1 Leanne S Hawken University of Utah Danielle Starkey Missouri SWPBS Ericka Dixon Winfield Primary Illinois PBIS Forum 2012 Overview BEPCICO Principles Where have we been and where are we going ID: 760322
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Check in, Check Out- Part" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Check in, Check Out- Part 1
Leanne S. Hawken
, University of
Utah
Danielle Starkey
, Missouri, SWPBS
Ericka
Dixon
, Winfield Primary
Illinois PBIS Forum,
2012
Slide2Overview BEP/CICO PrinciplesWhere have we been and where are we going?BEP/CICO at the state/regional level.BEP/CICO at the school level.
Overview
Slide33
Slide4Student Recommended for
BEP/CICO
BEP/CICO
Implemented
ParentFeedback
Regular Teacher Feedback
AfternoonCheck-out
Morning Check-in/DPRPick-up
BEP Coordinator
Summarizes Data
For Decision Making
Bi-weekly BEP Meeting
to Assess Student
Progress
Exit
Program
ReviseProgram
BEP-CICO Implementation Process
Slide5Started at Fern Ridge Middle School, Elmira OregonCrone, Horner, & Hawken (2004). Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York, NY: Guilford Press 5 schools3 elementary2 middle schoolsOne BEP Coordinator served:15-20 students elementary20-30 students secondary Excel Data SystemNo web-based system
In the Beginning………..
Slide6To support more students, some schools have multiple BEP/CICO check-in, check out facilitators. Expanded to include high school & preschool populationsNew data systemSWIS CICOCurrent – 1999 schools K-12 use SWIS CICO data base. Fidelity of Implementation Individual Systems Evaluation Tool (I-SET)
Current BEP/CICO practice
Slide7Crone, Hawken, & Horner (2010). Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press
7
Manual on How to Implement BEP/CICO
Slide8DVD on how to Implement BEP/CICO
Leanne S. Hawken, PhD - 2011
8
Hawken, Pettersson, Mootz, & Anderson (2005).
The Behavior Education Program: A Check-in, Check-out Intervention for Students at Risk.
New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Slide9Effective in reducing problem behavior for:Elementary school students (Cheney et al., 2009; Fairbanks, Sugai, Guardino, & Lathrop, 2007; Filter et al., 2007; Hawken, MacLeod, & Rawlings, 2007; McCurdy, 2007; Stage, Cheney, Flower, Templeton, & Waugh, 2010; Todd, Kaufman, Meyer, & Horner, 2007).Middle School Students (Hawken, 2006; Hawken & Horner, 2003; March & Horner, 2002)Students in Urban School Settings (McCurdy, 2007)Students with disabilities (Hawken, et al., 2007, MacLeod, Hawken, & O’Neill, 2010)***Problem behaviors measured via direct observation, rating scales, changes in percentage of points earned on DPRs, & reductions in ODRs
Research on BEP/CICO
Slide10Effective in increasing academic engagement, including for students in high school settings (Hawken & Horner, 2003, Swain-Bradway, 2009)Reduced need for Tier 3 and special education supports following CICO implementation (Hawken, et al., 2007)Overall range of effectiveness of CICO ranges from 40% to 70% (Fairbanks, et al., 2007) (Hawken, et al., 2007)
Research on CICO
Slide11More effective with students with attention-maintained problem behavior (March & Horner, 2002; McIntosh, et., al., 2009, Campbell & Anderson, 2008)Effective across behavioral functions (Hawken, O’Neill, & MacLeod, 2011)Students who do not respond to CICO benefit from function-based, individualized interventions (Fairbanks, et., al., 2007, March & Horner, 2002; Macleod, Hawken, & O’Neill, 2010)
Research on CICO
Slide12Supporting Check-In, Check-Out Implementation
Danielle Starkey,Regional SW-PBS ConsultantHeart of Missouri Regional Professional Development Center
Slide13Missouri SW-PBS Training Structure
MO SW-PBS
Slide14Missouri SW-PBS Personnel
State Coordinator (1)State Data/Web Consultant (1)Tier 2/3 Consultants (6)Regional Consultants (24)
MO SW-PBS
Slide15Missouri SW-PBSTier 2 Readiness Indicators and Guidelines
Building the Foundation for Effective Implementation of Check-In, Check-Out
Slide16Readiness for Tier 2
SW-PBS universal systems are consistently implemented with fidelitySchoolwideNon-ClassroomClassroom
MO SW-PBS
Slide17Readiness for Tier 2
