/
Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Section in the U.S. Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Section in the U.S.

Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Section in the U.S. - PowerPoint Presentation

aaron
aaron . @aaron
Follow
388 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-01

Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Section in the U.S. - PPT Presentation

Professor Gene Declercq PhD Boston University School of Public Health wwwbirthbythenumbersorg With support from The Transforming Birth Fund Slides Updated through January 152015 US Cesarean Rates ID: 640301

org cesarean mothers birthbythenumbers cesarean org birthbythenumbers mothers 2013 health rates births rate source amp birth vbac 1990 national

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Sec..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Myth and Reality Concerning Cesarean Section in the U.S.

Professor Gene Declercq, PhD

Boston University School of Public Health

www.birthbythenumbers.org

With

support from:

The

Transforming Birth

Fund

Slides Updated through January 15,2015Slide2

US Cesarean Rates,

1989-2013

Source: National Center for Health Statistics Annual Birth Reports

%

1,284,339

c

esareans

in 2013

If the

2013

cesarean rate was the same as in 1996, there would have been

475,000

fewer cesareans in the U.S. in

’13.Slide3

US Cesarean Rates,

1989-2013

Source: National Center for Health Statistics

Annual

Birth Reports

%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide4

US Cesarean Rates,

1989-2013

Source: National Center for Health Statistics Annual

Birth

Reports

%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide5

US Cesarean Rates,

1989-2013

Source: National Center for Health Statistics

Annual

Birth Reports

%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide6

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting olderMore multiples

being bornMaternal obesity increasingBabies are getting biggerMothers are generally less healthyMothers are

asking for itSlide7

Older Mothers?

% Births to Mothers 30 +, U.S. 1990-2013

Between 2003 & 2010 CS

Rate

increased by 20%

>

35

>

35

>30

BirthByTheNumbers.org

From 2010-2013,

CS rate unchangedSlide8

Total Cesarean Rates (per 100 births) by Age of Mother: United States, 1996 and 2013

Source: National vital statistics system, NCHS, CDC.

Percent

Overall increase,

1996-2013: 58.0%Slide9

Multiple Births?

Proportion of all babies in multiple births,U.S., 1980-2013

BirthByTheNumbers.org

Source: National Center for Health Statistics Annual Birth ReportsSlide10

Cesarean Rates for Multiple Births, U.S. 1990-2013

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide11

Are Babies Getting Bigger?

% Singleton Babies by Birthweight, U. S., 1991-2013

41%

41%

39%

36%

36%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide12

% Cesareans in

Singleton Births, U.S. by Birthweight, 1991-2013

53.6%

38.6%

31.3%

21.8%

27.8%

38.2%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide13

Mothers’ Health?

Prepregnancy Obesity, U.S. 2003

, 2006, 2009, 2011

Sources: 2003-2009 -- S

. Fisher. Is obesity still increasing among pregnant women?Preventive Medicine 2013; 56: 372-378; 2011 – CDC VitalStats. Slide14

Mothers’ Health?

Cesarean Rate Singleton Births by Prepregnancy Weight Range, U.S. 2013

Source:

CDC VitalStats, 2013. Slide15

Mothers’ Health?

Diabetes* & Hypertension*, 1992,2002,2013

* Either gestational or chronic condition

Source: CDC VitalStats, selected years. Slide16

Mothers’ Health?

Cesarean Rates, Singleton Births, U.S.,

1990, 1996, 2004, 2013

Source: CDC VitalStats, selected years. Slide17

Mothers’ Health?

Cesarean Rates, Singleton Births, U.S.,

1990, 1996, 2004, 2013

Source: CDC VitalStats, selected years. Slide18

Mothers asked for itHave maternal request cesareans played a major role in these increases?Slide19

http://www.childbirthconnection.org

Asking Mothers about

Maternal Request CesareansSlide20

Two Components to Maternal Request Primary Cesarean

1.

Mother made request for planned cesarean before laborSlide21

Two Components to Maternal Request Primary Cesarean

1. Mother made request for planned cesarean before labor

2. Cesarean for no medical reasonSlide22

Patient Choice Primary Cesareans

Combining reason for cesarean and timing of decision found only about 1% of respondents had a planned primary cesarean for no medical reason.

