/
2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologicaldevelopments.Methods:Literat 2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologicaldevelopments.Methods:Literat

2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologicaldevelopments.Methods:Literat - PDF document

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
393 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-19

2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologicaldevelopments.Methods:Literat - PPT Presentation

4DMadiganetalSafetyDatalinkprovidesanearlyexampleofaLODspeci callydesignedforsafetyPapersfocusingondrugsafetyincludeCurtisetal2008Jinetal2008Kulldor etal2008Li2009Norenetal2008an ID: 165300

4D.Madiganetal.SafetyDatalinkprovidesanearlyexampleofaLODspeci callydesignedforsafety.PapersfocusingondrugsafetyincludeCurtisetal.(2008) Jinetal.(2008) Kulldor etal.(2008) Li(2009) Norenetal.(2008)

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologic..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

2D.Madiganetal.recentrelatedmethodologicaldevelopments.Methods:Literaturereview.Results:Theself-controlledcaseserieso ersseveraladvantagesforactivesurveillancefordrugsafetybutwealsooutlinesomekeylimitations.Wedescribeapproachesforaddressedsomeoftheselimitations.Conclusions:Theself-controlledcaseseriesmodelanditsexten-sionsmayprovetobeausefultoolforactivesurveillance.Con ictsofInterest:NoneWordCount:3912KeyPointsTheself-controlledcaseseries(SCCS)representsonepartic-ularmethodologythatmaybeusefulforactivesurveillanceofdrugsafety.SCCShasstrengthsandweaknesses.Modi cationsofthebasicmodelcanaddresssomebutnotalloftheweaknesses.Furtherresearchisrequiredtoestablishtheoperatingchar-acteristicsofSCCS-basedactivesurveillance.KeywordsandPhrases:Drugsafety;Shrinkage;Poissonregression;Caseseries;1.INTRODUCTIONIncreasingscienti c,regulatoryandpublicscrutinyfocusesontheobligationofthemedicalcommunity,pharmaceuticalindustryandhealthauthoritiestoensurethatmarketeddrugshaveacceptablebene t-riskpro les.Thisisanintricateandongoingprocessthatbeginswithcarefullydesignedrandomizedclinicaltrialspriortoapprovalbutcontinuesafterregulatorymarketautho-rizationwhenthedrugisinwidespreadclinicaluse.Inthepost-approvalenvironment,surveillanceschemesbasedonspontaneousreportingsystems(SRS)representacornerstonefortheearlydetectionofnoveldrughazards.KeylimitationsofSRS-basedpharmacovigilanceincludeunder-reporting,du-plicatereporting,andtheabsenceofadenominatororcontrolgrouptopro-videacomparison.NewerdatasourceshaveemergedthatovercomesomeoftheSRSlim-itationsbutpresentmethodologicalandlogisticalchallengesoftheirown. 4D.Madiganetal.SafetyDatalinkprovidesanearlyexampleofaLODspeci callydesignedforsafety.PapersfocusingondrugsafetyincludeCurtisetal.(2008),Jinetal.(2008),Kulldor etal.(2008),Li(2009),Norenetal.(2008),andSchneeweissetal.(2009).3.THESELF-CONTROLLEDCASESERIESMETHODFarrington(1995)proposedtheself-controlledcaseseries(SCCS)methodinordertoestimatetherelativeincidenceofadverseeventstoassessvaccinesafety.ThemajorfeaturesofSCCSarethat(1)itautomaticallycontrolsfortime- xedcovariatesthatdon'tvarywithinapersonduringthestudyperiod,and(2)onlycases(individualswithatleastoneevent)needtobeincludedintheanalysis.WithSCCS,eachindividualservesastheirowncontrol.Inotherwords,SCCScomparesoutcomeeventratesduringtimeswhenapersonisexposedversusoutcomeeventratesduringtimeswhenthesamepersonisunexposed.Ine