SW-PBS Universal System OutcomesSchoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET)Score (80/80) within past 12 monthsBenchmarks of Quality (BoQ)Score of 80% or higher Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)80% of staff report that Schoolwide, Non-Classroom & Classroom Systems are in place
MO SW-PBS
OR
WITH
Slide18Readiness for Tier 2
Office referral data indicates 80 percent of students in the 0-1 referral rangeSystem in place to document classroom minorsConsistent use of school-wide data for making decisions as evidenced by monthly Big 5 Data Reports
MO SW-PBS
Slide19Tier 2 Training Content
Slide20Systems Training
Foundational KnowledgeThe Tier 2 TeamStudent Identification ProcessNominationsExisting school dataScreening instrument scoresMonitoring Progress & Evaluating Outcomes using the Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers
MO SW-PBS
Slide21Intervention Training
Check-in/Check-out (BEP-CICO)Check & ConnectSocial Skill Instructional GroupsTargeted Environmental Interventions
MO SW-PBS
Slide22Lessons Learned – CICO/BEP
Higher level of success with implementation when solid Tier 1 is in place.Staff training on intervention components is essential, with a review each school year.Tier 2 Systems in place are criticalTeamStudent Identification ProcessMonitoring Progress & Evaluating Outcomes
MO SW-PBS
Slide23Winfield Primary School’s Check-In / Check-Out(CICO) Program
Winfield Primary
Ericka Dixon
erickadixon@winfield.k12.mo.us
Slide24Total Enrollment: 386-404Grade Levels Served: Pre-School-2nd GradeFree and Reduced Lunch Rates:
Winfield Primary at a Glance
Slide25Big Five Data Showing Increases in Problem BehaviorIntervention to Build Relationship65% of the day spent on disciplineReceived Verbal Permission from Parents for Students to enter CICO Intervention
2010-2011 First Year of Implementation
Slide26Big Five Data Report
2010-2011 Referrals: 133
2011-2012 Referrals: 204
Slide2722 Students Utilized the CICO Intervention17 Staff Members were Utilized as Coordinators7 Students were dismissed9 Students Continued3 Students Moved3 Students Moved to Tier III Intervention
2010-2011 CICO Year One Facts
Slide282010-2011 Staff Survey Results
Positives
Negatives
Intervention Built RelationshipsSaw Some Improvements in Behaviors
One More Thing to Do
Time Consuming for Both the Classroom Teacher and Staff Coordinator
Minimal Successes
No Set Criteria to Exit the Program
No End Result Known
No Real Training in the Intervention-felt thrown in
Coordinators felt like counselors
Slide29Received Professional Development from our PBIS RPDC RepresentativesDesigned Entrance and Exit CriteriaCreated a Teacher Recommendation FormCreated a Daily Points SheetCreated a Flow Chart and Celebrations for Fading CICO StudentsCreated a Letter to Inform Parents of the CICO ProgramMade Personal Phone Calls to CICO Student ParentsReceived Written Permission from Parents to Start and Exit CICO Offered On-Going Professional Development to Staff
2011-2012-
Second Year of Implementation
Slide30Slide312010-2012 CICO Results for Winfield Primary School
Slide322011-2012 Staff Survey Results
Positives
Negatives
Major Behavior Referrals DecreasedStaff Members felt SupportedProfessional Development Improved Implementation ProcessStudents began to Self-Monitor BehaviorParents began to get involvedCoordinators felt like support teams instead of counselors
Classroom Teachers continued to struggle with effective feedback after each classroom activity.
This intervention was not working for Tier III Students
Slide33Total Number of Students Serviced by CICO Intervention
Slide34Slide35Slide36Continued Professional Development on CICO InterventionContinued Revising, Refining, and Monitor of CICO InterventionContinued Staff Development for all Tier I and Tier II Interventions
Implement CICO in Pre-SchoolImplement Self-Monitoring InterventionImplement Check-N-Connect InterventionImplement Social Skills InterventionImplement a Universal Behavior Screener
Future Plans
for
Winfield Primary School
Slide37Winfield Primary’s CICO Forms
Slide38Goals and Rewards
Slide39Daily Progress Report (DPR)
Ratio of at minimum 4:1 for Pre-corrects/Positives to Negative
Slide40Daily Parent Report
Slide41Entrance Criteria
Student Data InventoryTeacher NominationUniversal Screening
Slide42Questions
If you need materials, advice, etc., please email Ericka Dixon.
erickadixon@winfield.k12.mo.us