/
B iological B iological

B iological - PowerPoint Presentation

aaron
aaron . @aaron
Follow
364 views
Uploaded On 2017-03-31

B iological - PPT Presentation

P roduction R ates in the Southern California Current System David Munro University of Washington 1 Acknowledgements Paul Quay Mark Haught Johnny Stutsman and Jackie Leung UW Laurie ID: 531790

gop ncp ocean production ncp gop production ocean export 14c variability calcofi based coastal net ratio terms

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "B iological" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

B

iological Production Rates in the Southern California Current System

David MunroUniversity of Washington

1Slide2

AcknowledgementsPaul Quay, Mark Haught, Johnny Stutsman, and Jackie Leung (UW)Laurie

Juranek, Cynthia Peacock (NOAA), Deirdre Lockwood, Hilary PalevskyRalf Goericke, Dave Wolgast, and CalCOFI research associates (SIO)2Slide3

AcknowledgementsFunding sourcesFirst year graduate fellowship from the Program on Climate Change

Office of Naval Research (NDSEG) fellowshipNASA WA space grant fellowshipNational Science Foundation support for sample supplies and analysis3Slide4

Primary Production and Carbon Export in the Coastal OceanGlobal aquatic PP from satellites ~45-50 Pg

C y-1 (Carr et al., 2006)Based on derived Chl a, PAR, SST, and calibrated with 14C PP Estimates vary by a factor of 2 (Campbell et al., 2002; Carr et al. 2006)~20% of ocean PP occurs in continental margins (50-2000 m depth) (Carr et al., 2002; Muller-Karger et al., 2005) 40 to 50% of global C export flux occurs in continental margins (Muller-Karger et al., 2005; Dunne et al. 2007)Eastern Boundary Currents (EBC’s) <1% of ocean surface area but ~20% of global fish catchSlide5

Sea surface chlorophyll5

From Sarmiento and GruberSlide6

Net Primary Production6

From Sarmiento and GruberSlide7

Air-Sea C Flux in the Coastal Ocean

Globally, coastal seas may be a small net sink, high variability -0.22±0.16 Pg C y-1 (Cai et al. 2006)Global ocean ~ -2.0 Pg C y-1High variability, many poorly characterized systemsTable 1 and Fig. from Cai et al. 2006

7Slide8

Productivity termsGOP – Gross O2 production; photosynthetic O

2 production via water-splitting reactions in PSIINCP – Net community production; net production of O2 or C in surface ocean after demands of autotrophic and heterotrophic communities have been metNPP – Net primary production (Gross C production minus respiration by phytoplankton)Estimated using 14C-PP and VGPMNCP/GOP ratio – An estimate of the fraction of gross production available for export in terms of O2.NCP/NPP – equivalent to e-ratio or ef-ratio; fraction of NPP in C terms available for export8Slide9

Study Goals I: Spatial and seasonal variability of PP rates

Determine variability of PP and NCP and its impact on coastal C system using in situ methodsGross oxygen production (GOP) using 17Δ of dissolved O2Net community production (NCP) NOP = GOP – (Community Resp) using (O2/Ar)measuredExport efficiency (NOP/GOP)Comparison to incubation-based 14C-PPValidation of satellite-based PP in the coastal ocean9Slide10

Study Goals II: Variability in C export over the last three decades

Estimate NCP using four different approachesMixed layer O2 budgetMixed layer nitrate budget15N uptake f-ratios combined with 14C-PPSatellite-based (VGPM) x export algorithmsDunne et al. (2007); Laws et al. (2000) O2-NCP from biological O2 saturation based on O2/Ar measurementsEvaluate interannual and decadal variability in NCP10Slide11

Study Site: CalCOFI

Annual Mean Surface Chl a in mg m-3 from Photobiology Group (SIO)

CalCOFI grid coded by region17D O2

/Ar Samples collected during 6 cruises

11Slide12

14C PP: why another method?

In vitro effects are a big unknown (Marra, 2002)Uncertainty in what it actually measures (Marra, 2002)Something between GCP and NCP, closest to net primary production (NPP)Recycling of labeled CSome labeled C is dissolved (depending on methodology either included/excluded)Snapshot estimate (6 to 24 hours)Logistical constraintsSlide13

17Δ in situ GOP Method

Uses a mixed layer O2 and O2-isotope budget to estimate GOP in the mixed layerLuz and Barkan (2000)GOP = Kgas* [O2]sat *17D not sensitive to respirationMore terms in the coastal ocean (i.e. coastal upwelling, curl-driven upwelling, horizontal transports)Must convert from O2 to CNot based on an incubation(

17Δdiss – 16) (249 – 17Δdiss)13Slide14

Ocean Range of 17Δ Values

Purely Photosynthetic O2

249±15 per meg

Purely Gas Exchange O2

16±2 per meg

Half Photo + Half Gas Exchange O

2

132 per meg

Measuring

17

Δ yields a direct estimate of the

proportion

of O

2

from air and photosynthesis.

