language Activity Make a list of the kinds of features associated with legal language Do not worry about the proper name for the ID: 815382
Download The PPT/PDF document "Characteristics of legal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Characteristics of legal language
Slide2ActivityMake a list of
the
kinds
of
features
associated
with
legal
language
. Do
not
worry
about
the
‘
proper
’
name
for
the
features
;
perhaps
start
just
by
writing
down
some
examples
or
phrases
that
seem
characteristic
of
legal
texts
www.law.cornell.edu
Slide3Written legal language
Precision
(
e.g
.
definitions
)
Information
overload
Abbreviations
Intertextuality
Syntactic complexity
Nominalization
The
use
of
doublets
and
triplets
(
breaking
and
entering
,
null
and
void
,
last
will
and
testament)
Archaisms
Latin
terms
(
ratio
decidendi
,
obiter
dicta
, stare
decisis
)
Slide4Saying it twice: examples
Breaking
and
entering
Null
and
void
Fit
and
proper
Aid
and
abet
Goods
and
chattels
Slide5activityConsider the
pairs
above
.
Does
each
part
of
the
pair
mean
the
same
thing
?
Look
up
each
of
the
pairs
in
a
dictionary
Slide6Breaking and entering
entering a residence or other enclosed property through the slightest amount of force (even pushing open a door), without authorization. If there is intent to commit a crime, this is burglary. If there is no such intent, the breaking and entering alone is probably at least illegal trespass, which is a misdemeanor crime. (See: burglary, trespass
).
Slide7Breaking and entering
Break
to (cause something to) separate suddenly or violently into two or more pieces, or to (cause something to) stop working by being damaged
;
to destroy or end something, or to come to an end: to do something better than the best known speed, time, number, etc. previously
achieved
;
:to
fail to keep a law,
r
ule, or
promise
Enter
to come or go into a particular place: to be included in a competition, race, or exam, or to arrange for someone else to do this: to put information into a computer, book, or document: to become a member of a particular organization, or to start working in a particular type of job: to begin a period of time:
Slide8Null and void
1.
having
no legal
force
; 2. (
of
an agreement or contract) having no
l
egal effect and to be considered therefore as if it did not
exist
Null
1.
Having
no
legal
or
binding
force
; 2.having
or
associated
with
the
value
zero; 3.
lacking
distinctive
qualities
Void
1.
Having
no legal force or effect; not legally binding or
enforceable
; 2.
useless
; ineffectual; vain.
Slide9Fit and proper
Morally
suitable
;
The
concept of a ‘fit and proper’ person is a fundamental one in many professions, jurisdictions and
organisations
as it is used to determine a person’s honesty, integrity and reputation in order to confirm that they are fit and proper for the role they are undertaking. There is, however, no single infallible test regarding what constitutes a ‘fit and proper’ person and in some instances, this requirement is not defined in
legislation
For example, in the case of
General Council of the Bar of South Africa v
Jiba
and others [2016] 4 All SA 443 (GP)
, it was stated that in determining whether a person was a ‘fit and proper’ for the legal profession, such person should have
integrity, dignity, the possession of knowledge and technical skills, a capacity for hard work, respect for legal order and a sense of equality or fairness.
Slide10Fit and properFit
1.
healthy
and strong, especially as a result of exercise:
2.
suitable
for a particular purpose or
activity
Proper
real, satisfactory, suitable, or correct
:
› showing standards of
behaviour
that are socially and morally
acceptable
;
complete
Slide11Aid and abet
To help and encourage, usually in the commission of a crime or anti-social act
.
;
The person who aids and abets participates in the commission of a crime by performing some Overt Act or by giving advice or encouragement. He or she must share the criminal intent of the person who actually commits the crime, but it is not necessary for the aider and abettor to be physically present at the scene of the crime.
Slide12Aid and abet
Aid
To
help
,
assist
,
or
support
Abet
to help or encourage someone to do something wrong or illegal:
If one person abets another, they help or encourage them to do something criminal or wrong. Abet is often used in the legal expression 'aid and abet'.
