/
Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality C Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality C

Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality C - PowerPoint Presentation

aaron
aaron . @aaron
Follow
372 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-30

Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality C - PPT Presentation

Mount Carmel Health System Colorectal Surgery Fellowship Program Disclosures None Background Colorectal cancer CRC is the 2 nd most common cause of cancerrelated deaths in the US Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for detection and excision of adenomatous polyps which are a pr ID: 601033

start time quality rate time start rate quality results cancer detection withdrawal day endoscopist patients colorectal intubation adr age

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Pre..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality Colonoscopy?

Mount Carmel Health SystemColorectal Surgery Fellowship ProgramSlide2

Disclosures

NoneSlide3

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the USColonoscopy is considered the gold standard for detection and excision of adenomatous polyps, which are a precursor to CRC

The ASGE/ACG task force has outlined multiple quality indicators for colonoscopy

Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin

2014;64:104–117

Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570–1595Slide4

Background

Key Quality IndicatorsCecal intubation rate

95% in screening colonoscopies for normal healthy adults

Adenoma detection rate (ADR)

25% in men &

15% in women

Mean withdrawal time

6 minutes in patients with no polyps and intact anatomy

 Slide5

Purpose of Study

Determine whether a delayed start time impacts the quality of colonoscopyAssess whether time of day or day of week impacts these quality indicatorsCompare and contrast adenoma detection rates among 8

endoscopists

6 Colorectal surgery teaching faculty

2 Community GastroenterologistsSlide6

Methods

Retrospective chart review of 746 patients who underwent screening colonoscopy from January 2016 – February 2016

Excluded patients with insufficient data or any patient that had a prior colon resection

Late start time defined as

15 minute difference between scheduled and actual start time

Multiple logistic regression used to determine association between late start time and quality indicators of colonoscopy

 Slide7

Data Collected

Patient age and genderEndoscopistDate and day of the week of procedureScheduled start time

Actual start time

Cecal

intubation time

Withdrawal time

Number of polypectomies

Number of adenomas

Pathology dataSlide8

Results – Overall

692 patients met inclusion criteria344 males (49.7%) and 348 females (50.3%)

Median Age – 60

C

ecal

intubation rate – 98.6%

Mean adenoma detection rate – 39.6%

Mean withdrawal time – 10.6 minutes

99.0% rate

6 minutes Slide9

Results – Demographics / Endoscopist

ADR was associated with:Gender: Male - 49.2% vs Female - 30.2% (p <0.0001)

Mean Age: 57.7 vs 62.6 years old among patients without adenomas vs. patients with adenomas respectively (p<0.0001)

Endoscopist

: ADR ranged from 24% - 60% (p<0.0001)Slide10

Results – Quality Indicators

Quality Indicator

On Time

Delayed Start Time

p-Value

Cecal

Intubation

Rate

98.4%

98.7%

0.7609

Adenoma

Detection Rate

41.7%

37.5%

0.2750

Mean

Withdrawal time (SD)

10.6 (6.1)

minutes

10.5 (4.9) minutes

0.8956Slide11

Results – Other Factors

Analysis accounting for age, sex, and individual endoscopist found no association between ADR and:Delayed Start time (p=0.2701)

Case load for the day (p=0.8384)

Time of day (p=0.9345)

Day of week (0.5985)Slide12

Results by Endoscopist

p

<0.0001 for all parametersSlide13

Results – Endoscopists’ Late Start

vs. Withdrawal TimesSlide14

Results – Late Start vs. ADRSlide15

Conclusions

Delayed start time or other scheduling factors did not impact key quality indicators of colonoscopyCecal

intubation rate

95%

Adenoma detection rate males

25%, Females

15%

Mean withdrawal time

6 minutes

ADR varies by age, gender, and

endoscopist

as seen in other studies