/
Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment Challenges to Rest: The Latest Evidence on the Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment Challenges to Rest: The Latest Evidence on the

Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment Challenges to Rest: The Latest Evidence on the - PowerPoint Presentation

WonderWoman
WonderWoman . @WonderWoman
Follow
348 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-03

Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment Challenges to Rest: The Latest Evidence on the - PPT Presentation

Supported by an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc EPISODE 4 Richard K Bogan MD FCCP FAASM President of Bogan Sleep Consultants LLC Associate Clinical Professor University of South Carolina ID: 934435

sleep lxb treatment nightly lxb sleep nightly treatment participants long 2021 placebo safety meeting annual difference abstract idiopathic sdp

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Putting Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment Challenges to Rest: The Latest Evidence on the Safety and Efficacy of Emerging Therapies

Supported by an educational grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

EPISODE 4

Slide2

Richard K. Bogan, MD, FCCP, FAASM

President of Bogan Sleep Consultants, LLCAssociate Clinical Professor, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SCAssociate Clinical Professor, Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston, SC

Slide3

Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer, DO, MS, FAASM, FAAN, FAES, FACNSProfessor of NeurologyCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western UniversityDirector, Cleveland Clinic Sleep Disorders Center

Cleveland, OH

Slide4

Learning Objective

Evaluate novel strategies for the management of idiopathic hypersomnia, with and without long sleep time, for their benefit in improving excessive daytime sleepiness, symptom severity, and global functioning. 1

Slide5

How to Treat IHLower-sodium oxybate is the first and only FDA-approved treatment of IH in adults

Treatment approaches for EDS in IH similar to narcolepsyAASM 2021 draft guideline updates recommends the following for IH:Use modafinil for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. (Strong) Use clarithromycin for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. (Conditional) Use methylphenidate for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. (Conditional) Use pitolisant for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. (Conditional) Use sodium oxybate for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. (Conditional)EDS =excessive daytime sleepiness; IH = idiopathic hypersomniaMaski K, et al. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Mar 15. [Epub ahead of print].

Slide6

LXB: Efficacy in IH Study DesignDBRWP = double-blind randomized withdrawal period; OLE = open-label safety extension; IH = idiopathic hypersomnia;

OLT = open-label titration and optimization period; LXB = lower-sodium oxybate; SDP = stable-dose period; SXB = sodium oxybateArnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485.; Bogan K, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070. SXB onlySXB + alerting agentAlerting agent onlyTreatment naiveOLT

SDP

LXB

Placebo

OLE

Safety

follow-up

Randomization

Screening period

(≤ 30 days)

(10-14 weeks)

(2 weeks)

DBRWP

(2 weeks)

(24 weeks)

(2 weeks)

Treatment at study entry

LXB

LXB

LXB

Slide7

LXB: Efficacy in IH, with and without Long Sleep Time – Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

From end of SDP to end of DBRWP, ESS scores worsened with placebo but not with continuing LXB in participants both with long sleep time and without long sleep timeBogan RK, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070.With Long SleepLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–7.8 (–11.4, –4.2)p = .0002Without Long SleepLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–6.2 (–7.8, –4.6)p < .0001Change in ESS ScoreMean (SD)End of SDPEnd of DBRWP

LXB(n = 13)

5.2 (4.2)

7.3 (5.0)

LXB

(n = 43)

6.6 (4.4)

6.9 (5.1)

Placebo

(n = 11)

5.3 (3.0)

15.4 (3.9)

Placebo

(n = 48)

6.0 (3.8)

12.8 (4.0)

20

10

0

-10

Slide8

LXB: Efficacy in IH, with and without Long Sleep Time – Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS)

From end of SDP to end of DBRWP, worsening was observed with placebo but not with continuing LXB on IHSS total score in participants both with long sleep time and without long sleep timeBogan RK, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070.With Long SleepLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–15.0 (–20.0, –9.0)p < .0001Without Long SleepLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–11.0 (–14.0, –7.0)p < .0001Change in IHSS Total ScoreMedian (Q1, Q3):End of SDPEnd of DBRWP

LXB(n = 13)

15.0 (6.0, 24.0)

20.0 (12.0, 22.0)

LXB

(n = 43)

14.0 (8.0, 22.0)

15.0 (11.0, 23.0)

Placebo

(n = 11)

16.0 (14.0, 27.0)

33.0 (30.0, 43.0)

Placebo

(n = 48)

13.5 (9.5, 19.5)

27.5 (20.5, 32.0)

20

10

0

-10

30

40

Slide9

LXB: Efficacy in IH, with and without Long Sleep Time – Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

From end of SDP to end of DBRWP, more participants randomized to placebo reported worsening of IH symptoms (minimally, much, or very much worse) compared with those continuing LXB in participants both with long sleep time and without long sleep timeBogan RK, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070.23.1%

100%

4.7

2.3

2.1

85.4%

Without Long Sleep Time

p < .

