/
Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings

Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
397 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-26

Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings - PPT Presentation

David Wright Trilateral Research Skopje 6 May 2014 Why do we need to enforce privacy Privacy is a cornerstone of democracy Privacy gives us space to grow as individuals Privacy needs enforcers esp regulators to protect privacy ID: 493484

enforcement privacy ordination operation privacy enforcement operation ordination investigate dpa information powers lack private barriers investigation public share sector

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Enforcing privacy: PHAEDRA findings

David Wright

Trilateral Research

Skopje

6 May 2014Slide2

Why do we need to enforce privacy?

Privacy is a cornerstone of democracy

Privacy gives us space to grow as individuals

Privacy needs enforcers, esp. regulators, to protect privacy

2Slide3

Enforcement powers

Notices and warnings

Naming and shaming

Mandatory PIAs

Inspections, investigations and auditsFinesCourt orders

3Slide4

Enforcement powers vary

from one DPA to another

OPC cannot levy fines, but ICO, AEPD, CNIL can

ICO cannot investigate private sector without consent of target of investigation, whereas the Kosovo DPA can investigate public and private sector organisations

FTC cannot disclose an investigation underway, whereas in Norway DPA documents are public by default Monaco has enforcement powers, but Singapore does not. ILITA cannot share criminal information but can share other information.

4Slide5

Co-operation and co-ordination are ways

to

leverage a shortage of resources

Growing co-operation between and among DPAs and PEAs is apparent to all.

There are various levels or degrees of co-operation and co-ordination.Experience demonstrates benefits of co-operation.Building relationships is an evolutionary process.

5Slide6

Barriers to co-operation and co-ordination

Lack of resources

Variability in technical

resources Language Confidentiality: Legislation may prevent or hamper sharing of information. Laws have differences in

scope Lack of awareness - Some DPAs are more “plugged in” than others.Lobbying power and obstinacy of multinationals 

Recognition of

PEAs

6Slide7

Efforts being made to overcome barriers

Instruments

Institutional arrangements

Issues

7Slide8

Instruments

Memoranda of understanding (

MoUs

)Revision of Convention 108

8Slide9

Institutional arrangements

International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (ICDPPC

) and its working group on enforcement

Global Privacy Enforcement Network (GPEN)Regional and sectoral organisationsCase-handling and privacy enforcement workshops

 

9Slide10

Issues

Interoperability of BCRs and

CBPR

Agreeing a lead authority to investigate Reciprocity is important 

10