January 22 2014 1245 PM Gateway AampB Agenda Minutes Donaghy Opening RemarksAnnouncements Donaghy Presidential Address Wheeler CoC Actions Daley Promotion and Tenure Report ID: 790254
Download The PPT/PDF document "College-wide Governance Meeting" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
College-wide Governance Meeting
January 22, 2014, 12:45 PM, Gateway A&B
Slide2Agenda
Minutes (Donaghy)Opening Remarks/Announcements (
Donaghy
)
Presidential Address (
Wheeler
)
CoC
Actions (
Daley
)
Promotion and Tenure Report (
Malmsheimer
)
Slide3DRAFT Proposal on behalf of ESF was submitted before the 12/30 deadline
Due to constraints, minimal to no faculty input was solicited
Executive Committee is meeting with VP
Rufo
tomorrow to review Draft proposal
Our role? To make sure that whatever company takes advantage contributes to the academic mission of the College
Eventually a 30-day review by campus
Slide4Mentoring Colloquium
Scott BlairKelley Donaghy
Theodore
Endreny
Melissa
Fierke
Douglas JohnstonNeil Ringler
Scott Turner
Stephen
WeiterTheresa Kaier-May
January 8, 2014
Slide5Mentoring Colloquium Results
Satisfied with program: 67% S and 28% VSLength: 70% just right, 25% too short
Content: 60% agree, 34% strongly agree
Organized: 50% agree, 47% strongly agree
Achieved its goals: 57% A, 38% SA
Slide6Elections
Nominations are being accepted by Sergeant-at-Arms Bob Meyer for:Executive Chair (2 year term)
SUNY Senator (3-year term)
SU Senator (3 year term)
If you are interested in serving on a committee – please let your department chair and department know. They should have an election process to fill this positions.
Slide7Quentin Wheeler
Envisioning our Sustainable Future
ESF
Slide8Quentin Wheeler
First steps:
Listen
Review strategic plan
Understand
curriculum/student experience
Identify
“right” questions that brand
ESF
Strategic PR Plan
Slide9SCHOOL OF SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION
Justice and social inquiry
African-American studies
Asian-Pacific/American studies
Women & gender studies
SCHOOL OF HISTORY, PHILOSOPY & RELIGIOUS STUDIES
History
Philosophy
Religious studies/Jewish studies
Asia studies
SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES & URBAN PLANNING
Geography
Urban planning
GIS
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL SCIENCES
Mathematics and statistics
Mathematical biology
Mathematics education
SCHOOL OF POLITICS & GLOBAL STUDIES
American politics
International relations
Cultural perspectives and place
Violence, conflict and human rights
HOW DO WE BUILD SUSTAINABLE CITIES?
HOW DO WE PREDICT NATURAL PROCESSES?
HOW DO WE GIVE AND USE POWER?
HOW DOES SOCIETY SHAPE ITS VALUES?
Slide10Slide11“You’ve got to be very careful if you don’t know where you are going because you might not get there”
—Yogi Berra
, American Baseball Legend
Slide12clarity of vision
courage of purpose
bold leadership
Slide13We will educate and inspire environmental leaders, explore the natural world, and blaze the trail to a sustainable future
Big. Audacious. Inspiring.
Vision
Slide14984%
2008 = 13
2012 = 141
Differentiate
Slide15Quentin Wheeler
ESF Design Imperatives:
1. Ask the “right” questions
2. Transformative education
3. Conceptual consilience
4. Measure success inside out
5. Evolutionary entrepreneurism
6. Leverage with partnerships
7. Power of place
8. Balance fundamental discovery and problem-solving
Slide16Quentin Wheeler
1. Ask the “right” questions
Slide17“Historians of science often observe that asking the right question is more important than producing the right answer. The right answer to a trivial question is also trivial, but the right question, even when insoluble in exact form, is a guide to major discovery.”
— E. O.
Wilson, 1998,
Consilience
Slide18Quentin Wheeler
W
hat are earth’s species?
How can we detect and adapt to climate change?
What are options for renewable energy?
How can we make cities sustainable?
and on and on and on
Slide19Quentin Wheeler
2. Transformative education
Slide20Educated
Passionate
Courageous
Liberal Arts PLUS
Science, Sustainability, Cultural, Global “Literacies”
PLUS Awareness: e.g., Team-work Tolerance
Transformative Impact on Student Lives
Slide21Quentin Wheeler
Transformative Impact on Society:
public science education
on-ground impact
reliable, objective knowledge
Slide22Campus without borders
Develop pipeline for diverse STEM students
Cultivate an informed, inspired public
Open access to information/knowledge for general welfare
Diversify sustainability workforce through citizen science
Slide23SECS in the City
Sustainability Education and Citizen Science in New York City
Slide24Quentin Wheeler
3. Conceptual Consilience
Transdisciplinarity
Slide25Quentin Wheeler
4. Success Inside Out
ESF will measure success in the
quality
of students, knowledge, and impact it produces
— not the quantity of dollars it brings in
i.e., revenue streams are a means, not an end
Slide26Quentin Wheeler
5
. Evolutionary Entrepreneurism
ESF will be an engine for an adaptation economy
Slide27Quentin Wheeler
Slide28Quentin Wheeler
6. Leverage Partnerships
SUNY
NYS
NYC
national
international
Slide29Collaborative competition
Sustainability Innovation and Vision (“I.V.”) League
Slide30Quentin Wheeler
7
. Power of Place
Syracuse University
Syracuse
Adirondacks
NYC
Slide31Quentin Wheeler
8. Balance Curiosity-Driven Discovery and Problem-Solving Solutions
Slide32“The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance — it is the illusion of knowledge”
—
Daniel J.