Slide13Goods and chattels
the things that you own other than land and
buildings
Goods
items
for sale, or possessions that can be
moved
;
things for sale, or the things that you
own
;
things, but not people, that are
tra
nsported by railway or
road
Chattel
a piece of personal property, including something that can be moved, or rights such as copyright and patents, but not usually including land and buildings:
Slide14Synonyms?Goods
and
chattels
:
someone’s
possessions
, not
including
any
houses
or
land
that
they own
Goods
is a term of flexible context and meaning and extends to all tangible
items
Chattel
:
an
item of personal property which is movable, as distinguished from real property (
land
)
Fit
and
proper
: a
very
important requirement for admission as an attorney or
advocate
; (fit:
in a
good
enough
physical
or
mental
condition
;
proper
:
morally
good
;
serious
)
Aid
and
abet
:
To
assist another in the commission of a crime by words or
conduct
Abet
:
to encourage, support, or countenance by aid or approval, usually in
wrongdoing
;
aid
:
to provide support for or relief to; help:
Slide15Repetition I swear to
tell
the
truth
,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
‘
the
whole
truth
’ – ‘
lies
of
omission
’ are
not
allowed
The
formula
has
a
poetic
function
,
signals
the
importance
of
the
oath
Slide16Binomials/doublets
After
the
Norman
Conquest
(1066) a
large
number
of
French
words
were
borrowed
It
became
comon
to use
both
the
English
and
the
French
term
for
the
same
concept
or
referent
There
was
some
doubt
whether
the
words
were
full
synonyms
;
it
was
safe
to
include
both
variants
just
in
case
there
was
a
difference
of
meaning
Another
reason
:
the
poetic
function
of
language
:
binomials
provide a
certain
rhythm
;
suggest
formality
and
ritual,
which
are
important
to
the
law
Slide17Borrowings from Latin and French
Latin: stare
decisis
‘
stand
by
the
decision
’,
ratio
decidendi
‘
reason
for
deciding
’,
obiter
dicta
‘
sth
said
in
passing
’’
French
:
estoppel
‘
legal
rule that prevents someone from changing their mind about something they have previously said is true in
court
’;
tort
‘civil
wrong
’
Slide18Overlapping between ordinary and
legal
language
Consideration
-
something of value given to someone in return for goods, services, or some other promise.
Reasonable
-
in
law, just, rational, appropriate, ordinary or usual in the circumstances. It may refer to care, cause, compensation, doubt (in a criminal trial), and a host of other actions or activities.
Intention
-
a
mental attitude with which an individual acts, and therefore it cannot ordinarily be directly proved but must be inferred from surrounding facts and circumstances
Slide19SummaryLegal language,
like
ordinary
language
,
has
been
influenced
by
history
English
legal
language
–
influenced
by
Latin
and
French
Some
parts
of
legal
language
–
opaque
, some
look
like
ordinary
language
Slide20Properties required of legislative language
1. a
law
should
be
concise
2. Legislative
language
should
respect
rules
of
grammar
(
correctness
)
3.
It
should
use
terminology
consistently
(
precision
)
4.
It
should
avoid
ambiguity
(
clarity
)
5.
Laws
should
be
formulated
in
a
logical
way
,
and
the
reasoning
should
be
coherent
Slide21Precision, vagueness and ambiguity
in
legal
language
„Natural
language
being
such
a
breeding
ground
for
ambiguity
, to
communicate
just
one set
of
meanings
while
excluding
many
others
is
often
impossible
; but
the
lawyer
must at
least
make
the
effort
,
and
legal
language
has
many
oddities
that
are
clear
evidence
of
the
kinds
of
effort
that
have
been
made
” (
Crystal
and
Davy
1969: 193)
Vagueness
–
acceptable
in
legal
language
(general
statements
)
Ambiguity
–
not
acceptable
(
multiple
interpretations
)
Slide22Drafting problemsHow to
achieve
precision
?
How to
achieve
concision
and
precision
at
the
same time?
How to
achieve
clarity
and
concision
?