I think that [cesarean] is… the best way … to give birth. It is a planned way, no hassle, no pain, the baby doesn’t struggle to come out, the baby is not pressed to come out …I think that … everybody should have the baby by cesarean section.” (quote from LtM2)

Studies from

England, Canada and U.S. states confirm very low rates of maternal request cesareansSlide23

Pressure to Accept Interventions

by Method of Delivery

Did you feel pressure from any health professional to have a cesarean? % yes

Source: Declercq et al.

2013.

Listening to Mothers III.BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide24

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting olderMore

multiples being bornBabies are getting biggerMaternal health is worse: obesity, diabetes & hypertension

Mothers are asking for itSlide25

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting older – NO

More multiples being born Babies are getting biggerMaternal health is worse: obesity,

diabetes & hypertensionMothers are asking for itSlide26

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting older – NO

More multiples being born– NOBabies are getting bigger

Maternal health is worse: obesity, diabetes & hypertensionMothers are asking for itSlide27

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting older–

NOMore multiples being born – NOBabies are getting bigger –

NO !!Maternal health is worse: obesity, diabetes & hypertension

Mothers are asking for itSlide28

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting older–

NOMore multiples being born – NOBabies are getting bigger –

NO !!Maternal health is worse: obesity, diabetes & hypertension –

Some Mothers are asking for it Slide29

Commonly Used Explanations for the High Cesarean Rate

Mothers are getting older– NO

More multiples being born – NOBabies are getting bigger –

NO !!Maternal health is worse: obesity, diabetes & hypertension –

Some Mothers are asking for it – NOSlide30

If the usual explanations for the rising cesarean rate don’t account for the changes w

hat does? Slide31

If the usual explanations for the rising cesarean rate don’t account for the changes w

hat does?

Practice ChangesSlide32

Leading Indications for Cesareans

Source: ACOG & SMFM.

Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery. 3/2014. Slide33

Cesarean Rates, Low Risk*, First-Time Mothers for Medical Risk Factors & Labor Complications

*Singleton, Vertex, Full Gestation Births

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide34

Source: National Center for Health Statistics

Annual

Birth Reports

%

Revisiting the trend in cesareans

in the US for comparison

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide35

Cesarean Rates, Low Risk*, First-Time Mothers for Medical Risk Factors & Labor Complications

*Singleton, Vertex, Full Gestation Births

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide36

Cesarean Rates, Low Risk*, First-Time Mothers for Medical Risk Factors & Labor Complications

*Singleton, Vertex, Full Gestation Births

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide37

Women have not changed nearly as much as practice patterns have

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide38

Any other evidence that this is about a culture of practice?

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide39

Let’s look at variation.

If the practice of maternity care is evidence based, then differences in rates should be based primarily on different risk profiles of mothers.

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide40

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide41

MT

WY

ID

WA

OR

NV

UT

CA

AZ

ND

SD

NE

CO

NM

TX

OK

KS

AR

LA

MO

IA

MN

WI

IL

IN

KY

TN

MS

AL

GA

FL

SC

NC

VA

WV

OH

MI

NY

PA

MD

DE

NJ

CT

RI

MA

ME

VT

NH

AK

HI

31.6%+

22.6-31.5%

DC

Cesarean

Delivery

Rates

1

, 2012

1

Percentage of all live births by cesarean delivery

Source: Martin J, et al.

Births Final Data

2012

.

National Vital Statistics System,

2014

.

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide42

MT

WY

ID

WA

OR

NV

UT

CA

AZ

ND

SD

NE

CO

NM

TX

OK

KS

AR

LA

MO

IA

MN

WI

IL

IN

KY

TN

MS

AL

GA

FL

SC

NC

VA

WV

OH

MI

NY

PA

MD

DE

NJ

CT

RI

MA

ME

VT

NH

AK

HI

DC

1960 Electoral College Map

Nixon 219

Harry Byrd 15

Kennedy 303

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide43

JFK 1960 Vote and

2012 Cesarean Rates

2012 Cesarean Rate

JFK % Vote

Each dot represents a U.S. stateSlide44

Variation is not just at the state level but at the hospital level as wellSlide45

% Cesarean Deliveries by Hospital

for

ALL

MA

Births, 2004-2006

N = 49 Mean =31.2 σ2 =29.6

All 49 Hospitals

Source: Caceres I, et al. Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts

(US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact. PLOS One.2013; 8 (3): e57817

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide46

% Cesarean Deliveries by Hospital

for

NTVS, Spontaneous Labor, BWT 2500-4000g

Births

N = 49 Mean =21.1 σ2 =37.1Source: Caceres I, et al. Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against

Case-Mix Artifact. PLOS One.2013; 8 (3): e57817

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide47

How does a culture of intervention get manifested in a hospital setting?

