Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin. -

0K - views

Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin.

Published bybikersjoker

Issues in Research Ethics. Coercion. $$$, extra credit, social pressures. Privacy. Deception. Physiology of cheating. Discomfort or Harm. Right to . Service. Experimental group gets beneficial treatment, control group does not..

Tags : amp research harm ethics research amp ethics harm problems data participants
Embed :
Download Link

Download - The PPT/PDF document "Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin.






Presentation on theme: "Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin."— Presentation transcript:

Slide1

Research Ethics

Please

read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin.

Slide2

Issues in Research Ethics

Coercion

$$$, extra credit, social pressures

Privacy

Deception

Physiology of cheating

Discomfort or Harm

Right to

Service

Experimental group gets beneficial treatment, control group does not.

Slide3

Reducing Ethical Problems

Institutional Review Boards

Preserve participants’ anonymity

Obtain informed

consent

This might contaminate the data

And even create harm (medical students’ syndrome)

Reduce risk of harm when possible

Slide4

Dehumanizing Language

“Subjects” or “Participants”

“Males & Females” or “Men and Women”

Words used to describe ethnic identity or sexual preference

What was appropriate yesterday might not be appropriate today

Slide5

Demand Characteristics

Martin discusses this topic under ethics.

I think of it as a threat to validity.

Circumstances in the research situation may have unintended effects on the subjects’ behavior

Good Guy Effect

Screw You Effect

Rosenthal &

Fode

– read this article, please.

Slide6

Plagiarism

Theft of another’s words

Paraphrase

and

cite

Do not quote frequently

“Self-Plagiarism

”

Theft of another’s ideas

My research with male & female deer mice

Slide7

Other Problems

Fabricating Data

Rare but potentially very destructive

Simulation does have a role in science and in pedagogy.

Falsifying Credentials

Research Ethics Please read Chapters 4 and 5 in Martin. - Description

Issues in Research Ethics Coercion extra credit social pressures Privacy Deception Physiology of cheating Discomfort or Harm Right to Service Experimental group gets beneficial treatment control group does not ID: 812642 Download

Similar presentations

End of “Rip Van Winkle” Unit
End of “Rip Van Winkle” Unit

Learning Targets. Demonstrate understanding of foundational nineteenth-century literature.. Write expository texts and demonstrate the writing process.. Language Targets. 1. Proofread your . final essay..

Human Research Ethics:
Human Research Ethics:

What it is and getting approval at LSHTM. John Porter. 2. Outline. Research ethics principles. Ethics review. Consent. Confidentiality. Ethics in the field. Making an ethics application to LSHTM. [Key reference: Rhodes & .

Research ethics
Research ethics

Jan Deckers. School of Medical Sciences. Education Development. Email:. . jan.deckers@ncl.ac.uk. Objectives. To reflect. on what (research) ethics is.. To develop. your skills as an ethical researcher..

teams-ethics-access
teams-ethics-access

Considering Communication Models. Agenda. Discuss Ethics & Ethical Dilemmas. Discuss . Copyright Issues . Watch & . d. iscuss.... http. ://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2007/03/fairy-use-. tale.

Hatchet
Hatchet

Determination and Perseverance. Unit 2 . Introduction. Lesson 1:. Essential Question. What do I know about survival skills?. Standards. ELACC6RL1: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text..

Hatchet
Hatchet

Determination and Perseverance. Unit 2 . Introduction. Lesson 1:. Essential Question. What do I know about survival skills?. Standards. ELACC6RL1: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text..

Ethics of scientific publishing
Ethics of scientific publishing

Helena Siipi. University of Turku. helsii@utu.fi. Contents. Ethics for authors. Ethics for referees. 3. . Ethics for publishers. . 1. Ethics for authors. Who is the author?. Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity 2012: .

Do ethics make a difference?
Do ethics make a difference?

Roger Watson. Professor of Nursing. University of Hull. 12 April 2015. What are ethics?. Ethics are what you do when nobody is looking. Without ethics. Your guess is as good as mine. Expediency rules.

Research ethics and
Research ethics and

how health research is reviewed. This presentation has been developed to form part of the lesson ‘Research ethics and how health research gets reviewed’ - www.nuffieldbioethics.org/education. ‘Clinical research’ - What is it?.

Receiving Ethics Approval
Receiving Ethics Approval

A Guide. 1. Before Writing an Ethics Application. Why is writing an ethics application NOT a waste of time?. . It helps you to... . clarify your research questions. . limit your research questions..