PPT-Rosie: History, Iconography and Contemporary Issues

Rosie as Propaganda Realities of a TWO FRONT WAR Soldiers for both European and Pacific Theaters 12 Million American Men in the Military by 1944 Plus Stuff for a 2 Front WarDifferent stuff. 2014-2015 Fall . Week 1. 1. WELCOME!. 2. WHO AM I?. ??????. 3. WHAT IS CONTEMPORARY?. Complicated. Not standard. Continuous. Altering. Consumed. Created. Inspired. ....????. 4. CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN LOGISTICS. Newbridge. . Integrated. College. August 2013. Aims of Session 9.30-11.00am. Raise your awareness of context and scope of addressing the teaching of controversial issues.. Constraints and limitations. ČÍSLO PROJEKTU: CZ.1.07/1.5.00/34.0434. NÁZEV PROJEKTU: Šablony – Gymnázium Tanvald. ČÍSLO ŠABLONY: III/2 Inovace a zkvalitnění výuky prostřednictvím ICT . This image of a young man, and the set of questions to follow, can be used for a writing class. They provide an example of how to interrogate a prompt or image to generate narrative threads.. Like stream of consciousness, students should be encouraged to write without thinking too much.. Hannah Chapman. The Rosie We Know. Rosie the Riveter is an image of a strong woman who fought for her country and at the same time paved a path for herself in the workforce.. The . Unknown. Created for . ]. Challenges in . Visualization. Interaction. and . Simulation. [Andrew . Nealen. .]. Department of Computer Science. Rutgers University. [Talk. . Origins.. ]. 2 years (= 3 classes) of teaching game design. By: Sarah Mitchell, Shannon Meulink, Meg Otersen. 3A. Background: Women in the War. “Rosie the Riveter” was a character in an American wartime song, written for the use of encouraging women to join the war effort. Tom Webster, Millie Crouch, Matida Sanneh, & Lee Groon. (“Rosie Poster”).. Why was Rosie the Riveter Invented?. During WWII, men were being drafted, leaving their jobs behind.. Factory workers were needed.. Making History: Block 4. 1. . 1979 . and . all that. Britain and 1979: the end of the post-war consensus?. Britain 1979: the ‘winter of discontent’. Britain 1979: Anarchy in the UK?. Seasons in . Corporal Punishment in Schools. INTASC Standard, Description and Rationale. Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice. The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.. A Public Liberal Art University in North Carolina. Lei Han, Katherine Min, Alex Huang, and . Agya Boakye-Boaten. Ten Subjects in 15 weeks. History. Politics. Foreign Affairs. Economics. Environment. Culture. Birth of Athena. Athena and Zeus. Elements of Iconography. Elements of Iconography. Elements of Iconography. Elements of Iconography. Elements of Iconography. Elements of Iconography. The Aegis. Look for examples of the aegis in the images above. Note the different ways it appears and what its key elements are.. Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society — led by President George W. Bush — find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale.Stem cells, which have the remarkable potential to develop into different parts of the body, are actually harvested from aborted fetal tissue or newly fertilized cells. Proponents of stem cell research argue that scientists are making legitimate use of already aborted fetuses and it is unfair to deprive those who are suffering the benefits of a potentially revolutionary therapy. Yet this practice has raised sharp criticisms from the Religious Right, who charge that science is capitalizing on an abhorrent procedure. Given the medical potential for treatment of incurable diseases by stem cell research, as well as the moral dilemmas this technology poses, should such research be permitted? What moral, religious, or political objections might be raised?Philosophers Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes have compiled this valuable, up-to-date, and newly revised collection of articles by noted experts to address all aspects of the stem cell controversy. The contributors — scientists, medical practitioners, philosophers, theologians, historians, and policy analysts — offer a variety of perspectives to give readers the critical tools they need to shape an informed position on the topic. Readers will come away with a deeper understanding of the science of stem cell research, its medical cures and promises, and the moral, religious, and policy concerns surrounding this controversial social issue. Stem cell research is headline news. Researchers are eager to move forward, state governments and private foundations are rushing to support it, and the sick and afflicted are desperate for its benefits. Yet powerful forces in our society — led by President George W. Bush — find it morally troubling and they are doing all in their powers to restrict its development beyond a very limited scale.Stem cells, which have the remarkable potential to develop into different parts of the body, are actually harvested from aborted fetal tissue or newly fertilized cells. Proponents of stem cell research argue that scientists are making legitimate use of already aborted fetuses and it is unfair to deprive those who are suffering the benefits of a potentially revolutionary therapy. Yet this practice has raised sharp criticisms from the Religious Right, who charge that science is capitalizing on an abhorrent procedure. Given the medical potential for treatment of incurable diseases by stem cell research, as well as the moral dilemmas this technology poses, should such research be permitted? What moral, religious, or political objections might be raised?Philosophers Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes have compiled this valuable, up-to-date, and newly revised collection of articles by noted experts to address all aspects of the stem cell controversy. The contributors — scientists, medical practitioners, philosophers, theologians, historians, and policy analysts — offer a variety of perspectives to give readers the critical tools they need to shape an informed position on the topic. Readers will come away with a deeper understanding of the science of stem cell research, its medical cures and promises, and the moral, religious, and policy concerns surrounding this controversial social issue.