/
IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG September 27 IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG September 27

IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG September 27 - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-10

IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG September 27 - PPT Presentation

th 2016 Conference Call 20160926 Max Riegel Nokia Bell Labs TG Chair Conference Call Tuesday September 27 th 2016 at 09301100am ET Join WebEx meeting httpsnokiameetingswebexcomnokiameetingsjphpMTIDmabf841eb441bcc71f495954cfd5e72d3 ID: 727402

omniran ieee dcn org ieee omniran org dcn mentor cf00 meeting standards https comments 1cf patent p802 chapter chair

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG September 27" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TGSeptember 27th, 2016 Conference Call

2016-09-26

Max

Riegel, Nokia Bell Labs

(TG

Chair)Slide2

Conference Call

Tuesday, September 27

th

, 2016 at 09:30-11:00am ET

Join WebEx meeting

https://nokiameetings.webex.com/nokiameetings/j.php?MTID=mabf841eb441bcc71f495954cfd5e72d3

Meeting number: 950 779 738

Meeting password:

2bjbBC23

Join by phone

Global call-in numbers

https://nokiameetings.webex.com/nokiameetings/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=487224687&tollFree=0

>

Access code: 950 779 738Slide3

Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform

All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy.

Participants [Note:

Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws

subclause

6.2

]:

“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents

“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)

The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group

Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged

No duty to perform a patent searchSlide4

Patent Related Links

All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.

Patent Policy is stated in these sources:

IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws

http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6

IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual

http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3

Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html

If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit

http://

standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/index.html

This slide set is available at

https://

development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset.pptSlide5

Call for Potentially Essential Patents

If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:

Either speak up now or

Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or

Cause an LOA to be submittedSlide6

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.

Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.

Technical considerations remain primary focus

Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.

Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.

Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.

---------------------------------------------------------------

See

IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual

, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.Slide7

Resources – URLsLink to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation

http://

standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html

Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines

http://

standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf

Link to IEEE Code of Ethics

http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/ethics/code_ethics.html

Link to IEEE Patent Policy

http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pptSlide8

Agenda proposalReview

of minutes

Warsaw F2F minutes

Reports

Contributions

to P802.1CF D0.3

Conclusion on additions and amendments for P802.1CF D0.3

Planning updateAoBSlide9

Business#1Call Meeting to Order

Meeting called to order by chair at 09:35 AM ET

Minutes taker:

Walter volunteered to take notes

Roll Call

Name

Affiliation

Name

Affiliation

Max Riegel

Nokia

Walter Pienciak

IEEE SAWang HaoFujitsu

Fan

Xiaojing

Fujitsu

Yonggang

Fang

ZTE TXSlide10

Call for Potentially Essential Patents

If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:

Either speak up now or

Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or

Cause an LOA to be submitted

Nothing brought up.Slide11

Agenda

Review

of minutes

Warsaw F2F minutes

https://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0063-00-00TG-sept-2016-meeting-minutes.docx

Reports

?Contributions to P802.1CF D0.3https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0070-00-CF00-chapter-7-introduction.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0069-00-CF00-response-to-comments-on-revision-of-chapter-7-6-7.pptxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0060-01-CF00-chapter-7-6-7-revision.docx

https

://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0068-00-CF00-chapter-7-4-1-revision.pptx

https://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0067-00-CF00-deployment-scenarios-for-home-network.docxConclusion on additions and amendments for P802.1CF D0.3https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0059-01-00TG-p802-1cf-d0-2-collected-comments.xlshttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0066-00-CF00-comments-on-p802-1cf-d02.xlsPlanning updateAoBAccess network instantiationhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0065-00-CF00-virtual-access-network-instantiation.pptxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0071-00-CF00-key-concepts-of-an-instantiation.pptx?Slide12

Business #2Review of minutes

Warsaw F2F minutes

https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0063-00-00TG-sept-2016-meeting-minutes.docx

Chair quickly introduced minutes of Warsaw meeting. No comments raised.

Reports

Chair mentioned that 5G SC Action B3 led to a liaison send from 802.11 to the 3GPP RAN, now followed by a further liaison from EC to the 3GPP PCG. AANI is taking care of Action B3 in 802.11.Slide13

Business #3

Contributions to P802.1CF D0.3

Review

and acceptance of updated

contributions

https://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0067-00-CF00-deployment-scenarios-for-home-network.docx

Wang Hao presented the contribution showing the well-fitting mapping of the architecture of a residential gateway to the P802.1CF Network Reference Model.Discussion brought up demand for a more explicit description, e.g. pointing out which of the Y.2070 functions and interfaces have direct relationship with functions and interfaces in 802.1CF NRM.The group asked the author to revise the document adding more details about the mapping of functions and interfaces.https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0070-00-CF00-chapter-7-introduction.docx

Max presented proposed text for the introduction of Section 7 Functional design and decomposition.

