UNEVEN ROADS CHAPTER 6 Chapter Objectives Explain the racial considerations incorporated into the nations founding documents and the motivations behind them Identify how societal factors and government practices shaped options for new populations arriving from Europe and challenged the conce ID: 688573
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Whiteness and the Shifting Roads of Immi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Whiteness and the Shifting Roads of Immigrant America, 1780s-1960s
UNEVEN ROADS, CHAPTER 6Slide2
Chapter Objectives
Explain the racial considerations incorporated into the nation’s founding documents and the motivations behind them
Identify how societal factors and government practices shaped options for new populations arriving from Europe and challenged the conception of Whiteness
Explain how White identity expanded to include White ethnics by the dawn of the Civil Rights era
Discuss the ways in which government created long-term advantages for Whites not available to other races in U.S. societySlide3
Whiteness and the Study of U.S. Race/Ethnicity
Position of racial/ethnic minorities in U.S. society can only be understood by assessing their position relative to White Americans
Popular definitions of government policies defining Whiteness have changed over time
Benjamin Franklin (1751) – “ Instead of learning our language, we must learn theirs, or live as in a foreign country. Already the English begin to quit particular neighborhoods surrounded by Dutch, being made uneasy by the disagreeableness of dissonant manners …”
Madison Grant (1918) – migrants from the Mediterranean and Baltic countries: “contained a large and increasing number of the weak, the broken and the mentally crippled … Our jails, insane asylums and almshouses filled with the human flotsam and the whole tone of American life, social, moral and political has been lowered by them.”Slide4
Whiteness at the American Founding
The U.S. Constitution
Article One, Section 2 – “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed,
three fifths of all other Persons
.”
Article One, Section 8 – “To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”
Article One, Section 9 – Prohibited restrictions on slave importation until 1808
Article Four, Section 2 – Fugitive slave clause – required that all states enforce the rights of slave holders
Early national law
Naturalization Act of 1790 – Naturalization limited to “free white persons” (free white males)Slide5
Expansions of White Identity
New European migrants 1830s
Countries of origin diversified
Roman Catholics and Jews joined Protestants in migration steam
Initially viewed as non-White or less than White – “in-between” peoples
European migration further diversified after Civil War to include migrants from Southern and Eastern Europe
Transitions to Whiteness
State and local acceptance
Numbers
Federalism
Scientific racism (see chapter 1)
Efforts to privilege and privilege the practices of Northern/Western Europeans relative to Southern/Eastern Europeans (Prohibition as example)
Southern/Eastern European migrants and their descendants organized to demand equal rights and protectionsSlide6
Cross Road: General Grant’s Expulsion of Jews “as a Class”
General Orders #11 – Expulsion of all Jews from the military district of Tennessee
Origins unclear
May have tapped anti-Semitism and perceptions of Jews as profiteers
Jews in the district mobilized to have the orders reversed … and succeeded
Tapped the principle that individual liberty extended to all Whites
And that all Whites should have their rights respected as individuals
Had the orders stood, they would have established a precedent that Jews as a group (and, by extension, other Whites) could have had their rights denied as a group
Grant appears to have regretted the order
Appointed a record number of Jews to public office
Opposed “religious” amendment to Constitution
Earned a high share of the Jewish vote in 1872Slide7
White Identity at the Dawn of the Civil Rights Era
Low levels of new European migration, 1920s-1960s
Political organization, local then national, among immigrants/descendants of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe
The Depression reduced class differences between Whites of different immigration origins/histories
Decline in new European immigration led to greater social contact and higher rates of intermarriage among Whites of different immigration origins/histories
Post-World War II economy allowed for “non-zero-sum mobility” for white ethnics
All
were necessary pre-conditions for White identity to coalesce in the mid-twentieth CenturySlide8
Road Sign: Not White Enough for the White House?
