/
Second International Second International

Second International - PowerPoint Presentation

Muscleman
Muscleman . @Muscleman
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-03

Second International - PPT Presentation

Spes Workshop LNL 26 th 28 th May 2014 Prompt collective oscillations with exotic beams Letter of intent for the SPESALPI facility S Barlini from INFNFi and University of Florence ID: 933419

university ddr dipole system ddr university system dipole emission spes infn lnl energy gamma workshop physics italy international poland

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Second International" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Second International Spes Workshop, LNL, 26 th- 28th May 2014

Prompt collective oscillations with exotic beams

Letter

of intent for the SPES-ALPI facility

S.

Barlini from INFN-Fi and University of Florence

Subscribers from:

INFN

(Fi,

Mi

, LNL, Bo

,

Ct, LNS), Italy

LPC, Caen, France

Daresbury

, UK;

NIPNE, Romania;

Nevsheir

University, Turkey;

IFJ PAN

Krakòw

,

Jagellonian

Univ., Warsaw Univ

., Silesian University

Katovice

, Poland

;

Ohio University,

US

R.Boskovic

Institute, Zagreb, Croatia

Slide2

Physics caseThe Dynamical Dipole Resonance (DDR) is a collective oscillation occurring at the beginning of the interaction between nuclei with different N/Z.The centres of mass of protons and neutrons don’t coincide and a dipole moment oscillation develops in the mean-field of the system, with emission of high energy gamma.

Second International Spes Workshop, LNL, 26 th- 28th May 2014

N

1/Z1

N2/Z2

Dynamical Dipole γ

emission from a not equilibrated source

γ

γ

Earlier stage of nuclear interaction

 

Isospin

equilibration

The damping of the DD emission is connected to the dynamical evolution of the system towards the

isospin

equilibration.

Slide3

Main features of the DDR emission

 

The DDR yield grows as a function of the charge-asymmetry of the two reaction partners. Usually, the DDR is studied as a function of the initial dipole moment (D

0

) of the system, defined as

The gamma energy of DDR is shifted to lower values (around 10 MeV) with respect to GDR emission (emitted when the system is equilibrated), as a consequence of the larger deformation of the system

N/Z dependence

DDR occurs typically at beam energies in the range around 6-12AMeV:

below 6AMeV the acceleration felt by the charge distribution is too small

beyond 12AMeV quenched oscillations and high pre- equilibrium particle emission

Energy range 6-12AMeV

DDR produces gamma’s with angular distribution peaked perpendicularly to the interaction axis of the two nuclei

Second International

Spes

Workshop, LNL, 26

th

-

28

th

May

2014

Physics case

Slide4

Considering the connection of the DDR emission with the dynamic of the heavy ion collisions, the estimation of the total yield of the oscillation can be compared to the predicted values by dynamical model (as SMF) to constrain the stiffness of the Symmetry energy assumed in the calculations for the EOS.

Physics case Second International Spes Workshop, LNL, 26 th

- 28th May 2014

D.Pierroutsakou

et al. PRC80, 024612(2009)E.Giaz al., PLB submitted

36Ar+96Zr and 32

S+100Mo

16

O+

112

Sn

Asy

-stiff

Asy

-soft

Asy

-soft

Asy

-stiff

More data are

needed

Slide5

The “standard” technique to disentangle the DDR emission is the comparison between two reactions (one charge symmetric system with small D0 and one charge asymmetric system with big D0) producing the same CN. Second International

Spes Workshop, LNL, 26 th- 28th May 2014The proposed experiments: CN reactions

Slide6

ReactionN/ZCND0(fm)124Sn+

56Fe1.48 – 1.15180Os2590Kr

+90Zr1.50 -

1.25180Os21.5

ReactionN/ZCN

124Sn+58Ni

1.48 – 1.07182

Pt

124

Sn

+

64

Ni

1.48 -

1.29

182

Pt

132

Sn

+

58

Ni

1.64

– 1.07

190Pt

ReactionN/ZCN

124Sn+48

Ca

1.48 -

1.40

172

Yb

132

Sn

+

40

Ca

1.64

– 1.00

172

Yb

Energy range 6-12

AMeV

Reaction

N/Z

CN

D0

(

fm

)

