instruments in the context of domestic planning systems with special reference to Hungary Géza Salamin PhD President Hungarian Society for Urban Planning ID: 794337
Download The PPT/PDF document "Integrated development" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Slide2Integrated development instruments in the context of domestic planning systems, with special reference to Hungary
Géza Salamin PhDPresident, Hungarian Society for Urban Planning
Slide3The ‚EUropean’ Model of Spatial Planning (EMP)
A model of directions
of
changes
based on main statements of European planning literature and content
analisis
of relevant EU strategies and policy documents
Functional
territories, soft spaces with fuzzy borders, etc
Source
:
Salamin 2019
Slide4Diverse domestic planning systems in the EU
Land
use
managament
Comprehensive
integrated
Regional
economic
Urbanism
BE, IE, LU, UK, HU, CY, CZ, MT
(PT, ES)
PT, FR, DE, HU, LV, LT,
(IE, SE, UK)
GR, IT, ES, CY, MT
AT, DK, FI, NL, SE, DE, NO, BG (
UK, BE, FR, IE, LU, EE,, LV, LT, PL, RO, SL, SK
)
European
traditions
(
types
) of spatial planning
Source
: Salamin 2018
based
on
EC 1999,
Nadin
, V. –
Stead
, D. 2008,
Farinósi-Dasí
eds
. 2006,
Dühr
S
etal
2010.
Slide5More and more instruments.. Change of existence of different types of plans on
different scales (2002-2017) (Number of countries)
Level
/
space
Type of planning
Total change by levels
Spatial strategy/vision/concept
Physical/land use plan (zoning)
Integrated development strategy (addressing more policies)
Building control (regulation)
introduced
abolished
introduced
abolished
introduced
abolished
introduced
abolished
introduced
abolished
Federal
1
1
1
1
4
State
4122741 147Regional (NUTS2)5253511 166Regional (NUTS3, subregion)5 237111155Local-municipal2 8 10 Part of city (Sub-local)312 4 91Border crossing732181 1176Transnational72 151 1125Cityregion, FUA8231111 224Other functional11 2 31Total change4213161257103411839
Source
:
Salamin 2018 (
Based
on
key
expert
survey
)
Slide6Have new types of plans or new planning activities emerged by the motivation of EU cohesion (regional) policy or
its sources since 2002?
East
: PL, HU, CZ, SK, SL, HR, SRB, RO, EE, LV, LT
North
and West: AT, FR, UK, IE, SE, NO, FI, DK, DE, LU, BE, NL, CH,
South: IT, PT, MT, CY, GR, ES
Source
:
Salamin
2018
Questionnaire
survey
(M:120)
Slide7Level and dynamics of Europeanization of spatial planning in countries (Composite based on dimension 1,2,4,5 of EMP)
Source
:
Salamin 2018
Slide8Sources of Cohesion Policy implemented in ‚territorial type’ programmes and the Europeanization of spatial planning between 2002-2017
Sources
of territorial type operational programmes per a
head (with cofinance)
Europeanization of planning (2002-2017)
Source
:
Salamin 2018
Slide9Cohesion policy support delivered via ITI ERDF, ESF and CF allocation by MS
Programming results
20 MS
use ITI
15 MS to deliver SUD
13 MS for other territories
Total of
EUR 13.8 billion
ERDF 11.8
bn
ESF 1.7
bn
CF 0.3
bn
12 MS use both funds
Concentration
80% by 9 MS
28% by PL alone
60% for SUD Article 7
Source
: European
Commission
2016
Slide10Cohesion policy support to CLLDERDF and ESF allocation by MS
Programming results
18 MS
apply CLLD in CP
EUR 1.8 billion
ERDF 1.1
bn
(0.6%)
ESF 0.7
bn
(0.8%)
For comparison:
EAFRD 6.9
bn
(7%)
EMFF 0.5
bn
(9%)
14 MS use both funds
GR, HU, PL, PT, SE via multi-fund OP
Concentration
92% by 9 MS
25% by CZ alone
Source
: European
Commission
2016
Slide11Integrated
development without ITI: Case
of Hungary
Source
:
Calculations
based
on
1702/2014. (XII. 3.) , 1707/2014. (XII. 3.) and Miniszterelnökség 2018.
Slide12Integrated development without ITI: Case of Hungary
Source
: Miniszterelnökség 2018.
Slide13Main conclusions and recommendations of the evaluation of Hungarian ITP evalutaion (by HBH) The ITP is appropriate instrument for the public development, which is based on local development needs and taking into account territorial aspects.
Preparation and institutional capacity of territorial actors should be developed to strengthen territorial planning and the implementation, monitoring and control capacity of territorial stakeholders. It can help to strengthen the strategic responses to territory specific needs. Programme cycle understanding of ITP should be strengthened, wich could further clarify the tasks and relations of the relevant territorial actors (counties – cities with county rights).
Territoriality (place based cntent) of the ITP-s should be strengthened e.g. by stronger connection with territorial strategies, further guidance on the content of ITP-s. Stronger and transparent link between territorial strategy and project selection.
The link between county ITP and city ITP-s is weak, thus new types of territorial structures (functional urban area, thematic areas, regional ecosystem) of integrated development should be introduced and strengthening the territorial integration of projects, applying a multi-municipal project approach
Source
: HBH Stratégia és Fejlesztés Kft 2018
Slide14Territorial instruments are adequate and efficient tools to support both EU and national policy goals in an integrated way.They can be used efficiently if they are harmonised with (or integrated in) the domestic spatial-urban planning-development system.The specifics of domestic planning-development systems should be taken into account in Cohesion Policy implementation.The transformation tendencies of domestic planning systems and practices are mostly supporting integrated developments (but there are differences
between countries). The spread of integrated approach of planning in domestic systems is important for this integration.Flexibility is needed in in the implementation of Cohesion Policy: integrated development can be achieved in very different ways in different forms depending on the characteristics of planning –development system of the specific country.
Personal
conclusions
Slide15Thank you for attention!president@mut.hu geza.salamin@uni-corvinus.hu
Sources:SALAMIN, G (2018): EUROPEANIZATION OF SHAPING GEOGRAPHIC SPACE -
The influence of the European Union's spatial planning, strategies, and Cohesion Policy on the transformation of the spatial planning systems of European countries. (PhD research report
)SALAMIN, G (2019): European trends in planning - Lessons from a
survey on changes of spatial planning
.
https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/15/15367/13th_European_Biennial_of_Towns_and_Town_Planners_2019_Final_Programme.pdf
European Commission
(2016):
MATKÓ
, Márton, DG Regional and Urban Policy presentation: EG TCUM meeting, 23 June 20161702/2014. (XII. 3.) Gov.Decree HU1707/2014. (XII. 3.) Gov.Decree;
Miniszterelnökség (2018): A TOP félidőben - Válogatás a Terület- és Településfejlesztési Operatív Program támogatott projektjeiből
HBH Stratégia és Fejlesztés Kft (201 8): Az integrált területi programok értékelése - kutatási zárójelentés.
https://www.palyazat.gov.hu › download