Consequences of the Referendum - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Consequences of the ReferendumSlide2

Still a large group of unsatisfied Quebecers

Since

Canada's constitution was repatriated without Quebec's

consent in 1982,

later initiatives would seek to improve the constitutional 

status quo

, with varying results. Two formal, and unsuccessful, attempts were made to reform the constitution. A subsequent sovereignty referendum in 1995 – only narrowly lost – shook Canada to its core.Slide3

Meech

Lake Accord (1989)

In 1987, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney attempted to address these concerns and bring the province into an amended constitution. Quebec's provincial government, then controlled by a party that advocated remaining in Canada on certain conditions (the

Parti

libéral

du Québec), endorsed the accord (called the

Meech

Lake Accord). Premier Robert Bourassa of Quebec referred to it as the "first step" towards gaining new powers from the federal government. The accord failed, however, as the legislature in Manitoba deadlocked after Elijah Harper refused consent to speed up the process enough to pass the Accord, and Clyde Wells refused to grant a vote on the Accord in the Newfoundland House of Assembly.

In 1990, after the

Meech

Lake Accord had failed, several Quebec representatives of the ruling Progressive Conservative Party and some members of the Liberal Party of Canada formed the Bloc Quebecois, a federal political party intent on defending Quebecers' interests while pursuing independence.Slide4

The Accord contained five main modifications to the Canadian constitution: a recognition of Quebec as a "distinct society"; a constitutional veto for all provinces; increased provincial powers with respect to immigration; extension and regulation of the right for a reasonable financial compensation to any province that chooses to opt

out of

any future federal programs in areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction; and provincial input in the appointment of senators and Supreme Court justices.Slide5

Referendum on Charlottetown Accord (1992)

The federal government, the twelve provincial and territorial governments, and four first peoples' groups then negotiated a second proposed constitutional accord in 1992—the Charlottetown Accord. Despite near-unanimous support from the country's political leaders, this second effort at constitutional reform was rejected in a nation-wide October 1992 referendum. Only 32 per cent of British Columbians supported the accord, because it was seen there and in other western provinces as blocking their hopes for future constitutional changes, such as Senate reform. In Quebec 57 per cent opposed the accord, seeing it as a step backwards compared to the

Meech

Lake Accord.

In the 1993 federal elections the Bloc Québécois became the official opposition. The following year, the provincial

Parti

Québécois, also separatist, was elected in Quebec. The two parties' popularity led to a second referendum on

independce

, the 1995 Quebec Referendum.Slide6

Referendum on sovereignty (1995)

A referendum held in Quebec on October 30, 1995 resulted in a narrow 50.56%-to-49.44% decision against Quebec sovereignty, with a 93% voter turnout.Slide7

Clarity Act (1998)

In response to concern expressed by immigrants and English-speaking Canadians regarding the wording of the question and the possibility of another referendum, Prime Minister Chrétien referred the matter to the Supreme Court of Canada in December 1999. The Court ruled that Quebec, with less than 23 percent of Canada's population, could not

unilaterally

separate

and

only

consent

to sovereignty if the referendum has a clear majority in

favour

of a clearly worded question.

Following the Supreme Court's decision, the federal government introduced legislation known as the Clarity Act which set forth the guidelines for any future referendum undertaken by the government of any province on the subject of separation. Ironically, the definition of "clearly worded" and "clear majority" were never given in the bill. Instead, it stated that the federal government would determine "whether the question is clear" and whether a "clear majority" (with a requisite majority for success being inferred) is attained.

Sovereigntists

argue that this bill grants veto power to the federal government over referendums on sovereignty.

Consequentially, with a majority vote supported by all members of the House of Commons, except for members of the Bloc Québécois, both houses of the Parliament approved the legislation

..