Slide23Legal terms may have
multiple
meanings
(
polysemy
)
Therefore
,
they
are
often
defined
within
a
particular
context
to
avoid
mistakes
and
misunderstandings
Legal
language
–
many
definitions
Corpus
iuris
civilis
(
Code
,
Digest
, Institutes, Novellae; the Digest: 246 legal definitions)
Precision: Definitions
Slide24Real and terminologicalReal d.: concern entities that exist in reality in the physical world (e.g. real property)“
Goods are movable by their nature, or if the law so determines”
Terminological d
. only exist in legal reality (e.g. an obligation)
Definitions
Slide25MEANING OF “HOUSE” AND “HOUSE AND PREMISES”, AND ADJUSTMENT OF BOUNDARY.- (1) For purposes of this Part of this Act, “house” includes any building designed or adopted for living in and reasonably so called, nothwithstanding that the building is not structurally detached, or was or is not solely designed or adapted for living in, or is divided horizontally into flats or maisonettes; and-
Example:
Slide26(a) where a building is divided horizontally; the flats or other units into which it is so divided are not separate “houses”, though the building as a whole may be; and(b) where a building is divided vertically the building as a whole is not a “house” though any of the units into which it is divided may be…. (p. 68)
Example (cont.)
Slide27Vagueness: examplesReasonable
:
Reasonable
man
Beyond
reasonable
doubt
Reasonable
force
Reasonable
care
Reasonably
foreseeable
Slide28Reasonable man/person
A
fictional person with an ordinary degree of reason, prudence, care, foresight, or intelligence whose conduct, conclusion, or expectation in relation to a particular circumstance or fact is used as an objective standard by which to measure or determine something (as the existence of negligence)
Reasonable
man theory refers to a test whereby a hypothetical person is used as a legal standard, especially to determine if someone acted with negligence. This hypothetical person referred to as the reasonable/prudent man exercises average care, skill, and judgment in conduct that society requires of its members for the protection of their own and of others' interests. This serves as a comparative standard for determining liability. For example, the decision whether an accused is guilty of a given offense might involve the application of an objective test in which the conduct of the accused is compared to that of a reasonable person under similar circumstances.
Slide29Beyond reasonable doubt
The standard that must be met by the prosecution's evidence in a criminal prosecution: that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime, thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
If the jurors or judge have no doubt as to the defendant's guilt, or if their only doubts are unreasonable doubts, then the prosecutor has proven the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the defendant should be pronounced guilty
.
Beyond a reasonable doubt
is the highest standard of proof that must be met in any trial
Slide30Reasonable forceReasonable force refers to the amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. Reasonable force is used to defend one's person or property from a violent attack, theft, or other type of unlawful aggression. It is used as a defense in a criminal trial or to defend oneself in a suit alleging tortuous conduct. When a person uses excessive force or more than the force necessary for such protection, s/he is considered to have forfeited the right to defense.
Slide31Reasonable carethe degree of caution and concern an ordinarily prudent and rational person would use in similar circumstances. It is a standard used to determine a legal duty and whether such duty was fulfilled.
Slide32Reasonably foreseeableA consequence is reasonably foreseeable if it could have been anticipated by an ordinary person of average intelligence as naturally flowing from his actions
.
When determining whether a defendant breached his duty of care by acting below the standard of care, the court first determines whether the
risk
was
r
easonably
foreseeable
Slide33Syntactic complexityProductivity
,
compositionality
,
recursion
– some
of
the
universal
properties
of
language
Mechanisms
of
recursion
:
coordination
and
embedding
Compound
sentence –
all
parts
of
equal
importance
:
coordination
Complex sentence -
embedding
Slide34Syntactic complexity
Long
sentences
:
Compound
sentence
Complex sentence
Slide35Compound sentencesComprise
of
a
string
of
simple
sentences
of
equal
importance
joined
together
with
words
such
as ‘
and
’:
E.g
.
The
patron
may
be
allowed
to
remove
food
from the Hotel and the Hotel may allow such activity and the patron will sign an agreement and the
patron
will
accept
responsibility
for
the
food
A
compound
sentence
may
be
long
, but
all
its
component
parts
are
equal
in
terms
of
being
at
the
same
hierarchical
level
;
this
is
not
the
case
with
a complex sentence
Another
feature
of
legal
language
:
repetition
–
using
nouns
instead
of
pronouns
Complex sentenceAttention should
be
paid
to
relations
between
the
clauses
In
older
statutes
–
long
sentences
, no
formatting
and
very
little
punctuation
Complex
sentences
–
harder
to
process
than
compound
sentences
Slide37Complex sentencesMain
clause
,
subordinate
clauses
:
E.g
.
