Feeding - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Feeding the Planet through Democracy and DiversityFlorence – 14 July 2014

What can the Italian Presidency do to help resolve the EU food security paradox: good policy – lousy PCD? Nora McKeonTerra Nuova/Concord Italia representative in the European Food Security Working Group

1Slide2

Concord position paper on food security: Justice, Democracy and Diversity

in our Food System 1. Observations:Hunger is a result of injustice, not of scarcity.2Slide3

In our globalised world we have a dual food

system: the industrial system generating huge profits for corporations but failing to feed people with healthy food and generating other negative impacts…

3Slide4

…and local small-scale food systems that are still the basis of the world’s

food supply (80%) and can restore the environment and improve social justice, but are neglected by policies, research and investment.

4Slide5

Concord position paper on food security.2. ProblemsDomination of production, processing,

retailing by a small number of multinationals giving them an unsafe level of power.5Slide6

2. Problems (cont.)Political support invested in unfair

and environmentally damaging food systems; vast majority excluded from contributing to decision-making on food.Unjust trade rules that force markets in food insecure countries open to unfair competiton.Financialization of natural resources

and

agricultural

commodities

leading

to

speculation

and

land

grabbing

.

Unsustainable

production

methods.Race to the bottom in food provision creating long and unaccountable food chains.Unsustainable consumption patterns. Research agenda and funding disproportionately geared to high-tech, profit-driven approaches rather than meeting the needs of local food producers. 6Slide7

Concord position paper on food security.3. Solutions Ensure

democracy and coherence in policy making, with bottom-up approach. Globally: Committee on World Food Security.Opt for agroecological methods of production.Prioritise local economies and trade.Bring back the State! Investment policies focused on provision of public goods to complement

farmers

’

investments

rather

than

facilitating

foreign

private

sector

.

Let

food insecure countries ensure stable and fair prices and more responsible consumption by managing and protecting markets – as Europe does.Guarantee access to productive resources. Redirect agricultural research towards meeting the needs of family farmers, with their participation.Better aid and development policies built on human rights.7Slide8

EU food security policy framework - the best in town in 2010. The EU and Members should

:“focus on sustainable small-scale food production to increase availability of food in developing countries. It has multiple effects of enhancing incomes and resilience for rural producers, making food available for consumers, and maintaining or enhancing environmental quality.”. “help create employment In rural areas through agro-processing, mainly in small and medium sized enterprises.”“support research and innovation which have clear benefits for smallholder farmers”.“support application of right to food in developing countries: strategies that tackle the root causes of hunger and empowerment of marginalised groups in the design, implementation and monitoring of national programmes, as well as establishing and strengthening redress mechanism”.«Support the reformed CFS to become the pivotal institution to coordinate global food security».8Slide9

EU Food and Nutrition Security Implementation Plan – 2013.Laudable

effort to ensure policy doesn’t remain on a shelf and to build coherence among Members.Council conclusions, reiterate rights-based approach, support for small-scale producers as biggest investors, shorter food chains, support for CFS and

VGGTs

,

addressing

root

causes

of

food

and

nutrition

security.

Baseline

monitoring

exercise

in 2013/2014 – report will be published under Italian Presidency. An excellent initiative but…Too much emphasis on coordination and complementarity and not enough on policy coherence.Patchy inclusion of civil society in the monitoring exercise despite reiterated efforts by Concord EFSG. Italy the positive exception thanks to Italian HARD member.9Slide10

A special word about Italy. Particular attention to food security. EXPO, ICN, Rome-

based agencies and CFS. No coherent policy yet but interesting reflections in post 2015 process highlighting:Need to focus on local agri-food systemsNeed to act on root causes of food insecurity including distortions in international

market.

Right to

food

the

basis

.

Italy

a

rich

terrain

of

experimentation

in building a

better

food system from the base up – food sovereignty:Family farming and agroecologyTerritorially rooted quality food provision. Producer-consumer cooperation.Public procurement.10Slide11

BUT…. good policies risk being thwarted by inadequate Policy

Coherence for Development. Can the Italian Presidency make a difference?A few examples:1. Economic Partnership AgreementsBenefit European competitivity at the expense of African small-scale producers that EU food security policy claims to

want

to

support

. Will

Italian

Presidency

witness

final

act

of a decade of ROPPA

resistence

?

2. AgrifuelsCan Italian Presidency pilot an ILUC decision through EP and Council that has a meaningful impact in terms of reducing EU’s incitment of land grabbing? 11Slide12

Good policies risk being thwarted by lousy Policy Coherence

for Development. Can the Italian Presidency make a difference? 3. Financial speculationWe support the Italian Presidency’s efforts to seek agreement on the FTT, targeting those forms most

pernicious

for

speculation

on

food

and

land

.

4.

Transatlantic

Trade

and

Investment

Partnership.

We

urge the Italian Presidency to fight against pressure to:lower EU standards on food safety and labelling and tolerance of GMOs.Derail efforts to make financial and commodity market regulations more effective and transparent.Undermine public procurement policies favouring local food.Introduce Investor State Dispute Settlement clause.And to fight for transparency and an end to

favoring corporations in consultations. 12Slide13

13Slide14

Good policies risk being thwarted by inadquate Policy

Coherence for Development. Can the Italian Presidency make a difference?5. Role of Private Sector in Development. Council conclusions in December? We urge Italian Presidency to be cognizant that the EC Communication:forgets that the bulk of investment in agriculture comes from small-scale producers themselves. They are the actors that need to be “leveraged”, not TNCs profiting from public funding to increase private profits.

14Slide15

5. Role of Private Sector in Development (cont.)Extols global market-led, value chain, contract farming

approach to “turning smallholders into small entrepreneurs” denounced by small-scale producer organizations and demonstrated to undermine autonomy that is the basis of their resilience. Trade and Agriculture Support Programme in SAGCOT/Tanzania.15Slide16

5. Role of Private Sector in Development (cont.)Parrots the mantra of PPPs and use of public “patient capital” to support enterprises, ignoring the evidence that they represent a more expensive and less equitable way of delivering public services and infrastructure in the longer-term.

16Slide17

5. Role of Private Sector in Development (cont.)Counts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to induce TNCs

to respect human rights and economic, social and environmental impacts of their investments despite evidence that it is a weak or even counterproductive approach to regulation. «We don’t want

‘

responsible

investors

’.

We

want

a legislative

framework

that

protects

us effectively and investors who are obliged to respect the law.»17Slide18

5. Role of Private Sector in Development (cont.)Strengthens corporations’ already excessive

influence in shaping policies and regulatory frameworks.No mention of Committee on World Food Security, where principles on responsible investment in agriculture are being negotiated in the name of food security and the right to food, with small-scale producers’

organisations

in

the room.

18Slide19

The EU, the Italian Presidency and the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition - whose

added value is corporate-friendly policy change: land, seeds and other inputs, rules and regulations that «make a difference for entrepreneurs».

19Slide20

Two important international appointments during Italian

Presidency where EU can and must play a decisive role:International Conference on Nutrition 2 (19-21 November 2014)Fight for an approach to nutrition security based on sustainable, diversified local food production and provision VS corporate GMOs and fortified foods.Negotiation of principles for responsible

agricultural

investment

(rai) in

Committee

on World

Food

Security (4-8 August 2014)

Fight

for

principles

grounded

in human

rights

that prioritise public policies and investments to support and protect small-scale food producers and local food systems. 20Slide21

We need each other to build a just, democratic and diverse

food system! 21