133

Cs

+

48

Ca

1.42

– 1.40

181

Re

1.2

141

Cs

+

40

Ca1.56 - 1.00181Re36142Cs+40Ca1.58 – 1.00182Re36

SPES beam (UCx 200 µA)

141Cs : 2.6* 108pps142Cs : 2.69* 107 pps90Kr : 8.74* 107 pps132Sn : 3.11* 107 pps

132Sn: the “monster” resonance

Possible DDR dependence on the mass asymmetry between projectile and target (same initial dipole, obtained with a mass asymmetric and symmetric system to test possible difference in the dynamics of interaction)

New subject

The proposed experiments: CN reactions

Slide7

SMF prediction for some of the proposed system (by M. Colonna)Isospin asymmetric: large initial dipole

DDR energy depends on the oscillation frequency

Time evolution of the dipole moment

 

Isospin

symmetric: no initial dipole

Bremsstrahlung quantitative formula:

Slide8

The experimental apparatus: some requirementsEvaporation Residue (and Fission Fragments) Detection LCP for pre-equilibrium estimation

Gamma detectorPPACPhoswich detectors RCo detectorMass spectrometer….

GARFIELDFAZIAFARCOS

TRACE...HECTORSERPEMEDEA

PARISLaBr…

It is important to detect at the same time the ER, LCP and gamma rays (with ER-gamma and ER-LCP coincidences). A strong collaboration among the different experimental groups interested in this type of experiments should start in order to find what is the best and most feasible solution that can

be implemented.

Slide9

S.Barlinia, G. Casinia, M. Binia, M. Brunob, M. Cinauseroe, M. D'Agostinob, D. Fabrise, N. Gellia, F. Gramegnae, T. Marchi

e, L. Morellib, A. Nanninia,A. Olmia, S. Valdrea, G. Pasqualia, S. Piantellia, G. Poggia, R. Albag, C

. Maiolinog, D. Santonocitog, G. Pretee, A. Braccoc

, F. Camerac, O. Wielandc, A.Giazc, F.L.C.Crespic, G.Benzonic, S.Leonic, B.Millionc, N.Blasic, M. Ciemala

d, B. Fornald, M. Kmiecikd, A. Majd, K. Mazurekd, B. Wasilewska

d, C.Borceai , M. Parloglp,i, M. Degerlier

f , T. Kozikju, A. Kordyaszwa

,

P.

Kulig

ju

,

Z.

Sosin

ju

,

A.

Wieloch

ju

,

T. Twarogju

, D. Sierpowskiju

, M. Kajetanowiczju, J. Lukasik

d,K. Korcyld,B. Klossi

, S. Kowalskisi, A. Grzeszczuksi,W. Zippersi, M. Chartierh, R. Lemmonh, Z. Basrakz, M. Milinz, N. Soicz, S. Szilnerz, A. Voinovoh, M.Colonnag, M.Di Torog, C.Rizzo

g, V.Barani

a INFN, Sezione di Firenze and Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università, Firenze, Italyb

INFN,

Sezione di Bologna and Dipartimento di

Fisica

dell'Università,

Bologna, Italy

c

INFN,

Sezione di Milano and Dipartimento di

Fisica

dell'Università,

Milano, Italy

d

H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland

e

INFN,

Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Italy

f

Nevsehir University of Science and Art Faculty Physics Department, Nevsheir, Turkey

g

INFN,

Laboratori Nazionali del Sud , Catania, Italy

h

Daresbury Laboratory, Cheshire, United Kingdom

i

NIPNE-HH and Bucharest University, Romania

wa

University of Warsaw, Poland

ju

Jagellonian University, Krakow, Poland

si

Silesian University, Katowice, Polandoh Ohio University , USlp LPC, Caen, Francez R. Boskovic Institute, Zagreb,

Croatia