The text was accepted for inclusion into D0.3 with the condition that a small amendment is added clarifying that section 7 also provides functional specification of network setup and fault discovery and maintenance.

Max will distribute the revision by email to the participants for a check of the small amendment. If no concerns are raised the revision will be included into D0.3

https://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0068-00-CF00-chapter-7-4-1-revision.pptxWang Hao explained the issue of the location of the authenticator in the revised specification of 7.4.1.The group agreed that the issue is valid and the proposed remedy is appropriate. The proposed modification will be adopted to D0.3https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0069-00-CF00-response-to-comments-on-revision-of-chapter-7-6-7.pptxWang Hao presented the slides providing further background on the text proposal submitted by comment #56The group agreed that the proposed request acknowledge messages indeed make sense, and that https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0060-01-CF00-chapter-7-6-7-revision.docx should be adopted for D0.3, which explicitly mentions that the acknowledge message is send after integrity check.Slide14

Business #4Conclusion on additions and amendments for P802.1CF

D0.3

Warsaw comments database

https

://

mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0059-01-00TG-p802-1cf-d0-2-collected-comments.xls

The chair inserted in the comments table the closure of comment #56 and uploaded a revised version:

Late submission of comments on chapter 8.1https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0066-00-CF00-comments-on-p802-1cf-d02.xlsThe group reviewed shortly the late comments’ submission mainly addressing editorial and technical issues in chapter 8.1 on SDN.

While the editorial issues can be easily adopted by the editor for D0.3, the technical issues require more comprehensive review together with the original author of section 8.1.

The chair will inform Antonio de la Oliva about the comments and will ask for an email response to resolve the comments. If Antonio requires more input and discussions, the open comments will be put on the agenda of the next conference call on October 25

th

inviting both Yonggang and Antonio for participation.

Agreed list of amendments and additions for D0.3The following documents will be adopted to the revision D0.3:https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0059-02-00TG-p802-1cf-d0-2-collected-comments.xls and all the documents referenced in the resolution column of the spreadsheet.https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0060-01-CF00-chapter-7-6-7-revision.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0058-01-CF00-chapter-7-4-revision.docxhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0068-00-CF00-chapter-7-4-1-revision.pptxEditorial comments listed in https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0066-00-CF00-comments-on-p802-1cf-d02.xlshttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0070-01-CF00-chapter-7-introduction.docx, when no concerns raised in the email approvalSlide15

Business #5

Planning update

The chair brought up and reviewed the plan established at the Warsaw meeting.

The completion of comments’ resolution was done in conference call on Sept 27

th

.as well as the decision about the amendments adopted to D0.3. The remaining actions of the plan for creation of D0.3 are still valid:

15 days recirculation closing Nov 3rdAnnouncement of recirculation on Oct 17thExternal review of P802.1CF-D0.3The following potential actions were reviewed.Plan to present P802.1CF in intarea meeting at next IETF (Nov 14-17, Seoul, Korea)The plan was discussed and agreed at the IETF/IEEE leadership meeting in Paris on September 9th. If none of the OmniRAN core members are attending the IETF meeting in Korea, Juan Carlos Zuniga would bring up the presentation. Walter indicated that he would attend the IETF meeting in Korea and would be able to present if the session is taking place later in the week.

Preparation of the

slideset

and decision about the presenter will be done at the San Antonio meeting, which is taking place the week before of the IETF meeting.

TTC Japan; Introduction done by Fujitsu

Request for access to specificationSo far, no request for the specification has been received. Chair asked to forward the request to him for clarification with 802.1 chair Glenn Parsons.Other groups?No further groups are currently considered for distribution of the draft specification. It may change in the course of the 5G SC Action A discussions and when interest in the OmniRAN work is popping up at other locations.Slide16

Business #6AoB

Access network instantiation

https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0065-00-CF00-virtual-access-network-instantiation.pptx

Yonggang introduced his thoughts on the network instantiation. There was agreement that instantiation has to be followed by initialization. The proposed procedure did not find agreement.

https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/16/omniran-16-0071-00-CF00-key-concepts-of-an-instantiation.pptx

Max presented his initial thoughts to structure the instantiation by showing relationship between orchestrator and OSS/BSS system of access network operator, which is the agreed entity issuing the requests to the orchestrator.

The four presented use cases found acceptance with Yonggang mentioning that there might be additional use cases to be taken into account.

Further discussion is required regards message flows. There was a slight preference for direct message flows between OSS/BSS and orchestrator for the creation and removal of ANC, NA and BH instances.Further discussions are required to achieve conclusion about the basic concepts of instantiation.No other issues were brought up.

The chair reminded the next conference call will take place on October 25th, 0930-1100AM ET

Meeting adjourned by chair at 11:12AM ET.