0001 for difference in proportion rated

minimally, much, or very much worse

With Long Sleep Time

p = .

0003 for difference in proportion rated

minimally, much, or very much worse

Percentage of Participants

Worsened

Improved

20.9%

Slide10

LXB: Safety Across All Study Periods in ≥ 5% of Safety Population

Common TEAEs (≥ 10%) were nausea, headache, dizziness, anxiety, and vomitingBogan RK, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070.Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), n (%)Safety Population(N = 154)Baseline IH Medication(n = 88)Treatment Naïve(n = 66)Participants with ≥ 1 TEAE123 (79.9)73 (83.0)50 (75.8)

Nausea33 (21.4)20 (22.7)

13 (19.7)

Headache

25 (16.2)

15 (17.0)

10 (15.2)

Dizziness

18 (11.7)

8 (9.1)

10 (15.2)

Anxiety

16 (10.4)

9 (10.2)

7 (10.6)

Vomiting

16 (10.4)

13 (14.8)

3 (4.5)

Decreased appetite

14 (9.1)

7 (8.0)

7 (10.6)Diarrhea12 (7.8)

9 (10.2)3 (4.5)

Treatment at Study Entry

Slide11

LXB: Safety Across All Study Periods in ≥ 5% of Safety Population (cont.)

Common TEAEs (≥ 10%) were nausea, headache, dizziness, anxiety, and vomitingBogan RK, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. LBA070.TEAE, n (%)Safety Population(N = 154)Baseline IH Medication(n = 88)Treatment Naïve(n = 66)Upper respiratory tract infection12 (7.8)7 (8.0)5 (7.6)

Urinary tract infection12 (7.8)6 (6.8)

6 (9.1)

Insomnia

11 (7.1)

9 (10.2)

2 (3.0)

Dry mouth

10 (6.5)

8 (9.1)

2 (3.0)

Nasopharyngitis

10 (6.5)

5 (5.7)

5 (7.6)

Fatigue

9 (5.8)

6 (6.8)

3 (4.5)

Night sweats

8 (5.2)

6 (6.8)

2 (3.0)Tremor8 (5.2)

6 (9.1)0 (0.0)

Treatment at Study Entry

Slide12

LXB: Efficacy in IH, Once Nightly vs. Twice Nightly – ESSESS scores worsened from SDP to DBRWP in participants randomized to placebo compared with those continuing LXB treatment, both once nightly and twice nightly

Arnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485. Once nightlyLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–4.9 (–7.4, –2.5)p = .0004Twice nightlyLS Mean Difference (95% CI):–7.4 (–9.2, –5.7)p < .0001Change in ESS ScoreMean (SD)End of SDPEnd of DBRWP

LXB

(n = 15)

8.0 (4.8)

8.9 (5.3)

LXB

(n = 41)

5.7 (4.0)

6.3 (4.8)

Placebo

(n = 11)

4.4 (1.9)

10.0 (4.2)

Placebo

(n = 47)

6.3 (3.9)

14.0 (3.7)

20

10

0

-10

Slide13

LXB: Efficacy in IH, Once Nightly vs. Twice Nightly – IHSSIHSS total scores worsened from SDP to DBRWP in participants randomized to placebo compared with those continuing LXB treatment, both once nightly and twice nightly

Arnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485. Once nightlyEstimated Median Difference (95% CI):–9.0 (–16.0, –3.0)p = .0028Twice nightlyEstimated Median Difference(95% CI):–12.0 (–15.0, –8.0)p < .0001Change in IHSS Total ScoreMedian (SD):End of SDP

End of DBRWP

20

10

0

-10

30

40

LXB

(n=15)

16.7 (10.0)

16.7 (8.3)

LXB

(n=41)

15.0 (9.0)

