PAHOFlu OUTLINE Historical information Perspective from Laboratory and sentinel sites Perspective from Epidemiology Statistics Reporting Monitoring using online system Advantages and recommendations ID: 935053
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Suriname Country experience with" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Suriname
Country experience with
PAHOFlu
Slide2OUTLINE
Historical information
Perspective from Laboratory and sentinel sites
Perspective from Epidemiology: Statistics, Reporting, Monitoring using
on-line system
Advantages and recommendations
Slide3Historical data
Before
PIP:
Influenza
testing
in country
was
set up in
dec
2009 (in MWI)
Since
2010,
participation
in WHO-EQAP
program
every
year
(
consecutive
100% score)
LH and SZN (MMC) as SARI sentinel
sites
since
2010
Start as PIP country: June 1 , 2015
ICU (AZP) as sentinel
site
since
2015
Reporting
online
since
July
15, 2015
AZP (Pediatric ward) since 2016
Molecular ORV testing (MWI) since August 11, 2016
First virus sharing: Dec 2016
Rapid response training December 2017 (first in the region)
HAI
Draft
national action plan October 2017
Slide4Laboratory perspective
Country use of the online system by the laboratory
:
First use online reporting: July 15, 2015 (only for Influenza)
Since June 1, 2016: also weekly online reporting for RT-PCR ORV results
Country Benefits
:
Additional possibility for data check of patient details
(
investigation form vs online data
)
No extra paperwork for the laboratory for result form
No time loss between availability lab result and reaching the sentinel site (especially important for the ICU)
International Benefits:
Lab results from the country in real time available across the globe, enabling swift actions/reactions if necessary
Slide5Issues to be addressed in the LAB tab:
Entering of lab results not possible in case of mistakes in dates on the clinical information; delay of results
no specification of the PCR test possible (Influenza or ORV); sites cannot determine from the summary whether or not ORV has been tested
no option to enter data from different tests on consecutive data, all results need to be entered the same day even if available earlier: delay in reporting
Slide6Perspective Hospital surveillance
·
Data should be entered online as soon as possible
·
After result is available the case should be closed as soon as possible
·
Each week there is a weekly sentinel report available with the use of the automatic report generator
Slide7Epidemiology: statistics
Slide8Epidemiology: reporting
Slide9Epidemiology: Monitoring
Slide10Epidemiology: monitoring dashboard
Slide11Epidemiology: Dashboard, summary report
Slide12Advantages and recommendations
ADVANTAGES
Real time reporting system
Less time consuming
M&E Dashboard
Easy to access and use
RECOMMENDATIONS
Lab tab: some adjustments need to be made to optimize the system and allow full functionality
Further updates to also automate preparation of the ILI report