In
the
event
that
a patron
wants
to
remove
leftover
food
from
the
Hotel,
the
Hotel
may
allow
such
activity
only
if
such
patron
acknowledges
,
by its signature below, its agreement to accept responsibility and abide by the terms set forth in this
Agreement
(
document
from
a
Marriot
hotel
in
London)
Slide38Complexity: Act of Settlement (1701)Whereasin the First Year of the Reign of Your Majesty and of our late most gracious Sovereign Lady Queen Mary (of blessed Memory) An Act of Parliament was made
intituled
[An Act for declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and for
setling
the Succession of the Crown] wherein it was (amongst other things) enacted established and declared That the Crown and
Regall
Government of the Kingdoms of England France and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging should be and continue to Your
Majestie
and the said late Queen during the
joynt
Lives of Your Majesty and the said Queen and to the Survivor And that after the Decease of Your Majesty and of the said Queen the said Crown and
Regall
Government should be and remain to the Heirs of the Body of the said late Queen And for Default of such Issue to Her Royall Highness the Princess Ann of Denmark and the Heirs of Her Body And for Default of such Issue to the Heirs of the Body of Your Majesty And it was thereby further enacted That all and every Person and Persons that then were or afterwards should be reconciled to or shall hold Communion with the See or Church of Rome or should
professe
the Popish Religion
F1
... should be excluded and are by that Act made for ever [
X1
incapable] to inherit possess or enjoy the Crown and Government of this Realm and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging or any part of the same or to have use or exercise any
regall
Power Authority or Jurisdiction within the same And in all and every such Case and Cases the People of these Realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their Allegiance And that the said Crown and Government shall from time to time descend to and be enjoyed by such Person or Persons being Protestants as should have inherited and enjoyed the same in case the said Person or Persons so reconciled holding Communion professing
F1
... as aforesaid were naturally dead
Slide39LayoutNumbering
of
sections
and
subsections
in
modern
statutes
for
ease
of
navigation
In
older
statutes
– a
block
of
text
with
no
formatting
and
very
little
punctuation
(
setting
the text as a block made it more difficult to make fraudulent additions later); lack of punctuation – related to the idea that
legislation
was
not
intendedto
be
read
aloud
;
also
–
it
could
cause
ambiguity
Slide40LayoutThe
way
legislation
is
laid
out
makes
it
easier
to
follow
the
structure
and
understand
its
meaning
While
complex
sentences
are
typical
in
written
legal
language
,
there is one complex construction that is particularly commonLook at the first three subsections. What is the basic underlying
structure
?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qx6Bk9OTnbI
Slide41Complex sentence: example (Bribery Act 2010)
1.
Offences
of
bribing
another
person
(1) A
person
(P)
is
guilty
of
an
offence
if
either
of
the
following
cases
applies
.
(2) P
offers
,
promises
or
gives a financial or other advantage to another person, and(b) P intends the advantage (i) to induce a person o perform
improperly
a
relevant
function
or
activits
,
or
(ii) to
reward
a
person
for
the
improper
performance
of
such
a
function
or
activity
Slide42StructureIf X then
Y,
or
Y
is
true
if
X
is
true
„
There
are
of
course
many
possible
variations
on
this
basic
theme
, but
in
nearly
all
of
them
the
‘
if X’ component is an essential: every action or requirement, from a legal point of view, is hedged around
with
,
and
even
depends
upon
, a set
of
conditions
which
must
be
satisfied
before
anything
at
all
can
happen
(
Crystal
and
Davy
1969: 203)
Slide43Look at the subsections of
Section
1 (2) (b)
‘
perform
improperly
’
‘
improper
performance
’
While
legal
language
tends
to use a
small
set
of
verbs
,
it
uses
a
large
number
of
complex
noun
phrases
–
highly
nominal
Encoding something as a noun, when it could be another kind of a word (e.g. a verb)- nominalisation
Slide44NominalizationAn action
can
be
encoded
as a
noun
While
legal
language
uses
a
small
set
of
verbs
,
it
uses
a
large
number
of
complex
noun
phrases
,
and
can
be
said
to be ‘highly nominal’Encoding sth as a noun, when it could be another kind of word – nominalization (Tiersma 1999: 77)
Slide45Nominalisation - exampleTrustee
Act
2000
Section
3 General Power
of
Investment
(1)
Subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
Part
, a
trustee
may
make
any
kind
of
investment
that
he
could
make
if
he
were
absolutely
entitled to the assets of the trust…Is there nominalisation here?1. Subject to the provisions of this Part, a trustee
may
invest
in
any
way
that
he
could
if
he
were
absolutely
entitled
to
the
assets
of
the
trust…
Slide46Nominalisation Nominalisations –
common
in
legal
language
Nominalisation
can
lead
to
shorter
and
less
complex sentence
structure
Slide47Logical disposition helps to place legal information in a hierarchyLegal text moves from the abstract to the concrete, from the substantive to the proceduralStructure of the text should be consistent: the principal items presented before secondary items, general rules before special conditions and exceptions
Structure
and
formalism
in
legal
texts
:
Logical
disposition
Slide48Logical structure of a code informs the reader about hierarchies of legal concepts and terms expressing those conceptsThanks to such a structure, it is easy for a lawyer or translator to find in a code the terms they are looking for and to establish the contexts in which these terms are used
Structure
of
codes
Slide49Modern, complex society – enormous number of legal rulesLegal language should be as concise as possible to avoid laws and regulations that would otherwise be over-long and unclearAt the same time, legal language should avoid over-abstraction to enable decoding with minumum effort
Information overload
Slide50The key: to know for
whom
laws
are
written
–
experts
or
citizens
?
