/
Review of evolving technologies in CUP Review of evolving technologies in CUP

Review of evolving technologies in CUP - PowerPoint Presentation

belinda
belinda . @belinda
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-05-31

Review of evolving technologies in CUP - PPT Presentation

Dr Natalie Cook Senior Clinical Lecturer in Experimental Cancer Medicine University of Manchester Honorary Consultant in Medical Oncology Christie NHS Foundation Trust Talk overview Liquid biopsy technologies ID: 912650

cup tissue tumour blood tissue cup blood tumour ctc cancer amp patients cells circulating therapy origin treatment liquid 000

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Review of evolving technologies in CUP" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Review of evolving technologies in CUP

Dr

Natalie Cook

Senior Clinical Lecturer in Experimental Cancer Medicine, University of Manchester

Honorary Consultant in Medical Oncology

Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Slide2

Talk overview

Liquid biopsy technologies

to be discussed;

Circulating tumours cells (CTCs)

Circulating free DNA (

cfDNA

)Tumour educated platelets (TEPs)Current research

in Manchester, UK

Slide3

Liquid biopsy

Clinical Application

Resistance

Relapse

ctDNA

CTC

Circulating microRNA

Exosomes

Microvesicles

TEPs

Blood

Plasma

RNA expression

Protein expression

CTC derived

organoids

Point mutations

Methylation patterns

Chromosomal aberrations

Translocations

Amplifications/deletions

Early detection

Diagnosis

/

prognosis

Minimal residual disease

Response to therapy

Therapy selection

Slide4

Diagnostic challenges of CUP

Delays in diagnosis

& multiple (invasive) investigations to find primary site

Limited

robust evidence

that treating patients based on

molecularly-predicted primary improves outcomesSeveral research & commercial tissue of origin classifiers; not recommended for diagnosis of CUP

Without tissue of origin, no access to novel therapeutics or immunotherapy10-20% failure rate of molecularly profiling tumour tissue

How representative is a single small biopsy of 1 metastatic lesion?

Alternative = liquid biopsies

Slide5

Tissue

of origin from liquid biopsy?

Discovery of methylated circulating DNA biomarkers for comprehensive non-invasive monitoring of treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer

Barault

et al 2017, Gut, 67(11

):1995

Identification of methylation haplotype blocks aids in deconvolution of heterogeneous tissue samples & tumor tissue-of-origin mapping from plasma DNAGuo

et al 2017, Nat Genetics, 49(4):635

Plasma DNA tissue mapping by genome-wide methylation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal, cancer, and transplantation assessments

Sun

et al

2015, PNAS, 112(40):E5503

Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test

Cohen

et al

2018, Science, 359(6378

):

926

RNA-

Seq

of tumor-educated platelets enables blood-based pan-cancer, multiclass and

m

olecular pathway cancer diagnostics

Best

et al

2015, Cancer Cell, 28(5):666

Slide6

Where could liquid biopsies

fit?

Tissue of origin and biomarker status

Treat as equivocal tumour type

Palliative care

Immuno-therapy

Chemo-therapy

Prognostic indicators of appropriateness of therapy

Targeted therapy

Prognostic information

Quicker diagnosis to direct investigations

Determine

Primary site

Molecular subtype to stratify to treatment

Early indicators or response/resistance

Understand the

biology of CUP

Diagnosis

Management decisions

Treatment response or resistance

Slide7

Circulating Tumour Cells

(CTCs)

Slide8

Circulating tumour cells are very rare

CTC

1 ml of blood is about 1/5

th

of

a teaspoon

5,000,000,000 red blood cells/ml blood

7,000,000

white blood cells/ml blood

<1-15

circulating tumour cells/ml

blood

<1 CTC per 500,000 WBC

Slide9

What does 1 in

500,000 look like?

Slide10

What about

CTCs in CUP?

Very limited published research

(total of 21 patients evaluated across 2 studies)

Only CellSearch

technology used (only identifies

EpCam positive CTCs)No cellular or molecular characterisation

Allard et al 2004. Clin Cancer Res, 10(20):6897

Utility of measuring

CTC counts

to assess the efficacy of treatment for

CUP

Komine

et al

2014.

