/
CHANSON, H. (2012). CHANSON, H. (2012).

CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." - PDF document

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
382 views
Uploaded On 2015-10-25

CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." - PPT Presentation

Chanson 1994 1 86 with g the gravity acceleration Equations 1 and 2 are compared in Figure 1 with a broader range of physical data Baker 1994 Haddad 1998 Chanson and Toombes 2002 Gonza ID: 171573

Chanson (1994) (1)

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Rel..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-February 2011, Vol. 137, No. 2, pp. 262-266, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000297 Hubert Chanson Chanson (1994) (1) 86 with g the gravity acceleration. Equations (1) and (2) are compared in Figure 1 with a broader range of physical data (Baker 1994, Haddad 1998, Chanson and Toombes 2002, Gonzalez and Chanson 2004, Carosi and Chanson 2008, Hunt and Kadavy CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-the inception point of free-surface aeration took place upstream of the intersection between the free-surface and the boundary layer outer edge (Fig. 2). For example, Equations (1) and (2) overestimate the inception point position by a factor 2 for the experiment shown in Figure 2. The onset of self-aeration on very flat smooth and stepped chutes is not trivial. It is believed to be linked with turbulent structures acting next to the free-surface including longitudinal vortices (Levi 1965, Anwar 1994). In summary, the empirical correlations fit well with a broader range of physical data and may provide suitable pre-design guidelines for stepped spillways with slopes � 10°. However their accuracy is limited and the design engineers must fully comprehend the limitations as illustrated in Figure 1 where a prototype data set differs significantly from the predictive correlations. Physical modeling is strongly recommended during the final design stages of a stepped spillway. It is argued further that the above correlations should not be used for very flat slope stepped chutes ( )ee-surface aeration takes place upstream of the intersection of the outer edge of turbulent boundary layer with the free-surface. Self-aeration on very flat slope chutes is believed to be linked with the interactions of vortical structures with the free-surface, yielding to its deformation and air entrapment. Anwar, H.O. (1994). "Self-Aerated Flows on Chutes and Spillways - Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 6, pp. 778-779. Arreguin, F., and Echavez, G. (1986). "Natural Air Entrainment in High Velocity Flows." Proc. Conf. on Advancements in Aerodynamics, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics, ASCE, June, Minneapolis, USA, pp. Baker, R. (1994). "Brushes Clough Wedge Block Spillway - Progress Report No. 3." SCEL Project Report No. , University of Salford, UK, Nov., 47 pages. Carosi, G., and Chanson, H. (2008). "Turbulence Characteristics in Skimming Flows on Stepped Spillways." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 865-880 (DOI:10.1139/L08-030). Chanson, H. (1994). "Hydraulics of Skimming Flows over Stepped Channels and Spillways." Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 445-460. Chanson, H. (1997). "Air Bubble Entrainment in Open Channels. Flow Structure and Bubble Size Distributions." Intl Jl of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 193-203. Chanson, H., and Toombes, L. (2002). "Energy Dissipation and Air Entrainment in a Stepped Storm Waterway: an Experimental Study." Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 5, pp. 305-Gonzalez, C.A., and Chanson, H. (2004). "Interactions between Cavity Flow and Main Stream Skimming Flows: an Experimental Study." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 33-44. Haddad, A.A. (1998). "Water FlHunt, S.L., and Kadavy, K.C. (2011). "Inception Point Relationship for Flat-sJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 137, No. 2, pp. 262-266. CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-Levi, E. (1965). "Longitudinal Streaking in Liquid Currents." Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943- Fig. 1 - Dimensionless location L of the inception point of free-surface aeration for moderate-slope stepped spillway: comparison between Equations (1) and (2), a prototype data set = 18.4°, h = 0.19 m (Baker 1994) and several laboratory data sets = 6.8 & 13.5°, h = 0.024 m (Haddad 1998), m (Hunt and Kadavy 2011), = 16°, h = 0.05 & 0.1 m (Chanson and Toombes 2002, Gonzalez and Chanson = 22°, h = 0.05 & 0.1 m (Chanson and Toombes 2002, Carosi and Chanson 2008) Fig. 2 - Free-surface aeration down a very flat stepped channel ( = 3.4°, q = 0.15 m/s, h = 0.0715 m, Chanson and Toombes 2002) - High-shutter speed photograph, looking upstream for d/h = 1.86, highlighting the rapid onset of self-aeration CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-Fig. 1 - Dimensionless location Laeration for moderaspillway: comparison between Equations (1) and (2), a prototype data set = 18.4°, h = 0.19 m (Baker 1994) and several laboratory data sets = 6.8 & 13.5°, h = 0.024 m (Haddad 1998), m (Hunt and Kadavy 2011), = 16°, h = 0.05 & 0.1 m (Chanson and Toombes 2002, Gonzalez and Chanson = 22°, h = 0.05 & 0.1 m (Chanson and Toombes 2002, Carosi and Chanson 2008) /(h.cos 0.2 0.3 0.7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 20 30 100200 2 3 5 7 20 30 50 70 100 200 300 500 Prototype data Eq. (1) Eq.(2) , h=0.024 m , h=0.024 m , h=0.038 m , h=0.076 m , h=0.152 m , h=0.05 m , h=0.10 m , h=0.10 m , h=0.10 m , h=0.10 m , h=0.19 m Eq. (1) Eq. (2) CHANSON, H. (2012). "Inception Point Relationship for s. Discussion." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1002-1004 (DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-/s, h = 0.0715 m, Chanson and Toombes 2002) - High-shutter speed photograph, looking upstream for d/h = 1.86, highlighting the rapid onset of self-aeration