Even
laws
concerning
fundamental
questions
of
citizens
’
lives
–
written
for
experts
who
are
charged
with
their
technical
application
(e.g. fiscal law)Laws – highly complex: distributive justice (=fairness
in the way things are
distributed
)
presupposes
highly
detailed
rules
Information overload
Slide51Modern law-abstract character; regulates entities that are mental creations: rights and obligations; e.g. in
Swedish legislation: only 5-8% verbal substantives refer to entities that exist in time and space
Law – based on experience drawn from the real world but it regulates hypothetical future cases; timespan linked to legal rules – often characterised by universality, impossible to see from the chronological standpoint: “timelessness of law”
Universality
and aloofness
Abstraction and Hypothetical Character
Slide52Frequent use of passive: brings the object of the action into the foreground, giving the actor only a secondary roleEven when actors are in the foreground, individuals are pushed into the background by personification of authorities and corporations: e.g.
the ministry orders (…), the court finds(…)
Impersonality
and
Objectivisation
Slide53Actors to do not appear under their private names but are called by their titles or functions: director, president, etcPrivate persons -named according to their roles:
applicant, appellant, defendant
Advocates seek to lend their arguments an appearance of objectivity to make them credible and convincing (e.g. “
It appears that Article 27 of the law on judicial records should be interpreted so that
(…); not: “
It seems to me…
)”
Impersonality and Objectivisation
Slide54Legal language today: official and formalNeutral style: to have an effect on the understanding, rather than the feelings, of the reader or listenerLegal style: cold: rejects all that is affective and does not include emotional elements
Legal texts: no exclamation or question
marks
Neutrality of legal language – guaranteed by the fact that many legal texts (laws, administrative instructions, on the Continent also judgments) pass through the offices of several commentators and stylists before receiving their final form: they are not from a single hand
Neutrality
Slide55Legal language – characterised by “zero style”; however: advocates’ closing speeches are often affectiveSobriety of legal language – visible in legislative texts; exceptions: preambles to laws, whose style is often full of pathos and emotion
Neutrality
Slide56a figure of speech that describes a subject by asserting that it is, on some point of comparison, the same as another otherwise unrelated object. a type of
analogy
and is closely related to other
rhetorical figures of speech
that achieve their effects via association, comparison or resemblance
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players
;
They have their exits and their entrances
;
Metaphor
Slide57In contrast to medieval times, modern legal language is neutral; no longer figurativeOnly a few modest traces remain of the colourful legal language of the past, mostly in the form of legal maximsIn modern legal language, metaphors are rare
Metaphors: common in solemn speeches on the notion of law, its fundamental principles, etc.