14Slide15

Locations of

17D measurements to date, from Juranek and Quay (2013)15Slide16

O2/Ar in situ NCP method

NCP estimates (in O2 terms) are based on mixed layer budgets for [O2] and [Ar]NCP = Kgas * [O2]sat * ( – 1)NCP/GOP a measure of export efficiency from one measurement Does NOT depend on gas exchange (Kgas)NCP/GOP is comparable to f-ratio2x N/G ~ f-ratio (new production/net primary production)

(O2/Ar)meas (O2/Ar)sat16Slide17

Spatial

maps of 17Ddiss

and biological O2 saturation (from O2/Ar)

Samples collected at up to 50 of 66 standard

CalCOFI

stations compared to 16 productivity (

14

C-PP) stations

August

August

17Slide18

Variability of 17D-GOP and O

2:Ar-NCPAnnual NCP and GOP in mmol O2 m-2 d-118Slide19

17D-GOP : 14C-PP

19From Juranek and Quay (2013)

MBARI (Munro and Quay, unpublished data)Slide20

Comparison of NCP/GOP

Study LocationAuthors

NCP/GOPO2 terms

NCP/NPP

C terms

NCP/NPP

Laws et al (2000)

CalCOFI

– Entire Grid

CalCOFI

– N. Inshore

CalCOFI

– Offshore

Munro et al. 2012

0.16±.06

0.20±.06

0.15±.06

0.31±.12

0.39±.12

0.29±.12

0.26

0.38

0.18

HOT

BATS

Subarctic N. Pacific

Equatorial Pacific

Southern Ocean

North Atlantic – bloom

– annual

Quay et al. 2010

Barkan

et al. 2009

Juranek

et al. 2012

Hendricks et al. 2005

Stanley et al. 2010

Reuer

et al. 2007

Hamme

et al. 2010

Quay et al. 2012

0.19±.08

0.13±.05

0.08 - 0.13

0.06±.05

0.08 - 0.13

0.35±.13

0.07±.06

0.38±.15

0.25±.10

0.15 - 0.25

0.12±.10

0.15 - 0.25

0.68±.25 0.14±.12

0.15

0.14

0.35

0.12

0.70

0.50

0.50

Coastal Ocean

NCP/GOP

ratio similar to open

ocean

(

unexpected)

20Slide21

Particle Export Ratio21

As predicted by the Dunne et al. 2007 algorithm which is a function of chl a and SST From Sarmiento and GruberSlide22

POC Export Production22

From Sarmiento and GruberSlide23

Conclusions I17

D-GOP shows seasonality nearshore17D-GOP consistently 5-7x 14C-PP and 4x VGPM17D-GOP/14C-PP = 2-3x at MBARISuggests that CalCOFI 14C-PP underestimates NPP due to methodological effects in 14C-PPCannot rule out variability in O2/CNCP:GOP ratios close to ratios observed in the open ocean (0.1 to 0.2)Higher ratios than predicted by export models offshore23Slide24

Variability in NCP at CalCOFI over the last three decades

24Slide25

Trends in O2 in the S. Cal. Current

%change in O2 1984-2006

O2 trends at ~250 m depthFrom McClatchie et al. 2010

Bograd

et al. 2008 Slide26

Methods: Estimating Biological O2 saturation using O2 saturation

Consistent relationship between biological O2 saturation and O2 saturationEstimated for each region/seasonO2 and nitrate budgets constructed: upwelling terms; horizontal advection; time rate of change; NCP26Slide27

NCP anomaly calculated by differencing quarterly NCP with long-term mean for month of cruise

27Slide28

Longterm NCP trends in the South CCS

28

MEI: Multivariate ENSO Index (

Wolter

and

Timlin

1998)PDO: Pacific Decadal Oscillation (Mantua et al. 1997)NPGO: North Pacific Gyre Oscillation (Di Lorenzo et al. 2008) Slide29

Conclusions IINegative NCP anomalies in response to strong El Niño events (e.g.,

1987, 1991-92, 1998) Less signficant NCP response to weak El Niño and La Niña events.Since 2007, positive NCP anomalies based on all NCP estimates (i.e., O2:Ar, nitrate budget, 15N incubations and satellite NPP)NCP trends over the past three decades suggest that export of organic material to depth within the CalCOFI grid not responsible for lower O2 concentrations at depth observed by Bograd et al. (2008) and McClatchie et al. (2010)29Slide30

Questions?30

Related Contents

Next Show more