PPT-CIArb Workshop : Costs in Arbitration

Award and Assessment of Costs Hong Kong 2017 Mary Thomson Chartered Arbitrator Barrister Mediator amp Adjudicator Vice Chair CIArb EAB 1 Award and Assessment of Costs Introduction. org wwwciarborg Registered Charity No 803725 MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATORY DECISION OF APPEAL APPOINTMENT OF AN ADJUDICATOR In the matter of a dispute between the following ClaimantFirst Party ofRepresented by Address Telephone Mobile Email Fax Case Refe Johan . Lundstedt. Legal Counsel. Sweden and Swedish. . History. . of. . Swedish. . arbitration. Statutory text from the 14th century (Visby City Law). 1734 Statute Book. 1917 Arbitration Institute of the SCC is established. : . what . you need to know. Podcast # 3 . August 11, 2015. The . ranks of the investment advisory community have grown rapidly over the past decade, as the asset-gathering model has led to more . wirehouse. Moderator. : . Annette . C. Escobar. , Astigarraga Davis, Miami, . FL. Speakers. : . John . H. Mathias. , Jenner & Block LLP, . Chicago, IL. Mark . A. Nadeau. , . DLA. . Piper LLP, Phoenix, . AZ. is. . one of the techniques of  ADR . others. are . eg. . . mediation. , conciliation, expert . determination. Informal. . forms. of  . contract. . governance. in cross-border . contracts. , . Chapter. I:. WHY THE NECESSITY FOR AMENDMENT WAS FELT:. The lawmakers of our country devised the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to regulate the conduct of arbitral proceedings through out the country. Even though the 1996 Act is a well drafted legislation, in its application, the Act defeats the very purpose for which it was enacted.. Kamal Shah, . Partner and Head of Africa and India Groups, Stephenson Harwood LLP. Tunde Fagbohunlu, SAN, . Head of Dispute Resolution, Aluko & Oyebode. Law Digest Conference, 3 November 2016 . Introduction. A Risk Management Program For Accountants. On Dispute Resolution Alternatives. Gary H. Barnes. Gary H. Barnes, P.A.. North Venice, FL. Burlington, VT. ghb@ghbpa.com. © Copyright 2013, Gary H. Barnes Professional Association. All Rights Reserved. and Beyond:. Making Arbitration Great Again. Podcast # 5 April 5, 2017. Disclaimer. This presentation is © 2017 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted or otherwise distributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. Any reproduction, transmission or distribution of this form or any of the material herein is prohibited and is in violation of US and international law. Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. expressly disclaims any liability in connection with use of this presentation or its contents by any third party. . Development of Commercial Arbitration in Cambodia. Mr. BUN Youdy. ,. . Arbitrator. Member of the NCAC Executive Board. Member of . EuroCham. Board . Intercontinental Hotel. 22 September 2015. EuroCham. Raymond Cox QC . Fountain Court Chambers. Section 44 of the Arbitration Act. Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 provides that:. “(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the court has for the purposes of and in relation to arbitral proceedings the same power of making orders about the matters listed below as it has for the purposes of and in relation to legal proceedings.. Tejas Karia . Partner . . Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.. tejas.karia@AMSShardul.com. Introduction. Who can act as Arbitrator? . Neutrality of an arbitrator.. Rights and Responsibilities of an arbitrator.. By. Prof. . Neha. . Sajnani. Alternate Dispute Resolution. Arbitration. . Arbitration is one of the methods of settling civil disputes between two or more persons by reference of the dispute to an independent and impartial third person, called arbitrator, instead of litigating the matter in the usual way through Courts.. By R.B.. The Doctrine of Privity. In Tweddle v. Atkinson, the Court acknowledged the existence of contrary authorities, but held that the Doctrine of Privity of contract meant that third party beneficiary could not enforce against the promisor the promise that the promisor had made to the .