/
sPHENIX  DOE-SC CD-1/3A  Review sPHENIX  DOE-SC CD-1/3A  Review

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-30

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review - PPT Presentation

Minimum Bias Trigger Detector Mickey Chiu May 2325 2018 BNL May 2325 2018 sPHENIX DOESC CD13A Review 1 Expected that we can reuse the PHENIX BBC 128 chs of 3 cm thick quartz radiator on mesh dynode PMTs ID: 734567

doe sphenix review 2018 sphenix doe 2018 review wbs phenix resolution eff signal 144 timing adc 2018sphenix trigger board

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewMinimum Bias Trigger Detector

Mickey ChiuMay 23-25, 2018BNL

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

1Slide2

Expected that we can re-use the PHENIX BBC128 ch’s of 3 cm thick quartz radiator on mesh dynode PMTsProvide minimum-bias trigger with high efficiency for heavy ion collisions (>85%)Needs online z-vertex resolution of at least 2.5 cm, ie

, 120 ps/chContributes to centrality, reaction plane, and start time

2

WBS 1.07: Overview

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide3

WBS 1.07: Placement in sPHENIX

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review3

Considering z = 144, 200, 250, and 300 cm, ie, from original PHENIX location to near flux return

z (cm)

ηminηmax

B

Z

(T)

Rel. Gain

AuAu

MB

Eff

(%)

pp

MB

Eff

(%)

144

3.0

3.9

1.110.0190392003.334.230.750.1589362503.564.450.500.588343003.744.630.320.98732

May 23-25, 2018Slide4

WBS 1.07: Placement in sPHENIX

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review4

Considering z = 144, 200, 250, and 300 cm, ie, from original PHENIX location to near flux returnz

(cm)

ηminηmax

B

Z

(T)

Rel. Gain

AuAu

MB

Eff

(%)

pp

MB

Eff

(%)

144

3.0

3.9

1.110.0190392003.334.230.750.1589362503.564.450.500.588343003.744.630.320.98732

May 23-25, 2018Slide5

WBS 1.07: Placement in sPHENIX

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review5

Considering z = 144, 200, 250, and 300 cm, ie, from original PHENIX location to near flux return

z

(cm)ηminηmax

B

Z

(T)

Rel. Gain

AuAu

MB

Eff

(%)

pp

MB

Eff

(%)

144

3.0

3.9

1.110.0190392003.334.230.750.1589362503.564.450.500.588343003.744.630.320.987

32

May 23-25, 2018Slide6

L1 Trig, Modebits, CLK

6

WBS 1.07: Readout Design

sPHENIXGTM

sPHENIX DAQsPHENIXBBC LL1sPHENIXGL1

Use

sPHENIX

EMCAL digitizers, and build a transition board to convert single-ended PMT signal to 100 ohm differential that stretches PMT signal to be recorded by 60 MHz ADC

Two possibilities to satisfy the trigger and timing requirements. Both options require splitting the signal. One is a shaped pulse for energy measurement. The other

is a square ~1V discriminator signal (for timing at trigger level and

precisiong

timing in offline).

or is a ramp and hold on a comparator (TAC) that is input to the digitizer

sPHENIX

Digitizers

(4 ADC boards)

Disc/

Shaper

Board

BBC PMTs

In WBS 1.05 + 1.06 ScopeIn WBS 1.07 ScopesPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewMay 23-25, 2018Slide7

ShapedWBS 1.07: Status & Recent Accomplishments

7

C.Y. Chi,W. SippachTDC ADC

sPHENIX

DigitizerDAQD/S BoardLL1Board

43

2

ps

+ ? + 13

2

ps

<= 50

2

ps

Disc

Laser PMT Test

Split Pulse Test

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewMay 23-25, 2018Slide8

WBS 1.07: Project Organization

8

BNL M. Chiu, M. Lenz, R. PisaniProject Lead, detector and electronics testingRIKEN Y. Goto

PHENIX BBCs

Nevis/Columbia C.Y. Chi, W. SippachDisc/Shaper BoardLehigh University R. ReedDetector and electronics testing, simulation, operations supportsPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewMay 23-25, 2018Slide9

WBS 1.07: Milestones

9

1.07.03 Procure and Test Electronics for MBD Milestone

1.07.02 Disc/Shaper Board Prototype Milestone

May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide10

WBS 1.07: sPHENIX MinBias Trigger MIE At-Year Burdened & Esc $

10

May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide11

WBS 1.07: sPHENIX MinBias Trigger Labor ProfileMIE Labor + BNL Contributed Labor + Collaborator Contributed Labor

11

May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide12

WBS 1.07: sPHENIX MinBias Trigger Detector MIE M&S Basis of Estimate

12

May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide13

Risk Summary: WBS 1.7 Min Bias Detector

May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

13Slide14

Issues and ConcernsIf the the Disc/Shaper Board cannot meet the spec of 50 ps resolution with 60 MHz digitizers, a backup solution based on a TAC (as used in PHENIX) will have to be designed

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review14Slide15

SummaryReuse of PHENIX BBC provides a high quality, cost-effective, reduced risk solution for the sPHENIX MBDMay 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review15Slide16

Back Up

May 23-25, 2018

16

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide17

PMT Resolution Study17

Used 20

ps piLAS

laser studies going wellGot 43 ps time resolution for 33 p.e.

at lower than nominal gainLaserBBCMay 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide18

Testing sPHENIX Digitizer Timing

NEW ADC

Input a signal from Agilent generator, that is passively split, and look at time difference between the two “identical” signals from the NEW ADCs to determine the timing resolution of the NEW ADCs.Signal generated is shown on the right, and is intended to get close to matching what will be generated by the new disc/shaper board.

We need to know the final shape to use!Shape tested was only ~2 samples during rise to check if this would be good enough

18May 23-25, 2018sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide19

sPHENIX Digitizers Timing Resol.

19

We created signal shape templates and did a full chi-2 minimization (MINUIT) fit to get the start time for each of the two pulses from the split cable

This can only be done in offline, and is the best possible resolution one could ever get

For the resolution at L1, the resolution depends on the algorithm and still needs to be studiedWe put the two split (identical) signals into the same board and also into different ADC boards so that we could see if there was a contribution from the clock propagationGetting sub 1 ps from same ADC board, and ~13 ps (= 18.6/√2) from different boards. Clock propagation jitter at 13 ps level?Some anomalous systematic timing difference (at Δt = 0.01 ns) in some events that needs to be studiedSame BoardDifferent ADC BoardsAnomalous times?

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide20

B-field Study20

Study of PMT Gain vs (Field Strength, Angle, PMT HV)

w/ Paul Gianotti

, Camillia Fayyazi

Field Strength: Up to 0.735 T but in old documentation it says safer to stop at 0.4 TEventually stopped at 0.5 TField orientation at proposed locations of BBC range from 2-5 degreesRan at 0 and 5 degreesPiLas LaserMagnet regionDRS4Readout

Hall

Proble

Magnet region

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A ReviewSlide21

B-field Study ResultsBBC in PHENIX runs at 30 (inner) or 40 (outer) pC

/MIPNeed MIP peak to calibrate gainNeed to confirm expected max particles in a tube (was ~30 in PHENIX) to get required dynamic range

Single particle peak

PHENIX@144 cm

sPHENIX@300 cmEff -3% AuAu, -7% ppsPHENIX@250 cm

Eff -2%

AuAu

, -5% pp

PHENIX

AuAu

200 GeV

May 23-25, 2018

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

21