Boorstin
, Librarian of U. S. Congress
Slide33Slide34Slide35Slide361. Biosphere Baseline
Slide372. Adaptation Economics
Evolutionary Entrepreneurism
Natural history, informatics,
biomimicry
Slide383
. Origins
Slide39S
ource
: Pink Floyd
“
Tree of Half Life
”
album cover
by Storm
Thorgerson
.
Slide40Slide41Think ecologically,
a
ct evolutionarily
Recognize open niches
Develop interconnected networks
Maximize options and adapt
Slide42“Department” of shameless self-promotion
Popularize vision, discoveries, and achievements,
p
ackaged in ways to capture public imagination
Slide43Slide44Top 10 New Species 2013
Slide45Curriculum Committee
Report to Faculty Governance1/22/2014
Slide46Report Items
CommunicationsWebsite http://www.esf.edu/coc/
Email:
curriculum@esf.edu
Committee reports the following courses are approved
FCH
232 Career Skills for Chemists (new)
FCH
511 Atmospheric Chemistry (revised)
FOR 340 Watershed Hydrology (revised)Committee moves to accept revisions of FNRM curricula to bring them in line with
SUNY General Education policy Forest Ecosystem ScienceForest Resources ManagementNatural Resources ManagementSustainable Energy Management
Committee announces proposal reviews:
FCH
110 (new General Education)
FOR 232 Natural Resources Ecology (new General Education)
B.S. Environmental Science (revision, reduce credit hours by reducing senior synthesis project)
B.S.
Environmental Chemistry (new)
Next
CoC
Meeting:
1/29/2014
Availability of Special Topics course proposals in all program areas
Program reviews: 30 credit hour requirements of General Education
Use of Foreign Language to meet GER
Slide4747
P&T Committee Report
Bob Malmsheimer
Chair
Slide48Members of the ESF P&T Committee
Bob Malmsheimer, Chair (
FNRM
)
Robin
Kimmerer
(
EFB)
Chuck
Kroll (ERE
)Matthew Potteiger (LA)
Bandaru
Ramarao
(PBE
)
David
Sonnenfeld
(ES
)
William
Smith (SCME
)
Arthur
Stipanovic
(CHEM).
48
Slide49Review of ESF P&T Standards
P&T Standards require the CRC (a.k.a. the P&T Committee) to review the standards every three years.
Review Process:
6 two hour meetings of P&T Committee.
6 two hour meetings of P&T Committee with Provost.
Reached consensus on how to improve the Standards.
Memo summarizing changes and revised Standards will be sent out to faculty members after this meeting.
Three meetings for faculty member’s comments.
49
Slide50Overarching Guidelines for Review
Use lessons
learned from the CRC’s experience with the
standards and process
during the past 2 years
.
Goals:
Make standards clearer for candidates.
Make standards clearer for reviewers.
Make process clearer for candidates and reviewers.
50
Slide51Results of Review: Issues
Readability, consistency, and concision issues.
L
ogical flow and placement of ideas issues.
I
nconsistencies and conflicts
.
Need for updating.
Major changes, minor changes, and additions.
51
Slide52Results of Review: Major Changes
Specifies productivity
, impact/effectiveness, and/or continuous growth
standards.
Specifies a
CRC member from the candidate’s department
can participate
in the discussion of the candidate’s application, but may
not
vote.Requires reviews of Associate Professors every 3 years.
Removes
peer-evaluation of teaching
requirement.
D
epartments
can
still require
these.
Specifies materials included in Dossier and Evaluative File and their organization.
52
Slide53Results of Review: Minor Changes
18 minor changes.
Examples:
Clarifies that professional collegiality is a criteria for Continuing Appointment
.
Coordinates the dates for Associate Professors’ 3rd Year Review with Promotion and Continuing Appointment review process.
Changes
the minimum number of external reviews required for professorial ranks to 4 (previously was 5)
.
Clarifies appeals process.
53
Slide54Results of Review: Additions
11 additions
Examples:
Table of Contents
Definition section (e.g. conflict of interest)
Flowcharts
Clarifies that SUNY and ESF non-discrimination principles apply to the P&T process.
Sets
out a procedure for solicitation and inclusion of evaluations from the
director
of non-departmental units (e.g., GPES, Research Centers) that a candidate participates in.
54
Slide55Next Steps
Three
meetings
for
comments.
Wednesday, February 5: College Hour
Wednesday, February 19: 10:00 to 11:30
Wednesday, March 5: College Hour
Provost and P&T Committee will review input.
Provost’s and President’s approval.
Bottom Line: P&T Committee and Provost believe revised standards will significantly improve the ESF P&T process.
55