PPT-Clerkship Grading 2022-2023

Author : barbara | Published Date : 2023-07-26

Kristen Bettin MD MEd Sr Asst Dean Clinical Curriculum Three components of clerkship grading How to achieve this goal Clinical Evaluations Entrustable Professional

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Clerkship Grading 2022-2023" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Clerkship Grading 2022-2023: Transcript


Kristen Bettin MD MEd Sr Asst Dean Clinical Curriculum Three components of clerkship grading How to achieve this goal Clinical Evaluations Entrustable Professional Activities EPAs 1 Gather a . for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty. A 10-minute primer. on student performance assessment in required clerkships . Stanford School of Medicine. July 2014. Contents. Criterion-based vs. norm-based evaluation. and Why Many Traditional Grading Practices Miss the Mark. Presented by: . Amy Cashwell. We will:. Examine the purpose of grading. Realize the complexity of grading. Recognize the importance of critically examining traditional grading practices. (Well, Almost). James O. Hammons & Janice R. . Barnsley. Presented by . Sterling McLeod. Contributions. Overview of grading approaches. History of grades. Four generic approaches to grading. Provide eight principles . in . finnish. . HEIs. Tommi Haapaniemi. Silja Kostia. Universities Act. “A . student has . the right . to obtain information about the . application . of assessment . criteria . to . his/her study attainment. Essentials . for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty. A 10-minute primer. on student performance assessment in required clerkships . Stanford School of Medicine. July 2014. Contents. Criterion-based vs. norm-based evaluation. 2016-2017. Chelsea Carson, M.D., FAPA. Clerkship Director. chcarson@augusta.edu. Clerkship Orientation Overview. Policies. Objectives. Expectations and clerkship components. Psychiatric interview. Mental status exam. For the 2018-19 Academic Year. UWSOM Registration & Scheduling. somreg@uw.edu. | 206-543-5560. Your Explore and Focus Year. Advanced Patient Care Clerkship – 4 weeks, 8 credits. Sub-Internship – 4 weeks, 8 credits. Student Evaluation Results. Jessie Bay. 11/1/13. Overall Evaluation of Clerkship Experience: General. CPMC. 4.62. DHMC. 4.42. NHH. 4.48. VAMC. 4.36. Strengths: Teamwork. Students loved working with the multidisciplinary team and felt like valued team members.. presents. FALL 2015. Today’s Material. 10 . S. teps for Applying to C. lerkships—overview. OSCAR for Federal . Clerkships—intro . Researching State Clerkships. Application Materials. Letters of Recommendation—asking, process. 1 Clerkship Electives - Chicago (CELE) NO. OF CASES. I. Therapeutic. intervention. 2. II. Suspected. adverse drug reactions. 2. III. Drug interaction. 8. IV. Patient Counselling. . 2. V. Valerie P. Jameson, MD.. Assistant Dean of Clinical Curriculum. Office of Medical Education. Why grade at all?. Grading is the summative (ultimate) feedback to student performance.. Am I performing at a high, low or acceptable level?. Paul Hanissian, MD, Clerkship Director. Lori Avery, Clerkship Administrator . Site Comparability. Grade Distribution: CPMC. NBME . shelf percentile score at CPMC (31 students) 50.8 compared to Geisel Average of 65.2.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Clerkship Grading 2022-2023"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents