Consultant Immunology What we already know 1 Chlorhexidine is widely used in healthcare and the community see appendix in report A hidden allergen responsible for a significant number of cases of perioperative anaphylaxis ID: 934443
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chlorhexidine Tomaz Garcez" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Chlorhexidine
Tomaz GarcezConsultant Immunology
Slide2What we already know (1)Chlorhexidine is widely used in healthcare and the community (see appendix in report)
A “hidden allergen” responsible for a significant number of cases of perioperative anaphylaxisGeographical variationUnder-recognitionDifferential practice / use of decontamination / testing for allergyHighly effective antiseptic
Slide3What we already know (2)
Uses include:Skin decontaminationLubricating gelsCoated catheters (CVC)DentalCommonly there are features of a prior reaction in those subsequently confirmed with allergyInvestigation for allergy not standardised (timing or tests)Positive tests to other potential culprits reported
Slide4Key Findings (1)3rd of the “big four” – 18 cases (9%)
16 males6 urology surgery; 3 cardiac; 3 orthopaedics0.78 events per 100,000 exposures (possible overestimate)1 fatal caseNot investigated by specific IgE to chlorhexidine
Slide5Exposure routes
Number
Time to onset & grade
Skin for cannula
10
Skin for neuraxial blockade
7
Skin for surgical site
4
≈ 1 hour; grade 3
Coated CVC6< 5 minutes; grade 4Urethral gel11
None where only reported exposure was skin preparation for cannulation
Slide6Clinical features
Slide7Key Findings (2)
Often not suspected (only in 28% of cases) by anaesthetist3 potentially avoidable cases1 reported prior chlorhexidine allergy1 reported prior perioperative allergy that was not investigated 1 NAP6 confirmed chlorhexidine allergy case experienced subsequent anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine in 2nd procedureChlorhexidine coated central lines not always removed (2 of 6 CVC related cases)
Slide8Key Findings (3)
16 patients had dynamic / raised tryptaseTesting for chlorhexidine was frequently omitted in allergy clinicsTesting does not always follow recommendations
Slide9Only 7 cases had more than one test as is recommended
In 3 cases more than one trigger identified on testing
Test modalities
Number
Positive*
Skin prick testing only
7
6
Skin prick testing and IgE
3
3 (both tests) Skin prick testing, intradermal testing and IgE 3 2 (all tests) 1 (IDT & IgE) IgE only 2 2
Intradermal testing only
1
1
Intradermal testing and IgE
1
1 (both tests)
Slide10Key Recommendations
National:Prominent labelling (MHRA & manufacturers)Institutional:Alternatives should be availableAll cases should be tested for chlorhexidine with at least 2 modalities of test; and all potential culprits should be testedIndividual:Improved awareness of chlorhexidine and allergy history takingChlorhexidine coated CVCs should be removed when anaphylaxis occurs following insertion
Slide11Thank you