In 2012, three of the four party nominees for President and Vice President where not mainstream Protestants
The one who is a mainstream Protestant was African American
Religion not a central theme in the campaign
Not the case in 1928 when a party nominated the first non-Protestant – New York Governor Al Smith (D)
Until 1928, all nominees for President and Vice President were Protestants
Most had been of British ancestry, with a few of Dutch ancestry
Smith
Catholic
Irish ancestry
Ancestors part of the “First Great Wave” –1820s-1840sSlide9
Road Sign, continued
Smith opposed Prohibition
Issue divided White electorate
Costs of prohibition becoming evident by 1928
Smith’s religion central to race
Asserted that he would govern at the behest of the Pope
Success (and independence) as Governor of New York insufficient to quell prejudice
Smith lost
Religion returned to debate when John Kennedy ran for and won the U.S. Presidency in 1960 and when Mitt Romney (a Mormon) ran for President in 2008 and 2012
President Obama was the only mainstream Protestant among 2012 party nominees for President or Vice President
But, first descendant of a post-Civil War migrant to win the Presidency
The Second Great Wave of U.S. immigration (1960s-1920s) has yet to see a descendant win the PresidencySlide10
The State and White Advantage
White advantage – the social, economic, and legal privileges that Whites could exercise or exercise more freely than non-Whites
Colonies / early United States devalues and destroyed the assets of non-Whites to the advantage of European colonists
Native lands expropriated
Blacks transition from indentured servitude to slavery
Citizenship denied
Early national era
Constitution entrenches racial hierarchy
Naturalization (a federal power) extended only to Whites
States reinforced White advantage
Voting rights expand from landholders to most adult males (including Blacks in some states)
Ensures that immigrants and their children gain the franchise and local political powerSlide11
White Privilege in Westward Expansion
Lands in West progressively taken from Native populations
Homestead Act of 1862
Land sold in small plots to ensure its productive use
Few non-Whites had the resources to migrate and farm the land for five years to gain ownership
Blacks faced added burden of “anti-vagrancy” laws
Southern lands that were made available (where most Blacks lived) or low quality
Homestead Act transferred 285 million acres / 10 percent of U.S. land mass
Morrill Land-Grant College Act of 1862
Land made available in each state to build state colleges
Blacks (and later Mexican Americans and Asian Americans) often denied equal access to admissions
Plessy v Ferguson
(1896) formally established “separate but equal”
Real estate covenants –
Corrigan v. Buckley
(1926)
Each policy explains contemporary racial/ethnic wealth gapsSlide12
Immigration Policy Reinforces Racial Hierarchy
Until 1875, popular understanding was that immigration could not be restricted (naturalization could be)
Restrictions, as they are enacted, include racial bars
Page Act 1875 – notion of “consent”
Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) – Chinese laborers
Expansion to all Asians (1882-1917)
The Illiterate (1917) – not applied evenly, excluded many Southern and Eastern Europeans and Mexicans
National Origin Quotas (1921 & 1924) – Southern and Eastern Europeans (see chapter 11)Slide13
White Privilege and the Emergence of the National Welfare State
New Deal programs
To pass, President Roosevelt needed the support of Southern Democrats in Congress
As a result, they systematically excluded African Americans or offered them less access to state resources
Social Security initially excluded the industries that overwhelmingly employed African Americans and Mexican Americans
L
ower benefits today
Partial explanation for the racial/ethnic wealth gap today
The G.I. Bill
Educational discrimination ensure that non-White veterans less able to seize full benefits of education financing
Redlining / “racial homogeneity” principles limited non-White veteran access to the U.S. housing market (and subsequent appreciation in home prices)
These policies served for further homogenize White ethnic identity and reduce social, educational, and wealth differences among Whites of different ancestriesSlide14
Conclusions
Racial hierarchy – with White ethnic identity largely unquestioned – in place as Civil Rights debates emerge
Lyndon Johnson speech at Howard University (1965)
Growing gaps between Whites and Blacks
“You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him to the starting line of a race and then say, ‘you are free to complete with all the others,’ and justly believe that you have been completely fair.”
Policy responses
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Affirmative action policies
Across U.S. history, racial differences
within
the White population insufficient or inconsequential as barriers for Whites to exercise the rights and privileges of citizenship