Metaphors e.g. “landscape of legal culture”
Metaphors
Slide58“burden of proof” (Roman law: onus probandi: calques all over Europe: onere della prova, carga de la prueba
,
charge de la preuve
,
Beweistlast
,
bevisbörda
,
Source of law
Metaphors
Slide59Legal order – systemic character: each element forms part of a greater wholeAn article forms part of a law, and a law forms part of legislation. In civil-law countries, precedents complement legislation; in common-law countries they are of fundamental importance; legal science – also important; result: each element should be in harmony with the entirety of the legal order
Systemic character
Interrelationship of different elements of the law
Slide60Systemic character of the legal order - components of the order linked to one another by references: intertextualitygiven that law relies on authorities (e.g. the legislator, the courts), a legal text has a dependent relationship with other texts; an article of the law refers to other articles of the same law or to other legislative texts, a judicial decision refers to laws, a legal textbook or treatise refers to laws, etc.
Interrelationship
of
different
elements
of
the
law
:
intertextuality
Slide611. in reinforcing the systemic idea of the legal order, references are appropriate for eliminating internal contradictions 2. References show the wider contexts to which the different elements of the legal order belong; informative and mnemotechnical function. A reference shows that another legal text exists that links to the issue involved
3. References eliminate repetitions, the text becomes lighter and more economical
Functions of referencing
Slide62Too many references make a text difficult o understand, potentially causing mistakes and misunderstandings; a legal text becomes a “hypertext” weighed down with a large number of references making the reader lose the thread of the document; such a text saves space but is very difficult from the reader’s stand-point
Problems of Referencing
Slide63“A person who fails to make a declaration, or who does not make it in a correct or complete manner, or in due time, contrary to paragraph 2 of Art. 4, paragraph 1 of Art. 26, Art. 27, Paragraph 1 or 2 of Art 28, paragraph 1 or 2 of Art. 28 a, paragraph 2 of Art. 34 paragraph 1 or 2 of Art. 38 or paragraph 2,3 or 4 of Art. 42, or who fails to attach the items prescribed by law to the declaration, contrary to paragraph 2 of Art. 26, paragraph 2 of Art. 34, paragraph 2 of Art. 38 or paragraph 3 or 4 of Art. 42, contravenes the law (decree implementing law on firearms, Art 43, p. 4) German legislation on firearms
Problems of Referencing
Slide64Official title of a law, a publication, or an office can be long and complicated Ie.g. Receueil de jurisprudence du droit administratif et du Conseil d’Etat)The use of initialisation (RJDA) facilitates references to various texts
Space-saving
Frequency
of
initialisations
and
acronyms
Slide65The legislator seeks to ensure respect for legal rules, notably by linguistic means: solemnityThe entry into force of a constitution – performed by a formula full of dignityA close connection between the gravity of a text and its archaic character
Archaism and Solemnity
Slide66Anaphora The use of pronouns for a recurrent noun phrase – anaphoraLegal
texts
–
very
low
levels
of
pronoun
use
and
hence
low
levels
of
anaphora
of
this
kind
Slide67Searching for clarityTrying to
avoid
syntactic
complexity
,
ambiguous
words
and
unhelpful
nominalisations
–
important
in
making
legal
language
more
accessible
to
lay
reader
Acquiring
legal
language
is
not
limited
to
learning a set of terms; it is also about learning a new way of thinking, entering into a different language
and
a
different
world
(
Mooney
2014: 38)
While
the
sign
universes
of
legal
language
and
ordinary
language
may
be
parallel
,
they
are
not
isomorphic
,
i.e
.
they
do
not
completely
correspond
Slide68Plain English„Plain English
does
not
involve
the
simplification
of
a
law
to
the
point
it
becomes
legally
uncertain
. In
particular
, care
needs
to
be
taken
that
legal
uncertainty
is
not
created when dispensing with terms having established meanings for users of legislation. Plain English may involve a balance of
simplicity
and
legal
certainty
to
ensure
the
law
is
both
easily
read
and
understood
and
legally
effective
to
achieve
the
desired
policy
objectives
,
(
Queensland
Government
, 2011,
section
3.5.1)
Slide69Plain languageLegal
language
may
be
the
most
effective
and
comprehensible
variety
if
the
addressee
is
a
legal
professional
Plain
English
is
highly
desirable
for
texts
addressed
to a
lay
audience
The
move from ‘legal English’ to ‘Plain English’ is similar to a translationBecause of this, the move to Plain English requires the involvement
of
willing
legal
professionals
who
are
blingual
Slide70Terminology1) the set
of
practices
and
methods
used
for
the
collection
,
description
and
presentation
of
terms
2) a
theory
required
for
explaining
the
relationship
between
concepts
and
terms
3) a
vocabulary
of a special subject-field
Slide71TermsTerms should
be
:
Accurate
Concise
Easy
to
spell
and
pronounce
Allow
the
formation
of
derivatives
Linguistically correct
Monosemous
(having 1 meaning) ,
mononymous
(consisting of one word), and a member of a term system
Slide72Legal terminologyA) “pure” law
terminology
(
estoppel
)
B)
law
terminology
found
in
everyday
speech
(
title
‘
right
’)
C) everyday words assigned a special meaning in a given legal context (e.g.