ect,thecases'unexposedtimeletsusinferexpectationsaboutwhatwouldhavehappenedduringtheirexposedtimehadtheynotbeenexposed.SCCSisoneofseveralself-controlledmethodsthattheepidemiologylit-eraturedescribes,manyofwhicharevariantsonthecase-crossovermethod(Maclure,1991).Howeverunlikethecase-crossovermethod,whichtypicallyrequiresthechoiceofacomparatortimeperiodtoserveasacontrol,SCCSmakesuseofallavailabletemporalinformationwithouttheneedforselection.EpidemiologicalapplicationsofSCCStendtofocusonsituationswithsmallsamplesizesandfewexposurevariablesofinterest.Incontrast,theproblemofdrugsafetysurveillanceinLODsmustcontendwithmillionsofindividualsandmillionsofpotentialdrugexposures.Thesizeoftheproblempresentsamajorcomputationalchallenge{ensuringtheavailabilityofanecientoptimizationprocedureisessentialforafeasibleimplementation.3.1.Onedrug,oneadverseeventWewill rstfocusonthecasewherethereisonedrug(e.g.Vioxx)andoneadverseevent(e.g.myocardialinfarction,MI)ofinterest.Tosetupthenotation,iwillindexindividualsfrom1toN.Eventsandexposuresinourdatabasesarerecordedwithdates,sotemporalinformationisavailabledowntothelevelofdays(indexedbyd).Letibethenumberofdaysthatpersoniisobserved,with(i,d)beingtheirdthdayofobservation.Thenumberofeventsonday(i,d)isdenotedbyyid,anddrugexposureisindicatedbyxid,wherexid=1ifiisexposedtothedrugon(i,d),and0otherwise.SCCSassumesthatAEsariseaccordingtoanon-homogeneousPoissonprocess,wheretheunderlyingeventrateismodulatedbydrugexposure.We 6D.Madiganetal.Inordertoavoidestimatingthenuisanceparameter,wecanconditiononitssucientstatisticandremovethedependenceoni.UnderthePoissonmodelthissucientstatisticisthetotalnumberofeventspersonihasovertheirentireobservationperiod,whichwedenotebyni=Pdyid.Foranon-homogeneousPoissonprocess,niisaPoissonrandomvariablewithrateparameterequaltothecumulativeintensityovertheobservationperiod:nijxiPoisson(iXd=1id=eiiXd=1e xid)Inourcasethecumulativeintensityisasum(ratherthananintegral)sinceweassumeaconstantintensityovereachday.Conditioningonniyieldsthefollowinglikelihoodforpersoni:Lci=P(yijxi;ni)=P(yijxi) P(nijxi)/iYd=1e xid Pd0e xid0yidNoticethatbecauseniissucient,theindividuallikelihoodintheaboveexpressionnolongercontainsi.Thisconditionallikelihoodtakestheformofamultinomial,butdi ersfromatypicalmultinomialregression.Herethenumberof\bins"(observeddays)variesbyperson,the parameterisconstantacrossdays,andthecovariatesxidvarybyday.Assumingthatpatientsareindependent,thefullconditionallikelihoodissimplytheproductoftheindividuallikelihoods.Lc/NYi=1iYd=1e xid Pd0e xid0yidEstimationofthedruge ectcannowproceedbymaximizingthecondi-tionallog-likelihoodtoobtain^ CMLE.Winkelmann(2008)showedthatthisestimatorisconsistentandasymptoticallyNormalinthePoissoncase.Itisclearfromtheexpressonforthelikelihoodthatifpersonihasnoobservedevents(yi=0),theywillhaveacontributionofLci=1.Conse-quently,personihasnoe ectontheestimation,anditfollowsthatonlycases(ni1)needtobeincludedintheanalysis.SCCSdoesawithin-personcomparisonoftheeventrateduringexposuretotheeventratewhileunexposed,andthusthemethodis\self-controlled".Intuitivelyitfollowsthatifihasnoevents,theycannotprovideanyinfor-mationabouttherelativerateatwhichtheyhaveevents.ThattheSCCSanalysisreliessolelyondatafromcasesisasubstantialcomputationaladvan-tage{sincetheincidencerateofmostAEsisrelativelylow,typicalSCCSanalyseswillutilizeonlyamodestfractionofthetotalnumberofpatients. 