/
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas

Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas - PowerPoint Presentation

aaron
aaron . @aaron
Follow
394 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-30

Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas - PPT Presentation

Sarah Belcher amp Grant Cooper December 8 2014 Introduction Goals To quantify land useland cover change for Las Vegas over time Collect necessary data Determine class scheme Use skills obtained through lab exercises ID: 564986

area imagery land water imagery area water land change methods data 1999 landsat 2014 study areas vegetation urban vegas

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas

Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper

December 8, 2014Slide2

Introduction

Goals:

To quantify land use/land cover change for Las Vegas over time

Collect necessary data

Determine class scheme

Use skills obtained through lab exercises

Show Results

Validation

ReportSlide3

Rapid Population

G

rowth

1950: 48,589

1990: 741,459

2000: 1,375,7652004: 1,685,1972013: 2,027,868 (Est.)Desert ClimateAlluvial SoilsSparse VegetationHot, dry summers

http://cdn.teslarati.com/wp-

content/uploads/2014/02/LasVegasStrip.jpg

Satellite imagery courtesy of Digital Globe Inc.

Study AreaSlide4

Study Area

Southern Nevada receives 90% of its water supply from the Colorado River

Area has been experiencing drought for the last 14 years

Per capita water use has dropped 40% in the past two decades in Las Vegas

http://www.activistangler.com/storage/Lake_Mead_after_11_years_of_drought.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1395066723992

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/LakeMead/images/mead_2000_lrg.jpg

Slide5

Study Area

Previous studies have been conducted on ISA (impervious surface areas)

ISA indicator of non-point source pollution or polluted runoff

Changes in ISA useful indicators of spatial extent, intensity and potentially types of LULC change

Source: Xian, G. Analysis of Urban Land Use Change in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area Using

Multitemporal Satellite Imagery. ASPRS 2006 Annual Conference. Slide6

Methods

30m Landsat (5, 7 & 8) imagery

Utilized bands R, G, B, and

near IR

All collected in the month of JulyAll images stacked in ERDAS ImagineLandsat imagery 7/4/1999Slide7

Methods

2010 Census tract for Clark County

Arc Map 10.2 used to select tracts for study area and dissolve boundaries

Projection changed to WGS 1984 UTM completed in Arc Map 10.2Slide8

Methods

Each Landsat image subset/clipped based on census tract polygon (AOI)

Improve speed for processing and accuracy of supervised classificationSlide9

Methods

Classes:

Structures

Impervious

Undeveloped

VegetationWaterHousing 20 training sites per classSlide10

Supervised Classification, Maximum Likelihood

6 Classes with housing addedSlide11

Methods

1999-2005 2005-2010 2010-2014Slide12

1999-2014Slide13

1999-2005 Thematic ChangeSlide14

Results

Fda

1999

2014

1999 Total

Vegetation

Undeveloped

Urban

Water

Vegetation

1,560.78

45.14

430.79

1.98

2,038.69

Undeveloped

726.12

23,559.26

30,370.82

5.04

54,661.24

Urban

1,153.35

6,524.46

49,490.51

7.29

57,175.61

Water

0.81

5.94

48.51

100.91

156.17

2014 Total

3,441.06

30,134.8

80,340.63

115.22

114,031.71

*All areas in hectaresSlide15

Results

Undeveloped areas decreased 45%

Urban areas increased 41%

Water decreased 26%

Vegetation increased 69%Slide16

Accuracy Assessment

Classified Data

Reference Data

Total

Vegetation

Urban

Undeveloped

Water

Vegetation

7

0

0

0

7

Urban

0

54

8

2

64

Undeveloped

0

5

19

0

24

Water

0

0

0

5

5

Total

7

60

27

7

100Slide17

Limitations

Reference data for classification should have should have had imagery for all four years of interest

Accuracy assessment should have used an independent source, not the World View 1 imagery

Mixed pixels on edges and with roofs/buildings and bare soil Slide18

If we Knew What we Know Now…

Data can be very challenging to track down

Scope creep

With more time, we could have:

Obtained high resolution imagery for all four years of interest, possibly more to not used

Landsat all togetherDone more detailed analysis – added NDVI’s to look at percentage of vegetation over time