17.0 (8.1)

Placebo

(n=11)

13.1 (3.3)

22.9 (9.1)

Placebo

(n=47)

15.9 (8.4)

29.7 (8.6)

Slide14

From end of SDP to end of DBRWP, more participants randomized to placebo experienced worsening of IH symptoms (minimally, much, or very much worse) compared with those randomized to continue LXB treatment, both once nightly and twice nightly

Arnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485. Once nightlyp = .0077 for difference in proportion rated minimally, much, or very much worseTwice nightlyp = .0001 for difference in proportion rated minimally, much, or very much worse

2.4

2.4

0

2.1

19.5%

81.8%

0

0

0

26.7%

0

0

Percentage of Participants

89.4%

LXB: Efficacy in IH, Once Nightly vs.

Twice Nightly – PGI-C

Worsened

Improved

Slide15

LXB: Safety in OLT and SDP by LXB Dosing Regimen

Arnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485.

The incidence of TEAEs was similar in participants who initiated and remained on a once-nightly regimen of LXB compared with those who initiated and remained on a twice-nightly regimenNo serious TEAEs were considered related to study treatment

TEAEs in ≥ 5% of Participants, n (%)

Initiated and Remained on a Once-Nightly Regimen

(n = 21)

Initiated and Remained on a Twice-Nightly Regimen (n = 93)

Changed Regimen Once or More (n = 40)

Any TEAE

13 (61.9)

69 (74.2)

33 (82.5)

Nausea

5 (23.8)

20 (21.5)

7 (17.5)

Headache

3 (14.3)

15 (16.1)

6 (15.0)

Dizziness

4 (19.0)

7 (7.5)

7 (17.5)

Anxiety

2 (9.5)

9 (9.7)3 (7.5)Decreased appetite

3 (14.3)9 (9.7)0Vomiting

1 (4.8)6 (6.5)3 (7.5)Dry mouth

08 (8.6)1 (2.5)

Slide16

LXB: Safety in OLT and SDP by LXB Dosing Regimen (cont.)

Arnulf I, et al. SLEEP 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstract No. 485.

The incidence of TEAEs was similar in participants who initiated and remained on a once-nightly regimen of LXB compared with those who initiated and remained on a twice-nightly regimenNo serious TEAEs were considered related to study treatment

TEAEs in ≥ 5% of Participants, n (%)

Initiated and Remained on a Once-Nightly Regimen

(n = 21)

Initiated and Remained on a Twice-Nightly Regimen (n = 93)

Changed Regimen Once or More (n = 40)

Urinary tract infection

1 (4.8)

5 (5.4)

3 (7.5)

Diarrhea

1 (4.8)

6 (6.5)

1 (2.5)

Insomnia

1 (4.8)

6 (6.5)

1 (2.5)

Tremor

0

5 (5.4)

3 (7.5)

Somnolence

0

3 (3.2)

4 (10.0)Upper respiratory tract infection0

6 (6.5)1 (2.5)Back pain04 (4.3)

2 (5.0)

Slide17

ConclusionsLXB is the only FDA-approved treatment for IHThe efficacy and safety of LXB in IH were demonstrated for both once-nightly and twice-nightly regimens, and similar effects were seen between regimens

The majority of participants initiated and remained on a twice-nightly regimenThe safety profile was similar between regimens and was consistent with that of SXB 

Slide18

SMART GoalsIncorporate LXB into treatment planning for IH not only to improve symptoms but also global functioning.

When making treatment decisions for patients with IH, with and without long sleep time, consider the latest clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of LXB. Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely

Slide19

Visit the Sleep Disorders Hub

Free resources, education, and tools for both HCPs and patients about narcolepsy.www.cmeoutfitters.com/sleep-disorders-hub/

Slide20

EPISODE 1

Breakthroughs in the Management of Idiopathic Hypersomnia: The Future is NowCardiovascular Comorbidities in Narcolepsy: The Latest Insights on Treatment Options to Mitigate Risks Real-World Strategies for the Management of Narcolepsy: Highlights from the 2021 Sleep Meeting on Dosing and Titrationwww.CMEOutfitters.comEPISODE 2

EPISODE 3

Slide21

To receive CME/CE credit for this activity, participants must complete the post-test and evaluation online.

Participants will be able to download and print their certificate immediately upon completion.To Receive Credit