8D.Madiganetal.interactionsandavectoroftime-varyingcovariateszidcanbewrittenasid=ei+ 0xid+Pr6=s rsxidrxids+ 0zidwhere denotesatwo-wayinteractionbetweendrugsrands.Remark1.Inpractice,manyadversee ectscanoccuratmostonceinagivendaysuggestingabinaryratherthanPoissonmodel.Onecanshowthatadoptingalogisticmodelyieldsanidenticalconditionallikelihoodto(1).Thisequivalenceallowsshiftingtoalogisticmodelwithfollow-uptruncatedattheoutcomeevent,whenthateventistheonsetofanenduringconditionthatpermanentlychangesexposurepropensity(seeDiscussionbelow.)Remark2.Itisstraightforwardtoshowthattheconditionallikelihoodin(1)islog-concave.3.3.BayesianSelf-ControlledCaseSeriesWehavenowsetupthefullconditionallikelihoodformultipledrugs,soonecouldproceedby ndingconditionalmaximumlikelihoodestimatesofthedrugparametervector .Howeverintheproblemofdrugsafetysurveil-lanceinLODstherearemillionsofpotentialdrugexposurepredictors(tensofthousandsofdrugmaine ectsalongwithdruginteractions).Thishighdimensionalityleadstopotentialover ttingundertheusualmaximumlikeli-hoodapproach,soregularizationisnecessary.WetakeaBayesianapproachbyputtingaprioroverthedruge ectpa-rametervectorandperforminginferencebasedonposteriormodeestimates.Therearemanychoicesofpriordistributionsthatshrinktheparameteresti-matestowardzeroandaddressover tting.Inparticular,wefocusonthe(1)Normalpriorand(2)Laplacianprior.(i)Normalprior.HereweshrinktheestimatestowardzerobyputtinganindependentNormalprioroneachoftheparametercomponents.TakingtheposteriormodeestimateswouldbeanalogoustoaridgePoissonregression,placingaconstraintontheL2-normoftheparametervector.(ii)Laplaceprior.Underthischoiceofprioraportionoftheposteriormodeestimateswillshrinkallthewaytozero,andtheircorrespondingpredictorswille ectivelybeselectedoutofthemodel.ThisisequivalenttoalassoPoissonregression,wherethereisaconstraintontheL1-normoftheparametervectorestimate.Ecientalgorithmsexistfor ndingposteriormodes,renderingourap-proachtractableeveninthelarge-scalesetting.Inparticular,wehaveadaptedthecyclic-coordinatedescentalgorithmofGenkinetal.(2007)totheSCCScontext.Anopen-sourceimplementationisavailableathttp://omop.fnih.org. 10D.Madiganetal.increaseanindividual'sfutureeventrisk.LetNi(t)recordthenumberofeventsthatpersonihasexperiencedupuntiltimet.Assume,asbefore,thatihasnitotaleventsduringtheirobservationperiodandthattheseeventsoccurattimesti1tini.Itisconvenienttode neacountingprocess,suchasNi(t),intermsofitsintensityfunctioni(tjxi(t)).Thisfunctiongivestheinstantaneousprobabilitythataneventoccursattimet,giventhehistoryoftheprocessandcovariates.UndertheSCCSmodel,thePoissonintensityforiattimetisi(tjxi(t))=ei+ 0xi(t)(4)aswaspreviouslydescribed.PD-SCCSextendsthismodelbyincorporatingNi(t�),thenumberofeventsthatihasexperienceduptobutnotincludingtimet,asanadditivee ectontheindividualbaselineei.ThePD-SCCSintensityfunctiontakestheformi(tjxi(t))=(ei+Ni(t�))e 0xi(t)(5)whereistheparameterthatcontrolsthelevelofdependencebetweenevents.BasedonpluggingthePD-SCCSintensity(5)intothelikelihoodexpressionforageneralintensity-basedprocess,onecanseethatthetotalnumberofeventsniissucientforthenuisanceparameteri.AsintheSCCSmodel,conditioningonniremovesifromthelikelihoodexpression.Symmetryargumentsyieldaclosedformfortheconditionallikelihood,whichinthede-nominatorrequiresintegratingoverallpossiblewaysforitohavenieventsduringtheirobservationperiod.Inferencefor andisbasedonthiscon-ditionallikelihood.Sincetheintensityfunctionmustbenon-negative,theeventdependenceparameterisrestrictedto&#x-306;0.Inthecasethat=0,thePD-SCCSintensitymodelin(5)reducestothatoftheSCCSmodelin(4).4.3.RelaxingtheIndependenceAssumptionsIII:Exposures.Asdiscussedabove,theSCCSmodelassumesthateventsarecondition-allyindependentofsubsequentexposures.Farringtonetal.