Anticancer Res, 34(6):

3165

Summary of CTC counts in 7.5 mL of blood from patients with various types of carcinomas

Slide11

The Manchester approach;

the CUP BioBank

Parsortix

method

HDSCA

slide preparation

Cell pellet

Double spun plasma

Cells stored in glycerol

Total nucleic acids extracted

HDSCA

method

‘no

cell left

behind’

12 x slides

~

3 million cells per slide

Prospective recruitment of new CUP patients pre-treatment

Characterise CTCs & evaluate

heterogeneity

Consent

to:

Use of surplus biopsy

2 additional blood samples for CTC banking and nucleic acid extraction

Clinical

information

HDSCA;

High

Definition Single Cell

Assay

Slide12

Circulating Tumour

DNA

(

ctDNA

)

Slide13

Circulating tumour DNA

Multiple potentials for molecular profiling from blood

& tissue

(

none

funded in the UK)

FoundationOne; tissue, >300 genesFoundationOne Liquid

, blood based, 70 genesGuardant 360; 73 genes, blood based

Oncologica; tissue, 505 genes

Local Academic Initiatives;

eg TARGET

Looks for

Targetable

driver &

actionable

mutations

Copy number translocation

Tumour mutational burden in some cases

Slide14

All solid tumours

ctDNA

&

germline controls

DNA

360

gene panel

650 somatic mutations

Molecular Tumour Board

Stratified to treatment (Phase I)

Next generation sequencing

Determine tissue of origin

Tissue of origin directed therapy

Copy number analysis

Development and optimisation of

cfDNA

methylation assay

Combine mutational profile, methylation profile and copy number variation to

evaluate prognostic and predictive

biomarkers

Improved predictive power of mutational profile

Manchester approach

Within the TARGET

ctDNA

trial

Slide15

TARGET CUP patients so far

Gene

7

13

43

57

62

68

69

70

71

80

94

122

169

182

242

243

272

TP53

TTN

MAP2K2

NOTCH1

KRAS

ABCC1

ABL2

AKAP9

ALK

ALK

ARID4A

ATIC

ATM

BAP1

BUB1B

CDH1

CHD5

CYLD

DDR2

EPHA5

ERBB3

ERCC2

FBXW7

FGFR1

FLT4

HOXA11

IGF2R

KDM5A

KIF1B

KMT2A

KMT2C

LIFR

MLK1

MLLT6

MUC16

NOTCH3

NF1

NSD1

NTRK2

NTRK3

NUP214

NUTM2B

P2RY8

PCDHGB1

PRRX1

RAP1GDS1

SOX2

SPEN

SRGAP3

STK38

SYNE1

TCF12

TCF7L2

TRIP11

Total

17

2

5

2

4

2

2

0

5

3

6

3

2

5

5

1

6

17 CUP TARGET patients recruited to date

>10% VAF

1-9% VAF

Predicted driver mutation in CGI

Mutation data alone insufficient to determine tissue of origin

We can determine presence of tumour DNA

Majority of patients have at least 1 mutation (16/17)

13/17 patients have VAF of >5%

Slide16

Tumour Educated Platelets

(TEPs)

Slide17

Tumour Educated Platelets

Best

et al

2015.

Cancer Cell 28(5):

666-676

Slide18

Manchester CUP project overview

Cells

&

Proteins

team

Tissue Biomarker team

Nucleic acid biomarker team

Preclinical

Team

TARGET trial

Phase 1

ECMT

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology

TIIML

CTC team

Advanced cultures

CUP biology

& heterogeneity

Immune markers

MSI/

dMMR

CTC enumeration

CTC biology

Longitudinal

cfDNA

analysis of patients on

treatment

Mutation & Copy Number analysis

Methylation patterns

MCRC CUP Biobank

Archival tissue

CUP project

Slide19

Conclusions

Lots of

new technologies in the field of liquid biomarkers

None routinely used;

lack evidence of improved outcomes

Mostly research

initiatives, but slowly being incorporated into trialsFuture standard of care?

Slide20

Acknowledgements

STR

Supported by

The Systemic Therapy Research Group

@ The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

The patients and their families

Alicia Marie Conway

Claire Mitchell

Caroline

Dive

Ged Brady

Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester

Institute