be some useful models in other relevant areas?--What process might be mobilized to further identify and evaluate the pros and cons of various options on the above?