(2009)presentaningeniousrelaxationofthisassumptionusingacounterfactualmodelingapproach.Theirapproachappliestothespeci csituationwheretheriskreturnstoitsbaselinelevelattheendofeachriskperiod,wheretheeventofinterestisnon-recurrent,andwheretheoccurenceoftheeventprecludesfutureexposures.HerewesketchtheFarringtonetal.approachusingasimpli edversionoftheirrunningexample.Considerasituationinwhicheachindividualcanhaveuptotwoexposures.Forindividuali,againdenoteby(ai;bi]theobservationperiodanddenotebyci1andci2theactualexposuretimes,shouldtheyoccur. 12D.Madiganetal.5.DISCUSSIONWehavedescribedself-controlledcaseseriesmethodsforpost-approvaldrugsafetyriskestimation,someBayesianandsomenot.Keyadvantagesoftheself-controlledcaseseriesapproachinclude:SCCSadjustsforalltime-invariantmultiplicativeconfounders,Estimationrequiresonlycases,andAregularized/BayesianimplementationofSCCSscalestolargedatabaseswiththepotentialtoadjustforlargenumbersoftime-varyingcovariates.ThemainproblemswiththeSCCSapproachconcerntheunderlyinginde-pendenceassumptions,inparticular,theassumptionthateventsarecondi-tionallyindependent,andtheassumptionthattheexposuredistributionandtheobservationperiodmustbeindependentofeventtimes.Wedescribedapproachestocircumventtheseassumptionsandthesemaybeusefulinsomeapplications.Furthermore,sinceSCCSestimatestheexposure-outcomeassociationincases,itignoresdataonindividualsinthestudypopulationthatdidnotexpe-riencetheoutcomeevent.Forexample,theremaybeseasonalitydrivingboththeexposureandtheoutcome,whereseasonisanimportanttime-varyingco-variate.Toadjustforseasonality,itishelpfultoaddressboth(a)therelationbetweenseasonandtheexposure,and(b)therelationbetweenseasonandtheoutcome.WhileSCCScanincorporatetimevaryingcovariates,ignoringSentinel'srichdataonthenon-caseslimitsourpowertoaddress(a).Inan-otherpaperinthisissue,wediscusshowanalysesofdatafromnon-casescansupplementcase-basedanalysesWenotethatonepossibleapproachtodealingwiththeexposureindepen-denceissueistotruncateobservationtimeafterthe rsteventoccurrence.ThisviolatesotherSCCSassumptionsbutmaystillbeusefulinpractice.Fig-ure2showsestimatesforanumberofdrug-outcomepairswithandwithouttruncation.Clearlythetruncationdoesaltersomeestimatedrelativeriskssubstantiallyandfutureworkwillevaluatetheempiricalperformanceofthisapproach.Real-lifeLODsarenoisyandhavethepotentialtointroduceallsortsofartifactsandbiasesintoanalyses.Forexample,conditionsandthedrugsprescribedtotreattheconditionsareoftenrecordedsimultaneouslyatasinglevisittothedoctor,eventhoughtheconditionactuallypredatedthevisit.Thiscanintroduce\confoundingbyindication"-thedrugusedtotreataconditioncanappeartobecausedbythecondition.Manysuchchallengesexistanditremainstobeseenwhetherornotfalsepositiveswillrenderriskidenti cationinLODsimpractical. 14D.Madiganetal.Noren,G.N.,Bate,A.,Hopstadius,J.,Star,K.,andEdwards,I.R.(2008).Temporalpatterndiscoveryfortrendsandtransiente ects:itsapplicationtopatientrecords.In:ProceedingsoftheFourteenthInternationalConferenceonKnowledgeDiscoveryandDataMiningSIGKDD2008,963{971.Roy,J.,Alderson,D.,Hogan,J.W.,andTashima,K.T.(2006).ConditionalinferencemethodsforincompletePoissondatawithendogenoustime-varyingcovariates,J.Amer.Statist.Assoc.101,424{434.Schneeweiss,S.,Rassen,J.A.,Glynn,R.J.,Avorn,J.,Mogun,H.,andBrookhart,M.A.(2009).High-dimensionalpropensityscoringadjustmentinstudiesoftreatmente ectsusinghealthcareclaimsdata.Epidemiology,20,512-522.Simpson,S.E.(2011).Thepositive-dependenceself-controlledcaseseriesmodel.Submitted.Walker,A.M.(2009).Signaldetectionforvaccinesidee ectsthathavenotbeenspeci edinadvance.Preprint.Winkelmann,R.(2008).EconometricAnalysisofCountData.Springer.