Antoljak Common indicators related to organization and invitation Quality and performance indicators Targeted Eligible Invited Screenedtested at first screening and at subsequent screening episodes ID: 596234
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "izv.prof.dr.sc. Nataša" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1Slide2
izv.prof.dr.sc. Nataša Antoljak
Common indicators related to organization and invitationSlide3
Quality and performance
indicators
Targeted
Eligible
Invited
Screened/tested at first screening and at subsequent screening episodes
Inadequate tests
(
samples
)
Waiting
times
between
procedures
Positive test or screening
Follow-up colonoscopy examination attended (diagnostic assessment and/or treatment)
Negative follow-up colonoscopy examination (diagnostic assessment and/or treatment)
Positive follow-up colonoscopy examination (diagnostic assessment and/or treatment)
Lesion detected (at least one)
Adenoma detected (at least one)
Non-advanced adenoma detected (at least one)
Advanced/high-risk adenoma detected (at least one)
Cancer detected by stageSlide4
Aim of organization
and
invitation
indicators
local
and
national
coordinators
must take a care for
optimal
procedures
must
understand
each
detail
of
such
complicated
program (
depends
on
communication
between
many
people
and
machines
!)
each
must
resolve
problems
on same
way
, but
still
there
are
many
specific
situations
in
counties
coordinators
must
know
everything
about
other
specialist
indicators
and
understand
of
their
meaning
and
consequences
other
specialist
must
also
be
well
informed
and
aware
of
all
procedures
and
other
coleagues
part
in
this
system
anyway
must
be
aware
that
this
is
system
different
of
daily
routine
job
Slide5
Performance indicators
monotoring
mean
time of each procedure:
invitation
letter
,
sending
test,
returned
tests
with
aplied
specimens
,
reading
test
results
,
invitation
of
positives
assurance
and
monitoring waiting time to
colonoscopy-less
than
6
weeks
(
currently
no problem but
if
response
rate
arise-than
it
can
be
problem!)
monitoring
of
writing
data
in
IT
aplication
(
screening
register
)-
individualy
and
in
reports
which
immediately
calculate
responses
or
findings
monitoring
internal
procedures
within
their
institutions
internal
protocols
must
be
in
line
with
recommended
protocols
and
also
IT must
follow
these
procedures
and
indicatorsSlide6
Public health
institute
level
external
control
of
FOBT
reading
epidemiologic
control
of
storage
conditions
for FOBT
internal
procedures
for
quality
assurance
of
each
phase
conditions
for FOBT
reading
staff
and
daily
engagement
on
screening
(
other
job
)
working
conditions
, IT
equipement
,
function
of
screening
web
aplication
/
registry
coordination
with
GP-s
and
field
nurses
do
they
inform
patients
about
positive
test
personaly
/
by
letter
do
they
inform
GP
about
positive
patient
personaly
/
by
letter
any
other
problems
or
objections
IT
reports
about
response
to
invitation
letter
and
on test,
number
of
positive
,
number
of
colonoscopy
appointments
,
cause
of
nonresponse
(
according
to post
office
stamp
,
or
personal
answer
etc
.)
need
to
upgrade
IT for monitoring waiting time
between
procedures
and
also
different
schedule
for
persons
detected
polyps
(
guidelines
)Slide7
internal
control
of
reading
and
also
must
understand
that
it
depend
on
timely
recording
data
in
aplication
Slide8
FOBT
positive
invited
to
colonoscopy
colonoscopies
doneSlide9
Reasons
for
non-participation
/
nonresponse