PPT-NVMe™/TCP Development

NVMeTCP Development Status and a Case study of SPDK User Space Solution 2019 NVMe Annual Members Meeting and Developer Day March 19 2019 Sagi Grimberg Lightbits Labs Ben Walker and Ziye. eSAS. ). and benchmarking . eSAS. prototype against legacy SAS. UCCS. Master’s Project Proposal. Deepti Reddy. 1. Typical SAS Topology. X. X. X. X. - . DISK DRIVES. - . EXPANDERS. MPT Driver. SAS CONTROLLER. Advanced Computer Networks: TCP Congestion Control. 1. Principles of Congestion Control. Congestion:. informally: “too many sources sending too much data too fast for the . network. to handle”. different from flow control!. Based on: A look back at “Security Problems in the TCP/IP Protocol Suite” by Steven M. . Bellovin. , AT&T Labs-Research. Presented by :Moinul I . Zaber. ,. Kent State University. What’s on Today!. Kulkarni. . Ameya.s. . JongHwa. Song. Ashvin. Goal (University of Toronto). Charles . Krasic. (University of British Columbia). Jonathan Walpole (Portland State University) . (. AccECN. ). draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn-03. Bob Briscoe, BT. Richard Scheffenegger, NetApp. Mirja . Kühlewind. , Stuttgart . Uni. IETF-90, Jul’14. Bob Briscoe’s work is part-funded by the European Community. CEG436: Mobile Computing. Prabhaker. . Mateti. TCP RFCs: 793, 1122, 1323, 2018, 2581. Connection-oriented. Point-to-point: one sender, one receiver processes. send & receive buffers. Flow control: Do not flood the receiver’s buffer. Computer Networks. Principles of Congestion Control. Congestion:. informally: “too many sources sending too much data too fast for the . network. to handle”. different from flow control!. manifestations:. Sylvia Ratnasamy. http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee122. /. Material thanks to Ion . Stoica. , Scott . Shenker. , Jennifer Rexford, Nick . McKeown. , and many other colleagues. 2. TCP Header. Source port. Costin Raiciu. Advanced Topics in Distributed Systems. 2011. TCP Primer. Loss recovery. Fast retransmit. Timeouts. Congestion Control. Buffer sizing. TCP . Incast. Why does it happen?. How bad is it?. Presenter – Bob Kinicki. Advanced Computer Networks : XCP paper. 2. Fairness in TCP Variants. n. s-2 dumbbell simulations. C = 1 . Gbps. Min RTT = 104 . ms.. Drop tail routers. 1500 byte packets. Buffer size = BDP. CS144 Review Session 4. April 25, 2008. Ben Nham. Announcements. Upcoming dates. Wed, 4/30: Lab 3 due, Lab 4 out. Fri, 5/2: Midterm Review. Mon, 5/5: In-class midterm. Wed, 5/14: Lab 4 due. Lab 3 is more complex than Lab 1 or Lab 2, so start now. CMB. and . PMR. Ecosystem. Stephen Bates, PhD. CTO, . Eideticom. Oren . Duer. . Software Architect, . Mellanox. NVM Express Developers Day, May 1, 2018. Outline. Intro to . NVMe. ™. Controller Memory Buffers (. TCP Vegas Lawrence s. Brakmo Sean W. O’Malley Larry l. Peterson Presented TCP Vegas in 1994 Presented by Chung Tran TCP Vegas VS TCP Reno When TCP Vegas was research and presented in 1994 it stated that it have a better throughput than TCP Reno by 40 to 70 percent Accelerating Applications with NVM Express™ Computational Storage 2019 NVMe™ Annual Members Meeting and Developer Day March 19, 2019 Prepared by Stephen Bates , CTO , Eideticom & Richard Mataya, Co-Founder & EVP, NGD Systems