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide48

How does a culture of intervention get manifested in a hospital setting?

Consider the Cascade of Interventions

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide49

Induction

No53%

EpiduralNo39%Epidural

Yes61%Induction

Yes47%EpiduralNo22%EpiduralYes78%First-time mothers with term births (37-41 weeks’ gestation) who experienced laborCesarean Yes

20%Cesarean Yes5%Cesarean Yes31%Cesarean Yes19%

In this group, which included 85% of first-time mothers, the

overall

epidural rate was 69% and overall cesarean rate was 21%.

Cascade

of interventions in first-time mothers with term births who experienced labor

Base: first-time mothers with term births who experienced labor

n=750

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide50

What about Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) ?

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide51

VBAC

Rates*, U.S.,1990-2011

Source: NCHS Vital Stats. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/VitalStats.htm

*

Number of VBACs among women with prior cesarean

NOTE

: Rates for

2005-2011

are unofficial

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide52

% VBAC Lower Risk* Mothers, U.S., Monthly Rates, 1990-2012

* Full-gestation(37+ weeks), vertex presentation, singleton births

Sachs, NEJM

1/99

ACOG New

VBAC Guidelines

10/98 & 7/99

Lydon

-Rochelle

& Greene 7/01

Landon

NEJM 12/04

Flamm

Studies

1988,’90, ‘94

McMahon

NEJM

9/96

ACOG guidelines encourage

VBAC, 1/82 10/88 Reaffirmed 1991

Revised

ACOG

Guide-

lines 8/10

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide53

VBAC Rates Industrialized Countries, 2010

Source: Adapted from

Peristats &

US

DataVBAC % = VBACS Women w/ Prior CS

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide54

August, 2010

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide55

Mother had cesarean in the past, and did not have the option of a VBAC for recent birth.

LTMI

2000-02

LTMII 2005

LTMIII2011-12

Did not have the option because caregiver was unwilling to do a VBAC

36%

45%

24%

Did not have the option because hospital was unwilling to allow a VBAC

12%

23%

15%

Medical reason unrelated to prior cesarean

38%

20%

45%

U.S. Mothers Report of Experience

Seeking a VBAC, 2000, 2005, 2012

Source:

Listening to Mothers 3

.

New VBAC Guidelines

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide56

So is a rising cesarean rate inevitable?

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide57

So is a rising cesarean rate inevitable?

ABSOLUTELY NOT

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide58

US Cesarean Rates, 1989-2012

Source: National Center for Health Statistics

Annual

Birth Reports

%

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide59

Trends in Cesarean Rates

(per 1000 births), Comparison Countries, 1990-2011

Sources:

OECD Health Data

2013; WHO Health for All Database, 2014.BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide60

Trends in Caesarean Rates

(per 1000 births), Comparison Countries, 1990-2011

Sources:

OECD Health Data

2013; WHO Health for All Database, 2014.BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide61

www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Obstetric_Care_Consensus_Series/Safe_Prevention_of_the_Primary_Cesarean_Delivery

Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery

Questioning the Rising Cesarean Rate

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide62

Evidence Based

Advocacy

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide63

Prematurity and Low Birthweight, U.S., 1990-2012

Year

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide64

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide65

http://www.choicesinchildbirth.org/

Evidence Based Advocacy

BirthByTheNumbers.orgSlide66

https://www.childbirthconnection.org/

Evidence Based AdvocacySlide67

Follow Birth by the Numbers on Social Media:

RSS (blog):

www.birthbythenumbers.orgwww.facebook.com/BirthByTheNumbers

Twitter: @BirthNumbers

Email: birthbynumbers@gmail.com“Birth by the Numbers” on Pinterest

www.birthbythenumbers.org