/
Integrated   development Integrated   development

Integrated development - PowerPoint Presentation

bikersquackers
bikersquackers . @bikersquackers
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-07-03

Integrated development - PPT Presentation

instruments in the context of domestic planning systems with special reference to Hungary Géza Salamin PhD President Hungarian Society for Urban Planning ID: 794337

territorial planning development integrated planning territorial integrated development source salamin 2018 policy european spatial cohesion itp based systems domestic

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Integrated development" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Slide2

Integrated development instruments in the context of domestic planning systems, with special reference to Hungary

Géza Salamin PhDPresident, Hungarian Society for Urban Planning

Slide3

The ‚EUropean’ Model of Spatial Planning (EMP)

A model of directions

of

changes

based on main statements of European planning literature and content

analisis

of relevant EU strategies and policy documents

Functional

territories, soft spaces with fuzzy borders, etc

Source

:

Salamin 2019

Slide4

Diverse domestic planning systems in the EU

Land

use

managament

Comprehensive

integrated

Regional

economic

Urbanism

BE, IE, LU, UK, HU, CY, CZ, MT

(PT, ES)

PT, FR, DE, HU, LV, LT,

(IE, SE, UK)

GR, IT, ES, CY, MT

AT, DK, FI, NL, SE, DE, NO, BG (

UK, BE, FR, IE, LU, EE,, LV, LT, PL, RO, SL, SK

)

European

traditions

(

types

) of spatial planning

Source

: Salamin 2018

based

on

EC 1999,

Nadin

, V. –

Stead

, D. 2008,

Farinósi-Dasí

eds

. 2006,

Dühr

S

etal

2010.

Slide5

More and more instruments.. Change of existence of different types of plans on

different scales (2002-2017) (Number of countries)

Level

/

space

Type of planning

Total change by levels

Spatial strategy/vision/concept

Physical/land use plan (zoning)

Integrated development strategy (addressing more policies)

Building control (regulation)

introduced

abolished

introduced

abolished

introduced

abolished

introduced

abolished

introduced

abolished

Federal

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

4

State

4122741 147Regional (NUTS2)5253511 166Regional (NUTS3, subregion)5 237111155Local-municipal2   8   10 Part of city (Sub-local)312 4   91Border crossing732181 1176Transnational72 151 1125Cityregion, FUA8231111  224Other functional11  2   31Total change4213161257103411839

Source

:

Salamin 2018 (

Based

on

key

expert

survey

)

Slide6

Have new types of plans or new planning activities emerged by the motivation of EU cohesion (regional) policy or

its sources since 2002?

East

: PL, HU, CZ, SK, SL, HR, SRB, RO, EE, LV, LT

North

and West: AT, FR, UK, IE, SE, NO, FI, DK, DE, LU, BE, NL, CH,

South: IT, PT, MT, CY, GR, ES

Source

:

Salamin

2018

Questionnaire

survey

(M:120)

Slide7

Level and dynamics of Europeanization of spatial planning in countries (Composite based on dimension 1,2,4,5 of EMP)

Source

:

Salamin 2018

Slide8

Sources of Cohesion Policy implemented in ‚territorial type’ programmes and the Europeanization of spatial planning between 2002-2017

Sources

of territorial type operational programmes per a

head (with cofinance)

Europeanization of planning (2002-2017)

Source

:

Salamin 2018

Slide9

Cohesion policy support delivered via ITI ERDF, ESF and CF allocation by MS

Programming results

20 MS

use ITI

15 MS to deliver SUD

13 MS for other territories

Total of

EUR 13.8 billion

ERDF 11.8

bn

ESF 1.7

bn

CF 0.3

bn

12 MS use both funds

Concentration

80% by 9 MS

28% by PL alone

60% for SUD Article 7

Source

: European

Commission

2016

Slide10

Cohesion policy support to CLLDERDF and ESF allocation by MS

Programming results

18 MS

apply CLLD in CP

EUR 1.8 billion

ERDF 1.1

bn

(0.6%)

ESF 0.7

bn

(0.8%)

For comparison:

EAFRD 6.9

bn

(7%)

EMFF 0.5

bn

(9%)

14 MS use both funds

GR, HU, PL, PT, SE via multi-fund OP

Concentration

92% by 9 MS

25% by CZ alone

Source

: European

Commission

2016

Slide11

Integrated

development without ITI: Case

of Hungary

Source

:

Calculations

based

on

1702/2014. (XII. 3.) , 1707/2014. (XII. 3.) and Miniszterelnökség 2018.

Slide12

Integrated development without ITI: Case of Hungary

Source

: Miniszterelnökség 2018.

Slide13

Main conclusions and recommendations of the evaluation of Hungarian ITP evalutaion (by HBH) The ITP is appropriate instrument for the public development, which is based on local development needs and taking into account territorial aspects.

Preparation and institutional capacity of territorial actors should be developed to strengthen territorial planning and the implementation, monitoring and control capacity of territorial stakeholders. It can help to strengthen the strategic responses to territory specific needs. Programme cycle understanding of ITP should be strengthened, wich could further clarify the tasks and relations of the relevant territorial actors (counties – cities with county rights).

Territoriality (place based cntent) of the ITP-s should be strengthened e.g. by stronger connection with territorial strategies, further guidance on the content of ITP-s. Stronger and transparent link between territorial strategy and project selection.

The link between county ITP and city ITP-s is weak, thus new types of territorial structures (functional urban area, thematic areas, regional ecosystem) of integrated development should be introduced and strengthening the territorial integration of projects, applying a multi-municipal project approach

Source

: HBH Stratégia és Fejlesztés Kft 2018

Slide14

Territorial instruments are adequate and efficient tools to support both EU and national policy goals in an integrated way.They can be used efficiently if they are harmonised with (or integrated in) the domestic spatial-urban planning-development system.The specifics of domestic planning-development systems should be taken into account in Cohesion Policy implementation.The transformation tendencies of domestic planning systems and practices are mostly supporting integrated developments (but there are differences

between countries). The spread of integrated approach of planning in domestic systems is important for this integration.Flexibility is needed in in the implementation of Cohesion Policy: integrated development can be achieved in very different ways in different forms depending on the characteristics of planning –development system of the specific country.

Personal

conclusions

Slide15

Thank you for attention!president@mut.hu geza.salamin@uni-corvinus.hu

Sources:SALAMIN, G (2018): EUROPEANIZATION OF SHAPING GEOGRAPHIC SPACE -

The influence of the European Union's spatial planning, strategies, and Cohesion Policy on the transformation of the spatial planning systems of European countries. (PhD research report

)SALAMIN, G (2019): European trends in planning - Lessons from a

survey on changes of spatial planning

.

https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/15/15367/13th_European_Biennial_of_Towns_and_Town_Planners_2019_Final_Programme.pdf

European Commission

(2016):

MATKÓ

, Márton, DG Regional and Urban Policy presentation: EG TCUM meeting, 23 June 20161702/2014. (XII. 3.) Gov.Decree HU1707/2014. (XII. 3.) Gov.Decree;

Miniszterelnökség (2018): A TOP félidőben - Válogatás a Terület- és Településfejlesztési Operatív Program támogatott projektjeiből

HBH Stratégia és Fejlesztés Kft (201 8): Az integrált területi programok értékelése - kutatási zárójelentés.

https://www.palyazat.gov.hu › download