Frigaliment
Importing Co., Ltd. v. BNS International Sales Corp.
, 190 F. Supp. 116 (
S.D.N.Y.
1960
), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GANTX_Irim4
D) terms from other disciplines
Slide73Frigaliment Importing Co., Ltd. v. BNS International Sales Corp., 190 F. Supp. 116
FACTS:Defendant
state sales corporation had two contracts with plaintiff foreign corporation for the sale of "chicken". After plaintiff received one shipment of stewing chicken and another was stopped, plaintiff brought a breach of warranty action, alleging that the goods sold should have corresponded to the description because the chicken was not suitable for broiling and frying. Plaintiff says 'chicken' means a young chicken, suitable for broiling and frying.
ISSUE:Does
chicken mean only "young chicken" under the contract?
ANSWER:No
.
Defendant's
subjective intent that it could comply with the contracts by delivering stewing chicken coincided with objective meaning of "chicken," which had at least some usage in the trade; and plaintiff did not sustain its burden that "chicken" was used in the narrower rather than in the broader sense.
Slide74Everyday words assigned a special
meaning
in
a
given
legal
context
:
example
Welfare
of
Pigs
Act
1998 –
definition
of
a
pig
for
the
purposes
of
that
law
: “
pig
means
an
animal
of the porcine species of any age, kept for breeding or fattening”If a pig fails to fulfil either of the
two
qualifying
conditions
,
its
owner
stays
outside
the
scope
of
that
law
Slide75English legal termsRemember
the
rule
: Legal
terms
must
be
:
Monosemous
(
having
1
meaning
) ,
mononymous
(
consisting
of
one word),
and
a
member
of
a
term
system
How
about
English
legal
terms
?
Slide76English legal termsMulti
-word
expressions
and
phrases
Polysemy
Synonymy
Slide77PolysemyWhen p.
occurs
,
interpreters
of
the
text
should
be
able
to
assign
to
a
term
the
meaning
appropriate
to
the
context
Often
–
easy
to
distinguish
between
different
meanings
;
sometimes – impossible to tell what is the correct interpretation of the text: ambiguity
Slide78SynonymyOpposite to polysemy
:
two
or
several
terms
express
the
same
concept
Synonymy – a common feature of legal terms
In legal languages with several layers of language, such as English, this is especially frequent
Legal English often expresses the same concept by an Anglo-Saxon term, a French term, and a Latin term
Slide79Legal conceptsLaw – a
social
phenomenon
Legal
rules
differ
in
different
legal
orders
Legal
concepts
also
differ
Slide80Legal conceptsWhere
the
concepts
of
two
legal systems
differ
,
the
semantic
domains
of
legal
terms
do
not
correspond
with
one
another
Historical
interaction
between
societies
:
legal
concepts
of
Sweden
and Finland _ very close, since Finland formed part of the Kingdom of Sweden for over 6 centuries; England and
the
US: English
law
was
applied
in
the
former
colonies
Slide81Scientific terms introduced into
law
Terms
from
other
sciences
introduced
into
statutes
The materials may introduce a specific meaning, broader or narrower than the scientific one
Medical terms e.g.
alchoholic
or
drug addict
may be understood in law differently
The scientific term becoming a legal term may acquire a different meaning
Slide82The future?Future legal language
– more
descriptive
than
conceptual
and
closer
to
ordinary
language
More
guidelines
with
reference to
the
linguistic
aspects
of
creation
and
application
of
law
Slide83ProblemsSome efforts
directed
towards
the
modernization
of
legal
terms
may
not
lead
to
an
increase
in
their
understandability
Legal
vocabulary
–
rarely
used
and
understood
in
an
isolated
formAttempts to increase understandability should focus on the structure of legal texts The impact of modernization of legal vocabulary
should
not
be
overestimated